Shortening a title without changing its meaning












4















Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03
















4















Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03














4












4








4


1






Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?










share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Essentially, I want to change:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem




to:



Lot of people, difficult problem



I understand that when you shorten a title, it will become more vague, but sometimes, I feel like when you shorten it too much the meaning becomes too uncertain or difficult to guess, is there a consensus on how to do this properly or perhaps a widespread practice on how to do this properly, that I am not aware of?







technical-writing titles






share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 1 at 13:54









tefisjbtefisjb

233




233




New contributor




tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






tefisjb is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03














  • 14





    Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 1 at 17:17






  • 1





    "Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

    – David Rice
    Apr 1 at 20:18











  • @AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

    – user45266
    Apr 2 at 5:09






  • 2





    Managing many is difficult

    – mcalex
    Apr 2 at 7:50











  • @user you must have read a different comment then

    – Azor Ahai
    Apr 2 at 15:03








14




14





Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17





Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

– Azor Ahai
Apr 1 at 17:17




1




1





"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18





"Managing large teams: problems and solutions"

– David Rice
Apr 1 at 20:18













@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:09





@AzorAhai The people of SE have got to be the most intelligent commenters on the entire internet. Every time I see some intellectual joke comment with like 10 upvotes, I smile.

– user45266
Apr 2 at 5:09




2




2





Managing many is difficult

– mcalex
Apr 2 at 7:50





Managing many is difficult

– mcalex
Apr 2 at 7:50













@user you must have read a different comment then

– Azor Ahai
Apr 2 at 15:03





@user you must have read a different comment then

– Azor Ahai
Apr 2 at 15:03










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















12














It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



So far, you have:




Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
to
Lot of
people, difficult problem




In this example, you have 3 concepts:




  1. It's about managing people

  2. There are a lot of people

  3. It's hard


The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



This leaves you with:




Managing a lot of people




It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






share|improve this answer































    7














    How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



    Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
    and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1





      "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

      – wizzwizz4
      Apr 1 at 18:29






    • 4





      crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

      – Alexandre Aubrey
      Apr 1 at 19:23



















    6














    Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



    Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



    Apply the same rule to your titles.






    share|improve this answer































      5














      Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



      Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



      You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



      Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



      Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



      Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






      share|improve this answer































        1














        I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



        I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






        share|improve this answer










        New contributor




        ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





















          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "166"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44248%2fshortening-a-title-without-changing-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          12














          It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



          So far, you have:




          Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
          to
          Lot of
          people, difficult problem




          In this example, you have 3 concepts:




          1. It's about managing people

          2. There are a lot of people

          3. It's hard


          The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



          I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



          This leaves you with:




          Managing a lot of people




          It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



          I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



          What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






          share|improve this answer




























            12














            It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



            So far, you have:




            Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
            to
            Lot of
            people, difficult problem




            In this example, you have 3 concepts:




            1. It's about managing people

            2. There are a lot of people

            3. It's hard


            The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



            I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



            This leaves you with:




            Managing a lot of people




            It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



            I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



            What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






            share|improve this answer


























              12












              12








              12







              It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



              So far, you have:




              Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
              to
              Lot of
              people, difficult problem




              In this example, you have 3 concepts:




              1. It's about managing people

              2. There are a lot of people

              3. It's hard


              The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



              I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



              This leaves you with:




              Managing a lot of people




              It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



              I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



              What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?






              share|improve this answer













              It's fine to shorten but only when the reader can fill in the blank.



              So far, you have:




              Managing a lot of people is a very difficult problem
              to
              Lot of
              people, difficult problem




              In this example, you have 3 concepts:




              1. It's about managing people

              2. There are a lot of people

              3. It's hard


              The most important of these is the first, that your article is about management. Yet it's the one you dropped in your title revision. "Lot of people, difficult problem" can be about anything. Even if you know from context it's about a workplace (and not about, say, overpopulation), it could be about noise levels or fitting in enough desks/cubicles or the fact that you don't have enough bathrooms. All those can be legit articles about work.



              I would drop the third concept, that it's hard. Because that is implied by the fact that you are dedicating an entire article to it.



              This leaves you with:




              Managing a lot of people




              It's a boring title, but it's got all 3 concepts in it (the 3rd is implied). And it's half the length of the old one.



              I'll leave it to you to make the title more interesting, and more focused (since you're presumably not covering everything about managing multiple people), because the job of Writing.SE isn't to rewrite for you. Instead, it's to help you work through it.



              What are the concepts you are trying to convey? Which are the most vital? Which can be dropped because they're implied? Which can be dropped because they're unnecessary in the title?







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Apr 1 at 15:19









              CynCyn

              17.6k13783




              17.6k13783























                  7














                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23
















                  7














                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






                  share|improve this answer



















                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23














                  7












                  7








                  7







                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".






                  share|improve this answer













                  How about... "Crowd Management Challenges"



                  Where "Crowd" encapsulates "lot of people"
                  and "Challenges" implies "is a difficult problem".







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 1 at 14:57









                  Henry TaylorHenry Taylor

                  9,5661732




                  9,5661732








                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23














                  • 1





                    "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                    – wizzwizz4
                    Apr 1 at 18:29






                  • 4





                    crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                    – Alexandre Aubrey
                    Apr 1 at 19:23








                  1




                  1





                  "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                  – wizzwizz4
                  Apr 1 at 18:29





                  "Crowd" needs to be replaced; it implies the public, and disorganisation. Perhaps "mass" instead? (Not sure whether this is any better.)

                  – wizzwizz4
                  Apr 1 at 18:29




                  4




                  4





                  crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                  – Alexandre Aubrey
                  Apr 1 at 19:23





                  crowd management is a real field of work/research that I think is unrelated to what OP is actually talking about.

                  – Alexandre Aubrey
                  Apr 1 at 19:23











                  6














                  Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                  Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                  Apply the same rule to your titles.






                  share|improve this answer




























                    6














                    Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                    Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                    Apply the same rule to your titles.






                    share|improve this answer


























                      6












                      6








                      6







                      Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                      Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                      Apply the same rule to your titles.






                      share|improve this answer













                      Management Difficulties Scale with Headcount



                      Titles follow the same rule as billboard advertisements: no more than 7 words; no matter what their size. Scientifically speaking, billboard comprehension rates drop off a cliff after 7 words.



                      Apply the same rule to your titles.







                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Apr 1 at 15:07









                      AmadeusAmadeus

                      58.2k574186




                      58.2k574186























                          5














                          Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                          Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                          You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                          Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                          Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                          Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






                          share|improve this answer




























                            5














                            Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                            Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                            You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                            Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                            Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                            Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






                            share|improve this answer


























                              5












                              5








                              5







                              Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                              Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                              You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                              Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                              Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                              Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.






                              share|improve this answer













                              Your first title is a complete sentence, which is unusual. Your second title completely drops the concept of management.



                              Ask yourself what the core of the title is and use that. If it were me, I might distill it down to Management Difficulties or Problems in Management.



                              You can also add a subtitle if the main title is not enough. Management Difficulties: Effects of Larger Staff.



                              Your second title could apply to any gathering of people, including the audience at a rock concert. It could be about overpopulation and the problems caused by that.



                              Titles need not be grammatically correct. They should be clear or, in fiction, evocative.



                              Find some combination that properly conveys to the reader that you will discuss the difficulties caused by managing many people rather than a few.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered Apr 1 at 14:39









                              RasdashanRasdashan

                              9,6481160




                              9,6481160























                                  1














                                  I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                  I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






                                  share|improve this answer










                                  New contributor




                                  ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                  Check out our Code of Conduct.

























                                    1














                                    I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                    I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






                                    share|improve this answer










                                    New contributor




                                    ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                                      1












                                      1








                                      1







                                      I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                      I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.






                                      share|improve this answer










                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.










                                      I'd go with something short and to the point, like Challenges of managing people.



                                      I'm not sure about putting The in front of Challenges, but I think it basically says all you want.







                                      share|improve this answer










                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited Apr 2 at 11:24









                                      Chenmunka

                                      6991319




                                      6991319






                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.









                                      answered Apr 2 at 9:39









                                      ChatterOneChatterOne

                                      1114




                                      1114




                                      New contributor




                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.





                                      New contributor





                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






                                      ChatterOne is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                                      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded


















                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                          tefisjb is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid



                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44248%2fshortening-a-title-without-changing-its-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                          Bunad