Why does standard notation not preserve intervals (visually)












4















(Disclaimer: I don't know much about music theory but ...)



The notes A, B are a whole step apart, and B, C are a semitone apart, yet their distance in standard notation is the same visually (from a space to a line, ... etc). Why ?



It's unnecessarily difficult to identify intervals like fifths or thirds. Is it just a historical accident or is there a deeper reason behind it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Possible duplicate of Why is C the base note of standard notation and keys?

    – Carl Witthoft
    53 mins ago






  • 1





    I'm asking about intervals, not why C is the base note.

    – SigmaPhi
    51 mins ago











  • You shouldn't be identifying intervals by spatial separation in the first place. You'll have just as many errors w/ accidentals as you are attempting to avoid here. The reason for standard notation is to make it easy to play, not to "analyze"

    – Carl Witthoft
    51 mins ago











  • I would hope there's enough information at the linked question to provide you with, if nothing else, hints as to existing books on music notation and history.

    – Carl Witthoft
    50 mins ago











  • I guess my intent with the intervals was phrased badly. What i intended was, wouldn't it be easier to identify chords of the same type (ex: minor chords, Am, Fm, etc ... would all look the same but just moved up or down, instead of only some having sharps/flats and some not) and other things aswell. Anyway, I'll have a look at the sources you gave.

    – SigmaPhi
    44 mins ago


















4















(Disclaimer: I don't know much about music theory but ...)



The notes A, B are a whole step apart, and B, C are a semitone apart, yet their distance in standard notation is the same visually (from a space to a line, ... etc). Why ?



It's unnecessarily difficult to identify intervals like fifths or thirds. Is it just a historical accident or is there a deeper reason behind it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • Possible duplicate of Why is C the base note of standard notation and keys?

    – Carl Witthoft
    53 mins ago






  • 1





    I'm asking about intervals, not why C is the base note.

    – SigmaPhi
    51 mins ago











  • You shouldn't be identifying intervals by spatial separation in the first place. You'll have just as many errors w/ accidentals as you are attempting to avoid here. The reason for standard notation is to make it easy to play, not to "analyze"

    – Carl Witthoft
    51 mins ago











  • I would hope there's enough information at the linked question to provide you with, if nothing else, hints as to existing books on music notation and history.

    – Carl Witthoft
    50 mins ago











  • I guess my intent with the intervals was phrased badly. What i intended was, wouldn't it be easier to identify chords of the same type (ex: minor chords, Am, Fm, etc ... would all look the same but just moved up or down, instead of only some having sharps/flats and some not) and other things aswell. Anyway, I'll have a look at the sources you gave.

    – SigmaPhi
    44 mins ago
















4












4








4








(Disclaimer: I don't know much about music theory but ...)



The notes A, B are a whole step apart, and B, C are a semitone apart, yet their distance in standard notation is the same visually (from a space to a line, ... etc). Why ?



It's unnecessarily difficult to identify intervals like fifths or thirds. Is it just a historical accident or is there a deeper reason behind it ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












(Disclaimer: I don't know much about music theory but ...)



The notes A, B are a whole step apart, and B, C are a semitone apart, yet their distance in standard notation is the same visually (from a space to a line, ... etc). Why ?



It's unnecessarily difficult to identify intervals like fifths or thirds. Is it just a historical accident or is there a deeper reason behind it ?







theory notation






share|improve this question









New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 26 mins ago







SigmaPhi













New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 59 mins ago









SigmaPhiSigmaPhi

234




234




New contributor




SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SigmaPhi is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • Possible duplicate of Why is C the base note of standard notation and keys?

    – Carl Witthoft
    53 mins ago






  • 1





    I'm asking about intervals, not why C is the base note.

    – SigmaPhi
    51 mins ago











  • You shouldn't be identifying intervals by spatial separation in the first place. You'll have just as many errors w/ accidentals as you are attempting to avoid here. The reason for standard notation is to make it easy to play, not to "analyze"

    – Carl Witthoft
    51 mins ago











  • I would hope there's enough information at the linked question to provide you with, if nothing else, hints as to existing books on music notation and history.

    – Carl Witthoft
    50 mins ago











  • I guess my intent with the intervals was phrased badly. What i intended was, wouldn't it be easier to identify chords of the same type (ex: minor chords, Am, Fm, etc ... would all look the same but just moved up or down, instead of only some having sharps/flats and some not) and other things aswell. Anyway, I'll have a look at the sources you gave.

    – SigmaPhi
    44 mins ago





















  • Possible duplicate of Why is C the base note of standard notation and keys?

    – Carl Witthoft
    53 mins ago






  • 1





    I'm asking about intervals, not why C is the base note.

    – SigmaPhi
    51 mins ago











  • You shouldn't be identifying intervals by spatial separation in the first place. You'll have just as many errors w/ accidentals as you are attempting to avoid here. The reason for standard notation is to make it easy to play, not to "analyze"

    – Carl Witthoft
    51 mins ago











  • I would hope there's enough information at the linked question to provide you with, if nothing else, hints as to existing books on music notation and history.

    – Carl Witthoft
    50 mins ago











  • I guess my intent with the intervals was phrased badly. What i intended was, wouldn't it be easier to identify chords of the same type (ex: minor chords, Am, Fm, etc ... would all look the same but just moved up or down, instead of only some having sharps/flats and some not) and other things aswell. Anyway, I'll have a look at the sources you gave.

    – SigmaPhi
    44 mins ago



















Possible duplicate of Why is C the base note of standard notation and keys?

– Carl Witthoft
53 mins ago





Possible duplicate of Why is C the base note of standard notation and keys?

– Carl Witthoft
53 mins ago




1




1





I'm asking about intervals, not why C is the base note.

– SigmaPhi
51 mins ago





I'm asking about intervals, not why C is the base note.

– SigmaPhi
51 mins ago













You shouldn't be identifying intervals by spatial separation in the first place. You'll have just as many errors w/ accidentals as you are attempting to avoid here. The reason for standard notation is to make it easy to play, not to "analyze"

– Carl Witthoft
51 mins ago





You shouldn't be identifying intervals by spatial separation in the first place. You'll have just as many errors w/ accidentals as you are attempting to avoid here. The reason for standard notation is to make it easy to play, not to "analyze"

– Carl Witthoft
51 mins ago













I would hope there's enough information at the linked question to provide you with, if nothing else, hints as to existing books on music notation and history.

– Carl Witthoft
50 mins ago





I would hope there's enough information at the linked question to provide you with, if nothing else, hints as to existing books on music notation and history.

– Carl Witthoft
50 mins ago













I guess my intent with the intervals was phrased badly. What i intended was, wouldn't it be easier to identify chords of the same type (ex: minor chords, Am, Fm, etc ... would all look the same but just moved up or down, instead of only some having sharps/flats and some not) and other things aswell. Anyway, I'll have a look at the sources you gave.

– SigmaPhi
44 mins ago







I guess my intent with the intervals was phrased badly. What i intended was, wouldn't it be easier to identify chords of the same type (ex: minor chords, Am, Fm, etc ... would all look the same but just moved up or down, instead of only some having sharps/flats and some not) and other things aswell. Anyway, I'll have a look at the sources you gave.

– SigmaPhi
44 mins ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















7














It DOES preserve intervals (visually). What it does NOT tell you is whether those intervals are major or minor (or augmented or diminished). The distance of a space to its adjacent line will always be a second of some sort. This is because in part of history (which requires a discussion of Church modes and the history of notation), and partly because the notes on the staff change depending on what clef I give it as well as what key signature I give it. I will always know that a line to the next line, or a space to the next space, will be a third of some sort, but I only know what kind of third (and also what the notes are) if I am given more information, namely clef and key signature.






share|improve this answer



















  • 1





    How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

    – Tim
    9 mins ago











  • Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

    – LSM07
    2 mins ago



















3














It's actually easier to find 3rds and 5ths. 3rds are on the next line or space, and 5ths are on the next but one. As in F is on bottom space in treble clef, A (3rd higher) is on the next space. In key E, with 4#, E is on the bottom line, G# (3rd) is on the nexy line up, and B (5th) is on the next line up from that. (Next but one from E). Once the key signature is established - it's at the beginning of each line - there's no problem. I think if there was always a problem for the last few hundred years, something would have been changed.






share|improve this answer
























  • I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

    – SigmaPhi
    35 mins ago













  • "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

    – Carl Witthoft
    34 mins ago






  • 1





    @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

    – Tim
    27 mins ago



















2














A shallow answer as to why standard notation does not preserve intervals visually in terms of numbers of semitones is that modern standard notation evolved around the ideas that:




  • the octave is split into 12 identifiable notes, each a semitone apart

  • every particular piece of music would be based around a diatonic scale, which represents a 7-note subset of those 12 identifiable notes in the octave in a particular pattern which itself has uneven sizes of intervals.


The stave in standard notation without a key signature depicts the C major scale and its modes (all of which are Diatonic scales). Adding a key signature allows it to depict other diatonic scales, and the use of accidentals allows all possibilities in the 12-note (chromatic) scale.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "240"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    SigmaPhi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82054%2fwhy-does-standard-notation-not-preserve-intervals-visually%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7














    It DOES preserve intervals (visually). What it does NOT tell you is whether those intervals are major or minor (or augmented or diminished). The distance of a space to its adjacent line will always be a second of some sort. This is because in part of history (which requires a discussion of Church modes and the history of notation), and partly because the notes on the staff change depending on what clef I give it as well as what key signature I give it. I will always know that a line to the next line, or a space to the next space, will be a third of some sort, but I only know what kind of third (and also what the notes are) if I am given more information, namely clef and key signature.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

      – Tim
      9 mins ago











    • Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

      – LSM07
      2 mins ago
















    7














    It DOES preserve intervals (visually). What it does NOT tell you is whether those intervals are major or minor (or augmented or diminished). The distance of a space to its adjacent line will always be a second of some sort. This is because in part of history (which requires a discussion of Church modes and the history of notation), and partly because the notes on the staff change depending on what clef I give it as well as what key signature I give it. I will always know that a line to the next line, or a space to the next space, will be a third of some sort, but I only know what kind of third (and also what the notes are) if I am given more information, namely clef and key signature.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

      – Tim
      9 mins ago











    • Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

      – LSM07
      2 mins ago














    7












    7








    7







    It DOES preserve intervals (visually). What it does NOT tell you is whether those intervals are major or minor (or augmented or diminished). The distance of a space to its adjacent line will always be a second of some sort. This is because in part of history (which requires a discussion of Church modes and the history of notation), and partly because the notes on the staff change depending on what clef I give it as well as what key signature I give it. I will always know that a line to the next line, or a space to the next space, will be a third of some sort, but I only know what kind of third (and also what the notes are) if I am given more information, namely clef and key signature.






    share|improve this answer













    It DOES preserve intervals (visually). What it does NOT tell you is whether those intervals are major or minor (or augmented or diminished). The distance of a space to its adjacent line will always be a second of some sort. This is because in part of history (which requires a discussion of Church modes and the history of notation), and partly because the notes on the staff change depending on what clef I give it as well as what key signature I give it. I will always know that a line to the next line, or a space to the next space, will be a third of some sort, but I only know what kind of third (and also what the notes are) if I am given more information, namely clef and key signature.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 40 mins ago









    LSM07LSM07

    844413




    844413








    • 1





      How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

      – Tim
      9 mins ago











    • Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

      – LSM07
      2 mins ago














    • 1





      How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

      – Tim
      9 mins ago











    • Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

      – LSM07
      2 mins ago








    1




    1





    How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

    – Tim
    9 mins ago





    How can a different clef affect anything except which notes are where?

    – Tim
    9 mins ago













    Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

    – LSM07
    2 mins ago





    Because the notes decide whether the intervals are major/minor/aug/dim. From the center line on the staff to the first space above it always measures a second. In treble clef, it's a minor second (B -> C), but in bass and alto clef it's a major second (D -> E and C -> D respectively). If we change the key sig to, for example, A major, the previous intervals become a major second (B -> C#), major second (D -> E), and minor second (C# -> D).

    – LSM07
    2 mins ago











    3














    It's actually easier to find 3rds and 5ths. 3rds are on the next line or space, and 5ths are on the next but one. As in F is on bottom space in treble clef, A (3rd higher) is on the next space. In key E, with 4#, E is on the bottom line, G# (3rd) is on the nexy line up, and B (5th) is on the next line up from that. (Next but one from E). Once the key signature is established - it's at the beginning of each line - there's no problem. I think if there was always a problem for the last few hundred years, something would have been changed.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

      – SigmaPhi
      35 mins ago













    • "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

      – Carl Witthoft
      34 mins ago






    • 1





      @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

      – Tim
      27 mins ago
















    3














    It's actually easier to find 3rds and 5ths. 3rds are on the next line or space, and 5ths are on the next but one. As in F is on bottom space in treble clef, A (3rd higher) is on the next space. In key E, with 4#, E is on the bottom line, G# (3rd) is on the nexy line up, and B (5th) is on the next line up from that. (Next but one from E). Once the key signature is established - it's at the beginning of each line - there's no problem. I think if there was always a problem for the last few hundred years, something would have been changed.






    share|improve this answer
























    • I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

      – SigmaPhi
      35 mins ago













    • "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

      – Carl Witthoft
      34 mins ago






    • 1





      @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

      – Tim
      27 mins ago














    3












    3








    3







    It's actually easier to find 3rds and 5ths. 3rds are on the next line or space, and 5ths are on the next but one. As in F is on bottom space in treble clef, A (3rd higher) is on the next space. In key E, with 4#, E is on the bottom line, G# (3rd) is on the nexy line up, and B (5th) is on the next line up from that. (Next but one from E). Once the key signature is established - it's at the beginning of each line - there's no problem. I think if there was always a problem for the last few hundred years, something would have been changed.






    share|improve this answer













    It's actually easier to find 3rds and 5ths. 3rds are on the next line or space, and 5ths are on the next but one. As in F is on bottom space in treble clef, A (3rd higher) is on the next space. In key E, with 4#, E is on the bottom line, G# (3rd) is on the nexy line up, and B (5th) is on the next line up from that. (Next but one from E). Once the key signature is established - it's at the beginning of each line - there's no problem. I think if there was always a problem for the last few hundred years, something would have been changed.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 46 mins ago









    TimTim

    104k10107261




    104k10107261













    • I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

      – SigmaPhi
      35 mins ago













    • "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

      – Carl Witthoft
      34 mins ago






    • 1





      @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

      – Tim
      27 mins ago



















    • I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

      – SigmaPhi
      35 mins ago













    • "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

      – Carl Witthoft
      34 mins ago






    • 1





      @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

      – Tim
      27 mins ago

















    I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

    – SigmaPhi
    35 mins ago







    I'm not saying that its a huge issue; more rather it's missed a chance to make the intervals visually uniform (including the sharps and flats).

    – SigmaPhi
    35 mins ago















    "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

    – Carl Witthoft
    34 mins ago





    "...if there was a ... problem for the last few hundred years..." hah. Have you seen how humanity solves other long-standing problems? :-( .

    – Carl Witthoft
    34 mins ago




    1




    1





    @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

    – Tim
    27 mins ago





    @CarlWitthoft - ah, but musos, being part of deity rather than humanity, work at a different level...

    – Tim
    27 mins ago











    2














    A shallow answer as to why standard notation does not preserve intervals visually in terms of numbers of semitones is that modern standard notation evolved around the ideas that:




    • the octave is split into 12 identifiable notes, each a semitone apart

    • every particular piece of music would be based around a diatonic scale, which represents a 7-note subset of those 12 identifiable notes in the octave in a particular pattern which itself has uneven sizes of intervals.


    The stave in standard notation without a key signature depicts the C major scale and its modes (all of which are Diatonic scales). Adding a key signature allows it to depict other diatonic scales, and the use of accidentals allows all possibilities in the 12-note (chromatic) scale.






    share|improve this answer




























      2














      A shallow answer as to why standard notation does not preserve intervals visually in terms of numbers of semitones is that modern standard notation evolved around the ideas that:




      • the octave is split into 12 identifiable notes, each a semitone apart

      • every particular piece of music would be based around a diatonic scale, which represents a 7-note subset of those 12 identifiable notes in the octave in a particular pattern which itself has uneven sizes of intervals.


      The stave in standard notation without a key signature depicts the C major scale and its modes (all of which are Diatonic scales). Adding a key signature allows it to depict other diatonic scales, and the use of accidentals allows all possibilities in the 12-note (chromatic) scale.






      share|improve this answer


























        2












        2








        2







        A shallow answer as to why standard notation does not preserve intervals visually in terms of numbers of semitones is that modern standard notation evolved around the ideas that:




        • the octave is split into 12 identifiable notes, each a semitone apart

        • every particular piece of music would be based around a diatonic scale, which represents a 7-note subset of those 12 identifiable notes in the octave in a particular pattern which itself has uneven sizes of intervals.


        The stave in standard notation without a key signature depicts the C major scale and its modes (all of which are Diatonic scales). Adding a key signature allows it to depict other diatonic scales, and the use of accidentals allows all possibilities in the 12-note (chromatic) scale.






        share|improve this answer













        A shallow answer as to why standard notation does not preserve intervals visually in terms of numbers of semitones is that modern standard notation evolved around the ideas that:




        • the octave is split into 12 identifiable notes, each a semitone apart

        • every particular piece of music would be based around a diatonic scale, which represents a 7-note subset of those 12 identifiable notes in the octave in a particular pattern which itself has uneven sizes of intervals.


        The stave in standard notation without a key signature depicts the C major scale and its modes (all of which are Diatonic scales). Adding a key signature allows it to depict other diatonic scales, and the use of accidentals allows all possibilities in the 12-note (chromatic) scale.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 35 mins ago









        topo mortotopo morto

        26.8k246106




        26.8k246106






















            SigmaPhi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            SigmaPhi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            SigmaPhi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            SigmaPhi is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f82054%2fwhy-does-standard-notation-not-preserve-intervals-visually%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad