Schmidt decomposition - example Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionSchmidt decomposition of coupled oscillatorsIs there a known generalization of the Schmidt decomposition based on a maximal set of “locally recorded branches”?The expectation value of entanglement entropy of composite system in a random pure stateCan every density operator be written as an outer product of two vectors?What are the energy states of a particle in a delta potential well $V(x)=-delta(x)$?Complement for joint POVMs?Pauli principle for “Phonons”Finding basis of Schmidt decompositionInverse of a matrix in a Path IntegralHow unique is the Schmidt decomposition?
3D Masyu - A Die
Where and when has Thucydides been studied?
Table formatting with tabularx?
New Order #6: Easter Egg
Relating to the President and obstruction, were Mueller's conclusions preordained?
Why are current probes so expensive?
Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose landing?
Centre cell contents vertically
What does the writing on Poe's helmet say?
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Statistical analysis applied to methods coming out of Machine Learning
Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell
Determine whether an integer is a palindrome
Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?
How could a hydrazine and N2O4 cloud (or it's reactants) show up in weather radar?
latest version of QGIS fails to edit attribute table of GeoJSON file
Is there a spell that can create a permanent fire?
Obtaining packet switch-port information via a mirrored port?
Why BitLocker does not use RSA
Inverse square law not accurate for non-point masses?
"Destructive power" carried by a B-52?
Fit odd number of triplets in a measure?
Is it Possible to Dye Cloth/Leather with Blood?
Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?
Schmidt decomposition - example
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionSchmidt decomposition of coupled oscillatorsIs there a known generalization of the Schmidt decomposition based on a maximal set of “locally recorded branches”?The expectation value of entanglement entropy of composite system in a random pure stateCan every density operator be written as an outer product of two vectors?What are the energy states of a particle in a delta potential well $V(x)=-delta(x)$?Complement for joint POVMs?Pauli principle for “Phonons”Finding basis of Schmidt decompositionInverse of a matrix in a Path IntegralHow unique is the Schmidt decomposition?
$begingroup$
I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.
However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
$$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
$$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
$$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
left| a_2 right>.$$
This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.
I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises quantum-information
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.
However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
$$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
$$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
$$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
left| a_2 right>.$$
This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.
I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises quantum-information
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.
However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
$$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
$$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
$$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
left| a_2 right>.$$
This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.
I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises quantum-information
$endgroup$
I'm trying to compute the Schmidt decomposition of $left| psi right> = (left| 00 right> + left| 01 right> + left| 10 right>)/sqrt3$. This should be possible by first computing the reduced density matrices $rho_A=Tr_Bleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| a_i right> left< a_i right|$ and $rho_B=Tr_Aleft| psi right> left< psi right|=sum_i p_i left| b_i right> left< b_i right|$, and then by identifying $left| psi right>=sum_i sqrtp_ileft| a_i right> otimes left| b_i right>$.
However, somewhere in the computation I'm doing a mistake: I find that
$$rho_A=rho_B=left(2left| 0 right> left< 0 right| + left| 0 right> left< 1 right| + left| 1 right> left< 0 right|+left| 1 right> left< 1 right|right)/3,$$
which has eigenvalues $lambda_1=0.87$ and $lambda_2=0.13$ with corresponding eigenvectors
$$ left| a_1 right>=0.85 left| 0 right> + 0.53 left| 1 right>,quad left| a_2 right>=-0.53 left| 0 right> + 0.85 left| 1 right>. $$
This means that $left| psi right>$ should be given by
$$ left| psi right> = sqrtlambda_1 left| a_1 right> otimes
left| a_1 right> + sqrtlambda_2 left| a_2 right> otimes
left| a_2 right>.$$
This, however, is not true. If you check for example the numerical value in front of $left| 00 right>$, you find that it is not equal to $1/sqrt3$.
I would appreciate if someone could help me to see where I made the mistake.
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises quantum-information
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises quantum-information
edited Mar 27 at 11:53
Kyle Kanos
21.8k114894
21.8k114894
asked Mar 24 at 12:46
ScottScott
182
182
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.
To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
$$
|psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
$$
($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).
(The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
$$
sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
$$
which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
$$
|psiranglepropto
(3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
-(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
$$
with
beginalign
|Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
|Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
endalign
Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
$$
langle A|Brangle = 0.
$$
Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468380%2fschmidt-decomposition-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.
To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
$$
|psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
$$
($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).
(The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
$$
sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
$$
which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.
To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
$$
|psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
$$
($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).
(The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
$$
sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
$$
which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.
To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
$$
|psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
$$
($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).
(The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
$$
sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
$$
which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)
$endgroup$
The phase of your eigenvectors is not correct (or rather, it is not determined, so you need to make a judicious choice). If you put a minus sign in front of the 2nd term, it works out.
To elaborate on that: If you want to find the Schmidt decomposition, you can proceed e.g. as in Preskill's lecture notes: Diagonalize the reduced state of A, which yields eigenvalues $lambda_i$ and eigenvectors $|a_irangle$. Then, rewrite
$$
|psirangle = sum_i |a_irangleotimes |b_irangle .tag*
$$
($|b_irangle$ can be determined e.g. as $|b_irangle = langle a_i|psirangle$.) Then, the $|b_irangle$ are orthogonal with $langle b_i|b_irangle=lambda_i$ (cf. Preskill), i.e., the form $(*)$ above is the Schmidt decomposition (upon normalizing the $|b_irangle$).
(The latter can be seen by computing the reduced density matrix of A from $(*)$, which yields
$$
sum |a_irangle langle a_j | ; langle b_j|b_jrangle = sum lambda_i |a_irangle langle a_i| ,
$$
which yields $langle b_j|b_jrangle = lambda_idelta_ij$ as the $|a_iranglelangle a_j|$ are linearly independent.)
edited Mar 24 at 21:06
answered Mar 24 at 14:16
Norbert SchuchNorbert Schuch
9,55022739
9,55022739
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
A link or source to Preskill’s notes would nicely complement your answer.
$endgroup$
– ZeroTheHero
Mar 27 at 9:37
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
$begingroup$
@ZeroTheHero I think the answer is self-contained. And if I add a link, I would have to link a specific section, and Preskill occasionally updates his notes, which could both make the link and an exact reference within the notes obsolete, so people might complain about that.
$endgroup$
– Norbert Schuch
Mar 27 at 9:45
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
$$
|psiranglepropto
(3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
-(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
$$
with
beginalign
|Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
|Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
endalign
Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
$$
langle A|Brangle = 0.
$$
Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
$$
|psiranglepropto
(3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
-(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
$$
with
beginalign
|Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
|Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
endalign
Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
$$
langle A|Brangle = 0.
$$
Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
$$
|psiranglepropto
(3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
-(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
$$
with
beginalign
|Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
|Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
endalign
Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
$$
langle A|Brangle = 0.
$$
Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.
$endgroup$
Norbert Schuch's answer is correct. Just for fun, here's the exact decomposition:
$$
|psiranglepropto
(3+sqrt5)|Arangleotimes |Arangle
-(3-sqrt5)|Brangleotimes |Brangle
$$
with
beginalign
|Arangle &= 2|0rangle+(sqrt5-1)|1rangle \
|Brangle &= 2|0rangle-(sqrt5+1)|1rangle.
endalign
Using these equations, we can verify that the coefficient of $|11rangle$ is zero and that the coefficients of $|00rangle$, $|01rangle$, and $|10rangle$ are all equal to each other, and
$$
langle A|Brangle = 0.
$$
Unnormalized vectors $A,B$ are used here to simplify the coefficients in the overall expression for $|psirangle$.
edited Mar 24 at 15:18
answered Mar 24 at 14:53
Chiral AnomalyChiral Anomaly
14.6k22047
14.6k22047
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468380%2fschmidt-decomposition-example%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown