Word for 'of or related to division'





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







2















I'm writing a program with a numeric parser. The operations involved are multiplying, dividing, squaring, and cubing.



In order to define what kind of objects can be multiplied, divided, etc with what, I'm trying to name classes that define these relationships. Currently, I have MultiplicativeRelationship, CubicRelationship, QuadraticRelationship... and a divivitive relationship?



I can't think of a word that means 'of or relating to division'!



Divisible is the first word that comes to mind, but this can't be right because the relationship itself isn't divisible. The relationship describes other things that are divisible, making it a ________ relationship.



In short:

Multiplication is to Multiplicative as Division is to ________



Thanks!










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Perhaps fractional.

    – jxh
    Dec 29 '16 at 18:59






  • 2





    Isn't that still called multiplicative?

    – alwayslearning
    Jan 28 '17 at 8:20











  • Divisional exists, but it relates to a division of an organization, not to the mathematical operation: en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/divisional

    – jejorda2
    Mar 29 '17 at 13:25






  • 3





    Per the OED, it would be divisive. Multiplicative: "Tending to multiply or increase; having the quality or function of multiplying." Divisive: "Having the quality or function of dividing; causing or expressing division or distribution; making or perceiving distinctions, analytical."

    – 1006a
    Mar 29 '17 at 14:16






  • 2





    I disagree with this being off topic. The author came across an issue while programming, but the issue isn't related to programming per se.

    – jimm101
    Nov 26 '17 at 15:17


















2















I'm writing a program with a numeric parser. The operations involved are multiplying, dividing, squaring, and cubing.



In order to define what kind of objects can be multiplied, divided, etc with what, I'm trying to name classes that define these relationships. Currently, I have MultiplicativeRelationship, CubicRelationship, QuadraticRelationship... and a divivitive relationship?



I can't think of a word that means 'of or relating to division'!



Divisible is the first word that comes to mind, but this can't be right because the relationship itself isn't divisible. The relationship describes other things that are divisible, making it a ________ relationship.



In short:

Multiplication is to Multiplicative as Division is to ________



Thanks!










share|improve this question


















  • 2





    Perhaps fractional.

    – jxh
    Dec 29 '16 at 18:59






  • 2





    Isn't that still called multiplicative?

    – alwayslearning
    Jan 28 '17 at 8:20











  • Divisional exists, but it relates to a division of an organization, not to the mathematical operation: en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/divisional

    – jejorda2
    Mar 29 '17 at 13:25






  • 3





    Per the OED, it would be divisive. Multiplicative: "Tending to multiply or increase; having the quality or function of multiplying." Divisive: "Having the quality or function of dividing; causing or expressing division or distribution; making or perceiving distinctions, analytical."

    – 1006a
    Mar 29 '17 at 14:16






  • 2





    I disagree with this being off topic. The author came across an issue while programming, but the issue isn't related to programming per se.

    – jimm101
    Nov 26 '17 at 15:17














2












2








2


1






I'm writing a program with a numeric parser. The operations involved are multiplying, dividing, squaring, and cubing.



In order to define what kind of objects can be multiplied, divided, etc with what, I'm trying to name classes that define these relationships. Currently, I have MultiplicativeRelationship, CubicRelationship, QuadraticRelationship... and a divivitive relationship?



I can't think of a word that means 'of or relating to division'!



Divisible is the first word that comes to mind, but this can't be right because the relationship itself isn't divisible. The relationship describes other things that are divisible, making it a ________ relationship.



In short:

Multiplication is to Multiplicative as Division is to ________



Thanks!










share|improve this question














I'm writing a program with a numeric parser. The operations involved are multiplying, dividing, squaring, and cubing.



In order to define what kind of objects can be multiplied, divided, etc with what, I'm trying to name classes that define these relationships. Currently, I have MultiplicativeRelationship, CubicRelationship, QuadraticRelationship... and a divivitive relationship?



I can't think of a word that means 'of or relating to division'!



Divisible is the first word that comes to mind, but this can't be right because the relationship itself isn't divisible. The relationship describes other things that are divisible, making it a ________ relationship.



In short:

Multiplication is to Multiplicative as Division is to ________



Thanks!







single-word-requests






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 29 '16 at 5:18









Blue0500Blue0500

1111




1111








  • 2





    Perhaps fractional.

    – jxh
    Dec 29 '16 at 18:59






  • 2





    Isn't that still called multiplicative?

    – alwayslearning
    Jan 28 '17 at 8:20











  • Divisional exists, but it relates to a division of an organization, not to the mathematical operation: en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/divisional

    – jejorda2
    Mar 29 '17 at 13:25






  • 3





    Per the OED, it would be divisive. Multiplicative: "Tending to multiply or increase; having the quality or function of multiplying." Divisive: "Having the quality or function of dividing; causing or expressing division or distribution; making or perceiving distinctions, analytical."

    – 1006a
    Mar 29 '17 at 14:16






  • 2





    I disagree with this being off topic. The author came across an issue while programming, but the issue isn't related to programming per se.

    – jimm101
    Nov 26 '17 at 15:17














  • 2





    Perhaps fractional.

    – jxh
    Dec 29 '16 at 18:59






  • 2





    Isn't that still called multiplicative?

    – alwayslearning
    Jan 28 '17 at 8:20











  • Divisional exists, but it relates to a division of an organization, not to the mathematical operation: en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/divisional

    – jejorda2
    Mar 29 '17 at 13:25






  • 3





    Per the OED, it would be divisive. Multiplicative: "Tending to multiply or increase; having the quality or function of multiplying." Divisive: "Having the quality or function of dividing; causing or expressing division or distribution; making or perceiving distinctions, analytical."

    – 1006a
    Mar 29 '17 at 14:16






  • 2





    I disagree with this being off topic. The author came across an issue while programming, but the issue isn't related to programming per se.

    – jimm101
    Nov 26 '17 at 15:17








2




2





Perhaps fractional.

– jxh
Dec 29 '16 at 18:59





Perhaps fractional.

– jxh
Dec 29 '16 at 18:59




2




2





Isn't that still called multiplicative?

– alwayslearning
Jan 28 '17 at 8:20





Isn't that still called multiplicative?

– alwayslearning
Jan 28 '17 at 8:20













Divisional exists, but it relates to a division of an organization, not to the mathematical operation: en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/divisional

– jejorda2
Mar 29 '17 at 13:25





Divisional exists, but it relates to a division of an organization, not to the mathematical operation: en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/divisional

– jejorda2
Mar 29 '17 at 13:25




3




3





Per the OED, it would be divisive. Multiplicative: "Tending to multiply or increase; having the quality or function of multiplying." Divisive: "Having the quality or function of dividing; causing or expressing division or distribution; making or perceiving distinctions, analytical."

– 1006a
Mar 29 '17 at 14:16





Per the OED, it would be divisive. Multiplicative: "Tending to multiply or increase; having the quality or function of multiplying." Divisive: "Having the quality or function of dividing; causing or expressing division or distribution; making or perceiving distinctions, analytical."

– 1006a
Mar 29 '17 at 14:16




2




2





I disagree with this being off topic. The author came across an issue while programming, but the issue isn't related to programming per se.

– jimm101
Nov 26 '17 at 15:17





I disagree with this being off topic. The author came across an issue while programming, but the issue isn't related to programming per se.

– jimm101
Nov 26 '17 at 15:17










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















-1














Although I'd love the answer to be 'divisive', I'm not sure there's a direct equivalent. In mathematics we speak of the 'multiplicative inverse' which is too much of a mouthful for your purposes. The term 'reciprocal' can be used to mean the same thing, but doesn't fit your pattern.



(You could try asking over at the SE Maths site.)






share|improve this answer































    -1














    I would propose



    DivisibleRelationship



    because multiplicative is an adjective meaning




    Tending to multiply or capable of multiplying (American Heritage)




    Compare this with the definition of divisible:




    Capable of being divided (American Heritage)







    share|improve this answer
























    • One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

      – tautophile
      Jun 24 '18 at 15:38



















    -1














    multiplicative: tending or having the power to multiply.



    additive: of, relating to, or characterized by addition.



    subtractive: tending to subtract



    So,



    divisitive should be tending to division. Yes, this word does not exist in any of the standard (or auxiliary) dictionaries. If you use it, there is no harm. Few authors have already used it in their respective books.



    Citation 1: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning by Douglas A. Grouws




    Situations must be developed in which children systematically build their understanding of principles that underlie the invariance and the compensation for variation within additive, subtractive, multiplicative and divisitive relations and operations.




    Citation 2: Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies by by Ramachandran, Muthu [Leeds Metropolitian Univeristy, UK]






    share|improve this answer































      -1














      divisive



      If you accept additive, subtractive, and multiplicative, then the
      fourth term should not be divisitive (as suggested in another answer)
      but divisive. Why? Because these adjectives are derived from the
      supine stems of Latin verbs:




      • addo, addidi, additus

      • subtraho, subtraxi, subtractus

      • multiplico, multiplicavi, multiplicatus

      • divido, divisi, divisus (not divisitus)






      share|improve this answer


























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "97"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f365614%2fword-for-of-or-related-to-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        -1














        Although I'd love the answer to be 'divisive', I'm not sure there's a direct equivalent. In mathematics we speak of the 'multiplicative inverse' which is too much of a mouthful for your purposes. The term 'reciprocal' can be used to mean the same thing, but doesn't fit your pattern.



        (You could try asking over at the SE Maths site.)






        share|improve this answer




























          -1














          Although I'd love the answer to be 'divisive', I'm not sure there's a direct equivalent. In mathematics we speak of the 'multiplicative inverse' which is too much of a mouthful for your purposes. The term 'reciprocal' can be used to mean the same thing, but doesn't fit your pattern.



          (You could try asking over at the SE Maths site.)






          share|improve this answer


























            -1












            -1








            -1







            Although I'd love the answer to be 'divisive', I'm not sure there's a direct equivalent. In mathematics we speak of the 'multiplicative inverse' which is too much of a mouthful for your purposes. The term 'reciprocal' can be used to mean the same thing, but doesn't fit your pattern.



            (You could try asking over at the SE Maths site.)






            share|improve this answer













            Although I'd love the answer to be 'divisive', I'm not sure there's a direct equivalent. In mathematics we speak of the 'multiplicative inverse' which is too much of a mouthful for your purposes. The term 'reciprocal' can be used to mean the same thing, but doesn't fit your pattern.



            (You could try asking over at the SE Maths site.)







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Dec 29 '16 at 6:45









            davedave

            6431610




            6431610

























                -1














                I would propose



                DivisibleRelationship



                because multiplicative is an adjective meaning




                Tending to multiply or capable of multiplying (American Heritage)




                Compare this with the definition of divisible:




                Capable of being divided (American Heritage)







                share|improve this answer
























                • One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

                  – tautophile
                  Jun 24 '18 at 15:38
















                -1














                I would propose



                DivisibleRelationship



                because multiplicative is an adjective meaning




                Tending to multiply or capable of multiplying (American Heritage)




                Compare this with the definition of divisible:




                Capable of being divided (American Heritage)







                share|improve this answer
























                • One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

                  – tautophile
                  Jun 24 '18 at 15:38














                -1












                -1








                -1







                I would propose



                DivisibleRelationship



                because multiplicative is an adjective meaning




                Tending to multiply or capable of multiplying (American Heritage)




                Compare this with the definition of divisible:




                Capable of being divided (American Heritage)







                share|improve this answer













                I would propose



                DivisibleRelationship



                because multiplicative is an adjective meaning




                Tending to multiply or capable of multiplying (American Heritage)




                Compare this with the definition of divisible:




                Capable of being divided (American Heritage)








                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Apr 25 '18 at 2:05









                aparente001aparente001

                15.2k43673




                15.2k43673













                • One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

                  – tautophile
                  Jun 24 '18 at 15:38



















                • One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

                  – tautophile
                  Jun 24 '18 at 15:38

















                One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

                – tautophile
                Jun 24 '18 at 15:38





                One could say "multiplication : multiplicative :: division : divisive, but this is simply a case of analogy of spelling, and doesn't take into account the differences in meaning of the words.

                – tautophile
                Jun 24 '18 at 15:38











                -1














                multiplicative: tending or having the power to multiply.



                additive: of, relating to, or characterized by addition.



                subtractive: tending to subtract



                So,



                divisitive should be tending to division. Yes, this word does not exist in any of the standard (or auxiliary) dictionaries. If you use it, there is no harm. Few authors have already used it in their respective books.



                Citation 1: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning by Douglas A. Grouws




                Situations must be developed in which children systematically build their understanding of principles that underlie the invariance and the compensation for variation within additive, subtractive, multiplicative and divisitive relations and operations.




                Citation 2: Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies by by Ramachandran, Muthu [Leeds Metropolitian Univeristy, UK]






                share|improve this answer




























                  -1














                  multiplicative: tending or having the power to multiply.



                  additive: of, relating to, or characterized by addition.



                  subtractive: tending to subtract



                  So,



                  divisitive should be tending to division. Yes, this word does not exist in any of the standard (or auxiliary) dictionaries. If you use it, there is no harm. Few authors have already used it in their respective books.



                  Citation 1: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning by Douglas A. Grouws




                  Situations must be developed in which children systematically build their understanding of principles that underlie the invariance and the compensation for variation within additive, subtractive, multiplicative and divisitive relations and operations.




                  Citation 2: Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies by by Ramachandran, Muthu [Leeds Metropolitian Univeristy, UK]






                  share|improve this answer


























                    -1












                    -1








                    -1







                    multiplicative: tending or having the power to multiply.



                    additive: of, relating to, or characterized by addition.



                    subtractive: tending to subtract



                    So,



                    divisitive should be tending to division. Yes, this word does not exist in any of the standard (or auxiliary) dictionaries. If you use it, there is no harm. Few authors have already used it in their respective books.



                    Citation 1: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning by Douglas A. Grouws




                    Situations must be developed in which children systematically build their understanding of principles that underlie the invariance and the compensation for variation within additive, subtractive, multiplicative and divisitive relations and operations.




                    Citation 2: Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies by by Ramachandran, Muthu [Leeds Metropolitian Univeristy, UK]






                    share|improve this answer













                    multiplicative: tending or having the power to multiply.



                    additive: of, relating to, or characterized by addition.



                    subtractive: tending to subtract



                    So,



                    divisitive should be tending to division. Yes, this word does not exist in any of the standard (or auxiliary) dictionaries. If you use it, there is no harm. Few authors have already used it in their respective books.



                    Citation 1: Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning by Douglas A. Grouws




                    Situations must be developed in which children systematically build their understanding of principles that underlie the invariance and the compensation for variation within additive, subtractive, multiplicative and divisitive relations and operations.




                    Citation 2: Handbook of Research on Software Engineering and Productivity Technologies by by Ramachandran, Muthu [Leeds Metropolitian Univeristy, UK]







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered Apr 21 at 18:38









                    Ubi hattUbi hatt

                    5,3601737




                    5,3601737























                        -1














                        divisive



                        If you accept additive, subtractive, and multiplicative, then the
                        fourth term should not be divisitive (as suggested in another answer)
                        but divisive. Why? Because these adjectives are derived from the
                        supine stems of Latin verbs:




                        • addo, addidi, additus

                        • subtraho, subtraxi, subtractus

                        • multiplico, multiplicavi, multiplicatus

                        • divido, divisi, divisus (not divisitus)






                        share|improve this answer






























                          -1














                          divisive



                          If you accept additive, subtractive, and multiplicative, then the
                          fourth term should not be divisitive (as suggested in another answer)
                          but divisive. Why? Because these adjectives are derived from the
                          supine stems of Latin verbs:




                          • addo, addidi, additus

                          • subtraho, subtraxi, subtractus

                          • multiplico, multiplicavi, multiplicatus

                          • divido, divisi, divisus (not divisitus)






                          share|improve this answer




























                            -1












                            -1








                            -1







                            divisive



                            If you accept additive, subtractive, and multiplicative, then the
                            fourth term should not be divisitive (as suggested in another answer)
                            but divisive. Why? Because these adjectives are derived from the
                            supine stems of Latin verbs:




                            • addo, addidi, additus

                            • subtraho, subtraxi, subtractus

                            • multiplico, multiplicavi, multiplicatus

                            • divido, divisi, divisus (not divisitus)






                            share|improve this answer















                            divisive



                            If you accept additive, subtractive, and multiplicative, then the
                            fourth term should not be divisitive (as suggested in another answer)
                            but divisive. Why? Because these adjectives are derived from the
                            supine stems of Latin verbs:




                            • addo, addidi, additus

                            • subtraho, subtraxi, subtractus

                            • multiplico, multiplicavi, multiplicatus

                            • divido, divisi, divisus (not divisitus)







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Apr 22 at 1:28

























                            answered Apr 21 at 19:09









                            ToothrotToothrot

                            702626




                            702626






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f365614%2fword-for-of-or-related-to-division%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029