Does addError() work outside of triggers?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







6















I moved a method that sets addError() from a trigger into a Helper class. As I started writing test code for it it seems like the addError() is not actually preventing DML operations for the records that get modified in the helper class.



The information from the SF SObject class page states:
Marks a trigger record with a custom error message and prevents any DML operation from occurring.



Does this mean that addError() will not work outside of a trigger class?



EDIT



Adding some sample code.



public class MyHelperClass() {
public static void someMethod(Opportunity opp) {
opp.My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
insert opp;
}
}


And sample test for it without any asserts:



@IsTest
private class MyHelperClass_Test() {
@IsTest
static void someTest() {
Opportunity opp = new Opportunity();
opp.Name = 'Some Name';
opp.StageName = 'Prospect';
opp.CloseDate = Date.today().addDays(30);

MyHelperClass.someMethod(opp);
}
}


The above inserts the opportunity and does not trigger an exception. Am I doing something wrong?










share|improve this question

























  • addError works in Visualforce controllers, Visualforce extensions, and anywhere within a Trigger context. It might be you simply made a mistake somewhere; it won't block DML operations on records not involved in Trigger.new or Trigger.old (for delete events only). We probably need to see the actual code to help you.

    – sfdcfox
    May 14 at 16:09













  • @sfdcfox I added sample code. Let me know if this makes more sense?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:15


















6















I moved a method that sets addError() from a trigger into a Helper class. As I started writing test code for it it seems like the addError() is not actually preventing DML operations for the records that get modified in the helper class.



The information from the SF SObject class page states:
Marks a trigger record with a custom error message and prevents any DML operation from occurring.



Does this mean that addError() will not work outside of a trigger class?



EDIT



Adding some sample code.



public class MyHelperClass() {
public static void someMethod(Opportunity opp) {
opp.My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
insert opp;
}
}


And sample test for it without any asserts:



@IsTest
private class MyHelperClass_Test() {
@IsTest
static void someTest() {
Opportunity opp = new Opportunity();
opp.Name = 'Some Name';
opp.StageName = 'Prospect';
opp.CloseDate = Date.today().addDays(30);

MyHelperClass.someMethod(opp);
}
}


The above inserts the opportunity and does not trigger an exception. Am I doing something wrong?










share|improve this question

























  • addError works in Visualforce controllers, Visualforce extensions, and anywhere within a Trigger context. It might be you simply made a mistake somewhere; it won't block DML operations on records not involved in Trigger.new or Trigger.old (for delete events only). We probably need to see the actual code to help you.

    – sfdcfox
    May 14 at 16:09













  • @sfdcfox I added sample code. Let me know if this makes more sense?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:15














6












6








6








I moved a method that sets addError() from a trigger into a Helper class. As I started writing test code for it it seems like the addError() is not actually preventing DML operations for the records that get modified in the helper class.



The information from the SF SObject class page states:
Marks a trigger record with a custom error message and prevents any DML operation from occurring.



Does this mean that addError() will not work outside of a trigger class?



EDIT



Adding some sample code.



public class MyHelperClass() {
public static void someMethod(Opportunity opp) {
opp.My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
insert opp;
}
}


And sample test for it without any asserts:



@IsTest
private class MyHelperClass_Test() {
@IsTest
static void someTest() {
Opportunity opp = new Opportunity();
opp.Name = 'Some Name';
opp.StageName = 'Prospect';
opp.CloseDate = Date.today().addDays(30);

MyHelperClass.someMethod(opp);
}
}


The above inserts the opportunity and does not trigger an exception. Am I doing something wrong?










share|improve this question
















I moved a method that sets addError() from a trigger into a Helper class. As I started writing test code for it it seems like the addError() is not actually preventing DML operations for the records that get modified in the helper class.



The information from the SF SObject class page states:
Marks a trigger record with a custom error message and prevents any DML operation from occurring.



Does this mean that addError() will not work outside of a trigger class?



EDIT



Adding some sample code.



public class MyHelperClass() {
public static void someMethod(Opportunity opp) {
opp.My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
insert opp;
}
}


And sample test for it without any asserts:



@IsTest
private class MyHelperClass_Test() {
@IsTest
static void someTest() {
Opportunity opp = new Opportunity();
opp.Name = 'Some Name';
opp.StageName = 'Prospect';
opp.CloseDate = Date.today().addDays(30);

MyHelperClass.someMethod(opp);
}
}


The above inserts the opportunity and does not trigger an exception. Am I doing something wrong?







apex trigger adderror






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 14 at 16:15







Arthlete

















asked May 14 at 15:58









ArthleteArthlete

1,1541221




1,1541221













  • addError works in Visualforce controllers, Visualforce extensions, and anywhere within a Trigger context. It might be you simply made a mistake somewhere; it won't block DML operations on records not involved in Trigger.new or Trigger.old (for delete events only). We probably need to see the actual code to help you.

    – sfdcfox
    May 14 at 16:09













  • @sfdcfox I added sample code. Let me know if this makes more sense?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:15



















  • addError works in Visualforce controllers, Visualforce extensions, and anywhere within a Trigger context. It might be you simply made a mistake somewhere; it won't block DML operations on records not involved in Trigger.new or Trigger.old (for delete events only). We probably need to see the actual code to help you.

    – sfdcfox
    May 14 at 16:09













  • @sfdcfox I added sample code. Let me know if this makes more sense?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:15

















addError works in Visualforce controllers, Visualforce extensions, and anywhere within a Trigger context. It might be you simply made a mistake somewhere; it won't block DML operations on records not involved in Trigger.new or Trigger.old (for delete events only). We probably need to see the actual code to help you.

– sfdcfox
May 14 at 16:09







addError works in Visualforce controllers, Visualforce extensions, and anywhere within a Trigger context. It might be you simply made a mistake somewhere; it won't block DML operations on records not involved in Trigger.new or Trigger.old (for delete events only). We probably need to see the actual code to help you.

– sfdcfox
May 14 at 16:09















@sfdcfox I added sample code. Let me know if this makes more sense?

– Arthlete
May 14 at 16:15





@sfdcfox I added sample code. Let me know if this makes more sense?

– Arthlete
May 14 at 16:15










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















6














It only works on trigger context records, but it can be applied to those records outside of a trigger. You cannot call this method on a record which is not yet in a trigger context, then have the error carry through to the trigger context.



This code won't prevent DML:



Account record = new Account();
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
insert record;


However, this code will:



trigger Account on Account (before insert)
{
PreventDml.validate(trigger.new);
}
public with sharing class PreventDml
{
public void validate(List<SObject> records)
{
for (SObject record : records)
{
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
}
}
}


If you are trying to test this code, the only realistic, effective way to make sure it does what you want is to run the trigger. For example, in this scenario I might have a test like:



@IsTest
class AccountTriggerTests
{
@IsTest static void testPreventDml()
{
DmlException expectedException;
Test.startTest();
try
{
insert new Account();
}
catch (DmlException dmx)
{
expectedException = dmx;
}
Test.stopTest();

system.assertNotEquals(null, expectedException,
'You should not be able to insert any Account');
system.assertEquals(0, [SELECT count() FROM Account],
'The database should be unchanged');
}
}





share|improve this answer


























  • That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:33






  • 1





    @Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

    – Adrian Larson
    May 14 at 16:44













  • Thank you, I will remember this!

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:46



















4














addError won't block future DML operations, only those already in progress. You can use addError in any class, but it won't have any effect on future operations. As an example of what would work:



trigger myFieldBlock on Opportunity {
myFieldBlock.validate(Trigger.new);
}




public class myFieldBlock {
public static void validate(Opportunity records) {
records[0].My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
}
}




You can also use addError to display errors on a Visualforce page:



public class VFController {
public Account record { get; set; }
public VFController() {
record = new Account();
}
public void showError() {
record.Name.addError('Some error');
}
}




<apex:page controller="VFController">
<apex:form>
<apex:inputField value="{!record.Name}" />
<apex:commandButton value="Show Error" action="{!showError}" />
</apex:form>
</apex:page>





share|improve this answer
























  • i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

    – Anshul Agrawal
    May 15 at 13:15














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f262376%2fdoes-adderror-work-outside-of-triggers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









6














It only works on trigger context records, but it can be applied to those records outside of a trigger. You cannot call this method on a record which is not yet in a trigger context, then have the error carry through to the trigger context.



This code won't prevent DML:



Account record = new Account();
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
insert record;


However, this code will:



trigger Account on Account (before insert)
{
PreventDml.validate(trigger.new);
}
public with sharing class PreventDml
{
public void validate(List<SObject> records)
{
for (SObject record : records)
{
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
}
}
}


If you are trying to test this code, the only realistic, effective way to make sure it does what you want is to run the trigger. For example, in this scenario I might have a test like:



@IsTest
class AccountTriggerTests
{
@IsTest static void testPreventDml()
{
DmlException expectedException;
Test.startTest();
try
{
insert new Account();
}
catch (DmlException dmx)
{
expectedException = dmx;
}
Test.stopTest();

system.assertNotEquals(null, expectedException,
'You should not be able to insert any Account');
system.assertEquals(0, [SELECT count() FROM Account],
'The database should be unchanged');
}
}





share|improve this answer


























  • That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:33






  • 1





    @Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

    – Adrian Larson
    May 14 at 16:44













  • Thank you, I will remember this!

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:46
















6














It only works on trigger context records, but it can be applied to those records outside of a trigger. You cannot call this method on a record which is not yet in a trigger context, then have the error carry through to the trigger context.



This code won't prevent DML:



Account record = new Account();
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
insert record;


However, this code will:



trigger Account on Account (before insert)
{
PreventDml.validate(trigger.new);
}
public with sharing class PreventDml
{
public void validate(List<SObject> records)
{
for (SObject record : records)
{
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
}
}
}


If you are trying to test this code, the only realistic, effective way to make sure it does what you want is to run the trigger. For example, in this scenario I might have a test like:



@IsTest
class AccountTriggerTests
{
@IsTest static void testPreventDml()
{
DmlException expectedException;
Test.startTest();
try
{
insert new Account();
}
catch (DmlException dmx)
{
expectedException = dmx;
}
Test.stopTest();

system.assertNotEquals(null, expectedException,
'You should not be able to insert any Account');
system.assertEquals(0, [SELECT count() FROM Account],
'The database should be unchanged');
}
}





share|improve this answer


























  • That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:33






  • 1





    @Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

    – Adrian Larson
    May 14 at 16:44













  • Thank you, I will remember this!

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:46














6












6








6







It only works on trigger context records, but it can be applied to those records outside of a trigger. You cannot call this method on a record which is not yet in a trigger context, then have the error carry through to the trigger context.



This code won't prevent DML:



Account record = new Account();
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
insert record;


However, this code will:



trigger Account on Account (before insert)
{
PreventDml.validate(trigger.new);
}
public with sharing class PreventDml
{
public void validate(List<SObject> records)
{
for (SObject record : records)
{
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
}
}
}


If you are trying to test this code, the only realistic, effective way to make sure it does what you want is to run the trigger. For example, in this scenario I might have a test like:



@IsTest
class AccountTriggerTests
{
@IsTest static void testPreventDml()
{
DmlException expectedException;
Test.startTest();
try
{
insert new Account();
}
catch (DmlException dmx)
{
expectedException = dmx;
}
Test.stopTest();

system.assertNotEquals(null, expectedException,
'You should not be able to insert any Account');
system.assertEquals(0, [SELECT count() FROM Account],
'The database should be unchanged');
}
}





share|improve this answer















It only works on trigger context records, but it can be applied to those records outside of a trigger. You cannot call this method on a record which is not yet in a trigger context, then have the error carry through to the trigger context.



This code won't prevent DML:



Account record = new Account();
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
insert record;


However, this code will:



trigger Account on Account (before insert)
{
PreventDml.validate(trigger.new);
}
public with sharing class PreventDml
{
public void validate(List<SObject> records)
{
for (SObject record : records)
{
record.addError('You cannot insert this record');
}
}
}


If you are trying to test this code, the only realistic, effective way to make sure it does what you want is to run the trigger. For example, in this scenario I might have a test like:



@IsTest
class AccountTriggerTests
{
@IsTest static void testPreventDml()
{
DmlException expectedException;
Test.startTest();
try
{
insert new Account();
}
catch (DmlException dmx)
{
expectedException = dmx;
}
Test.stopTest();

system.assertNotEquals(null, expectedException,
'You should not be able to insert any Account');
system.assertEquals(0, [SELECT count() FROM Account],
'The database should be unchanged');
}
}






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 14 at 16:42

























answered May 14 at 16:23









Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

113k19127267




113k19127267













  • That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:33






  • 1





    @Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

    – Adrian Larson
    May 14 at 16:44













  • Thank you, I will remember this!

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:46



















  • That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:33






  • 1





    @Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

    – Adrian Larson
    May 14 at 16:44













  • Thank you, I will remember this!

    – Arthlete
    May 14 at 16:46

















That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

– Arthlete
May 14 at 16:33





That's very similar to my use case. How would you cover the line of code for record.addError('You cannot insert this record'); if you were to write test code for the PreventDml class alone? Is there a way to assert that the addError was set alone?

– Arthlete
May 14 at 16:33




1




1





@Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

– Adrian Larson
May 14 at 16:44







@Arthlete Unlike other service methods, validation can only be effectively tested by running the trigger. There are hacks like checking ApexPages.hasMessages(), but they may not work in future releases, nor in all contexts even in the current release.

– Adrian Larson
May 14 at 16:44















Thank you, I will remember this!

– Arthlete
May 14 at 16:46





Thank you, I will remember this!

– Arthlete
May 14 at 16:46













4














addError won't block future DML operations, only those already in progress. You can use addError in any class, but it won't have any effect on future operations. As an example of what would work:



trigger myFieldBlock on Opportunity {
myFieldBlock.validate(Trigger.new);
}




public class myFieldBlock {
public static void validate(Opportunity records) {
records[0].My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
}
}




You can also use addError to display errors on a Visualforce page:



public class VFController {
public Account record { get; set; }
public VFController() {
record = new Account();
}
public void showError() {
record.Name.addError('Some error');
}
}




<apex:page controller="VFController">
<apex:form>
<apex:inputField value="{!record.Name}" />
<apex:commandButton value="Show Error" action="{!showError}" />
</apex:form>
</apex:page>





share|improve this answer
























  • i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

    – Anshul Agrawal
    May 15 at 13:15


















4














addError won't block future DML operations, only those already in progress. You can use addError in any class, but it won't have any effect on future operations. As an example of what would work:



trigger myFieldBlock on Opportunity {
myFieldBlock.validate(Trigger.new);
}




public class myFieldBlock {
public static void validate(Opportunity records) {
records[0].My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
}
}




You can also use addError to display errors on a Visualforce page:



public class VFController {
public Account record { get; set; }
public VFController() {
record = new Account();
}
public void showError() {
record.Name.addError('Some error');
}
}




<apex:page controller="VFController">
<apex:form>
<apex:inputField value="{!record.Name}" />
<apex:commandButton value="Show Error" action="{!showError}" />
</apex:form>
</apex:page>





share|improve this answer
























  • i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

    – Anshul Agrawal
    May 15 at 13:15
















4












4








4







addError won't block future DML operations, only those already in progress. You can use addError in any class, but it won't have any effect on future operations. As an example of what would work:



trigger myFieldBlock on Opportunity {
myFieldBlock.validate(Trigger.new);
}




public class myFieldBlock {
public static void validate(Opportunity records) {
records[0].My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
}
}




You can also use addError to display errors on a Visualforce page:



public class VFController {
public Account record { get; set; }
public VFController() {
record = new Account();
}
public void showError() {
record.Name.addError('Some error');
}
}




<apex:page controller="VFController">
<apex:form>
<apex:inputField value="{!record.Name}" />
<apex:commandButton value="Show Error" action="{!showError}" />
</apex:form>
</apex:page>





share|improve this answer













addError won't block future DML operations, only those already in progress. You can use addError in any class, but it won't have any effect on future operations. As an example of what would work:



trigger myFieldBlock on Opportunity {
myFieldBlock.validate(Trigger.new);
}




public class myFieldBlock {
public static void validate(Opportunity records) {
records[0].My_Field__c.addError('Some error');
}
}




You can also use addError to display errors on a Visualforce page:



public class VFController {
public Account record { get; set; }
public VFController() {
record = new Account();
}
public void showError() {
record.Name.addError('Some error');
}
}




<apex:page controller="VFController">
<apex:form>
<apex:inputField value="{!record.Name}" />
<apex:commandButton value="Show Error" action="{!showError}" />
</apex:form>
</apex:page>






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered May 14 at 16:24









sfdcfoxsfdcfox

273k14221472




273k14221472













  • i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

    – Anshul Agrawal
    May 15 at 13:15





















  • i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

    – Anshul Agrawal
    May 15 at 13:15



















i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

– Anshul Agrawal
May 15 at 13:15







i did not get this. We add addError in trigger to prevent DML operations from occurring. Your first snippet should prevent any DML operation on the record as its been called from Trigger Context. However in VF snippet even if there is any DML after we add error, it will execute.

– Anshul Agrawal
May 15 at 13:15




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f262376%2fdoes-adderror-work-outside-of-triggers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029