Using 'would' or 'used to' with a time reference in a different sentence Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is past perfect necessary when you are talking in chronological order?Using “An” and “A” in a sentencePast perfect/simple question in an exampleCan I use the past progressive here?Referring to results in past or present tenseCan “To Date” be used with a from date?“Would” for past eventsCan “should” be used to mean “if” and used to mean “would” in the same sentence?could past perfect tense and present perfect tense coexist in a compound sentence. Please do not mark as duplicate if you have not read the questionUse of would in past tense
Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose landing?
Why can't fire hurt Daenerys but it did to Jon Snow in season 1?
Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?
Centre cell vertically in tabularx
3D Masyu - A Die
systemd and copy (/bin/cp): no such file or directory
Why BitLocker does not use RSA
Problem with display of presentation
Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?
Why is a lens darker than other ones when applying the same settings?
Vertical ranges of Column Plots in 12
Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?
Why are current probes so expensive?
Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines
Can two people see the same photon?
The bible of geometry: Is there a modern treatment of geometries from the most primitive to the most advanced?
Marquee sign letters
What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?
Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell
How to evaluate this function?
latest version of QGIS fails to edit attribute table of GeoJSON file
How to achieve cat-like agility?
Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?
What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?
Using 'would' or 'used to' with a time reference in a different sentence
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is past perfect necessary when you are talking in chronological order?Using “An” and “A” in a sentencePast perfect/simple question in an exampleCan I use the past progressive here?Referring to results in past or present tenseCan “To Date” be used with a from date?“Would” for past eventsCan “should” be used to mean “if” and used to mean “would” in the same sentence?could past perfect tense and present perfect tense coexist in a compound sentence. Please do not mark as duplicate if you have not read the questionUse of would in past tense
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
In a test there are such sentences:
"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously
(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."
The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".
I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).
But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?
My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?
grammaticality past-tense phrase-usage would used-to
add a comment |
In a test there are such sentences:
"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously
(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."
The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".
I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).
But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?
My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?
grammaticality past-tense phrase-usage would used-to
1
Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.
– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24
Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06
I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49
@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".
– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00
@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45
add a comment |
In a test there are such sentences:
"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously
(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."
The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".
I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).
But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?
My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?
grammaticality past-tense phrase-usage would used-to
In a test there are such sentences:
"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously
(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."
The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".
I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).
But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?
My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?
grammaticality past-tense phrase-usage would used-to
grammaticality past-tense phrase-usage would used-to
edited Mar 26 at 1:02
Ernest
asked Mar 25 at 22:47
ErnestErnest
62
62
1
Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.
– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24
Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06
I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49
@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".
– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00
@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45
add a comment |
1
Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.
– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24
Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06
I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49
@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".
– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00
@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45
1
1
Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.
– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24
Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.
– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24
Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06
Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06
I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49
I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49
@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".
– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00
@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".
– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00
@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45
@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491331%2fusing-would-or-used-to-with-a-time-reference-in-a-different-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491331%2fusing-would-or-used-to-with-a-time-reference-in-a-different-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.
– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24
Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.
– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06
I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49
@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".
– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00
@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.
– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45