Why does this part of the Space Shuttle launch pad seem to be floating in air?
$begingroup$
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-107/images/high/KSC-02PD-1894.jpg
shows a large part of the launch pad suspended off the ground.
What is it for and why is there all that empty space underneath it?
space-shuttle launch-site identify-this-object
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-107/images/high/KSC-02PD-1894.jpg
shows a large part of the launch pad suspended off the ground.
What is it for and why is there all that empty space underneath it?
space-shuttle launch-site identify-this-object
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
$endgroup$
14
$begingroup$
I'm not sure "floating in air" is quite right for something with enormous towers at each end holding it up. ;)
$endgroup$
– Graham
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Graham - Yeah I was thinking "Which part are you referring to?"
$endgroup$
– Kyle Delaney
16 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-107/images/high/KSC-02PD-1894.jpg
shows a large part of the launch pad suspended off the ground.
What is it for and why is there all that empty space underneath it?
space-shuttle launch-site identify-this-object
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
$endgroup$
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-107/images/high/KSC-02PD-1894.jpg
shows a large part of the launch pad suspended off the ground.
What is it for and why is there all that empty space underneath it?
space-shuttle launch-site identify-this-object
space-shuttle launch-site identify-this-object
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
asked yesterday
GnubieGnubie
430159
430159
14
$begingroup$
I'm not sure "floating in air" is quite right for something with enormous towers at each end holding it up. ;)
$endgroup$
– Graham
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Graham - Yeah I was thinking "Which part are you referring to?"
$endgroup$
– Kyle Delaney
16 hours ago
add a comment |
14
$begingroup$
I'm not sure "floating in air" is quite right for something with enormous towers at each end holding it up. ;)
$endgroup$
– Graham
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Graham - Yeah I was thinking "Which part are you referring to?"
$endgroup$
– Kyle Delaney
16 hours ago
14
14
$begingroup$
I'm not sure "floating in air" is quite right for something with enormous towers at each end holding it up. ;)
$endgroup$
– Graham
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
I'm not sure "floating in air" is quite right for something with enormous towers at each end holding it up. ;)
$endgroup$
– Graham
17 hours ago
2
2
$begingroup$
@Graham - Yeah I was thinking "Which part are you referring to?"
$endgroup$
– Kyle Delaney
16 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Graham - Yeah I was thinking "Which part are you referring to?"
$endgroup$
– Kyle Delaney
16 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That is the Rotating Service Structure.
It can be rotated to fit over the Shuttle while it is on the pad, giving access to the Shuttle cargo bay. The empty space allows the RSS to fit over the launch platform.
It's not floating, the leg on the left side of the photo is part of the RSS.
This is a detail of the leg:
You can see the cab and wheels used to move the RSS between its positions.
The rotating service structure provides protected access to the orbiter for installation and servicing of payloads at the pad, as well as servicing access to certain systems on the orbiter. The majority of payloads are installed in the vertical position at the pad, partly because of their design and partly because payload processing can thus take place further along in the launch processing schedule.
This photo shows the RSS in its rotated position:
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "508"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35036%2fwhy-does-this-part-of-the-space-shuttle-launch-pad-seem-to-be-floating-in-air%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
That is the Rotating Service Structure.
It can be rotated to fit over the Shuttle while it is on the pad, giving access to the Shuttle cargo bay. The empty space allows the RSS to fit over the launch platform.
It's not floating, the leg on the left side of the photo is part of the RSS.
This is a detail of the leg:
You can see the cab and wheels used to move the RSS between its positions.
The rotating service structure provides protected access to the orbiter for installation and servicing of payloads at the pad, as well as servicing access to certain systems on the orbiter. The majority of payloads are installed in the vertical position at the pad, partly because of their design and partly because payload processing can thus take place further along in the launch processing schedule.
This photo shows the RSS in its rotated position:
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is the Rotating Service Structure.
It can be rotated to fit over the Shuttle while it is on the pad, giving access to the Shuttle cargo bay. The empty space allows the RSS to fit over the launch platform.
It's not floating, the leg on the left side of the photo is part of the RSS.
This is a detail of the leg:
You can see the cab and wheels used to move the RSS between its positions.
The rotating service structure provides protected access to the orbiter for installation and servicing of payloads at the pad, as well as servicing access to certain systems on the orbiter. The majority of payloads are installed in the vertical position at the pad, partly because of their design and partly because payload processing can thus take place further along in the launch processing schedule.
This photo shows the RSS in its rotated position:
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
That is the Rotating Service Structure.
It can be rotated to fit over the Shuttle while it is on the pad, giving access to the Shuttle cargo bay. The empty space allows the RSS to fit over the launch platform.
It's not floating, the leg on the left side of the photo is part of the RSS.
This is a detail of the leg:
You can see the cab and wheels used to move the RSS between its positions.
The rotating service structure provides protected access to the orbiter for installation and servicing of payloads at the pad, as well as servicing access to certain systems on the orbiter. The majority of payloads are installed in the vertical position at the pad, partly because of their design and partly because payload processing can thus take place further along in the launch processing schedule.
This photo shows the RSS in its rotated position:
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
$endgroup$
That is the Rotating Service Structure.
It can be rotated to fit over the Shuttle while it is on the pad, giving access to the Shuttle cargo bay. The empty space allows the RSS to fit over the launch platform.
It's not floating, the leg on the left side of the photo is part of the RSS.
This is a detail of the leg:
You can see the cab and wheels used to move the RSS between its positions.
The rotating service structure provides protected access to the orbiter for installation and servicing of payloads at the pad, as well as servicing access to certain systems on the orbiter. The majority of payloads are installed in the vertical position at the pad, partly because of their design and partly because payload processing can thus take place further along in the launch processing schedule.
This photo shows the RSS in its rotated position:
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
answered yesterday
HobbesHobbes
94.5k2266420
94.5k2266420
1
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
6
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
9
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
The last photograph still leaves me with the question of why the launch pad itself is off the ground. I would have expected a tremendous amount of downward force against it.
$endgroup$
– sondra.kinsey
20 hours ago
6
6
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
$begingroup$
It had to be off the ground because it was carried by the crawler. The crawler set it down on a bunch of very sturdy pylons. The downward force went through holes in the launch pad.
$endgroup$
– Hobbes
20 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
$begingroup$
I always wondered why they needed a raised platform (the "mound") in the first place? A flame trench could have been dug into the ground. Then I remembered the water - millions of gallons that would have to be pumped out of the trench...
$endgroup$
– Mitch99
18 hours ago
9
9
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
@Mitch99, it's not just the water from the sound-suppression system. The entire state of Florida is basically a swamp, so any time you dig into the ground, you'll have to continuously pump water out.
$endgroup$
– Mark
17 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
On top of that add rain season and you start getting real problems. Did the area acutally ever get flooded?
$endgroup$
– TomTom
2 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f35036%2fwhy-does-this-part-of-the-space-shuttle-launch-pad-seem-to-be-floating-in-air%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
14
$begingroup$
I'm not sure "floating in air" is quite right for something with enormous towers at each end holding it up. ;)
$endgroup$
– Graham
17 hours ago
2
$begingroup$
@Graham - Yeah I was thinking "Which part are you referring to?"
$endgroup$
– Kyle Delaney
16 hours ago