Is there a difference in meaning between “I'll be there for 7pm” and “I'll be there at 7pm”?












2















I feel like "for 7pm" is possibly colloquial and perhaps not quite Standard English, but I have heard it a lot. I can't think if there's any difference in meaning between "I'll be there for 7" and "I'll be there at 7". Is there?



Also, where did this form come from? Is it dialectal or colloquial?



I couldn't find a related question on SE or Google, this question is about the difference between "at" and "by".










share|improve this question























  • It is formal British English.

    – Hugh
    23 hours ago











  • That's interesting - I'm British and never registered it had a formal meaning!

    – Lou
    23 hours ago











  • This is a duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/489274/17956 which was migrated to ELL

    – Jim
    17 hours ago


















2















I feel like "for 7pm" is possibly colloquial and perhaps not quite Standard English, but I have heard it a lot. I can't think if there's any difference in meaning between "I'll be there for 7" and "I'll be there at 7". Is there?



Also, where did this form come from? Is it dialectal or colloquial?



I couldn't find a related question on SE or Google, this question is about the difference between "at" and "by".










share|improve this question























  • It is formal British English.

    – Hugh
    23 hours ago











  • That's interesting - I'm British and never registered it had a formal meaning!

    – Lou
    23 hours ago











  • This is a duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/489274/17956 which was migrated to ELL

    – Jim
    17 hours ago
















2












2








2








I feel like "for 7pm" is possibly colloquial and perhaps not quite Standard English, but I have heard it a lot. I can't think if there's any difference in meaning between "I'll be there for 7" and "I'll be there at 7". Is there?



Also, where did this form come from? Is it dialectal or colloquial?



I couldn't find a related question on SE or Google, this question is about the difference between "at" and "by".










share|improve this question














I feel like "for 7pm" is possibly colloquial and perhaps not quite Standard English, but I have heard it a lot. I can't think if there's any difference in meaning between "I'll be there for 7" and "I'll be there at 7". Is there?



Also, where did this form come from? Is it dialectal or colloquial?



I couldn't find a related question on SE or Google, this question is about the difference between "at" and "by".







differences prepositions time






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









LouLou

97121237




97121237













  • It is formal British English.

    – Hugh
    23 hours ago











  • That's interesting - I'm British and never registered it had a formal meaning!

    – Lou
    23 hours ago











  • This is a duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/489274/17956 which was migrated to ELL

    – Jim
    17 hours ago





















  • It is formal British English.

    – Hugh
    23 hours ago











  • That's interesting - I'm British and never registered it had a formal meaning!

    – Lou
    23 hours ago











  • This is a duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/489274/17956 which was migrated to ELL

    – Jim
    17 hours ago



















It is formal British English.

– Hugh
23 hours ago





It is formal British English.

– Hugh
23 hours ago













That's interesting - I'm British and never registered it had a formal meaning!

– Lou
23 hours ago





That's interesting - I'm British and never registered it had a formal meaning!

– Lou
23 hours ago













This is a duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/489274/17956 which was migrated to ELL

– Jim
17 hours ago







This is a duplicate of english.stackexchange.com/q/489274/17956 which was migrated to ELL

– Jim
17 hours ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














'For' means "in good time for". In Britain, formal invitations for dinner used to say "7 for 7.30", meaning that you can arrive from 7 PM onwards, but should definitely arrive before 7.30.






share|improve this answer
























  • Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

    – Hugh
    23 hours ago











  • That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

    – Lou
    23 hours ago











  • @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

    – BoldBen
    21 hours ago











  • If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

    – Michael Harvey
    21 hours ago











  • I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

    – Kate Bunting
    9 hours ago



















0














I think its really more that for is used to describe an event in most cases, such as I'll be there for Christmas, while at is used for a time.



I guess you could use for, for a time, but it sounds odd.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




























    0














    Possibly, you can use 'for 7' if 7pm is the time of a thing (dinner, event). By using 'for 7' you would indicate that you will be there when the thing starts/happens. Although, possibly, you will be (slightly, or a lot) earlier, because you are making sure, are agreeing, that you will be there at 7pm.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491299%2fis-there-a-difference-in-meaning-between-ill-be-there-for-7pm-and-ill-be-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      'For' means "in good time for". In Britain, formal invitations for dinner used to say "7 for 7.30", meaning that you can arrive from 7 PM onwards, but should definitely arrive before 7.30.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

        – Hugh
        23 hours ago











      • That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

        – Lou
        23 hours ago











      • @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

        – BoldBen
        21 hours ago











      • If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

        – Michael Harvey
        21 hours ago











      • I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

        – Kate Bunting
        9 hours ago
















      2














      'For' means "in good time for". In Britain, formal invitations for dinner used to say "7 for 7.30", meaning that you can arrive from 7 PM onwards, but should definitely arrive before 7.30.






      share|improve this answer
























      • Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

        – Hugh
        23 hours ago











      • That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

        – Lou
        23 hours ago











      • @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

        – BoldBen
        21 hours ago











      • If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

        – Michael Harvey
        21 hours ago











      • I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

        – Kate Bunting
        9 hours ago














      2












      2








      2







      'For' means "in good time for". In Britain, formal invitations for dinner used to say "7 for 7.30", meaning that you can arrive from 7 PM onwards, but should definitely arrive before 7.30.






      share|improve this answer













      'For' means "in good time for". In Britain, formal invitations for dinner used to say "7 for 7.30", meaning that you can arrive from 7 PM onwards, but should definitely arrive before 7.30.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered 23 hours ago









      Michael HarveyMichael Harvey

      6,49911120




      6,49911120













      • Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

        – Hugh
        23 hours ago











      • That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

        – Lou
        23 hours ago











      • @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

        – BoldBen
        21 hours ago











      • If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

        – Michael Harvey
        21 hours ago











      • I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

        – Kate Bunting
        9 hours ago



















      • Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

        – Hugh
        23 hours ago











      • That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

        – Lou
        23 hours ago











      • @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

        – BoldBen
        21 hours ago











      • If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

        – Michael Harvey
        21 hours ago











      • I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

        – Kate Bunting
        9 hours ago

















      Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

      – Hugh
      23 hours ago





      Compare ell.stackexchange.com/questions/114695/…,

      – Hugh
      23 hours ago













      That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

      – Lou
      23 hours ago





      That's really interesting, I'm British and I'd never heard of this before!

      – Lou
      23 hours ago













      @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

      – BoldBen
      21 hours ago





      @Lou Which part haven't you encountered, "I'll be there for 7:00" or "Be there at 7:00 for 7:30"? I see the latter quite often in the context of performance bookings, it means "Be there for set up and sound checks at 7:00 or just after, the performance starts at 7:30"

      – BoldBen
      21 hours ago













      If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

      – Michael Harvey
      21 hours ago





      If a formal British upper-class dinner invitation says "7 for 7.30", that half-hour period is for "cocktails".

      – Michael Harvey
      21 hours ago













      I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

      – Kate Bunting
      9 hours ago





      I've seen it used for all kinds of social events, not just formal ones. The earlier time is when guests can start to arrive, find a drink and/or a seat, and the later time is when the activity itself is scheduled to start.

      – Kate Bunting
      9 hours ago













      0














      I think its really more that for is used to describe an event in most cases, such as I'll be there for Christmas, while at is used for a time.



      I guess you could use for, for a time, but it sounds odd.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.

























        0














        I think its really more that for is used to describe an event in most cases, such as I'll be there for Christmas, while at is used for a time.



        I guess you could use for, for a time, but it sounds odd.






        share|improve this answer








        New contributor




        user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.























          0












          0








          0







          I think its really more that for is used to describe an event in most cases, such as I'll be there for Christmas, while at is used for a time.



          I guess you could use for, for a time, but it sounds odd.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          I think its really more that for is used to describe an event in most cases, such as I'll be there for Christmas, while at is used for a time.



          I guess you could use for, for a time, but it sounds odd.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered yesterday









          user197001user197001

          111




          111




          New contributor




          user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          user197001 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.























              0














              Possibly, you can use 'for 7' if 7pm is the time of a thing (dinner, event). By using 'for 7' you would indicate that you will be there when the thing starts/happens. Although, possibly, you will be (slightly, or a lot) earlier, because you are making sure, are agreeing, that you will be there at 7pm.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                Possibly, you can use 'for 7' if 7pm is the time of a thing (dinner, event). By using 'for 7' you would indicate that you will be there when the thing starts/happens. Although, possibly, you will be (slightly, or a lot) earlier, because you are making sure, are agreeing, that you will be there at 7pm.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  Possibly, you can use 'for 7' if 7pm is the time of a thing (dinner, event). By using 'for 7' you would indicate that you will be there when the thing starts/happens. Although, possibly, you will be (slightly, or a lot) earlier, because you are making sure, are agreeing, that you will be there at 7pm.






                  share|improve this answer













                  Possibly, you can use 'for 7' if 7pm is the time of a thing (dinner, event). By using 'for 7' you would indicate that you will be there when the thing starts/happens. Although, possibly, you will be (slightly, or a lot) earlier, because you are making sure, are agreeing, that you will be there at 7pm.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Keep these mindKeep these mind

                  1,74311825




                  1,74311825






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491299%2fis-there-a-difference-in-meaning-between-ill-be-there-for-7pm-and-ill-be-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029