Schmidt decomposition - example Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionSchmidt decomposition of coupled oscillatorsIs there a known generalization of the Schmidt decomposition based on a maximal set of “locally recorded branches”?The expectation value of entanglement entropy of composite system in a random pure stateCan every density operator be written as an outer product of two vectors?What are the energy states of a particle in a delta potential well $V(x)=-delta(x)$?Complement for joint POVMs?Pauli principle for “Phonons”Finding basis of Schmidt decompositionInverse of a matrix in a Path IntegralHow unique is the Schmidt decomposition?

3D Masyu - A Die

Where and when has Thucydides been studied?

Table formatting with tabularx?

New Order #6: Easter Egg

Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?

Why are current probes so expensive?

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose landing?

Centre cell contents vertically

What does the writing on Poe's helmet say?

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

Determine whether an integer is a palindrome

Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?

How could a hydrazine and N2O4 cloud (or it's reactants) show up in weather radar?

latest version of QGIS fails to edit attribute table of GeoJSON file

Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?

Obtaining packet switch-port information via a mirrored port?

Why BitLocker does not use RSA

Inverse square law not accurate for non-point masses?

"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?

Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?

Is it Possible to Dye Cloth/Leather with Blood?

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?



Schmidt decomposition - example



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionSchmidt decomposition of coupled oscillatorsIs there a known generalization of the Schmidt decomposition based on a maximal set of “locally recorded branches”?The expectation value of entanglement entropy of composite system in a random pure stateCan every density operator be written as an outer product of two vectors?What are the energy states of a particle in a delta potential well $V(x)=-delta(x)$?Complement for joint POVMs?Pauli principle for “Phonons”Finding basis of Schmidt decompositionInverse of a matrix in a Path IntegralHow unique is the Schmidt decomposition?










3












$begingroup$


I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.



However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
$$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
$$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
$$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
left| a_2 right>.$$

This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.



I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$
















    3












    $begingroup$


    I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.



    However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
    $$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
    which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
    $$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
    This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
    $$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
    left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
    left| a_2 right>.$$

    This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.



    I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      3












      3








      3


      1



      $begingroup$


      I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.



      However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
      $$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
      which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
      $$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
      This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
      $$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
      left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
      left| a_2 right>.$$

      This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.



      I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.



      However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
      $$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
      which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
      $$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
      This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
      $$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
      left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
      left| a_2 right>.$$

      This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.



      I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.







      quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises quantum-information






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Mar 27 at 11:53









      Kyle Kanos

      21.8k114894




      21.8k114894










      asked Mar 24 at 12:46









      ScottScott

      182




      182




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.




          To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
          $$
          |psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
          $$

          ($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).



          (The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
          $$
          sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
          $$

          which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            Mar 27 at 9:37










          • $begingroup$
            @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
            $endgroup$
            – Norbert Schuch
            Mar 27 at 9:45


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
          $$
          |psiranglepropto
          (3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
          -(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
          $$

          with
          beginalign
          |Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
          |Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
          endalign

          Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
          $$
          langle A|Brangle = 0.
          $$

          Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468380%2fschmidt-decomposition-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.




            To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
            $$
            |psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
            $$

            ($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).



            (The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
            $$
            sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
            $$

            which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
              $endgroup$
              – ZeroTheHero
              Mar 27 at 9:37










            • $begingroup$
              @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
              $endgroup$
              – Norbert Schuch
              Mar 27 at 9:45















            3












            $begingroup$

            The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.




            To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
            $$
            |psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
            $$

            ($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).



            (The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
            $$
            sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
            $$

            which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
              $endgroup$
              – ZeroTheHero
              Mar 27 at 9:37










            • $begingroup$
              @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
              $endgroup$
              – Norbert Schuch
              Mar 27 at 9:45













            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.




            To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
            $$
            |psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
            $$

            ($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).



            (The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
            $$
            sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
            $$

            which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.




            To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
            $$
            |psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
            $$

            ($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).



            (The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
            $$
            sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
            $$

            which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Mar 24 at 21:06

























            answered Mar 24 at 14:16









            Norbert SchuchNorbert Schuch

            9,55022739




            9,55022739











            • $begingroup$
              A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
              $endgroup$
              – ZeroTheHero
              Mar 27 at 9:37










            • $begingroup$
              @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
              $endgroup$
              – Norbert Schuch
              Mar 27 at 9:45
















            • $begingroup$
              A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
              $endgroup$
              – ZeroTheHero
              Mar 27 at 9:37










            • $begingroup$
              @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
              $endgroup$
              – Norbert Schuch
              Mar 27 at 9:45















            $begingroup$
            A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            Mar 27 at 9:37




            $begingroup$
            A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
            $endgroup$
            – ZeroTheHero
            Mar 27 at 9:37












            $begingroup$
            @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
            $endgroup$
            – Norbert Schuch
            Mar 27 at 9:45




            $begingroup$
            @ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
            $endgroup$
            – Norbert Schuch
            Mar 27 at 9:45











            2












            $begingroup$

            Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
            $$
            |psiranglepropto
            (3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
            -(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
            $$

            with
            beginalign
            |Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
            |Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
            endalign

            Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
            $$
            langle A|Brangle = 0.
            $$

            Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              2












              $begingroup$

              Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
              $$
              |psiranglepropto
              (3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
              -(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
              $$

              with
              beginalign
              |Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
              |Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
              endalign

              Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
              $$
              langle A|Brangle = 0.
              $$

              Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                2












                2








                2





                $begingroup$

                Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
                $$
                |psiranglepropto
                (3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
                -(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
                $$

                with
                beginalign
                |Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
                |Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
                endalign

                Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
                $$
                langle A|Brangle = 0.
                $$

                Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
                $$
                |psiranglepropto
                (3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
                -(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
                $$

                with
                beginalign
                |Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
                |Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
                endalign

                Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
                $$
                langle A|Brangle = 0.
                $$

                Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Mar 24 at 15:18

























                answered Mar 24 at 14:53









                Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly

                14.6k22047




                14.6k22047



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468380%2fschmidt-decomposition-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                    He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                    Bunad