Can a monster with multiattack use this ability if they are missing a limb?












13












$begingroup$


For example, could a Giant Ape with one arm still use Multiattack even though it is listed as "two fist attacks"?










share|improve this question









New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you the DM or a player? Why does the Giant Ape only have one arm? Are you using the variant rule in the DMG for certain attacks?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    13 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Are there rules for handling broken limbs or injuries?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    12 hours ago
















13












$begingroup$


For example, could a Giant Ape with one arm still use Multiattack even though it is listed as "two fist attacks"?










share|improve this question









New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you the DM or a player? Why does the Giant Ape only have one arm? Are you using the variant rule in the DMG for certain attacks?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    13 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Are there rules for handling broken limbs or injuries?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    12 hours ago














13












13








13





$begingroup$


For example, could a Giant Ape with one arm still use Multiattack even though it is listed as "two fist attacks"?










share|improve this question









New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




For example, could a Giant Ape with one arm still use Multiattack even though it is listed as "two fist attacks"?







dnd-5e monsters multiattack






share|improve this question









New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 14 hours ago









Rubiksmoose

59.6k10287440




59.6k10287440






New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 14 hours ago









trollburgerstrollburgers

662




662




New contributor




trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






trollburgers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you the DM or a player? Why does the Giant Ape only have one arm? Are you using the variant rule in the DMG for certain attacks?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    13 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Are there rules for handling broken limbs or injuries?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    12 hours ago














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Are you the DM or a player? Why does the Giant Ape only have one arm? Are you using the variant rule in the DMG for certain attacks?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    13 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    13 hours ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Related: Are there rules for handling broken limbs or injuries?
    $endgroup$
    – Ruse
    12 hours ago








1




1




$begingroup$
Are you the DM or a player? Why does the Giant Ape only have one arm? Are you using the variant rule in the DMG for certain attacks?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Are you the DM or a player? Why does the Giant Ape only have one arm? Are you using the variant rule in the DMG for certain attacks?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
13 hours ago












$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
13 hours ago




$begingroup$
Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
13 hours ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Related: Are there rules for handling broken limbs or injuries?
$endgroup$
– Ruse
12 hours ago




$begingroup$
Related: Are there rules for handling broken limbs or injuries?
$endgroup$
– Ruse
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

Theoretically, yes, a creature could still Multiattack while missing a limb



Take, for example, a level 5 Fighter that uses Sword&Board, i.e. they fight with a Longsword (or some other one-handed weapon) and a Shield. In a given turn, they're permitted to make two attacks with their Action, one normally, and one permitted by their Extra Attack feature. This happens despite the fact that they're still only attacking with one weapon, held in one hand. If this same fighter were to lose an arm, they'd choose whether to stop wielding a weapon or stop wielding their shield; but they'd still be permitted to make two attacks each turn.



Same with the ape: the abstractions of the game mean that losing an arm doesn't necessarily mean they lose one of their attacks, because the rules don't expressly say that they do.



A Counterexample



In contrast, consider the Hydra, whose Multiattack feature expressly describes it as "having as many attacks as it has heads":




Multiple Heads. The hydra has five heads. While it has more than one head, the hydra has advantage on saving throws against being blinded, charmed, deafened, frightened, stunned, and knocked unconscious.



[...]



Multiattack. The hydra makes as many bite attacks as it has heads.



Hydra, Monster Manual, pg. 190




So because some creatures explicitly stipulate how many attacks they have as proportional to the number of "limbs" (heads) they have, whereas a Giant Ape does not, it's possible to interpret these statblocks as implying that the loss of a single limb does not penalize their normal mechanism of attack.



However...



The DM is empowered to make on-the-fly rulings on this matter



I certainly believe it is reasonable to impose some kind of handicap on a creature that is missing a limb. For a Giant Ape, if it lost one of its arms without straight-up dying in the process, then I might, as DM, remove one of its attacks each round or impose disadvantage on their attacks. But this would be a personal decision, and a DM is not required to support this ruling.



This would be a lot more clear-cut if we were taking about, say, a Humanoid wielding a greataxe: they definitely would not be able to fight using their normal statblock if they were missing an arm; if I were to even allow them to keep using the Greataxe in the first place. But I would also probably allow that creature to keep making multiple attacks if they instead switched to a one-handed weapon.



So this is ultimately a situation that comes down to your DM. The DM is empowered to make debilitating conditions (like losing an arm) come with mechanical penalties; but it's not strictly required for a DM to adjudicate that losing an arm means losing one of the attacks in a Multiattack, unless the statblock for the creature expressly says it would.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    7












    $begingroup$

    Depends on the specific limb and multiattack



    There is an optional rule called "Injuries" (DMG p272), and two of the listed injuries are relevant:




    Lose an Arm or a Hand. You can no longer hold anything with two hands, and you can hold only a single object at a time. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.







    Lose a Foot or Leg. Your speed on foot is halved, and you must use a cane or crutch to move unless you have a peg leg or other prosthesis. You fall prone after using the Dash action. You have disadvantage on Dexterity checks made to balance. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.




    Neighter of those injuries limits the number of attacks the injured character can make. However, those optional injuries are clearly meant for humanoids and there is no general rule for what other creatures missing a limb can or cannot do. Even the Sword of Sharpness doesn't attempt to list the effects of losing a limb:




    Then roll another d20. If you roll a 20, you lop off one of the target's limbs, with the effect of such loss determined by the DM.




    That said, there are some cases where the anatomy of creature comes into play. For example:



    A Giant Crocodile cannot multiattack if it is missing its only tail




    Multiattack. The crocodile makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail.




    Because the crocodile can't possibly attack with something it does not have.



    A Giant Subterranean Lizard can multiattack if it is missing its only tail



    So long as it chooses to replace its tail attack with a Swallow:




    Multiattack. The lizard makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail. One attack can be replaced by Swallow.




    A Giant Ape can Multiattack if it is missing an arm



    So long as it chooses to make both attacks with the same fist:




    Multiattack. The ape makes two fist attacks.




    Because "two fist attacks" does not necessarily mean "two attacks with distinct fists".



    Moreover, while there are no general rules for missing limbs, there some rules that require hands, like the rules for Grappling: a two-armed Giant Ape can doubtlessly hold a grappled foe with one hand and multiattack with the other fist, but a one-armed Giant Ape can't do the same.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      trollburgers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143996%2fcan-a-monster-with-multiattack-use-this-ability-if-they-are-missing-a-limb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      13












      $begingroup$

      Theoretically, yes, a creature could still Multiattack while missing a limb



      Take, for example, a level 5 Fighter that uses Sword&Board, i.e. they fight with a Longsword (or some other one-handed weapon) and a Shield. In a given turn, they're permitted to make two attacks with their Action, one normally, and one permitted by their Extra Attack feature. This happens despite the fact that they're still only attacking with one weapon, held in one hand. If this same fighter were to lose an arm, they'd choose whether to stop wielding a weapon or stop wielding their shield; but they'd still be permitted to make two attacks each turn.



      Same with the ape: the abstractions of the game mean that losing an arm doesn't necessarily mean they lose one of their attacks, because the rules don't expressly say that they do.



      A Counterexample



      In contrast, consider the Hydra, whose Multiattack feature expressly describes it as "having as many attacks as it has heads":




      Multiple Heads. The hydra has five heads. While it has more than one head, the hydra has advantage on saving throws against being blinded, charmed, deafened, frightened, stunned, and knocked unconscious.



      [...]



      Multiattack. The hydra makes as many bite attacks as it has heads.



      Hydra, Monster Manual, pg. 190




      So because some creatures explicitly stipulate how many attacks they have as proportional to the number of "limbs" (heads) they have, whereas a Giant Ape does not, it's possible to interpret these statblocks as implying that the loss of a single limb does not penalize their normal mechanism of attack.



      However...



      The DM is empowered to make on-the-fly rulings on this matter



      I certainly believe it is reasonable to impose some kind of handicap on a creature that is missing a limb. For a Giant Ape, if it lost one of its arms without straight-up dying in the process, then I might, as DM, remove one of its attacks each round or impose disadvantage on their attacks. But this would be a personal decision, and a DM is not required to support this ruling.



      This would be a lot more clear-cut if we were taking about, say, a Humanoid wielding a greataxe: they definitely would not be able to fight using their normal statblock if they were missing an arm; if I were to even allow them to keep using the Greataxe in the first place. But I would also probably allow that creature to keep making multiple attacks if they instead switched to a one-handed weapon.



      So this is ultimately a situation that comes down to your DM. The DM is empowered to make debilitating conditions (like losing an arm) come with mechanical penalties; but it's not strictly required for a DM to adjudicate that losing an arm means losing one of the attacks in a Multiattack, unless the statblock for the creature expressly says it would.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        13












        $begingroup$

        Theoretically, yes, a creature could still Multiattack while missing a limb



        Take, for example, a level 5 Fighter that uses Sword&Board, i.e. they fight with a Longsword (or some other one-handed weapon) and a Shield. In a given turn, they're permitted to make two attacks with their Action, one normally, and one permitted by their Extra Attack feature. This happens despite the fact that they're still only attacking with one weapon, held in one hand. If this same fighter were to lose an arm, they'd choose whether to stop wielding a weapon or stop wielding their shield; but they'd still be permitted to make two attacks each turn.



        Same with the ape: the abstractions of the game mean that losing an arm doesn't necessarily mean they lose one of their attacks, because the rules don't expressly say that they do.



        A Counterexample



        In contrast, consider the Hydra, whose Multiattack feature expressly describes it as "having as many attacks as it has heads":




        Multiple Heads. The hydra has five heads. While it has more than one head, the hydra has advantage on saving throws against being blinded, charmed, deafened, frightened, stunned, and knocked unconscious.



        [...]



        Multiattack. The hydra makes as many bite attacks as it has heads.



        Hydra, Monster Manual, pg. 190




        So because some creatures explicitly stipulate how many attacks they have as proportional to the number of "limbs" (heads) they have, whereas a Giant Ape does not, it's possible to interpret these statblocks as implying that the loss of a single limb does not penalize their normal mechanism of attack.



        However...



        The DM is empowered to make on-the-fly rulings on this matter



        I certainly believe it is reasonable to impose some kind of handicap on a creature that is missing a limb. For a Giant Ape, if it lost one of its arms without straight-up dying in the process, then I might, as DM, remove one of its attacks each round or impose disadvantage on their attacks. But this would be a personal decision, and a DM is not required to support this ruling.



        This would be a lot more clear-cut if we were taking about, say, a Humanoid wielding a greataxe: they definitely would not be able to fight using their normal statblock if they were missing an arm; if I were to even allow them to keep using the Greataxe in the first place. But I would also probably allow that creature to keep making multiple attacks if they instead switched to a one-handed weapon.



        So this is ultimately a situation that comes down to your DM. The DM is empowered to make debilitating conditions (like losing an arm) come with mechanical penalties; but it's not strictly required for a DM to adjudicate that losing an arm means losing one of the attacks in a Multiattack, unless the statblock for the creature expressly says it would.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          13












          13








          13





          $begingroup$

          Theoretically, yes, a creature could still Multiattack while missing a limb



          Take, for example, a level 5 Fighter that uses Sword&Board, i.e. they fight with a Longsword (or some other one-handed weapon) and a Shield. In a given turn, they're permitted to make two attacks with their Action, one normally, and one permitted by their Extra Attack feature. This happens despite the fact that they're still only attacking with one weapon, held in one hand. If this same fighter were to lose an arm, they'd choose whether to stop wielding a weapon or stop wielding their shield; but they'd still be permitted to make two attacks each turn.



          Same with the ape: the abstractions of the game mean that losing an arm doesn't necessarily mean they lose one of their attacks, because the rules don't expressly say that they do.



          A Counterexample



          In contrast, consider the Hydra, whose Multiattack feature expressly describes it as "having as many attacks as it has heads":




          Multiple Heads. The hydra has five heads. While it has more than one head, the hydra has advantage on saving throws against being blinded, charmed, deafened, frightened, stunned, and knocked unconscious.



          [...]



          Multiattack. The hydra makes as many bite attacks as it has heads.



          Hydra, Monster Manual, pg. 190




          So because some creatures explicitly stipulate how many attacks they have as proportional to the number of "limbs" (heads) they have, whereas a Giant Ape does not, it's possible to interpret these statblocks as implying that the loss of a single limb does not penalize their normal mechanism of attack.



          However...



          The DM is empowered to make on-the-fly rulings on this matter



          I certainly believe it is reasonable to impose some kind of handicap on a creature that is missing a limb. For a Giant Ape, if it lost one of its arms without straight-up dying in the process, then I might, as DM, remove one of its attacks each round or impose disadvantage on their attacks. But this would be a personal decision, and a DM is not required to support this ruling.



          This would be a lot more clear-cut if we were taking about, say, a Humanoid wielding a greataxe: they definitely would not be able to fight using their normal statblock if they were missing an arm; if I were to even allow them to keep using the Greataxe in the first place. But I would also probably allow that creature to keep making multiple attacks if they instead switched to a one-handed weapon.



          So this is ultimately a situation that comes down to your DM. The DM is empowered to make debilitating conditions (like losing an arm) come with mechanical penalties; but it's not strictly required for a DM to adjudicate that losing an arm means losing one of the attacks in a Multiattack, unless the statblock for the creature expressly says it would.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Theoretically, yes, a creature could still Multiattack while missing a limb



          Take, for example, a level 5 Fighter that uses Sword&Board, i.e. they fight with a Longsword (or some other one-handed weapon) and a Shield. In a given turn, they're permitted to make two attacks with their Action, one normally, and one permitted by their Extra Attack feature. This happens despite the fact that they're still only attacking with one weapon, held in one hand. If this same fighter were to lose an arm, they'd choose whether to stop wielding a weapon or stop wielding their shield; but they'd still be permitted to make two attacks each turn.



          Same with the ape: the abstractions of the game mean that losing an arm doesn't necessarily mean they lose one of their attacks, because the rules don't expressly say that they do.



          A Counterexample



          In contrast, consider the Hydra, whose Multiattack feature expressly describes it as "having as many attacks as it has heads":




          Multiple Heads. The hydra has five heads. While it has more than one head, the hydra has advantage on saving throws against being blinded, charmed, deafened, frightened, stunned, and knocked unconscious.



          [...]



          Multiattack. The hydra makes as many bite attacks as it has heads.



          Hydra, Monster Manual, pg. 190




          So because some creatures explicitly stipulate how many attacks they have as proportional to the number of "limbs" (heads) they have, whereas a Giant Ape does not, it's possible to interpret these statblocks as implying that the loss of a single limb does not penalize their normal mechanism of attack.



          However...



          The DM is empowered to make on-the-fly rulings on this matter



          I certainly believe it is reasonable to impose some kind of handicap on a creature that is missing a limb. For a Giant Ape, if it lost one of its arms without straight-up dying in the process, then I might, as DM, remove one of its attacks each round or impose disadvantage on their attacks. But this would be a personal decision, and a DM is not required to support this ruling.



          This would be a lot more clear-cut if we were taking about, say, a Humanoid wielding a greataxe: they definitely would not be able to fight using their normal statblock if they were missing an arm; if I were to even allow them to keep using the Greataxe in the first place. But I would also probably allow that creature to keep making multiple attacks if they instead switched to a one-handed weapon.



          So this is ultimately a situation that comes down to your DM. The DM is empowered to make debilitating conditions (like losing an arm) come with mechanical penalties; but it's not strictly required for a DM to adjudicate that losing an arm means losing one of the attacks in a Multiattack, unless the statblock for the creature expressly says it would.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered 13 hours ago









          XiremaXirema

          22.4k264131




          22.4k264131

























              7












              $begingroup$

              Depends on the specific limb and multiattack



              There is an optional rule called "Injuries" (DMG p272), and two of the listed injuries are relevant:




              Lose an Arm or a Hand. You can no longer hold anything with two hands, and you can hold only a single object at a time. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.







              Lose a Foot or Leg. Your speed on foot is halved, and you must use a cane or crutch to move unless you have a peg leg or other prosthesis. You fall prone after using the Dash action. You have disadvantage on Dexterity checks made to balance. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.




              Neighter of those injuries limits the number of attacks the injured character can make. However, those optional injuries are clearly meant for humanoids and there is no general rule for what other creatures missing a limb can or cannot do. Even the Sword of Sharpness doesn't attempt to list the effects of losing a limb:




              Then roll another d20. If you roll a 20, you lop off one of the target's limbs, with the effect of such loss determined by the DM.




              That said, there are some cases where the anatomy of creature comes into play. For example:



              A Giant Crocodile cannot multiattack if it is missing its only tail




              Multiattack. The crocodile makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail.




              Because the crocodile can't possibly attack with something it does not have.



              A Giant Subterranean Lizard can multiattack if it is missing its only tail



              So long as it chooses to replace its tail attack with a Swallow:




              Multiattack. The lizard makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail. One attack can be replaced by Swallow.




              A Giant Ape can Multiattack if it is missing an arm



              So long as it chooses to make both attacks with the same fist:




              Multiattack. The ape makes two fist attacks.




              Because "two fist attacks" does not necessarily mean "two attacks with distinct fists".



              Moreover, while there are no general rules for missing limbs, there some rules that require hands, like the rules for Grappling: a two-armed Giant Ape can doubtlessly hold a grappled foe with one hand and multiattack with the other fist, but a one-armed Giant Ape can't do the same.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                7












                $begingroup$

                Depends on the specific limb and multiattack



                There is an optional rule called "Injuries" (DMG p272), and two of the listed injuries are relevant:




                Lose an Arm or a Hand. You can no longer hold anything with two hands, and you can hold only a single object at a time. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.







                Lose a Foot or Leg. Your speed on foot is halved, and you must use a cane or crutch to move unless you have a peg leg or other prosthesis. You fall prone after using the Dash action. You have disadvantage on Dexterity checks made to balance. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.




                Neighter of those injuries limits the number of attacks the injured character can make. However, those optional injuries are clearly meant for humanoids and there is no general rule for what other creatures missing a limb can or cannot do. Even the Sword of Sharpness doesn't attempt to list the effects of losing a limb:




                Then roll another d20. If you roll a 20, you lop off one of the target's limbs, with the effect of such loss determined by the DM.




                That said, there are some cases where the anatomy of creature comes into play. For example:



                A Giant Crocodile cannot multiattack if it is missing its only tail




                Multiattack. The crocodile makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail.




                Because the crocodile can't possibly attack with something it does not have.



                A Giant Subterranean Lizard can multiattack if it is missing its only tail



                So long as it chooses to replace its tail attack with a Swallow:




                Multiattack. The lizard makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail. One attack can be replaced by Swallow.




                A Giant Ape can Multiattack if it is missing an arm



                So long as it chooses to make both attacks with the same fist:




                Multiattack. The ape makes two fist attacks.




                Because "two fist attacks" does not necessarily mean "two attacks with distinct fists".



                Moreover, while there are no general rules for missing limbs, there some rules that require hands, like the rules for Grappling: a two-armed Giant Ape can doubtlessly hold a grappled foe with one hand and multiattack with the other fist, but a one-armed Giant Ape can't do the same.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  7












                  7








                  7





                  $begingroup$

                  Depends on the specific limb and multiattack



                  There is an optional rule called "Injuries" (DMG p272), and two of the listed injuries are relevant:




                  Lose an Arm or a Hand. You can no longer hold anything with two hands, and you can hold only a single object at a time. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.







                  Lose a Foot or Leg. Your speed on foot is halved, and you must use a cane or crutch to move unless you have a peg leg or other prosthesis. You fall prone after using the Dash action. You have disadvantage on Dexterity checks made to balance. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.




                  Neighter of those injuries limits the number of attacks the injured character can make. However, those optional injuries are clearly meant for humanoids and there is no general rule for what other creatures missing a limb can or cannot do. Even the Sword of Sharpness doesn't attempt to list the effects of losing a limb:




                  Then roll another d20. If you roll a 20, you lop off one of the target's limbs, with the effect of such loss determined by the DM.




                  That said, there are some cases where the anatomy of creature comes into play. For example:



                  A Giant Crocodile cannot multiattack if it is missing its only tail




                  Multiattack. The crocodile makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail.




                  Because the crocodile can't possibly attack with something it does not have.



                  A Giant Subterranean Lizard can multiattack if it is missing its only tail



                  So long as it chooses to replace its tail attack with a Swallow:




                  Multiattack. The lizard makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail. One attack can be replaced by Swallow.




                  A Giant Ape can Multiattack if it is missing an arm



                  So long as it chooses to make both attacks with the same fist:




                  Multiattack. The ape makes two fist attacks.




                  Because "two fist attacks" does not necessarily mean "two attacks with distinct fists".



                  Moreover, while there are no general rules for missing limbs, there some rules that require hands, like the rules for Grappling: a two-armed Giant Ape can doubtlessly hold a grappled foe with one hand and multiattack with the other fist, but a one-armed Giant Ape can't do the same.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  Depends on the specific limb and multiattack



                  There is an optional rule called "Injuries" (DMG p272), and two of the listed injuries are relevant:




                  Lose an Arm or a Hand. You can no longer hold anything with two hands, and you can hold only a single object at a time. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.







                  Lose a Foot or Leg. Your speed on foot is halved, and you must use a cane or crutch to move unless you have a peg leg or other prosthesis. You fall prone after using the Dash action. You have disadvantage on Dexterity checks made to balance. Magic such as the regenerate spell can restore the lost appendage.




                  Neighter of those injuries limits the number of attacks the injured character can make. However, those optional injuries are clearly meant for humanoids and there is no general rule for what other creatures missing a limb can or cannot do. Even the Sword of Sharpness doesn't attempt to list the effects of losing a limb:




                  Then roll another d20. If you roll a 20, you lop off one of the target's limbs, with the effect of such loss determined by the DM.




                  That said, there are some cases where the anatomy of creature comes into play. For example:



                  A Giant Crocodile cannot multiattack if it is missing its only tail




                  Multiattack. The crocodile makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail.




                  Because the crocodile can't possibly attack with something it does not have.



                  A Giant Subterranean Lizard can multiattack if it is missing its only tail



                  So long as it chooses to replace its tail attack with a Swallow:




                  Multiattack. The lizard makes two attacks: one with its bite and one with its tail. One attack can be replaced by Swallow.




                  A Giant Ape can Multiattack if it is missing an arm



                  So long as it chooses to make both attacks with the same fist:




                  Multiattack. The ape makes two fist attacks.




                  Because "two fist attacks" does not necessarily mean "two attacks with distinct fists".



                  Moreover, while there are no general rules for missing limbs, there some rules that require hands, like the rules for Grappling: a two-armed Giant Ape can doubtlessly hold a grappled foe with one hand and multiattack with the other fist, but a one-armed Giant Ape can't do the same.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 11 hours ago

























                  answered 13 hours ago









                  RuseRuse

                  6,85211556




                  6,85211556






















                      trollburgers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      trollburgers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      trollburgers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      trollburgers is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143996%2fcan-a-monster-with-multiattack-use-this-ability-if-they-are-missing-a-limb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029