Posts

Showing posts from August 4, 2019

220

Image
< 220 > 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 Kategoriar Fann ikkje kategorien 220 220 i andre kalendrar Gregoriansk kalender 220 CCXX Ab urbe condita 973 Armensk kalender I/T Kinesisk kalender 2916 – 2917 ?亥 – 庚子 Etiopisk kalender 212 – 213 Jødisk kalender 3980 – 3981 Iransk kalender 402 BP – 401 BP Islamsk kalender 415 BH – 414 BH Hindukalendrar - Vikram Samvat 275 – 276 - Shaka Samvat 142 – 143 - Kali Yuga 3321 – 3322 Hendingar | Fødde | Døde | <<   200-talet   >> << 200 | 201 | 202 | 203 | 204 | 205 | 206 | 207 | 208 | 209 | 210 | 211 | 212 | 213 | 214 | 215 | 216 | 217 | 218 | 219 | 220 | 221 | 222 | 223 | 224 | 225 | 226 | 227 | 228 | 229 | 230 | 231 | 232 | 233 | 234 | 235 | 236 | 237 | 238 | 239 | 240 | 241 | 242 | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 |

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

Image
16 In a "just for fun" session of the card game Munchkin, would it be okay to join a game in progress? Of course the joining person would be in a disadvantage. Arguments against this, as far as I can think of for now: The current order of the players is disturbed by adding another player. munchkin share | improve this question edited 23 hours ago Christian asked yesterday Christian Christian 183 1 6