Piping the output of comand columns





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







5















I am using lolcat to get the output of ls in color. To do this i have copied /usr/bin/ls to /usr/bin/lsslss (to avoid an endless loop since alias cannot acccept $* or $@) and I have added the function:



ls(){ lsslss $* | lolcat; }
to .bashrc



The issue is that when i use ls the pipe is piped each file at a time so it shows up as a long list like this:



enter image description here



instead of a table like this:



enter image description here



to change it into a table I can pipe the output into columns command. but when I do it changes back into a long list (probably because of columns only formats it instead of changing it into rows)



I was originally going to do:



ls(){ lsslss $* | columns | lolcat; }



Anyway I was wondering is there a way to pipe the raw output instead of using | to be able to pipe the output of columns into lolcat?



Thanks in advance. Sorry if my question is badly worded or hard to understand. I almost always find the questions already asked so I dont post questions often.










share|improve this question































    5















    I am using lolcat to get the output of ls in color. To do this i have copied /usr/bin/ls to /usr/bin/lsslss (to avoid an endless loop since alias cannot acccept $* or $@) and I have added the function:



    ls(){ lsslss $* | lolcat; }
    to .bashrc



    The issue is that when i use ls the pipe is piped each file at a time so it shows up as a long list like this:



    enter image description here



    instead of a table like this:



    enter image description here



    to change it into a table I can pipe the output into columns command. but when I do it changes back into a long list (probably because of columns only formats it instead of changing it into rows)



    I was originally going to do:



    ls(){ lsslss $* | columns | lolcat; }



    Anyway I was wondering is there a way to pipe the raw output instead of using | to be able to pipe the output of columns into lolcat?



    Thanks in advance. Sorry if my question is badly worded or hard to understand. I almost always find the questions already asked so I dont post questions often.










    share|improve this question



























      5












      5








      5








      I am using lolcat to get the output of ls in color. To do this i have copied /usr/bin/ls to /usr/bin/lsslss (to avoid an endless loop since alias cannot acccept $* or $@) and I have added the function:



      ls(){ lsslss $* | lolcat; }
      to .bashrc



      The issue is that when i use ls the pipe is piped each file at a time so it shows up as a long list like this:



      enter image description here



      instead of a table like this:



      enter image description here



      to change it into a table I can pipe the output into columns command. but when I do it changes back into a long list (probably because of columns only formats it instead of changing it into rows)



      I was originally going to do:



      ls(){ lsslss $* | columns | lolcat; }



      Anyway I was wondering is there a way to pipe the raw output instead of using | to be able to pipe the output of columns into lolcat?



      Thanks in advance. Sorry if my question is badly worded or hard to understand. I almost always find the questions already asked so I dont post questions often.










      share|improve this question














      I am using lolcat to get the output of ls in color. To do this i have copied /usr/bin/ls to /usr/bin/lsslss (to avoid an endless loop since alias cannot acccept $* or $@) and I have added the function:



      ls(){ lsslss $* | lolcat; }
      to .bashrc



      The issue is that when i use ls the pipe is piped each file at a time so it shows up as a long list like this:



      enter image description here



      instead of a table like this:



      enter image description here



      to change it into a table I can pipe the output into columns command. but when I do it changes back into a long list (probably because of columns only formats it instead of changing it into rows)



      I was originally going to do:



      ls(){ lsslss $* | columns | lolcat; }



      Anyway I was wondering is there a way to pipe the raw output instead of using | to be able to pipe the output of columns into lolcat?



      Thanks in advance. Sorry if my question is badly worded or hard to understand. I almost always find the questions already asked so I dont post questions often.







      command-line bash pipe stdout






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked May 20 at 11:01









      cohill Oniellcohill Oniell

      484 bronze badges




      484 bronze badges

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          14














          Expanding on @dessert's answer, you need a bit more work to make your colored ls version behave just like the real ls in (hopefully?) all cases. The problem is that ls is not meant to be parsed but intended for human eyes only. For that purpose, it strongly adapts how it works depending on the environment, e.g. whether it is connected to a terminal or outputting to a pipe.



          First, you don't need a separate /bin/lsslss executable to avoid recursion. Use the shell built-in command to call an executable from the disk, ignoring any shell functions or aliases of the same name.



          Second, $* gives you all function arguments as a single string, which is then subject to word-splitting because it is unquoted. This can give surprisingly wrong results if you have arguments with spaces. Always use "$@", which exactly preserves all arguments as they were originally given, with no concatenation or further splitting.



          And third, depending on where you put the definition, the syntax ls () { ... ;} to define a function might not work if ls is already an alias, because alias expansion happens first, causing a syntax error. Use the explicit syntax by writing function before it.



          Then, we can use ls' -C flag to manually enable column output:





          function ls() { command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          However, if we just do that and pipe the output through lolcat (or anything else), you will notice that it doesn't use the full width of your terminal any more, but only 80 columns at most. This is because it can not detect the terminal width if its standard out is no longer directly connected to it. Your shell still knows the terminal though, and it populates the COLUMNS variable with the width it detected. But, as this variable is not exported by default, ls does not see this value. We can manually pass it on just for this command like:



          function ls() { COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          Now we should always get the correct width, but what happens if we really want to pipe ls through something else? Normally you shouldn't do that, because as I said in the beginning, ls should never be parsed. Sometimes it might still be useful though (and some scripts might sadly rely on it), so let's try to at least preserve the original behaviour then. Right now, we would always get the columns as output for e.g. ls | cat. (It's not colored any more there because lolcat also checks if it outputs to a terminal or pipe and switches colors off in the latter case)



          Let's add a check to our function that uses the plain real ls if it is piped and our fancy rainbow column version only for terminal view. Whether standard out (file descriptor 1) is a terminal/TTY can simply be checked with [[ -t 1 ]]:



          function ls() { 
          if [[ -t 1 ]] ; then COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ; else command ls "$@" ; fi
          }


          I think that should suffice to catch all cases where special/different behaviour from ls is expected, so that your function only adds color when viewed directly in a terminal and otherwise does not alter anything.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

            – cohill Oniell
            May 20 at 12:11











          • That is going beyond the call of duty!

            – TRiG
            May 20 at 18:21



















          4














          When its output is piped, ls disables the column listing. Use the -C option to explicitly enable it:



          ls(){ COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat; }


          COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" sets the COLUMNS variable correctly to the current terminal’s width, without that it defaults to 80 – try resizing your terminal window and compare the outputs. command ls serves to ignore aliases and functions and call ls wherever its executable is. Note that I used "$@", to quote the Bash Hackers Wiki:




          ["$@"] reflects all positional parameters as they were set initially
          and passed to the script or function. If you want to re-use your
          positional parameters to call another program (for example in a
          wrapper-script), then this is the choice for you, use double quoted
          "$@".

          Well, let's just say: You almost always want a quoted "$@"!







          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:14






          • 1





            Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:25














          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "89"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1144718%2fpiping-the-output-of-comand-columns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          14














          Expanding on @dessert's answer, you need a bit more work to make your colored ls version behave just like the real ls in (hopefully?) all cases. The problem is that ls is not meant to be parsed but intended for human eyes only. For that purpose, it strongly adapts how it works depending on the environment, e.g. whether it is connected to a terminal or outputting to a pipe.



          First, you don't need a separate /bin/lsslss executable to avoid recursion. Use the shell built-in command to call an executable from the disk, ignoring any shell functions or aliases of the same name.



          Second, $* gives you all function arguments as a single string, which is then subject to word-splitting because it is unquoted. This can give surprisingly wrong results if you have arguments with spaces. Always use "$@", which exactly preserves all arguments as they were originally given, with no concatenation or further splitting.



          And third, depending on where you put the definition, the syntax ls () { ... ;} to define a function might not work if ls is already an alias, because alias expansion happens first, causing a syntax error. Use the explicit syntax by writing function before it.



          Then, we can use ls' -C flag to manually enable column output:





          function ls() { command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          However, if we just do that and pipe the output through lolcat (or anything else), you will notice that it doesn't use the full width of your terminal any more, but only 80 columns at most. This is because it can not detect the terminal width if its standard out is no longer directly connected to it. Your shell still knows the terminal though, and it populates the COLUMNS variable with the width it detected. But, as this variable is not exported by default, ls does not see this value. We can manually pass it on just for this command like:



          function ls() { COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          Now we should always get the correct width, but what happens if we really want to pipe ls through something else? Normally you shouldn't do that, because as I said in the beginning, ls should never be parsed. Sometimes it might still be useful though (and some scripts might sadly rely on it), so let's try to at least preserve the original behaviour then. Right now, we would always get the columns as output for e.g. ls | cat. (It's not colored any more there because lolcat also checks if it outputs to a terminal or pipe and switches colors off in the latter case)



          Let's add a check to our function that uses the plain real ls if it is piped and our fancy rainbow column version only for terminal view. Whether standard out (file descriptor 1) is a terminal/TTY can simply be checked with [[ -t 1 ]]:



          function ls() { 
          if [[ -t 1 ]] ; then COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ; else command ls "$@" ; fi
          }


          I think that should suffice to catch all cases where special/different behaviour from ls is expected, so that your function only adds color when viewed directly in a terminal and otherwise does not alter anything.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

            – cohill Oniell
            May 20 at 12:11











          • That is going beyond the call of duty!

            – TRiG
            May 20 at 18:21
















          14














          Expanding on @dessert's answer, you need a bit more work to make your colored ls version behave just like the real ls in (hopefully?) all cases. The problem is that ls is not meant to be parsed but intended for human eyes only. For that purpose, it strongly adapts how it works depending on the environment, e.g. whether it is connected to a terminal or outputting to a pipe.



          First, you don't need a separate /bin/lsslss executable to avoid recursion. Use the shell built-in command to call an executable from the disk, ignoring any shell functions or aliases of the same name.



          Second, $* gives you all function arguments as a single string, which is then subject to word-splitting because it is unquoted. This can give surprisingly wrong results if you have arguments with spaces. Always use "$@", which exactly preserves all arguments as they were originally given, with no concatenation or further splitting.



          And third, depending on where you put the definition, the syntax ls () { ... ;} to define a function might not work if ls is already an alias, because alias expansion happens first, causing a syntax error. Use the explicit syntax by writing function before it.



          Then, we can use ls' -C flag to manually enable column output:





          function ls() { command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          However, if we just do that and pipe the output through lolcat (or anything else), you will notice that it doesn't use the full width of your terminal any more, but only 80 columns at most. This is because it can not detect the terminal width if its standard out is no longer directly connected to it. Your shell still knows the terminal though, and it populates the COLUMNS variable with the width it detected. But, as this variable is not exported by default, ls does not see this value. We can manually pass it on just for this command like:



          function ls() { COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          Now we should always get the correct width, but what happens if we really want to pipe ls through something else? Normally you shouldn't do that, because as I said in the beginning, ls should never be parsed. Sometimes it might still be useful though (and some scripts might sadly rely on it), so let's try to at least preserve the original behaviour then. Right now, we would always get the columns as output for e.g. ls | cat. (It's not colored any more there because lolcat also checks if it outputs to a terminal or pipe and switches colors off in the latter case)



          Let's add a check to our function that uses the plain real ls if it is piped and our fancy rainbow column version only for terminal view. Whether standard out (file descriptor 1) is a terminal/TTY can simply be checked with [[ -t 1 ]]:



          function ls() { 
          if [[ -t 1 ]] ; then COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ; else command ls "$@" ; fi
          }


          I think that should suffice to catch all cases where special/different behaviour from ls is expected, so that your function only adds color when viewed directly in a terminal and otherwise does not alter anything.






          share|improve this answer


























          • Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

            – cohill Oniell
            May 20 at 12:11











          • That is going beyond the call of duty!

            – TRiG
            May 20 at 18:21














          14












          14








          14







          Expanding on @dessert's answer, you need a bit more work to make your colored ls version behave just like the real ls in (hopefully?) all cases. The problem is that ls is not meant to be parsed but intended for human eyes only. For that purpose, it strongly adapts how it works depending on the environment, e.g. whether it is connected to a terminal or outputting to a pipe.



          First, you don't need a separate /bin/lsslss executable to avoid recursion. Use the shell built-in command to call an executable from the disk, ignoring any shell functions or aliases of the same name.



          Second, $* gives you all function arguments as a single string, which is then subject to word-splitting because it is unquoted. This can give surprisingly wrong results if you have arguments with spaces. Always use "$@", which exactly preserves all arguments as they were originally given, with no concatenation or further splitting.



          And third, depending on where you put the definition, the syntax ls () { ... ;} to define a function might not work if ls is already an alias, because alias expansion happens first, causing a syntax error. Use the explicit syntax by writing function before it.



          Then, we can use ls' -C flag to manually enable column output:





          function ls() { command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          However, if we just do that and pipe the output through lolcat (or anything else), you will notice that it doesn't use the full width of your terminal any more, but only 80 columns at most. This is because it can not detect the terminal width if its standard out is no longer directly connected to it. Your shell still knows the terminal though, and it populates the COLUMNS variable with the width it detected. But, as this variable is not exported by default, ls does not see this value. We can manually pass it on just for this command like:



          function ls() { COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          Now we should always get the correct width, but what happens if we really want to pipe ls through something else? Normally you shouldn't do that, because as I said in the beginning, ls should never be parsed. Sometimes it might still be useful though (and some scripts might sadly rely on it), so let's try to at least preserve the original behaviour then. Right now, we would always get the columns as output for e.g. ls | cat. (It's not colored any more there because lolcat also checks if it outputs to a terminal or pipe and switches colors off in the latter case)



          Let's add a check to our function that uses the plain real ls if it is piped and our fancy rainbow column version only for terminal view. Whether standard out (file descriptor 1) is a terminal/TTY can simply be checked with [[ -t 1 ]]:



          function ls() { 
          if [[ -t 1 ]] ; then COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ; else command ls "$@" ; fi
          }


          I think that should suffice to catch all cases where special/different behaviour from ls is expected, so that your function only adds color when viewed directly in a terminal and otherwise does not alter anything.






          share|improve this answer













          Expanding on @dessert's answer, you need a bit more work to make your colored ls version behave just like the real ls in (hopefully?) all cases. The problem is that ls is not meant to be parsed but intended for human eyes only. For that purpose, it strongly adapts how it works depending on the environment, e.g. whether it is connected to a terminal or outputting to a pipe.



          First, you don't need a separate /bin/lsslss executable to avoid recursion. Use the shell built-in command to call an executable from the disk, ignoring any shell functions or aliases of the same name.



          Second, $* gives you all function arguments as a single string, which is then subject to word-splitting because it is unquoted. This can give surprisingly wrong results if you have arguments with spaces. Always use "$@", which exactly preserves all arguments as they were originally given, with no concatenation or further splitting.



          And third, depending on where you put the definition, the syntax ls () { ... ;} to define a function might not work if ls is already an alias, because alias expansion happens first, causing a syntax error. Use the explicit syntax by writing function before it.



          Then, we can use ls' -C flag to manually enable column output:





          function ls() { command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          However, if we just do that and pipe the output through lolcat (or anything else), you will notice that it doesn't use the full width of your terminal any more, but only 80 columns at most. This is because it can not detect the terminal width if its standard out is no longer directly connected to it. Your shell still knows the terminal though, and it populates the COLUMNS variable with the width it detected. But, as this variable is not exported by default, ls does not see this value. We can manually pass it on just for this command like:



          function ls() { COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ;}


          Now we should always get the correct width, but what happens if we really want to pipe ls through something else? Normally you shouldn't do that, because as I said in the beginning, ls should never be parsed. Sometimes it might still be useful though (and some scripts might sadly rely on it), so let's try to at least preserve the original behaviour then. Right now, we would always get the columns as output for e.g. ls | cat. (It's not colored any more there because lolcat also checks if it outputs to a terminal or pipe and switches colors off in the latter case)



          Let's add a check to our function that uses the plain real ls if it is piped and our fancy rainbow column version only for terminal view. Whether standard out (file descriptor 1) is a terminal/TTY can simply be checked with [[ -t 1 ]]:



          function ls() { 
          if [[ -t 1 ]] ; then COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat ; else command ls "$@" ; fi
          }


          I think that should suffice to catch all cases where special/different behaviour from ls is expected, so that your function only adds color when viewed directly in a terminal and otherwise does not alter anything.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 20 at 11:54









          Byte CommanderByte Commander

          70.9k27 gold badges193 silver badges326 bronze badges




          70.9k27 gold badges193 silver badges326 bronze badges
















          • Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

            – cohill Oniell
            May 20 at 12:11











          • That is going beyond the call of duty!

            – TRiG
            May 20 at 18:21



















          • Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

            – cohill Oniell
            May 20 at 12:11











          • That is going beyond the call of duty!

            – TRiG
            May 20 at 18:21

















          Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

          – cohill Oniell
          May 20 at 12:11





          Yes that works. Thank you! I was under the impression ls would automatically parse any string given to it but your right.

          – cohill Oniell
          May 20 at 12:11













          That is going beyond the call of duty!

          – TRiG
          May 20 at 18:21





          That is going beyond the call of duty!

          – TRiG
          May 20 at 18:21













          4














          When its output is piped, ls disables the column listing. Use the -C option to explicitly enable it:



          ls(){ COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat; }


          COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" sets the COLUMNS variable correctly to the current terminal’s width, without that it defaults to 80 – try resizing your terminal window and compare the outputs. command ls serves to ignore aliases and functions and call ls wherever its executable is. Note that I used "$@", to quote the Bash Hackers Wiki:




          ["$@"] reflects all positional parameters as they were set initially
          and passed to the script or function. If you want to re-use your
          positional parameters to call another program (for example in a
          wrapper-script), then this is the choice for you, use double quoted
          "$@".

          Well, let's just say: You almost always want a quoted "$@"!







          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:14






          • 1





            Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:25
















          4














          When its output is piped, ls disables the column listing. Use the -C option to explicitly enable it:



          ls(){ COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat; }


          COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" sets the COLUMNS variable correctly to the current terminal’s width, without that it defaults to 80 – try resizing your terminal window and compare the outputs. command ls serves to ignore aliases and functions and call ls wherever its executable is. Note that I used "$@", to quote the Bash Hackers Wiki:




          ["$@"] reflects all positional parameters as they were set initially
          and passed to the script or function. If you want to re-use your
          positional parameters to call another program (for example in a
          wrapper-script), then this is the choice for you, use double quoted
          "$@".

          Well, let's just say: You almost always want a quoted "$@"!







          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:14






          • 1





            Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:25














          4












          4








          4







          When its output is piped, ls disables the column listing. Use the -C option to explicitly enable it:



          ls(){ COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat; }


          COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" sets the COLUMNS variable correctly to the current terminal’s width, without that it defaults to 80 – try resizing your terminal window and compare the outputs. command ls serves to ignore aliases and functions and call ls wherever its executable is. Note that I used "$@", to quote the Bash Hackers Wiki:




          ["$@"] reflects all positional parameters as they were set initially
          and passed to the script or function. If you want to re-use your
          positional parameters to call another program (for example in a
          wrapper-script), then this is the choice for you, use double quoted
          "$@".

          Well, let's just say: You almost always want a quoted "$@"!







          share|improve this answer















          When its output is piped, ls disables the column listing. Use the -C option to explicitly enable it:



          ls(){ COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" command ls -C "$@" | lolcat; }


          COLUMNS="$COLUMNS" sets the COLUMNS variable correctly to the current terminal’s width, without that it defaults to 80 – try resizing your terminal window and compare the outputs. command ls serves to ignore aliases and functions and call ls wherever its executable is. Note that I used "$@", to quote the Bash Hackers Wiki:




          ["$@"] reflects all positional parameters as they were set initially
          and passed to the script or function. If you want to re-use your
          positional parameters to call another program (for example in a
          wrapper-script), then this is the choice for you, use double quoted
          "$@".

          Well, let's just say: You almost always want a quoted "$@"!








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 20 at 11:26

























          answered May 20 at 11:08









          dessertdessert

          28.2k6 gold badges84 silver badges117 bronze badges




          28.2k6 gold badges84 silver badges117 bronze badges











          • 1





            You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:14






          • 1





            Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:25














          • 1





            You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:14






          • 1





            Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

            – Byte Commander
            May 20 at 11:25








          1




          1





          You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

          – Byte Commander
          May 20 at 11:14





          You might want to export the shell's COLUMNS variable first, so that ls can still determine how wide the output shall be. Without that, it defaults to 80 characters, I think. And instead of hardcoding /bin/ls you can also command ls to force an executable file lookup, ignoring shell functions/aliases.

          – Byte Commander
          May 20 at 11:14




          1




          1





          Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

          – Byte Commander
          May 20 at 11:25





          Hmm, actually... there's even more stuff needed to not break things. ls is really a tough one because it is not meant to be parsed and its output strongly depends on the environment. I'll add my own answer.

          – Byte Commander
          May 20 at 11:25


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1144718%2fpiping-the-output-of-comand-columns%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029