“too high” vs “so high”awareness about vs awareness ofhint vs point in the exam's sentencestays unknown vs remains unknownhaving been or had beenConfused about some exam questionsIs “bananas is” possible by any chance?Had looked or was looking?The question about “Had done” and “did”Which tense to use for the verb following “Do you mind if I…”?“..so..that..” or “…too…that…”

Is this homebrew life-stealing melee cantrip unbalanced?

How encryption in SQL login authentication works

Why is C# in the D Major Scale?

Identifying my late father's D&D stuff found in the attic

Junior developer struggles: how to communicate with management?

Why do money exchangers give different rates to different bills?

What to use instead of cling film to wrap pastry

Randomness of Python's random

What are the differences between credential stuffing and password spraying?

Can't remove one character of space in my environment

Is there a legal ground for stripping the UK of its UN Veto if Scotland and/or N.Ireland split from the UK?

Why is `abs()` implemented differently?

What happens to the Time Stone?

What is the most remote airport from the center of the city it supposedly serves?

I caught several of my students plagiarizing. Could it be my fault as a teacher?

Automatically use long arrows in display mode

Selecting a secure PIN for building access

What does this colon mean? It is not labeling, it is not ternary operator

Can the 歳 counter be used for architecture, furniture etc to tell its age?

What happens if I start too many background jobs?

Is Cola "probably the best-known" Latin word in the world? If not, which might it be?

My ID is expired, can I fly to the Bahamas with my passport?

How do I tell my manager that his code review comment is wrong?

What is a "listed natural gas appliance"?



“too high” vs “so high”


awareness about vs awareness ofhint vs point in the exam's sentencestays unknown vs remains unknownhaving been or had beenConfused about some exam questionsIs “bananas is” possible by any chance?Had looked or was looking?The question about “Had done” and “did”Which tense to use for the verb following “Do you mind if I…”?“..so..that..” or “…too…that…”






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















My brother in the middle school had a question in his vocab exam.



It says: The roof was ..... high that no one can touch it.



  1. to

  2. so

  3. such

  4. too

He thinks so high is correct, however, I am more into using too instead of so.
What would be the correct answer ?



Thanks










share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 3 at 15:16


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.


















  • I think both are correct, too is more logically sound.

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:16











  • @Tiw thank you, you can answer and I will accept it if you wish.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:20











  • Wait wait, others may have better ideas. Also my answer is too short to be a good answer :)

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:23






  • 2





    In that sentence, "too high" is absolutely wrong. That makes no sense. The answer is "so high." The guy who said "too is more logically sound" must not be a native English speaker because that's not right at all.

    – Benjamin Harman
    Mar 30 at 17:31











  • @BenjaminHarman Okay, you can add the answer as well and I can accept it.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:34

















2















My brother in the middle school had a question in his vocab exam.



It says: The roof was ..... high that no one can touch it.



  1. to

  2. so

  3. such

  4. too

He thinks so high is correct, however, I am more into using too instead of so.
What would be the correct answer ?



Thanks










share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 3 at 15:16


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.


















  • I think both are correct, too is more logically sound.

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:16











  • @Tiw thank you, you can answer and I will accept it if you wish.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:20











  • Wait wait, others may have better ideas. Also my answer is too short to be a good answer :)

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:23






  • 2





    In that sentence, "too high" is absolutely wrong. That makes no sense. The answer is "so high." The guy who said "too is more logically sound" must not be a native English speaker because that's not right at all.

    – Benjamin Harman
    Mar 30 at 17:31











  • @BenjaminHarman Okay, you can add the answer as well and I can accept it.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:34













2












2








2








My brother in the middle school had a question in his vocab exam.



It says: The roof was ..... high that no one can touch it.



  1. to

  2. so

  3. such

  4. too

He thinks so high is correct, however, I am more into using too instead of so.
What would be the correct answer ?



Thanks










share|improve this question














My brother in the middle school had a question in his vocab exam.



It says: The roof was ..... high that no one can touch it.



  1. to

  2. so

  3. such

  4. too

He thinks so high is correct, however, I am more into using too instead of so.
What would be the correct answer ?



Thanks







grammar vocabulary






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 30 at 17:12









Ahmad K MostafaAhmad K Mostafa

155




155




migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 3 at 15:16


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.









migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 3 at 15:16


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.














  • I think both are correct, too is more logically sound.

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:16











  • @Tiw thank you, you can answer and I will accept it if you wish.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:20











  • Wait wait, others may have better ideas. Also my answer is too short to be a good answer :)

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:23






  • 2





    In that sentence, "too high" is absolutely wrong. That makes no sense. The answer is "so high." The guy who said "too is more logically sound" must not be a native English speaker because that's not right at all.

    – Benjamin Harman
    Mar 30 at 17:31











  • @BenjaminHarman Okay, you can add the answer as well and I can accept it.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:34

















  • I think both are correct, too is more logically sound.

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:16











  • @Tiw thank you, you can answer and I will accept it if you wish.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:20











  • Wait wait, others may have better ideas. Also my answer is too short to be a good answer :)

    – Tiw
    Mar 30 at 17:23






  • 2





    In that sentence, "too high" is absolutely wrong. That makes no sense. The answer is "so high." The guy who said "too is more logically sound" must not be a native English speaker because that's not right at all.

    – Benjamin Harman
    Mar 30 at 17:31











  • @BenjaminHarman Okay, you can add the answer as well and I can accept it.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:34
















I think both are correct, too is more logically sound.

– Tiw
Mar 30 at 17:16





I think both are correct, too is more logically sound.

– Tiw
Mar 30 at 17:16













@Tiw thank you, you can answer and I will accept it if you wish.

– Ahmad K Mostafa
Mar 30 at 17:20





@Tiw thank you, you can answer and I will accept it if you wish.

– Ahmad K Mostafa
Mar 30 at 17:20













Wait wait, others may have better ideas. Also my answer is too short to be a good answer :)

– Tiw
Mar 30 at 17:23





Wait wait, others may have better ideas. Also my answer is too short to be a good answer :)

– Tiw
Mar 30 at 17:23




2




2





In that sentence, "too high" is absolutely wrong. That makes no sense. The answer is "so high." The guy who said "too is more logically sound" must not be a native English speaker because that's not right at all.

– Benjamin Harman
Mar 30 at 17:31





In that sentence, "too high" is absolutely wrong. That makes no sense. The answer is "so high." The guy who said "too is more logically sound" must not be a native English speaker because that's not right at all.

– Benjamin Harman
Mar 30 at 17:31













@BenjaminHarman Okay, you can add the answer as well and I can accept it.

– Ahmad K Mostafa
Mar 30 at 17:34





@BenjaminHarman Okay, you can add the answer as well and I can accept it.

– Ahmad K Mostafa
Mar 30 at 17:34










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














The following is ungrammatical:




✘ The roof was too high that no one can touch it.




It would be fine if the rest of the sentence were rephrased in one of a few ways:




The roof was too high for anyone to touch.

The roof was too high, and no one could touch it.




But I'm assuming the question doesn't allow for the rest of the sentence to be modified in any way.



The only word you can drop into the sentence as it is that keeps it grammatical is so.






share|improve this answer























  • yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:38











  • but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

    – Minty
    Mar 30 at 17:39











  • @Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 17:44






  • 1





    @Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 18:09






  • 1





    @Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

    – Canadian Yankee
    Apr 3 at 16:15











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203684%2ftoo-high-vs-so-high%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














The following is ungrammatical:




✘ The roof was too high that no one can touch it.




It would be fine if the rest of the sentence were rephrased in one of a few ways:




The roof was too high for anyone to touch.

The roof was too high, and no one could touch it.




But I'm assuming the question doesn't allow for the rest of the sentence to be modified in any way.



The only word you can drop into the sentence as it is that keeps it grammatical is so.






share|improve this answer























  • yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:38











  • but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

    – Minty
    Mar 30 at 17:39











  • @Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 17:44






  • 1





    @Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 18:09






  • 1





    @Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

    – Canadian Yankee
    Apr 3 at 16:15















2














The following is ungrammatical:




✘ The roof was too high that no one can touch it.




It would be fine if the rest of the sentence were rephrased in one of a few ways:




The roof was too high for anyone to touch.

The roof was too high, and no one could touch it.




But I'm assuming the question doesn't allow for the rest of the sentence to be modified in any way.



The only word you can drop into the sentence as it is that keeps it grammatical is so.






share|improve this answer























  • yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:38











  • but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

    – Minty
    Mar 30 at 17:39











  • @Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 17:44






  • 1





    @Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 18:09






  • 1





    @Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

    – Canadian Yankee
    Apr 3 at 16:15













2












2








2







The following is ungrammatical:




✘ The roof was too high that no one can touch it.




It would be fine if the rest of the sentence were rephrased in one of a few ways:




The roof was too high for anyone to touch.

The roof was too high, and no one could touch it.




But I'm assuming the question doesn't allow for the rest of the sentence to be modified in any way.



The only word you can drop into the sentence as it is that keeps it grammatical is so.






share|improve this answer













The following is ungrammatical:




✘ The roof was too high that no one can touch it.




It would be fine if the rest of the sentence were rephrased in one of a few ways:




The roof was too high for anyone to touch.

The roof was too high, and no one could touch it.




But I'm assuming the question doesn't allow for the rest of the sentence to be modified in any way.



The only word you can drop into the sentence as it is that keeps it grammatical is so.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 30 at 17:29









Jason BassfordJason Bassford

18.8k22441




18.8k22441












  • yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:38











  • but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

    – Minty
    Mar 30 at 17:39











  • @Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 17:44






  • 1





    @Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 18:09






  • 1





    @Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

    – Canadian Yankee
    Apr 3 at 16:15

















  • yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

    – Ahmad K Mostafa
    Mar 30 at 17:38











  • but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

    – Minty
    Mar 30 at 17:39











  • @Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 17:44






  • 1





    @Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 30 at 18:09






  • 1





    @Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

    – Canadian Yankee
    Apr 3 at 16:15
















yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

– Ahmad K Mostafa
Mar 30 at 17:38





yeah it was a multiple choice question and it does not allow for the sentence to be modified as you mentioned.

– Ahmad K Mostafa
Mar 30 at 17:38













but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

– Minty
Mar 30 at 17:39





but even the roof was so high that no one can touch it is weird because of the change of tense from was to can - for my money it should be was... could or is... can.

– Minty
Mar 30 at 17:39













@Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 30 at 17:44





@Minty Yes, I agree with you. As far as the verb tense goes, I would take it to be the best of available bad choices.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 30 at 17:44




1




1





@Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 30 at 18:09





@Tiw Not at all easily, I'm afraid. It's one of those things that, as a native speaker, I just know is wrong. I can't think of a simple explanation for it.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 30 at 18:09




1




1





@Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

– Canadian Yankee
Apr 3 at 16:15





@Tiw - It's not a grammar rule per se; it's just a fact of vocabulary that so...that is a common construction for joining two related ideas with a cause-and-effect relationship - see this exercise for example - and too...that isn't.

– Canadian Yankee
Apr 3 at 16:15

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203684%2ftoo-high-vs-so-high%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

Bunad