Problem in understanding the syntax












0















Here is an excerpt from the book flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi which has confused me a bit.




If the trend of traditional families keeping together is on the wane, the number of families that endure because their members enjoy each other may be increasing. Of course, because the external forces are still much more powerful than the internal ones, the net effect is likely to be further fragmentation of family life for some time to come.




The major concern I have with this complex sentence is that is the first line connected with the second line.



Is of course, because mentioned in the same context of the previous line?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • There are two sentences here. When you refer to the first line and the second line do you mean first/second sentence? Even if this is the case, I am afraid I don't understand your question(s).

    – Shoe
    yesterday













  • yes, i mean sentence that is first sentence and second sentence.My question is that is the author mentioning the second sentence in relation to the first one. Or is it a general line(the second one).

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • The sentences are connected. He is saying 1.) there may be currently an increase in the number of families that stay together because they enjoy each other's company, but 2.) external forces are more powerful and therefore more families are likely to break up in the future.

    – Shoe
    yesterday











  • Yes sir. I was looking for that. There is one more doubt if you can clear it. The link to the question is english.stackexchange.com/a/491125/301873

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • I have added a suggested paraphrase under your other question.

    – Shoe
    yesterday


















0















Here is an excerpt from the book flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi which has confused me a bit.




If the trend of traditional families keeping together is on the wane, the number of families that endure because their members enjoy each other may be increasing. Of course, because the external forces are still much more powerful than the internal ones, the net effect is likely to be further fragmentation of family life for some time to come.




The major concern I have with this complex sentence is that is the first line connected with the second line.



Is of course, because mentioned in the same context of the previous line?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • There are two sentences here. When you refer to the first line and the second line do you mean first/second sentence? Even if this is the case, I am afraid I don't understand your question(s).

    – Shoe
    yesterday













  • yes, i mean sentence that is first sentence and second sentence.My question is that is the author mentioning the second sentence in relation to the first one. Or is it a general line(the second one).

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • The sentences are connected. He is saying 1.) there may be currently an increase in the number of families that stay together because they enjoy each other's company, but 2.) external forces are more powerful and therefore more families are likely to break up in the future.

    – Shoe
    yesterday











  • Yes sir. I was looking for that. There is one more doubt if you can clear it. The link to the question is english.stackexchange.com/a/491125/301873

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • I have added a suggested paraphrase under your other question.

    – Shoe
    yesterday
















0












0








0








Here is an excerpt from the book flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi which has confused me a bit.




If the trend of traditional families keeping together is on the wane, the number of families that endure because their members enjoy each other may be increasing. Of course, because the external forces are still much more powerful than the internal ones, the net effect is likely to be further fragmentation of family life for some time to come.




The major concern I have with this complex sentence is that is the first line connected with the second line.



Is of course, because mentioned in the same context of the previous line?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












Here is an excerpt from the book flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi which has confused me a bit.




If the trend of traditional families keeping together is on the wane, the number of families that endure because their members enjoy each other may be increasing. Of course, because the external forces are still much more powerful than the internal ones, the net effect is likely to be further fragmentation of family life for some time to come.




The major concern I have with this complex sentence is that is the first line connected with the second line.



Is of course, because mentioned in the same context of the previous line?







grammar complex-sentences






share|improve this question









New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Glorfindel

8,369103842




8,369103842






New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Sudhir SharmaSudhir Sharma

11




11




New contributor




Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • There are two sentences here. When you refer to the first line and the second line do you mean first/second sentence? Even if this is the case, I am afraid I don't understand your question(s).

    – Shoe
    yesterday













  • yes, i mean sentence that is first sentence and second sentence.My question is that is the author mentioning the second sentence in relation to the first one. Or is it a general line(the second one).

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • The sentences are connected. He is saying 1.) there may be currently an increase in the number of families that stay together because they enjoy each other's company, but 2.) external forces are more powerful and therefore more families are likely to break up in the future.

    – Shoe
    yesterday











  • Yes sir. I was looking for that. There is one more doubt if you can clear it. The link to the question is english.stackexchange.com/a/491125/301873

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • I have added a suggested paraphrase under your other question.

    – Shoe
    yesterday





















  • There are two sentences here. When you refer to the first line and the second line do you mean first/second sentence? Even if this is the case, I am afraid I don't understand your question(s).

    – Shoe
    yesterday













  • yes, i mean sentence that is first sentence and second sentence.My question is that is the author mentioning the second sentence in relation to the first one. Or is it a general line(the second one).

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • The sentences are connected. He is saying 1.) there may be currently an increase in the number of families that stay together because they enjoy each other's company, but 2.) external forces are more powerful and therefore more families are likely to break up in the future.

    – Shoe
    yesterday











  • Yes sir. I was looking for that. There is one more doubt if you can clear it. The link to the question is english.stackexchange.com/a/491125/301873

    – Sudhir Sharma
    yesterday











  • I have added a suggested paraphrase under your other question.

    – Shoe
    yesterday



















There are two sentences here. When you refer to the first line and the second line do you mean first/second sentence? Even if this is the case, I am afraid I don't understand your question(s).

– Shoe
yesterday







There are two sentences here. When you refer to the first line and the second line do you mean first/second sentence? Even if this is the case, I am afraid I don't understand your question(s).

– Shoe
yesterday















yes, i mean sentence that is first sentence and second sentence.My question is that is the author mentioning the second sentence in relation to the first one. Or is it a general line(the second one).

– Sudhir Sharma
yesterday





yes, i mean sentence that is first sentence and second sentence.My question is that is the author mentioning the second sentence in relation to the first one. Or is it a general line(the second one).

– Sudhir Sharma
yesterday













The sentences are connected. He is saying 1.) there may be currently an increase in the number of families that stay together because they enjoy each other's company, but 2.) external forces are more powerful and therefore more families are likely to break up in the future.

– Shoe
yesterday





The sentences are connected. He is saying 1.) there may be currently an increase in the number of families that stay together because they enjoy each other's company, but 2.) external forces are more powerful and therefore more families are likely to break up in the future.

– Shoe
yesterday













Yes sir. I was looking for that. There is one more doubt if you can clear it. The link to the question is english.stackexchange.com/a/491125/301873

– Sudhir Sharma
yesterday





Yes sir. I was looking for that. There is one more doubt if you can clear it. The link to the question is english.stackexchange.com/a/491125/301873

– Sudhir Sharma
yesterday













I have added a suggested paraphrase under your other question.

– Shoe
yesterday







I have added a suggested paraphrase under your other question.

– Shoe
yesterday












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491206%2fproblem-in-understanding-the-syntax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Sudhir Sharma is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491206%2fproblem-in-understanding-the-syntax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum