Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?












84















Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism just like the plant? The cockroach possesses all characteristics sustainable in life as the plant with the exception of reproduction, although neither does the plant that has yet to show signs of reproduction.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    I marvel how with almost no references, someone managed to answer this. =D ;)

    – An old man in the sea.
    Mar 18 at 13:00






  • 1





    @Anoldmaninthesea. - There's lots of reference; several junior novels, an art book, a script and dozens of DVD features that mention EVE

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 13:24






  • 3





    Plants represent the bottom rung of the ecosystem. If the planet supports plan life, then it can, in time, be inhabited by other forms of life. Strictly speaking, the cockroach should be dead by now, because what is there for it to eat?

    – AJFaraday
    Mar 18 at 15:23






  • 14





    @AJFaraday - Twinkies

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 15:46






  • 3





    @AJFaraday - I don't see evidence of lots of cockroaches, I only see evidence of three

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:54
















84















Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism just like the plant? The cockroach possesses all characteristics sustainable in life as the plant with the exception of reproduction, although neither does the plant that has yet to show signs of reproduction.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 3





    I marvel how with almost no references, someone managed to answer this. =D ;)

    – An old man in the sea.
    Mar 18 at 13:00






  • 1





    @Anoldmaninthesea. - There's lots of reference; several junior novels, an art book, a script and dozens of DVD features that mention EVE

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 13:24






  • 3





    Plants represent the bottom rung of the ecosystem. If the planet supports plan life, then it can, in time, be inhabited by other forms of life. Strictly speaking, the cockroach should be dead by now, because what is there for it to eat?

    – AJFaraday
    Mar 18 at 15:23






  • 14





    @AJFaraday - Twinkies

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 15:46






  • 3





    @AJFaraday - I don't see evidence of lots of cockroaches, I only see evidence of three

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:54














84












84








84


2






Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism just like the plant? The cockroach possesses all characteristics sustainable in life as the plant with the exception of reproduction, although neither does the plant that has yet to show signs of reproduction.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism just like the plant? The cockroach possesses all characteristics sustainable in life as the plant with the exception of reproduction, although neither does the plant that has yet to show signs of reproduction.







wall-e






share|improve this question









New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 18 at 9:40









TheLethalCarrot

48k18257304




48k18257304






New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Mar 18 at 9:38









Ms. CarbajalMs. Carbajal

430123




430123




New contributor




Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 3





    I marvel how with almost no references, someone managed to answer this. =D ;)

    – An old man in the sea.
    Mar 18 at 13:00






  • 1





    @Anoldmaninthesea. - There's lots of reference; several junior novels, an art book, a script and dozens of DVD features that mention EVE

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 13:24






  • 3





    Plants represent the bottom rung of the ecosystem. If the planet supports plan life, then it can, in time, be inhabited by other forms of life. Strictly speaking, the cockroach should be dead by now, because what is there for it to eat?

    – AJFaraday
    Mar 18 at 15:23






  • 14





    @AJFaraday - Twinkies

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 15:46






  • 3





    @AJFaraday - I don't see evidence of lots of cockroaches, I only see evidence of three

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:54














  • 3





    I marvel how with almost no references, someone managed to answer this. =D ;)

    – An old man in the sea.
    Mar 18 at 13:00






  • 1





    @Anoldmaninthesea. - There's lots of reference; several junior novels, an art book, a script and dozens of DVD features that mention EVE

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 13:24






  • 3





    Plants represent the bottom rung of the ecosystem. If the planet supports plan life, then it can, in time, be inhabited by other forms of life. Strictly speaking, the cockroach should be dead by now, because what is there for it to eat?

    – AJFaraday
    Mar 18 at 15:23






  • 14





    @AJFaraday - Twinkies

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 15:46






  • 3





    @AJFaraday - I don't see evidence of lots of cockroaches, I only see evidence of three

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:54








3




3





I marvel how with almost no references, someone managed to answer this. =D ;)

– An old man in the sea.
Mar 18 at 13:00





I marvel how with almost no references, someone managed to answer this. =D ;)

– An old man in the sea.
Mar 18 at 13:00




1




1





@Anoldmaninthesea. - There's lots of reference; several junior novels, an art book, a script and dozens of DVD features that mention EVE

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 13:24





@Anoldmaninthesea. - There's lots of reference; several junior novels, an art book, a script and dozens of DVD features that mention EVE

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 13:24




3




3





Plants represent the bottom rung of the ecosystem. If the planet supports plan life, then it can, in time, be inhabited by other forms of life. Strictly speaking, the cockroach should be dead by now, because what is there for it to eat?

– AJFaraday
Mar 18 at 15:23





Plants represent the bottom rung of the ecosystem. If the planet supports plan life, then it can, in time, be inhabited by other forms of life. Strictly speaking, the cockroach should be dead by now, because what is there for it to eat?

– AJFaraday
Mar 18 at 15:23




14




14





@AJFaraday - Twinkies

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 15:46





@AJFaraday - Twinkies

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 15:46




3




3





@AJFaraday - I don't see evidence of lots of cockroaches, I only see evidence of three

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 16:54





@AJFaraday - I don't see evidence of lots of cockroaches, I only see evidence of three

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 16:54










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















139














As you can see from this DVD insert (describing the various robots and their primary focus) EVE is an Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator. Her main focus is to review organic, read plant organic, life on the planets that she surveys.



enter image description here



As such, a life-form other than a plant wouldn't register on her scanners.





You might want to note that on a purely personal level she absolutely does recognise the roach as a living being.




Eve finds the insect intriguing. Lowers her arm. The end separates into individual hovering sections...



Wall-E Script




But when she scans Wall•E and the cockroach together, she finds that they're simply "not what she was looking for" (e.g. plant life).




She let the roach get closer. The little bug intrigued her, and she let him crawl up her arm. WALL · E heard her emit a series of electronic beeps. She was giggling! The roach must have tickled her.



...



She slowly approached the shivering box. The cockroach ran down EVE’s
blaster arm and hopped onto his master. EVE’s blue light scanned WALL·E. NEGATIVE. He was not what she was looking for. She retracted her
blaster arm and glided away.



Wall•E - Official Junior novelisation







share|improve this answer





















  • 12





    Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:18






  • 7





    I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

    – AxGryndr
    Mar 19 at 6:27






  • 18





    @Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

    – Chronocidal
    Mar 19 at 8:19






  • 14





    @Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

    – Valorum
    Mar 19 at 8:40





















65














Unlike a plant, a cockroach does not show that the planet has started to recover, just that it has not yet run out of food waste yet.



More importantly: "EVE" stands for "Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator" - as the name suggests, she is specifically designed to search for Flora, not Fauna, (i.e. to search for Plant Life, not Animal Life).






share|improve this answer
























  • This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

    – Stark07
    Mar 21 at 7:37



















13














It is commonly thought that cockroaches are uniquely capable of surviving even in a highly radioactive environment.



Therefore the presence of a cockroach is not an indicator of an envoriment being inhabitable, or even safe to be in.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

    – TheLethalCarrot
    Mar 18 at 16:20






  • 8





    For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:52






  • 3





    @Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:19






  • 3





    I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 19 at 8:38













  • @TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

    – Mayavin
    Mar 21 at 10:54











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207449%2fwhy-didn-t-eve-recognize-the-little-cockroach-as-a-living-organism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









139














As you can see from this DVD insert (describing the various robots and their primary focus) EVE is an Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator. Her main focus is to review organic, read plant organic, life on the planets that she surveys.



enter image description here



As such, a life-form other than a plant wouldn't register on her scanners.





You might want to note that on a purely personal level she absolutely does recognise the roach as a living being.




Eve finds the insect intriguing. Lowers her arm. The end separates into individual hovering sections...



Wall-E Script




But when she scans Wall•E and the cockroach together, she finds that they're simply "not what she was looking for" (e.g. plant life).




She let the roach get closer. The little bug intrigued her, and she let him crawl up her arm. WALL · E heard her emit a series of electronic beeps. She was giggling! The roach must have tickled her.



...



She slowly approached the shivering box. The cockroach ran down EVE’s
blaster arm and hopped onto his master. EVE’s blue light scanned WALL·E. NEGATIVE. He was not what she was looking for. She retracted her
blaster arm and glided away.



Wall•E - Official Junior novelisation







share|improve this answer





















  • 12





    Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:18






  • 7





    I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

    – AxGryndr
    Mar 19 at 6:27






  • 18





    @Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

    – Chronocidal
    Mar 19 at 8:19






  • 14





    @Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

    – Valorum
    Mar 19 at 8:40


















139














As you can see from this DVD insert (describing the various robots and their primary focus) EVE is an Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator. Her main focus is to review organic, read plant organic, life on the planets that she surveys.



enter image description here



As such, a life-form other than a plant wouldn't register on her scanners.





You might want to note that on a purely personal level she absolutely does recognise the roach as a living being.




Eve finds the insect intriguing. Lowers her arm. The end separates into individual hovering sections...



Wall-E Script




But when she scans Wall•E and the cockroach together, she finds that they're simply "not what she was looking for" (e.g. plant life).




She let the roach get closer. The little bug intrigued her, and she let him crawl up her arm. WALL · E heard her emit a series of electronic beeps. She was giggling! The roach must have tickled her.



...



She slowly approached the shivering box. The cockroach ran down EVE’s
blaster arm and hopped onto his master. EVE’s blue light scanned WALL·E. NEGATIVE. He was not what she was looking for. She retracted her
blaster arm and glided away.



Wall•E - Official Junior novelisation







share|improve this answer





















  • 12





    Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:18






  • 7





    I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

    – AxGryndr
    Mar 19 at 6:27






  • 18





    @Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

    – Chronocidal
    Mar 19 at 8:19






  • 14





    @Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

    – Valorum
    Mar 19 at 8:40
















139












139








139







As you can see from this DVD insert (describing the various robots and their primary focus) EVE is an Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator. Her main focus is to review organic, read plant organic, life on the planets that she surveys.



enter image description here



As such, a life-form other than a plant wouldn't register on her scanners.





You might want to note that on a purely personal level she absolutely does recognise the roach as a living being.




Eve finds the insect intriguing. Lowers her arm. The end separates into individual hovering sections...



Wall-E Script




But when she scans Wall•E and the cockroach together, she finds that they're simply "not what she was looking for" (e.g. plant life).




She let the roach get closer. The little bug intrigued her, and she let him crawl up her arm. WALL · E heard her emit a series of electronic beeps. She was giggling! The roach must have tickled her.



...



She slowly approached the shivering box. The cockroach ran down EVE’s
blaster arm and hopped onto his master. EVE’s blue light scanned WALL·E. NEGATIVE. He was not what she was looking for. She retracted her
blaster arm and glided away.



Wall•E - Official Junior novelisation







share|improve this answer















As you can see from this DVD insert (describing the various robots and their primary focus) EVE is an Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator. Her main focus is to review organic, read plant organic, life on the planets that she surveys.



enter image description here



As such, a life-form other than a plant wouldn't register on her scanners.





You might want to note that on a purely personal level she absolutely does recognise the roach as a living being.




Eve finds the insect intriguing. Lowers her arm. The end separates into individual hovering sections...



Wall-E Script




But when she scans Wall•E and the cockroach together, she finds that they're simply "not what she was looking for" (e.g. plant life).




She let the roach get closer. The little bug intrigued her, and she let him crawl up her arm. WALL · E heard her emit a series of electronic beeps. She was giggling! The roach must have tickled her.



...



She slowly approached the shivering box. The cockroach ran down EVE’s
blaster arm and hopped onto his master. EVE’s blue light scanned WALL·E. NEGATIVE. He was not what she was looking for. She retracted her
blaster arm and glided away.



Wall•E - Official Junior novelisation








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 20 at 9:28

























answered Mar 18 at 11:02









ValorumValorum

411k11129923215




411k11129923215








  • 12





    Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:18






  • 7





    I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

    – AxGryndr
    Mar 19 at 6:27






  • 18





    @Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

    – Chronocidal
    Mar 19 at 8:19






  • 14





    @Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

    – Valorum
    Mar 19 at 8:40
















  • 12





    Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:18






  • 7





    I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

    – AxGryndr
    Mar 19 at 6:27






  • 18





    @Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

    – Chronocidal
    Mar 19 at 8:19






  • 14





    @Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

    – Valorum
    Mar 19 at 8:40










12




12





Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

– Sean
Mar 19 at 3:18





Given that she was scanning for vegetation on Earth, she should technically be a Terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator.

– Sean
Mar 19 at 3:18




7




7





I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

– AxGryndr
Mar 19 at 6:27





I don't totally agree with Sean. EVE's function, by design, could be Extraterrestrial, however after the events on Earth transpired, is being used Terrestrially. Using a robot in an unforeseen way would not change it's acronym.

– AxGryndr
Mar 19 at 6:27




18




18





@Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

– Chronocidal
Mar 19 at 8:19





@Sean She was on Earth, but from Space - beyond (extra) Earth (terrestrial). An "Extraterrestrial Vegetation-Evaluator", not an "Extraterrestrial-Vegetation Evaluator"

– Chronocidal
Mar 19 at 8:19




14




14





@Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

– Valorum
Mar 19 at 8:40







@Chronocidal - I read it differently. In my head, her typical role is to evaluate life on the various planets that BNL can get to in their exploration ships. Once Operation Recolonise was implemented, her role changed to periodically evaluating life on Earth. So she's a restasked EVE probe.

– Valorum
Mar 19 at 8:40















65














Unlike a plant, a cockroach does not show that the planet has started to recover, just that it has not yet run out of food waste yet.



More importantly: "EVE" stands for "Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator" - as the name suggests, she is specifically designed to search for Flora, not Fauna, (i.e. to search for Plant Life, not Animal Life).






share|improve this answer
























  • This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

    – Stark07
    Mar 21 at 7:37
















65














Unlike a plant, a cockroach does not show that the planet has started to recover, just that it has not yet run out of food waste yet.



More importantly: "EVE" stands for "Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator" - as the name suggests, she is specifically designed to search for Flora, not Fauna, (i.e. to search for Plant Life, not Animal Life).






share|improve this answer
























  • This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

    – Stark07
    Mar 21 at 7:37














65












65








65







Unlike a plant, a cockroach does not show that the planet has started to recover, just that it has not yet run out of food waste yet.



More importantly: "EVE" stands for "Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator" - as the name suggests, she is specifically designed to search for Flora, not Fauna, (i.e. to search for Plant Life, not Animal Life).






share|improve this answer













Unlike a plant, a cockroach does not show that the planet has started to recover, just that it has not yet run out of food waste yet.



More importantly: "EVE" stands for "Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator" - as the name suggests, she is specifically designed to search for Flora, not Fauna, (i.e. to search for Plant Life, not Animal Life).







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 18 at 10:58









ChronocidalChronocidal

2,004716




2,004716













  • This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

    – Stark07
    Mar 21 at 7:37



















  • This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

    – Stark07
    Mar 21 at 7:37

















This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

– Stark07
Mar 21 at 7:37





This is important! Roaches are great at scavenging. Even in the current time, it is predicted that roaches can easily survive a nuclear holocaust.

– Stark07
Mar 21 at 7:37











13














It is commonly thought that cockroaches are uniquely capable of surviving even in a highly radioactive environment.



Therefore the presence of a cockroach is not an indicator of an envoriment being inhabitable, or even safe to be in.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

    – TheLethalCarrot
    Mar 18 at 16:20






  • 8





    For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:52






  • 3





    @Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:19






  • 3





    I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 19 at 8:38













  • @TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

    – Mayavin
    Mar 21 at 10:54
















13














It is commonly thought that cockroaches are uniquely capable of surviving even in a highly radioactive environment.



Therefore the presence of a cockroach is not an indicator of an envoriment being inhabitable, or even safe to be in.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 6





    To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

    – TheLethalCarrot
    Mar 18 at 16:20






  • 8





    For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:52






  • 3





    @Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:19






  • 3





    I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 19 at 8:38













  • @TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

    – Mayavin
    Mar 21 at 10:54














13












13








13







It is commonly thought that cockroaches are uniquely capable of surviving even in a highly radioactive environment.



Therefore the presence of a cockroach is not an indicator of an envoriment being inhabitable, or even safe to be in.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










It is commonly thought that cockroaches are uniquely capable of surviving even in a highly radioactive environment.



Therefore the presence of a cockroach is not an indicator of an envoriment being inhabitable, or even safe to be in.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 20 at 3:12









amflare

25.1k885127




25.1k885127






New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered Mar 18 at 16:16









MayavinMayavin

1553




1553




New contributor




Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Mayavin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 6





    To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

    – TheLethalCarrot
    Mar 18 at 16:20






  • 8





    For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:52






  • 3





    @Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:19






  • 3





    I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 19 at 8:38













  • @TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

    – Mayavin
    Mar 21 at 10:54














  • 6





    To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

    – TheLethalCarrot
    Mar 18 at 16:20






  • 8





    For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

    – Valorum
    Mar 18 at 16:52






  • 3





    @Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

    – Sean
    Mar 19 at 3:19






  • 3





    I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

    – Konrad Rudolph
    Mar 19 at 8:38













  • @TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

    – Mayavin
    Mar 21 at 10:54








6




6





To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

– TheLethalCarrot
Mar 18 at 16:20





To clarify are you saying that Eve did recognise the cockroach as a living organism but discounted it because of the nature of a cockroach?

– TheLethalCarrot
Mar 18 at 16:20




8




8





For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 16:52





For the record, cockroaches are particularly susceptible to radiation poisoning and would likely be among the first class of creatures to die in a nuclear holocaust

– Valorum
Mar 18 at 16:52




3




3





@Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

– Sean
Mar 19 at 3:19





@Valorum: Compared to (say) fruit flies, yes. Compared to (say) humans, it's precisely the opposite.

– Sean
Mar 19 at 3:19




3




3





I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

– Konrad Rudolph
Mar 19 at 8:38







I feel this answer should get more upvotes. The scene was clearly a nod to the fabled hardiness of cockroaches, and their alleged ability to survive natural disasters.

– Konrad Rudolph
Mar 19 at 8:38















@TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

– Mayavin
Mar 21 at 10:54





@TheLethalCarrot Precisely. Note that it scans the cockroach more thoroughly than any of the inanimate matter around.

– Mayavin
Mar 21 at 10:54










Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Ms. Carbajal is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f207449%2fwhy-didn-t-eve-recognize-the-little-cockroach-as-a-living-organism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum