Is it OK to look at the list of played moves during the game to determine the status of the 50 move rule?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







8















There are some positions in which you need to know how many moves have been played without pawn move or capture. For example:



[FEN "1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000"]


(1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000)



Here, white must play Ra2 or Rb1 to force a capture within 1 move. If this is not done the game is drawn due to the 50 move rule.



If the 50 move rule was not a concern it would be an easy mate in 2.



Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Of course you can

    – David
    May 19 at 14:17


















8















There are some positions in which you need to know how many moves have been played without pawn move or capture. For example:



[FEN "1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000"]


(1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000)



Here, white must play Ra2 or Rb1 to force a capture within 1 move. If this is not done the game is drawn due to the 50 move rule.



If the 50 move rule was not a concern it would be an easy mate in 2.



Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Of course you can

    – David
    May 19 at 14:17














8












8








8


1






There are some positions in which you need to know how many moves have been played without pawn move or capture. For example:



[FEN "1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000"]


(1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000)



Here, white must play Ra2 or Rb1 to force a capture within 1 move. If this is not done the game is drawn due to the 50 move rule.



If the 50 move rule was not a concern it would be an easy mate in 2.



Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?










share|improve this question
















There are some positions in which you need to know how many moves have been played without pawn move or capture. For example:



[FEN "1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000"]


(1R5K/8/8/8/8/8/7R/k7 w - - 98 1000)



Here, white must play Ra2 or Rb1 to force a capture within 1 move. If this is not done the game is drawn due to the 50 move rule.



If the 50 move rule was not a concern it would be an easy mate in 2.



Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?







rules 50-move-rule claim-draw scoresheet






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 19 at 12:48









Rewan Demontay

1,5191 gold badge8 silver badges32 bronze badges




1,5191 gold badge8 silver badges32 bronze badges










asked May 19 at 8:54









boot4lifeboot4life

1434 bronze badges




1434 bronze badges








  • 1





    Of course you can

    – David
    May 19 at 14:17














  • 1





    Of course you can

    – David
    May 19 at 14:17








1




1





Of course you can

– David
May 19 at 14:17





Of course you can

– David
May 19 at 14:17










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















12














The rules for this and how it works are spelled out in articles 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. They don't mention whether or not you are allowed to check your scoresheet to do this because you are always allowed to check your scoresheet. You would be very foolish to not check your scoresheet first because there are penalties for an incorrect claim.



Here are articles 93, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess:




9.3 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:

9.3.1 he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will
result in the last 50 moves by each player having been made without
the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or

9.3.2 the last 50 moves by each player have been completed without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.

9.4 If the player touches a piece as in Article 4.3, he loses the right to claim a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3 on that move.

9.5.1 If a player claims a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3, he or the arbiter shall stop the chessclock (see Article 6.12.1 or 6.12.2). He
is not allowed to withdraw his claim.

9.5.2 If the claim is found to be correct, the game is immediately drawn.

9.5.3 If the claim is found to be incorrect, the arbiter shall add two minutes to the opponent’s remaining thinking time. Then the game shall
continue. If the claim was based on an intended move, this move must
be made in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.







share|improve this answer
























  • So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

    – boot4life
    May 19 at 9:51






  • 7





    You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

    – Brian Towers
    May 19 at 9:59











  • How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

    – Alexander
    May 20 at 3:28






  • 1





    @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

    – Douglas
    May 20 at 7:15



















4














Yes you're absolutely allowed to look at the score-sheet.



What you're not allowed to do is make special symbols/notes on the scoresheet to remind you of things. But that's non-applicable here.






share|improve this answer































    1















    Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?




    In a serious tournament game, you would stop the clocks and ask the arbiter to come and check your scoresheets. I remember there was a recent incident between Russian GM Alexandra Kosteniuk against Chinese GM Ju Wenjun.



    If there was no arbiter, you would have to do it with your opponents after stopping the clocks.






    share|improve this answer



















    • 3





      So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

      – boot4life
      May 19 at 9:16






    • 3





      @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

      – Brian Towers
      May 19 at 9:48






    • 1





      @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

      – SmallChess
      May 19 at 11:43
















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "435"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24522%2fis-it-ok-to-look-at-the-list-of-played-moves-during-the-game-to-determine-the-st%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    12














    The rules for this and how it works are spelled out in articles 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. They don't mention whether or not you are allowed to check your scoresheet to do this because you are always allowed to check your scoresheet. You would be very foolish to not check your scoresheet first because there are penalties for an incorrect claim.



    Here are articles 93, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess:




    9.3 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:

    9.3.1 he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will
    result in the last 50 moves by each player having been made without
    the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or

    9.3.2 the last 50 moves by each player have been completed without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.

    9.4 If the player touches a piece as in Article 4.3, he loses the right to claim a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3 on that move.

    9.5.1 If a player claims a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3, he or the arbiter shall stop the chessclock (see Article 6.12.1 or 6.12.2). He
    is not allowed to withdraw his claim.

    9.5.2 If the claim is found to be correct, the game is immediately drawn.

    9.5.3 If the claim is found to be incorrect, the arbiter shall add two minutes to the opponent’s remaining thinking time. Then the game shall
    continue. If the claim was based on an intended move, this move must
    be made in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.







    share|improve this answer
























    • So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

      – boot4life
      May 19 at 9:51






    • 7





      You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

      – Brian Towers
      May 19 at 9:59











    • How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

      – Alexander
      May 20 at 3:28






    • 1





      @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

      – Douglas
      May 20 at 7:15
















    12














    The rules for this and how it works are spelled out in articles 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. They don't mention whether or not you are allowed to check your scoresheet to do this because you are always allowed to check your scoresheet. You would be very foolish to not check your scoresheet first because there are penalties for an incorrect claim.



    Here are articles 93, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess:




    9.3 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:

    9.3.1 he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will
    result in the last 50 moves by each player having been made without
    the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or

    9.3.2 the last 50 moves by each player have been completed without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.

    9.4 If the player touches a piece as in Article 4.3, he loses the right to claim a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3 on that move.

    9.5.1 If a player claims a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3, he or the arbiter shall stop the chessclock (see Article 6.12.1 or 6.12.2). He
    is not allowed to withdraw his claim.

    9.5.2 If the claim is found to be correct, the game is immediately drawn.

    9.5.3 If the claim is found to be incorrect, the arbiter shall add two minutes to the opponent’s remaining thinking time. Then the game shall
    continue. If the claim was based on an intended move, this move must
    be made in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.







    share|improve this answer
























    • So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

      – boot4life
      May 19 at 9:51






    • 7





      You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

      – Brian Towers
      May 19 at 9:59











    • How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

      – Alexander
      May 20 at 3:28






    • 1





      @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

      – Douglas
      May 20 at 7:15














    12












    12








    12







    The rules for this and how it works are spelled out in articles 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. They don't mention whether or not you are allowed to check your scoresheet to do this because you are always allowed to check your scoresheet. You would be very foolish to not check your scoresheet first because there are penalties for an incorrect claim.



    Here are articles 93, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess:




    9.3 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:

    9.3.1 he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will
    result in the last 50 moves by each player having been made without
    the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or

    9.3.2 the last 50 moves by each player have been completed without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.

    9.4 If the player touches a piece as in Article 4.3, he loses the right to claim a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3 on that move.

    9.5.1 If a player claims a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3, he or the arbiter shall stop the chessclock (see Article 6.12.1 or 6.12.2). He
    is not allowed to withdraw his claim.

    9.5.2 If the claim is found to be correct, the game is immediately drawn.

    9.5.3 If the claim is found to be incorrect, the arbiter shall add two minutes to the opponent’s remaining thinking time. Then the game shall
    continue. If the claim was based on an intended move, this move must
    be made in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.







    share|improve this answer













    The rules for this and how it works are spelled out in articles 9.3, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess. They don't mention whether or not you are allowed to check your scoresheet to do this because you are always allowed to check your scoresheet. You would be very foolish to not check your scoresheet first because there are penalties for an incorrect claim.



    Here are articles 93, 9.4 and 9.5 of the FIDE Laws of Chess:




    9.3 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:

    9.3.1 he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will
    result in the last 50 moves by each player having been made without
    the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or

    9.3.2 the last 50 moves by each player have been completed without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.

    9.4 If the player touches a piece as in Article 4.3, he loses the right to claim a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3 on that move.

    9.5.1 If a player claims a draw under Article 9.2 or 9.3, he or the arbiter shall stop the chessclock (see Article 6.12.1 or 6.12.2). He
    is not allowed to withdraw his claim.

    9.5.2 If the claim is found to be correct, the game is immediately drawn.

    9.5.3 If the claim is found to be incorrect, the arbiter shall add two minutes to the opponent’s remaining thinking time. Then the game shall
    continue. If the claim was based on an intended move, this move must
    be made in accordance with Articles 3 and 4.








    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 19 at 9:44









    Brian TowersBrian Towers

    19.8k3 gold badges36 silver badges87 bronze badges




    19.8k3 gold badges36 silver badges87 bronze badges













    • So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

      – boot4life
      May 19 at 9:51






    • 7





      You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

      – Brian Towers
      May 19 at 9:59











    • How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

      – Alexander
      May 20 at 3:28






    • 1





      @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

      – Douglas
      May 20 at 7:15



















    • So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

      – boot4life
      May 19 at 9:51






    • 7





      You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

      – Brian Towers
      May 19 at 9:59











    • How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

      – Alexander
      May 20 at 3:28






    • 1





      @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

      – Douglas
      May 20 at 7:15

















    So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

    – boot4life
    May 19 at 9:51





    So I can always read the sheet at any time to decide how I want to play. Need to decide between the easy mate in 2 and the hard KRK mate. This is not about claiming draw since white wants to prevent a draw.

    – boot4life
    May 19 at 9:51




    7




    7





    You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

    – Brian Towers
    May 19 at 9:59





    You can always look at your scoresheet at any time for any purpose. Apart from checking if / when you can claim a draw, common reasons are to check that your opponent cannot claim a draw (you are repeating to gain time on the clock), checking that you wrote the last move down (happens to some of us as we get older that we also get absent minded), checking which move we are on (not allowed to offer a draw before a certain move in some tournaments), even "I know I always play Bd7 in this line on that move, is it time for me to play that now?" (not so good from chess pov)

    – Brian Towers
    May 19 at 9:59













    How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

    – Alexander
    May 20 at 3:28





    How is the end of 9.3.1 different from 9.3.2? I don't notice any difference

    – Alexander
    May 20 at 3:28




    1




    1





    @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

    – Douglas
    May 20 at 7:15





    @Alexander The difference is in whether the player claims a draw before or after making his move. 9.3.2 is for claiming that the game already is drawn by the 50 move rule, while 9.3.1 is for claiming that after making your move the game will be drawn by the 50 move rule. 9.3.1 is needed because you can only make the claim on your turn.

    – Douglas
    May 20 at 7:15













    4














    Yes you're absolutely allowed to look at the score-sheet.



    What you're not allowed to do is make special symbols/notes on the scoresheet to remind you of things. But that's non-applicable here.






    share|improve this answer




























      4














      Yes you're absolutely allowed to look at the score-sheet.



      What you're not allowed to do is make special symbols/notes on the scoresheet to remind you of things. But that's non-applicable here.






      share|improve this answer


























        4












        4








        4







        Yes you're absolutely allowed to look at the score-sheet.



        What you're not allowed to do is make special symbols/notes on the scoresheet to remind you of things. But that's non-applicable here.






        share|improve this answer













        Yes you're absolutely allowed to look at the score-sheet.



        What you're not allowed to do is make special symbols/notes on the scoresheet to remind you of things. But that's non-applicable here.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 19 at 18:12









        Inertial IgnoranceInertial Ignorance

        6,3045 silver badges15 bronze badges




        6,3045 silver badges15 bronze badges























            1















            Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?




            In a serious tournament game, you would stop the clocks and ask the arbiter to come and check your scoresheets. I remember there was a recent incident between Russian GM Alexandra Kosteniuk against Chinese GM Ju Wenjun.



            If there was no arbiter, you would have to do it with your opponents after stopping the clocks.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 3





              So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

              – boot4life
              May 19 at 9:16






            • 3





              @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

              – Brian Towers
              May 19 at 9:48






            • 1





              @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

              – SmallChess
              May 19 at 11:43


















            1















            Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?




            In a serious tournament game, you would stop the clocks and ask the arbiter to come and check your scoresheets. I remember there was a recent incident between Russian GM Alexandra Kosteniuk against Chinese GM Ju Wenjun.



            If there was no arbiter, you would have to do it with your opponents after stopping the clocks.






            share|improve this answer



















            • 3





              So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

              – boot4life
              May 19 at 9:16






            • 3





              @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

              – Brian Towers
              May 19 at 9:48






            • 1





              @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

              – SmallChess
              May 19 at 11:43
















            1












            1








            1








            Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?




            In a serious tournament game, you would stop the clocks and ask the arbiter to come and check your scoresheets. I remember there was a recent incident between Russian GM Alexandra Kosteniuk against Chinese GM Ju Wenjun.



            If there was no arbiter, you would have to do it with your opponents after stopping the clocks.






            share|improve this answer














            Of course it is very hard to remember how many moves have passed. Is white allowed to look at the scoresheet and count the number of moves during the game?




            In a serious tournament game, you would stop the clocks and ask the arbiter to come and check your scoresheets. I remember there was a recent incident between Russian GM Alexandra Kosteniuk against Chinese GM Ju Wenjun.



            If there was no arbiter, you would have to do it with your opponents after stopping the clocks.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 19 at 9:06









            SmallChessSmallChess

            15.4k2 gold badges23 silver badges51 bronze badges




            15.4k2 gold badges23 silver badges51 bronze badges








            • 3





              So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

              – boot4life
              May 19 at 9:16






            • 3





              @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

              – Brian Towers
              May 19 at 9:48






            • 1





              @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

              – SmallChess
              May 19 at 11:43
















            • 3





              So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

              – boot4life
              May 19 at 9:16






            • 3





              @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

              – Brian Towers
              May 19 at 9:48






            • 1





              @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

              – SmallChess
              May 19 at 11:43










            3




            3





            So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

            – boot4life
            May 19 at 9:16





            So you can pause the game at will just to determine how many moves you've got left? It seems that can be abused to obtain more time.

            – boot4life
            May 19 at 9:16




            3




            3





            @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

            – Brian Towers
            May 19 at 9:48





            @boot4life You are correct, however if you abuse the rule in this way then there is an automatic penalty of giving your opponent an additional 2 minutes on the clock. Furthermore if the arbiter thinks you have been malicious rather than incompetent he can apply additional penalties for bringing the game into disrepute. These vary from removing some of your time to awarding the game to your opponent.

            – Brian Towers
            May 19 at 9:48




            1




            1





            @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

            – SmallChess
            May 19 at 11:43







            @boot4life FIDE doesn't define what exactly the positions you can (or can't) check for 50 moves. However, it's always --very very-- obvious when it's appropriate to do it. Nobody would believe you if you just exchanged rooks a few moves earlier in an opening. You'd receive a penalty and being treated as an ass**ole. Your opponent is not going to agree for reviews, and you'd be in trouble.

            – SmallChess
            May 19 at 11:43




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchess.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24522%2fis-it-ok-to-look-at-the-list-of-played-moves-during-the-game-to-determine-the-st%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

            What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029