A car is moving at 40 km/h. A fly at 100 km/h, starts from wall towards the car(20 km away)flies to car and...












4












$begingroup$


A car is moving at a constant speed 40 km/h along a straight road which heads towards a wall.A fly flying at a constant speed of 100 km/h, starts from wall the towards the car at a instant when the car is 20 km away, flies until it reaches the car and comes back to the wall at the same speed.It continues to fly between the car and the wall till the car reach the wall. How many trips has it made between the car and the wall?



I don't expect a brute force because I already did that. Some thing like arithmetic/geometric/harmonic progression will satisfy my curiosity.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In theory infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    yesterday






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This 100 km/h fly is a very impressive aviator given that ordinary houseflies have a max speed of 8 km/h. Even more impressive is its ability to instantaneously go from +100 km/h to -100km/h without feeling a bit groggy for a moment.
    $endgroup$
    – RedGrittyBrick
    yesterday








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Everyone seems to forget Applied Mathematic is not as it should be when the car reaches the point where the gap is less than the size of the flies body it dies of the pressure if not exhaustion.
    $endgroup$
    – KJO
    23 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At least it's not a spherical cow....
    $endgroup$
    – Kathy
    21 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of 'Bee flying between two trains' problem
    $endgroup$
    – Herohtar
    20 hours ago
















4












$begingroup$


A car is moving at a constant speed 40 km/h along a straight road which heads towards a wall.A fly flying at a constant speed of 100 km/h, starts from wall the towards the car at a instant when the car is 20 km away, flies until it reaches the car and comes back to the wall at the same speed.It continues to fly between the car and the wall till the car reach the wall. How many trips has it made between the car and the wall?



I don't expect a brute force because I already did that. Some thing like arithmetic/geometric/harmonic progression will satisfy my curiosity.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In theory infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    yesterday






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This 100 km/h fly is a very impressive aviator given that ordinary houseflies have a max speed of 8 km/h. Even more impressive is its ability to instantaneously go from +100 km/h to -100km/h without feeling a bit groggy for a moment.
    $endgroup$
    – RedGrittyBrick
    yesterday








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Everyone seems to forget Applied Mathematic is not as it should be when the car reaches the point where the gap is less than the size of the flies body it dies of the pressure if not exhaustion.
    $endgroup$
    – KJO
    23 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At least it's not a spherical cow....
    $endgroup$
    – Kathy
    21 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of 'Bee flying between two trains' problem
    $endgroup$
    – Herohtar
    20 hours ago














4












4








4


1



$begingroup$


A car is moving at a constant speed 40 km/h along a straight road which heads towards a wall.A fly flying at a constant speed of 100 km/h, starts from wall the towards the car at a instant when the car is 20 km away, flies until it reaches the car and comes back to the wall at the same speed.It continues to fly between the car and the wall till the car reach the wall. How many trips has it made between the car and the wall?



I don't expect a brute force because I already did that. Some thing like arithmetic/geometric/harmonic progression will satisfy my curiosity.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




A car is moving at a constant speed 40 km/h along a straight road which heads towards a wall.A fly flying at a constant speed of 100 km/h, starts from wall the towards the car at a instant when the car is 20 km away, flies until it reaches the car and comes back to the wall at the same speed.It continues to fly between the car and the wall till the car reach the wall. How many trips has it made between the car and the wall?



I don't expect a brute force because I already did that. Some thing like arithmetic/geometric/harmonic progression will satisfy my curiosity.







algebra-precalculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









user654700user654700

334




334








  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In theory infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    yesterday






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This 100 km/h fly is a very impressive aviator given that ordinary houseflies have a max speed of 8 km/h. Even more impressive is its ability to instantaneously go from +100 km/h to -100km/h without feeling a bit groggy for a moment.
    $endgroup$
    – RedGrittyBrick
    yesterday








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Everyone seems to forget Applied Mathematic is not as it should be when the car reaches the point where the gap is less than the size of the flies body it dies of the pressure if not exhaustion.
    $endgroup$
    – KJO
    23 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At least it's not a spherical cow....
    $endgroup$
    – Kathy
    21 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of 'Bee flying between two trains' problem
    $endgroup$
    – Herohtar
    20 hours ago














  • 6




    $begingroup$
    In theory infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – fleablood
    yesterday






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    This 100 km/h fly is a very impressive aviator given that ordinary houseflies have a max speed of 8 km/h. Even more impressive is its ability to instantaneously go from +100 km/h to -100km/h without feeling a bit groggy for a moment.
    $endgroup$
    – RedGrittyBrick
    yesterday








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Everyone seems to forget Applied Mathematic is not as it should be when the car reaches the point where the gap is less than the size of the flies body it dies of the pressure if not exhaustion.
    $endgroup$
    – KJO
    23 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    At least it's not a spherical cow....
    $endgroup$
    – Kathy
    21 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of 'Bee flying between two trains' problem
    $endgroup$
    – Herohtar
    20 hours ago








6




6




$begingroup$
In theory infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
yesterday




$begingroup$
In theory infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
yesterday




4




4




$begingroup$
This 100 km/h fly is a very impressive aviator given that ordinary houseflies have a max speed of 8 km/h. Even more impressive is its ability to instantaneously go from +100 km/h to -100km/h without feeling a bit groggy for a moment.
$endgroup$
– RedGrittyBrick
yesterday






$begingroup$
This 100 km/h fly is a very impressive aviator given that ordinary houseflies have a max speed of 8 km/h. Even more impressive is its ability to instantaneously go from +100 km/h to -100km/h without feeling a bit groggy for a moment.
$endgroup$
– RedGrittyBrick
yesterday






2




2




$begingroup$
Everyone seems to forget Applied Mathematic is not as it should be when the car reaches the point where the gap is less than the size of the flies body it dies of the pressure if not exhaustion.
$endgroup$
– KJO
23 hours ago




$begingroup$
Everyone seems to forget Applied Mathematic is not as it should be when the car reaches the point where the gap is less than the size of the flies body it dies of the pressure if not exhaustion.
$endgroup$
– KJO
23 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
At least it's not a spherical cow....
$endgroup$
– Kathy
21 hours ago




$begingroup$
At least it's not a spherical cow....
$endgroup$
– Kathy
21 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of 'Bee flying between two trains' problem
$endgroup$
– Herohtar
20 hours ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of 'Bee flying between two trains' problem
$endgroup$
– Herohtar
20 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















12












$begingroup$

Suppose the fly is at the wall. And suppose this will be the last trip or partial trip of the fly. Suppose the car is $h$ miles away.



The fly and and car have a combined speed of $140 frac {km}{hr}$ so the fly reaches the car in $frac h{140}$ hours. In that time the car has traveled $40frac h{140} = frac 27h$ and is now $h-frac 27h = frac 57h$ from the wall. So the fly heads back to the wall.



As the trip back is just as far this takes $frac h{140}$ hours and the car has traveled another $frac 27h$ and is now $frac 37h$ from the wall. [1]



So the fly starts another trip, contradicting that this was his last. So the fly never makes a last trip an instead there are an infinite number of trips.



Figuring out how far the fly flies is a matter of noting the car is on a straight path and travels $20km$ at $40 kmh$ so this takes $30$ minutes. The fly no matter how many times (infinitely many) it zigs will travel at $100kmh$. So in $30$ minutes it flies $50 km$.



If one wishes to set this up as an infinite sum.....



Each trip the fly flies $frac {10}7$ of the distance the car was away. And each trip the car is $frac {3}{7}$ of the distance it was before. So the distance the fly travels is $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac {10}7*(frac {3}{7})^k*20$ which if I did this correctly is



$frac {10}7*20(sum_{k=0}^{infty} (frac {3}{7})^k)= frac {200}{7}frac 1{1-frac {3}{7}} = frac {200}{7}frac {7}{4}= 50$km.



[1](for the record, in this time, $frac 1{70}h$ hours, the car has traveled $frac 47h$ and the fly has travelled $frac {10}7h$).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    15












    $begingroup$

    It has made infinitely many trips. Every trip will be shorter than the last, but the fly will always reach the wall before the car, so it will always have room for one more trip. And one more. And one more.



    The total length the fly flies is 50km, as the car crashes into the wall exactly 30 minutes after the whole experiment started.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
      $endgroup$
      – user654700
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
      $endgroup$
      – Arthur
      yesterday






    • 8




      $begingroup$
      @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
      $endgroup$
      – Ross Millikan
      yesterday












    • $begingroup$
      I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
      $endgroup$
      – inavda
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
      $endgroup$
      – fleablood
      yesterday



















    3












    $begingroup$

    Simple way to calculate it: It takes the car 30 minutes to travel the 20km to the wall at 40km/hr. The fly, traveling at 100km/hr will travel 50km in those same 30 minutes.



    Edit: There will be an infinite number of trips. It's similar to how Zeno's paradox works where the trips get shorter and shorter and eventually take an infinitely small amount of time. But all those infinitely small trips end up as a finite amount of distance.






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$





















      1












      $begingroup$

      Arthur's answer is very good, but here is another (equally valid) way of visualizing the problem:



      Let us graph the positions of the wall, fly, and car over time. The wall doesn't move, so it is represented by a horizontal line. The car starts at some distance away from the wall but moves towards it at a constant speed until it hits the wall -- so we have a line that intersects the wall's line. Now for the interesting part:



      The fly's path starts off as a line with greater slope than the car's line, until it hits the wall's line. The fly's speed remains the same, but it is going in the opposite direction. So now the path continues as if the wall's line was a mirror and it was reflected. When the fly hits the car, the same thing happens -- the fly's path is reflected and it continues towards the wall again (one caveat: when it bounces off the car's line, the angles of incidence and reflection are not equal so it isn't behaving exactly as light would).



      So we can see that the fly's path continues bouncing up and down, always at the same or opposite slope.



      The final thing to notice to grasp the intuition is that this diagram we have constructed is self-similar. If we zoom in so that the second bounce with the wall is where the first bounce used to be, we have the same exact diagram as before. I won't prove this, but if you draw it out, you can see it intuitively. Essentially, this means that no matter how close the car gets to the wall, we can zoom in and see more bounces for the fly.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161870%2fa-car-is-moving-at-40-km-h-a-fly-at-100-km-h-starts-from-wall-towards-the-car%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        12












        $begingroup$

        Suppose the fly is at the wall. And suppose this will be the last trip or partial trip of the fly. Suppose the car is $h$ miles away.



        The fly and and car have a combined speed of $140 frac {km}{hr}$ so the fly reaches the car in $frac h{140}$ hours. In that time the car has traveled $40frac h{140} = frac 27h$ and is now $h-frac 27h = frac 57h$ from the wall. So the fly heads back to the wall.



        As the trip back is just as far this takes $frac h{140}$ hours and the car has traveled another $frac 27h$ and is now $frac 37h$ from the wall. [1]



        So the fly starts another trip, contradicting that this was his last. So the fly never makes a last trip an instead there are an infinite number of trips.



        Figuring out how far the fly flies is a matter of noting the car is on a straight path and travels $20km$ at $40 kmh$ so this takes $30$ minutes. The fly no matter how many times (infinitely many) it zigs will travel at $100kmh$. So in $30$ minutes it flies $50 km$.



        If one wishes to set this up as an infinite sum.....



        Each trip the fly flies $frac {10}7$ of the distance the car was away. And each trip the car is $frac {3}{7}$ of the distance it was before. So the distance the fly travels is $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac {10}7*(frac {3}{7})^k*20$ which if I did this correctly is



        $frac {10}7*20(sum_{k=0}^{infty} (frac {3}{7})^k)= frac {200}{7}frac 1{1-frac {3}{7}} = frac {200}{7}frac {7}{4}= 50$km.



        [1](for the record, in this time, $frac 1{70}h$ hours, the car has traveled $frac 47h$ and the fly has travelled $frac {10}7h$).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$


















          12












          $begingroup$

          Suppose the fly is at the wall. And suppose this will be the last trip or partial trip of the fly. Suppose the car is $h$ miles away.



          The fly and and car have a combined speed of $140 frac {km}{hr}$ so the fly reaches the car in $frac h{140}$ hours. In that time the car has traveled $40frac h{140} = frac 27h$ and is now $h-frac 27h = frac 57h$ from the wall. So the fly heads back to the wall.



          As the trip back is just as far this takes $frac h{140}$ hours and the car has traveled another $frac 27h$ and is now $frac 37h$ from the wall. [1]



          So the fly starts another trip, contradicting that this was his last. So the fly never makes a last trip an instead there are an infinite number of trips.



          Figuring out how far the fly flies is a matter of noting the car is on a straight path and travels $20km$ at $40 kmh$ so this takes $30$ minutes. The fly no matter how many times (infinitely many) it zigs will travel at $100kmh$. So in $30$ minutes it flies $50 km$.



          If one wishes to set this up as an infinite sum.....



          Each trip the fly flies $frac {10}7$ of the distance the car was away. And each trip the car is $frac {3}{7}$ of the distance it was before. So the distance the fly travels is $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac {10}7*(frac {3}{7})^k*20$ which if I did this correctly is



          $frac {10}7*20(sum_{k=0}^{infty} (frac {3}{7})^k)= frac {200}{7}frac 1{1-frac {3}{7}} = frac {200}{7}frac {7}{4}= 50$km.



          [1](for the record, in this time, $frac 1{70}h$ hours, the car has traveled $frac 47h$ and the fly has travelled $frac {10}7h$).






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$
















            12












            12








            12





            $begingroup$

            Suppose the fly is at the wall. And suppose this will be the last trip or partial trip of the fly. Suppose the car is $h$ miles away.



            The fly and and car have a combined speed of $140 frac {km}{hr}$ so the fly reaches the car in $frac h{140}$ hours. In that time the car has traveled $40frac h{140} = frac 27h$ and is now $h-frac 27h = frac 57h$ from the wall. So the fly heads back to the wall.



            As the trip back is just as far this takes $frac h{140}$ hours and the car has traveled another $frac 27h$ and is now $frac 37h$ from the wall. [1]



            So the fly starts another trip, contradicting that this was his last. So the fly never makes a last trip an instead there are an infinite number of trips.



            Figuring out how far the fly flies is a matter of noting the car is on a straight path and travels $20km$ at $40 kmh$ so this takes $30$ minutes. The fly no matter how many times (infinitely many) it zigs will travel at $100kmh$. So in $30$ minutes it flies $50 km$.



            If one wishes to set this up as an infinite sum.....



            Each trip the fly flies $frac {10}7$ of the distance the car was away. And each trip the car is $frac {3}{7}$ of the distance it was before. So the distance the fly travels is $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac {10}7*(frac {3}{7})^k*20$ which if I did this correctly is



            $frac {10}7*20(sum_{k=0}^{infty} (frac {3}{7})^k)= frac {200}{7}frac 1{1-frac {3}{7}} = frac {200}{7}frac {7}{4}= 50$km.



            [1](for the record, in this time, $frac 1{70}h$ hours, the car has traveled $frac 47h$ and the fly has travelled $frac {10}7h$).






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Suppose the fly is at the wall. And suppose this will be the last trip or partial trip of the fly. Suppose the car is $h$ miles away.



            The fly and and car have a combined speed of $140 frac {km}{hr}$ so the fly reaches the car in $frac h{140}$ hours. In that time the car has traveled $40frac h{140} = frac 27h$ and is now $h-frac 27h = frac 57h$ from the wall. So the fly heads back to the wall.



            As the trip back is just as far this takes $frac h{140}$ hours and the car has traveled another $frac 27h$ and is now $frac 37h$ from the wall. [1]



            So the fly starts another trip, contradicting that this was his last. So the fly never makes a last trip an instead there are an infinite number of trips.



            Figuring out how far the fly flies is a matter of noting the car is on a straight path and travels $20km$ at $40 kmh$ so this takes $30$ minutes. The fly no matter how many times (infinitely many) it zigs will travel at $100kmh$. So in $30$ minutes it flies $50 km$.



            If one wishes to set this up as an infinite sum.....



            Each trip the fly flies $frac {10}7$ of the distance the car was away. And each trip the car is $frac {3}{7}$ of the distance it was before. So the distance the fly travels is $sum_{k=0}^{infty} frac {10}7*(frac {3}{7})^k*20$ which if I did this correctly is



            $frac {10}7*20(sum_{k=0}^{infty} (frac {3}{7})^k)= frac {200}{7}frac 1{1-frac {3}{7}} = frac {200}{7}frac {7}{4}= 50$km.



            [1](for the record, in this time, $frac 1{70}h$ hours, the car has traveled $frac 47h$ and the fly has travelled $frac {10}7h$).







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            fleabloodfleablood

            73.4k22791




            73.4k22791























                15












                $begingroup$

                It has made infinitely many trips. Every trip will be shorter than the last, but the fly will always reach the wall before the car, so it will always have room for one more trip. And one more. And one more.



                The total length the fly flies is 50km, as the car crashes into the wall exactly 30 minutes after the whole experiment started.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user654700
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Arthur
                  yesterday






                • 8




                  $begingroup$
                  @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ross Millikan
                  yesterday












                • $begingroup$
                  I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
                  $endgroup$
                  – inavda
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
                  $endgroup$
                  – fleablood
                  yesterday
















                15












                $begingroup$

                It has made infinitely many trips. Every trip will be shorter than the last, but the fly will always reach the wall before the car, so it will always have room for one more trip. And one more. And one more.



                The total length the fly flies is 50km, as the car crashes into the wall exactly 30 minutes after the whole experiment started.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$













                • $begingroup$
                  I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user654700
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Arthur
                  yesterday






                • 8




                  $begingroup$
                  @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ross Millikan
                  yesterday












                • $begingroup$
                  I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
                  $endgroup$
                  – inavda
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
                  $endgroup$
                  – fleablood
                  yesterday














                15












                15








                15





                $begingroup$

                It has made infinitely many trips. Every trip will be shorter than the last, but the fly will always reach the wall before the car, so it will always have room for one more trip. And one more. And one more.



                The total length the fly flies is 50km, as the car crashes into the wall exactly 30 minutes after the whole experiment started.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                It has made infinitely many trips. Every trip will be shorter than the last, but the fly will always reach the wall before the car, so it will always have room for one more trip. And one more. And one more.



                The total length the fly flies is 50km, as the car crashes into the wall exactly 30 minutes after the whole experiment started.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                ArthurArthur

                120k7120203




                120k7120203












                • $begingroup$
                  I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user654700
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Arthur
                  yesterday






                • 8




                  $begingroup$
                  @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ross Millikan
                  yesterday












                • $begingroup$
                  I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
                  $endgroup$
                  – inavda
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
                  $endgroup$
                  – fleablood
                  yesterday


















                • $begingroup$
                  I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
                  $endgroup$
                  – user654700
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
                  $endgroup$
                  – Arthur
                  yesterday






                • 8




                  $begingroup$
                  @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Ross Millikan
                  yesterday












                • $begingroup$
                  I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
                  $endgroup$
                  – inavda
                  yesterday










                • $begingroup$
                  Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
                  $endgroup$
                  – fleablood
                  yesterday
















                $begingroup$
                I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
                $endgroup$
                – user654700
                yesterday




                $begingroup$
                I got that but can you please give me more rigorous proof? If you don't mind.
                $endgroup$
                – user654700
                yesterday












                $begingroup$
                @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
                $endgroup$
                – Arthur
                yesterday




                $begingroup$
                @user654700 What exactly do you find not rigorous enough?
                $endgroup$
                – Arthur
                yesterday




                8




                8




                $begingroup$
                @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
                $endgroup$
                – Ross Millikan
                yesterday






                $begingroup$
                @user654700: This is rigorous. One can also write an equation for the length of each trip the fly makes and sum the series, but under the assumptions that is not needed. Don't confuse rigor with fancy mathematical symbols. There is a famous anecdote about John von Neumann and this puzzle.
                $endgroup$
                – Ross Millikan
                yesterday














                $begingroup$
                I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
                $endgroup$
                – inavda
                yesterday




                $begingroup$
                I suppose there are some minor details that could be added to give it some more rigor (or at least make the rigor more obvious): when the fly is at the position of the car, it has to travel the same distance to get to the wall, but its speed is greater, so it will always reach first. Once the fly is at the wall, we know that the car is not yet at the wall, due to the above reasoning. Since the fly has nonzero speed and the car does not have "infinite" speed, the fly and the car will next meet at some point between their current positions (not at the wall). Repeat.
                $endgroup$
                – inavda
                yesterday












                $begingroup$
                Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
                $endgroup$
                – fleablood
                yesterday




                $begingroup$
                Well, one can figure that if the fly is at the wall and the car is a non-zero distance away that the fly flies to the car and that takes some non-zero time (they have a combined speed which is finite so to cover a distance takes non-zero time). The fly will then fly to the wall. As the fly is faster it reaches the wall first. The car is now a non-zero distance away. Thus is the same situation as before so by induction there will be an infinite number of trips . That is formal and rigorous.
                $endgroup$
                – fleablood
                yesterday











                3












                $begingroup$

                Simple way to calculate it: It takes the car 30 minutes to travel the 20km to the wall at 40km/hr. The fly, traveling at 100km/hr will travel 50km in those same 30 minutes.



                Edit: There will be an infinite number of trips. It's similar to how Zeno's paradox works where the trips get shorter and shorter and eventually take an infinitely small amount of time. But all those infinitely small trips end up as a finite amount of distance.






                share|cite|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






                $endgroup$


















                  3












                  $begingroup$

                  Simple way to calculate it: It takes the car 30 minutes to travel the 20km to the wall at 40km/hr. The fly, traveling at 100km/hr will travel 50km in those same 30 minutes.



                  Edit: There will be an infinite number of trips. It's similar to how Zeno's paradox works where the trips get shorter and shorter and eventually take an infinitely small amount of time. But all those infinitely small trips end up as a finite amount of distance.






                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  $endgroup$
















                    3












                    3








                    3





                    $begingroup$

                    Simple way to calculate it: It takes the car 30 minutes to travel the 20km to the wall at 40km/hr. The fly, traveling at 100km/hr will travel 50km in those same 30 minutes.



                    Edit: There will be an infinite number of trips. It's similar to how Zeno's paradox works where the trips get shorter and shorter and eventually take an infinitely small amount of time. But all those infinitely small trips end up as a finite amount of distance.






                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    $endgroup$



                    Simple way to calculate it: It takes the car 30 minutes to travel the 20km to the wall at 40km/hr. The fly, traveling at 100km/hr will travel 50km in those same 30 minutes.



                    Edit: There will be an infinite number of trips. It's similar to how Zeno's paradox works where the trips get shorter and shorter and eventually take an infinitely small amount of time. But all those infinitely small trips end up as a finite amount of distance.







                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    New contributor




                    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 21 hours ago





















                    New contributor




                    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.









                    answered 22 hours ago









                    Guest3711Guest3711

                    312




                    312




                    New contributor




                    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.





                    New contributor





                    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.






                    Guest3711 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                    Check out our Code of Conduct.























                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Arthur's answer is very good, but here is another (equally valid) way of visualizing the problem:



                        Let us graph the positions of the wall, fly, and car over time. The wall doesn't move, so it is represented by a horizontal line. The car starts at some distance away from the wall but moves towards it at a constant speed until it hits the wall -- so we have a line that intersects the wall's line. Now for the interesting part:



                        The fly's path starts off as a line with greater slope than the car's line, until it hits the wall's line. The fly's speed remains the same, but it is going in the opposite direction. So now the path continues as if the wall's line was a mirror and it was reflected. When the fly hits the car, the same thing happens -- the fly's path is reflected and it continues towards the wall again (one caveat: when it bounces off the car's line, the angles of incidence and reflection are not equal so it isn't behaving exactly as light would).



                        So we can see that the fly's path continues bouncing up and down, always at the same or opposite slope.



                        The final thing to notice to grasp the intuition is that this diagram we have constructed is self-similar. If we zoom in so that the second bounce with the wall is where the first bounce used to be, we have the same exact diagram as before. I won't prove this, but if you draw it out, you can see it intuitively. Essentially, this means that no matter how close the car gets to the wall, we can zoom in and see more bounces for the fly.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$


















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Arthur's answer is very good, but here is another (equally valid) way of visualizing the problem:



                          Let us graph the positions of the wall, fly, and car over time. The wall doesn't move, so it is represented by a horizontal line. The car starts at some distance away from the wall but moves towards it at a constant speed until it hits the wall -- so we have a line that intersects the wall's line. Now for the interesting part:



                          The fly's path starts off as a line with greater slope than the car's line, until it hits the wall's line. The fly's speed remains the same, but it is going in the opposite direction. So now the path continues as if the wall's line was a mirror and it was reflected. When the fly hits the car, the same thing happens -- the fly's path is reflected and it continues towards the wall again (one caveat: when it bounces off the car's line, the angles of incidence and reflection are not equal so it isn't behaving exactly as light would).



                          So we can see that the fly's path continues bouncing up and down, always at the same or opposite slope.



                          The final thing to notice to grasp the intuition is that this diagram we have constructed is self-similar. If we zoom in so that the second bounce with the wall is where the first bounce used to be, we have the same exact diagram as before. I won't prove this, but if you draw it out, you can see it intuitively. Essentially, this means that no matter how close the car gets to the wall, we can zoom in and see more bounces for the fly.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$
















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Arthur's answer is very good, but here is another (equally valid) way of visualizing the problem:



                            Let us graph the positions of the wall, fly, and car over time. The wall doesn't move, so it is represented by a horizontal line. The car starts at some distance away from the wall but moves towards it at a constant speed until it hits the wall -- so we have a line that intersects the wall's line. Now for the interesting part:



                            The fly's path starts off as a line with greater slope than the car's line, until it hits the wall's line. The fly's speed remains the same, but it is going in the opposite direction. So now the path continues as if the wall's line was a mirror and it was reflected. When the fly hits the car, the same thing happens -- the fly's path is reflected and it continues towards the wall again (one caveat: when it bounces off the car's line, the angles of incidence and reflection are not equal so it isn't behaving exactly as light would).



                            So we can see that the fly's path continues bouncing up and down, always at the same or opposite slope.



                            The final thing to notice to grasp the intuition is that this diagram we have constructed is self-similar. If we zoom in so that the second bounce with the wall is where the first bounce used to be, we have the same exact diagram as before. I won't prove this, but if you draw it out, you can see it intuitively. Essentially, this means that no matter how close the car gets to the wall, we can zoom in and see more bounces for the fly.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Arthur's answer is very good, but here is another (equally valid) way of visualizing the problem:



                            Let us graph the positions of the wall, fly, and car over time. The wall doesn't move, so it is represented by a horizontal line. The car starts at some distance away from the wall but moves towards it at a constant speed until it hits the wall -- so we have a line that intersects the wall's line. Now for the interesting part:



                            The fly's path starts off as a line with greater slope than the car's line, until it hits the wall's line. The fly's speed remains the same, but it is going in the opposite direction. So now the path continues as if the wall's line was a mirror and it was reflected. When the fly hits the car, the same thing happens -- the fly's path is reflected and it continues towards the wall again (one caveat: when it bounces off the car's line, the angles of incidence and reflection are not equal so it isn't behaving exactly as light would).



                            So we can see that the fly's path continues bouncing up and down, always at the same or opposite slope.



                            The final thing to notice to grasp the intuition is that this diagram we have constructed is self-similar. If we zoom in so that the second bounce with the wall is where the first bounce used to be, we have the same exact diagram as before. I won't prove this, but if you draw it out, you can see it intuitively. Essentially, this means that no matter how close the car gets to the wall, we can zoom in and see more bounces for the fly.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            inavdainavda

                            1198




                            1198






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161870%2fa-car-is-moving-at-40-km-h-a-fly-at-100-km-h-starts-from-wall-towards-the-car%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029