Generating adjacency matrices from isomorphic graphs
Here are some isomorphic graphs and their corresponding adjacency matrices. I can draw the graphs with tikz. But I'm not sure the best way to draw the matrices. Is it possible to generate one from the other? What's the right way to approach it?
Here's an example of the code to generate a graph:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
tikzset{Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,scale=0.75}}
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_1$}] (E1) at (0,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=above:{$e_2$}] (E2) at (1,3) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_3$}] (E3) at (2,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (2,0) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_5$}] (E5) at (0,0) {} ;
draw[thick] (E1)--(E2)--(E3)--(E4)--(E5)--(E1) {} ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
diagrams matrices graphs tikz-pic
add a comment |
Here are some isomorphic graphs and their corresponding adjacency matrices. I can draw the graphs with tikz. But I'm not sure the best way to draw the matrices. Is it possible to generate one from the other? What's the right way to approach it?
Here's an example of the code to generate a graph:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
tikzset{Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,scale=0.75}}
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_1$}] (E1) at (0,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=above:{$e_2$}] (E2) at (1,3) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_3$}] (E3) at (2,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (2,0) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_5$}] (E5) at (0,0) {} ;
draw[thick] (E1)--(E2)--(E3)--(E4)--(E5)--(E1) {} ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
diagrams matrices graphs tikz-pic
Shouldn't it be the other way around: you construct the diagrams from the adjacency matrices?
– marmot
yesterday
@marmot Probably, normally. Actually I don't think so. I mean.. Either way is probably good. But I have some graphs drawn up, and I want to draw the matrices to suit them. If I can't figure it out programmatically, I'll just draw them up separately. Either with LaTeX somehow or with Adobe Illustrator, or some spreadsheet/word processor. LaTeX would be nice though.
– tjt263
yesterday
1
Your graphics would be more informative if you did not shuffle vertex locations around between (a), (b) and (c).
– Szabolcs
yesterday
@Szabolcs that's exactly what I've done. Just need to draw the adjacency matrix. The image I posted was just a screenshot I had on my phone. But I've drawn them like you say. The vertices and labels stay the same, and the edges change.
– tjt263
yesterday
add a comment |
Here are some isomorphic graphs and their corresponding adjacency matrices. I can draw the graphs with tikz. But I'm not sure the best way to draw the matrices. Is it possible to generate one from the other? What's the right way to approach it?
Here's an example of the code to generate a graph:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
tikzset{Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,scale=0.75}}
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_1$}] (E1) at (0,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=above:{$e_2$}] (E2) at (1,3) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_3$}] (E3) at (2,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (2,0) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_5$}] (E5) at (0,0) {} ;
draw[thick] (E1)--(E2)--(E3)--(E4)--(E5)--(E1) {} ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
diagrams matrices graphs tikz-pic
Here are some isomorphic graphs and their corresponding adjacency matrices. I can draw the graphs with tikz. But I'm not sure the best way to draw the matrices. Is it possible to generate one from the other? What's the right way to approach it?
Here's an example of the code to generate a graph:
documentclass{standalone}
usepackage{tikz}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
tikzset{Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,scale=0.75}}
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_1$}] (E1) at (0,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=above:{$e_2$}] (E2) at (1,3) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_3$}] (E3) at (2,2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=right:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (2,0) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=left :{$e_5$}] (E5) at (0,0) {} ;
draw[thick] (E1)--(E2)--(E3)--(E4)--(E5)--(E1) {} ;
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
diagrams matrices graphs tikz-pic
diagrams matrices graphs tikz-pic
edited yesterday
tjt263
asked yesterday
tjt263tjt263
2077
2077
Shouldn't it be the other way around: you construct the diagrams from the adjacency matrices?
– marmot
yesterday
@marmot Probably, normally. Actually I don't think so. I mean.. Either way is probably good. But I have some graphs drawn up, and I want to draw the matrices to suit them. If I can't figure it out programmatically, I'll just draw them up separately. Either with LaTeX somehow or with Adobe Illustrator, or some spreadsheet/word processor. LaTeX would be nice though.
– tjt263
yesterday
1
Your graphics would be more informative if you did not shuffle vertex locations around between (a), (b) and (c).
– Szabolcs
yesterday
@Szabolcs that's exactly what I've done. Just need to draw the adjacency matrix. The image I posted was just a screenshot I had on my phone. But I've drawn them like you say. The vertices and labels stay the same, and the edges change.
– tjt263
yesterday
add a comment |
Shouldn't it be the other way around: you construct the diagrams from the adjacency matrices?
– marmot
yesterday
@marmot Probably, normally. Actually I don't think so. I mean.. Either way is probably good. But I have some graphs drawn up, and I want to draw the matrices to suit them. If I can't figure it out programmatically, I'll just draw them up separately. Either with LaTeX somehow or with Adobe Illustrator, or some spreadsheet/word processor. LaTeX would be nice though.
– tjt263
yesterday
1
Your graphics would be more informative if you did not shuffle vertex locations around between (a), (b) and (c).
– Szabolcs
yesterday
@Szabolcs that's exactly what I've done. Just need to draw the adjacency matrix. The image I posted was just a screenshot I had on my phone. But I've drawn them like you say. The vertices and labels stay the same, and the edges change.
– tjt263
yesterday
Shouldn't it be the other way around: you construct the diagrams from the adjacency matrices?
– marmot
yesterday
Shouldn't it be the other way around: you construct the diagrams from the adjacency matrices?
– marmot
yesterday
@marmot Probably, normally. Actually I don't think so. I mean.. Either way is probably good. But I have some graphs drawn up, and I want to draw the matrices to suit them. If I can't figure it out programmatically, I'll just draw them up separately. Either with LaTeX somehow or with Adobe Illustrator, or some spreadsheet/word processor. LaTeX would be nice though.
– tjt263
yesterday
@marmot Probably, normally. Actually I don't think so. I mean.. Either way is probably good. But I have some graphs drawn up, and I want to draw the matrices to suit them. If I can't figure it out programmatically, I'll just draw them up separately. Either with LaTeX somehow or with Adobe Illustrator, or some spreadsheet/word processor. LaTeX would be nice though.
– tjt263
yesterday
1
1
Your graphics would be more informative if you did not shuffle vertex locations around between (a), (b) and (c).
– Szabolcs
yesterday
Your graphics would be more informative if you did not shuffle vertex locations around between (a), (b) and (c).
– Szabolcs
yesterday
@Szabolcs that's exactly what I've done. Just need to draw the adjacency matrix. The image I posted was just a screenshot I had on my phone. But I've drawn them like you say. The vertices and labels stay the same, and the edges change.
– tjt263
yesterday
@Szabolcs that's exactly what I've done. Just need to draw the adjacency matrix. The image I posted was just a screenshot I had on my phone. But I've drawn them like you say. The vertices and labels stay the same, and the edges change.
– tjt263
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
This is in case you change your mind and use the adjacency matrices to draw the graphs. TikZ allows you to define arrays, see p. 999 of the pgfmanual. And these arrays can be converted to tables using this nice answer. And these matrices/arrays can also be used to define the graphs.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,positioning}
% building the table in a foreach loop from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/60400/121799
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,inner sep=1.5pt},
adjacency matrix/.style={ampersand replacement=&,matrix of math nodes,
row 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},
column 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},nodes in empty cells,
nodes={draw,minimum width=1.5em,text height=1.8ex},column sep=-pgflinewidth,row
sep=-pgflinewidth}]
% first matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,0,1,1,0},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{1,1,0,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=left]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (leftmat) [below=of left,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
%
% second matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,0,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,0,1,0},%
{0,0,1,0,1},%
{1,0,0,1,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=middle,xshift=5cm]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (midmat) [below=of middle,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
% third matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,1,0},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=right,xshift=10cm]
foreach X in {1,...,3}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
node[Bullet,label=90+72-4*72:{$e_5$}] (E5) at (90+72-4*72:2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=90+72-5*72:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (90+72-5*72:2) {} ;
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (rightmat) [below=of right,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Here is a sagetex
solution which uses the computer algebra system, SAGE, to do the work. SAGE has built in knowledge of different classes of graphs and has some compatibility with LaTeX and Tikz and can solve some graph parameters as well. All that knowledge means SAGE is not part of the LaTeX distribution, but this is easily handled with a free Cocalc account. It might be my lack of knowledge about the subject but I had trouble trying to get the graphs to look exactly the way you have drawn them but if you're willing to give up some control here is a straightforward implementation of what you want.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{sagetex}
usepackage{tikz,tkz-graph,tkz-berge}
begin{document}
begin{sagesilent}
H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:[1]})
H.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
H.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
J = Graph({1:[2], 2:[5], 3:[4], 4:[1], 5:[3]})
J.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
J.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
K = Graph({1:[3], 2:[4], 3:[5], 4:[1], 5:[2]})
K.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
K.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
end{sagesilent}
Consider the three graphs below:\\
begin{tabular}{ccc}
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{H}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{J}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{K}
end{tikzpicture}\
$sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{J.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{K.adjacency_matrix()}$\\
(a) & (b) & (c)\
end{tabular}
end{document}
The output is:
I set up the graph as a list of what a vertex is adjacent to; eg, H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:1}) says that vertex 1 is adjacent to 2, vertex 2 is adjacent to 3, and so until vertex 5 is adjacent to 1. Setting a circular layout makes Sage place the vertices for you, and by setting options we can change the size of the graphic. So Sage creates the graph with sage{H}
and the adjacency matrix with $sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$
.
By having a CAS do the work you can change the graph and SAGE will do the work without mistakes. This saves you having to code other examples and possibly making a mistake along the way.
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481289%2fgenerating-adjacency-matrices-from-isomorphic-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is in case you change your mind and use the adjacency matrices to draw the graphs. TikZ allows you to define arrays, see p. 999 of the pgfmanual. And these arrays can be converted to tables using this nice answer. And these matrices/arrays can also be used to define the graphs.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,positioning}
% building the table in a foreach loop from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/60400/121799
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,inner sep=1.5pt},
adjacency matrix/.style={ampersand replacement=&,matrix of math nodes,
row 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},
column 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},nodes in empty cells,
nodes={draw,minimum width=1.5em,text height=1.8ex},column sep=-pgflinewidth,row
sep=-pgflinewidth}]
% first matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,0,1,1,0},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{1,1,0,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=left]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (leftmat) [below=of left,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
%
% second matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,0,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,0,1,0},%
{0,0,1,0,1},%
{1,0,0,1,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=middle,xshift=5cm]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (midmat) [below=of middle,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
% third matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,1,0},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=right,xshift=10cm]
foreach X in {1,...,3}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
node[Bullet,label=90+72-4*72:{$e_5$}] (E5) at (90+72-4*72:2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=90+72-5*72:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (90+72-5*72:2) {} ;
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (rightmat) [below=of right,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
This is in case you change your mind and use the adjacency matrices to draw the graphs. TikZ allows you to define arrays, see p. 999 of the pgfmanual. And these arrays can be converted to tables using this nice answer. And these matrices/arrays can also be used to define the graphs.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,positioning}
% building the table in a foreach loop from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/60400/121799
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,inner sep=1.5pt},
adjacency matrix/.style={ampersand replacement=&,matrix of math nodes,
row 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},
column 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},nodes in empty cells,
nodes={draw,minimum width=1.5em,text height=1.8ex},column sep=-pgflinewidth,row
sep=-pgflinewidth}]
% first matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,0,1,1,0},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{1,1,0,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=left]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (leftmat) [below=of left,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
%
% second matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,0,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,0,1,0},%
{0,0,1,0,1},%
{1,0,0,1,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=middle,xshift=5cm]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (midmat) [below=of middle,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
% third matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,1,0},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=right,xshift=10cm]
foreach X in {1,...,3}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
node[Bullet,label=90+72-4*72:{$e_5$}] (E5) at (90+72-4*72:2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=90+72-5*72:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (90+72-5*72:2) {} ;
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (rightmat) [below=of right,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
This is in case you change your mind and use the adjacency matrices to draw the graphs. TikZ allows you to define arrays, see p. 999 of the pgfmanual. And these arrays can be converted to tables using this nice answer. And these matrices/arrays can also be used to define the graphs.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,positioning}
% building the table in a foreach loop from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/60400/121799
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,inner sep=1.5pt},
adjacency matrix/.style={ampersand replacement=&,matrix of math nodes,
row 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},
column 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},nodes in empty cells,
nodes={draw,minimum width=1.5em,text height=1.8ex},column sep=-pgflinewidth,row
sep=-pgflinewidth}]
% first matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,0,1,1,0},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{1,1,0,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=left]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (leftmat) [below=of left,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
%
% second matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,0,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,0,1,0},%
{0,0,1,0,1},%
{1,0,0,1,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=middle,xshift=5cm]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (midmat) [below=of middle,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
% third matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,1,0},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=right,xshift=10cm]
foreach X in {1,...,3}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
node[Bullet,label=90+72-4*72:{$e_5$}] (E5) at (90+72-4*72:2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=90+72-5*72:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (90+72-5*72:2) {} ;
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (rightmat) [below=of right,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
This is in case you change your mind and use the adjacency matrices to draw the graphs. TikZ allows you to define arrays, see p. 999 of the pgfmanual. And these arrays can be converted to tables using this nice answer. And these matrices/arrays can also be used to define the graphs.
documentclass[tikz,border=3.14mm]{standalone}
usepackage{etoolbox}
usetikzlibrary{matrix,positioning}
% building the table in a foreach loop from https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/60400/121799
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[Bullet/.style={circle,draw,fill=black,inner sep=1.5pt},
adjacency matrix/.style={ampersand replacement=&,matrix of math nodes,
row 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},
column 1/.append style={nodes={font=boldmath}},nodes in empty cells,
nodes={draw,minimum width=1.5em,text height=1.8ex},column sep=-pgflinewidth,row
sep=-pgflinewidth}]
% first matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,0,1,1,0},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{1,1,0,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=left]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (leftmat) [below=of left,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
%
% second matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,0,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,0,1,0},%
{0,0,1,0,1},%
{1,0,0,1,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=middle,xshift=5cm]
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (midmat) [below=of middle,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
% third matrix
defadjancymatrix{%
{{0,1,0,1,0},%
{1,0,0,0,1},%
{0,0,0,1,1},%
{1,0,1,0,0},%
{0,1,1,0,0}}}
letmymatrixcontentempty
defmymatrixcontent{|[draw=none]|& 1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5\}
begin{scope}[local bounding box=right,xshift=10cm]
foreach X in {1,...,3}
{node[Bullet,label=90+72-X*72:{$e_X$}] (EX) at (90+72-X*72:2) {} ;}
node[Bullet,label=90+72-4*72:{$e_5$}] (E5) at (90+72-4*72:2) {} ;
node[Bullet,label=90+72-5*72:{$e_4$}] (E4) at (90+72-5*72:2) {} ;
foreach X in {1,...,5}
{begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{X }}x
foreach Y in {1,...,5}
{pgfmathtruncatemacro{itest}{adjancymatrix[X-1][Y-1]}
ifnumitest=1
draw (EX) -- (EY);
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{& 1 }}x
else
begingroupedefx{endgroup
noexpandgapptonoexpandmymatrixcontent{ &}}x
fi
}
gapptomymatrixcontent{\}
}
end{scope}
matrix (rightmat) [below=of right,adjacency matrix]{
mymatrixcontent
};
end{tikzpicture}
end{document}
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
marmotmarmot
112k5141266
112k5141266
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
Not bad, can we get the matrix lines drawn in or is it just like that
– tjt263
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
@tjt263 Yes, sure.
– marmot
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
Excellent. Wish I could go the other way. Maybe I will just try to draw them manually instead.
– tjt263
yesterday
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
What package can I draw them with manually? I like exactly how yours look.
– tjt263
23 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
@tjt263 Sorry, I do not understand your question (because I do not know what "manually" means), nor your concerns. In order to draw these graphs, you need to know how they should look. The adjacency matrices have an almost minimal set of information. What kind of minimal set of information are you proposing to define the graphs?
– marmot
18 hours ago
|
show 3 more comments
Here is a sagetex
solution which uses the computer algebra system, SAGE, to do the work. SAGE has built in knowledge of different classes of graphs and has some compatibility with LaTeX and Tikz and can solve some graph parameters as well. All that knowledge means SAGE is not part of the LaTeX distribution, but this is easily handled with a free Cocalc account. It might be my lack of knowledge about the subject but I had trouble trying to get the graphs to look exactly the way you have drawn them but if you're willing to give up some control here is a straightforward implementation of what you want.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{sagetex}
usepackage{tikz,tkz-graph,tkz-berge}
begin{document}
begin{sagesilent}
H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:[1]})
H.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
H.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
J = Graph({1:[2], 2:[5], 3:[4], 4:[1], 5:[3]})
J.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
J.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
K = Graph({1:[3], 2:[4], 3:[5], 4:[1], 5:[2]})
K.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
K.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
end{sagesilent}
Consider the three graphs below:\\
begin{tabular}{ccc}
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{H}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{J}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{K}
end{tikzpicture}\
$sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{J.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{K.adjacency_matrix()}$\\
(a) & (b) & (c)\
end{tabular}
end{document}
The output is:
I set up the graph as a list of what a vertex is adjacent to; eg, H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:1}) says that vertex 1 is adjacent to 2, vertex 2 is adjacent to 3, and so until vertex 5 is adjacent to 1. Setting a circular layout makes Sage place the vertices for you, and by setting options we can change the size of the graphic. So Sage creates the graph with sage{H}
and the adjacency matrix with $sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$
.
By having a CAS do the work you can change the graph and SAGE will do the work without mistakes. This saves you having to code other examples and possibly making a mistake along the way.
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is a sagetex
solution which uses the computer algebra system, SAGE, to do the work. SAGE has built in knowledge of different classes of graphs and has some compatibility with LaTeX and Tikz and can solve some graph parameters as well. All that knowledge means SAGE is not part of the LaTeX distribution, but this is easily handled with a free Cocalc account. It might be my lack of knowledge about the subject but I had trouble trying to get the graphs to look exactly the way you have drawn them but if you're willing to give up some control here is a straightforward implementation of what you want.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{sagetex}
usepackage{tikz,tkz-graph,tkz-berge}
begin{document}
begin{sagesilent}
H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:[1]})
H.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
H.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
J = Graph({1:[2], 2:[5], 3:[4], 4:[1], 5:[3]})
J.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
J.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
K = Graph({1:[3], 2:[4], 3:[5], 4:[1], 5:[2]})
K.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
K.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
end{sagesilent}
Consider the three graphs below:\\
begin{tabular}{ccc}
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{H}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{J}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{K}
end{tikzpicture}\
$sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{J.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{K.adjacency_matrix()}$\\
(a) & (b) & (c)\
end{tabular}
end{document}
The output is:
I set up the graph as a list of what a vertex is adjacent to; eg, H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:1}) says that vertex 1 is adjacent to 2, vertex 2 is adjacent to 3, and so until vertex 5 is adjacent to 1. Setting a circular layout makes Sage place the vertices for you, and by setting options we can change the size of the graphic. So Sage creates the graph with sage{H}
and the adjacency matrix with $sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$
.
By having a CAS do the work you can change the graph and SAGE will do the work without mistakes. This saves you having to code other examples and possibly making a mistake along the way.
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Here is a sagetex
solution which uses the computer algebra system, SAGE, to do the work. SAGE has built in knowledge of different classes of graphs and has some compatibility with LaTeX and Tikz and can solve some graph parameters as well. All that knowledge means SAGE is not part of the LaTeX distribution, but this is easily handled with a free Cocalc account. It might be my lack of knowledge about the subject but I had trouble trying to get the graphs to look exactly the way you have drawn them but if you're willing to give up some control here is a straightforward implementation of what you want.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{sagetex}
usepackage{tikz,tkz-graph,tkz-berge}
begin{document}
begin{sagesilent}
H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:[1]})
H.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
H.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
J = Graph({1:[2], 2:[5], 3:[4], 4:[1], 5:[3]})
J.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
J.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
K = Graph({1:[3], 2:[4], 3:[5], 4:[1], 5:[2]})
K.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
K.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
end{sagesilent}
Consider the three graphs below:\\
begin{tabular}{ccc}
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{H}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{J}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{K}
end{tikzpicture}\
$sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{J.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{K.adjacency_matrix()}$\\
(a) & (b) & (c)\
end{tabular}
end{document}
The output is:
I set up the graph as a list of what a vertex is adjacent to; eg, H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:1}) says that vertex 1 is adjacent to 2, vertex 2 is adjacent to 3, and so until vertex 5 is adjacent to 1. Setting a circular layout makes Sage place the vertices for you, and by setting options we can change the size of the graphic. So Sage creates the graph with sage{H}
and the adjacency matrix with $sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$
.
By having a CAS do the work you can change the graph and SAGE will do the work without mistakes. This saves you having to code other examples and possibly making a mistake along the way.
Here is a sagetex
solution which uses the computer algebra system, SAGE, to do the work. SAGE has built in knowledge of different classes of graphs and has some compatibility with LaTeX and Tikz and can solve some graph parameters as well. All that knowledge means SAGE is not part of the LaTeX distribution, but this is easily handled with a free Cocalc account. It might be my lack of knowledge about the subject but I had trouble trying to get the graphs to look exactly the way you have drawn them but if you're willing to give up some control here is a straightforward implementation of what you want.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{sagetex}
usepackage{tikz,tkz-graph,tkz-berge}
begin{document}
begin{sagesilent}
H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:[1]})
H.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
H.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
J = Graph({1:[2], 2:[5], 3:[4], 4:[1], 5:[3]})
J.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
J.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
######
K = Graph({1:[3], 2:[4], 3:[5], 4:[1], 5:[2]})
K.set_pos(H.layout_circular()) #arrange the vertices in a circle
K.set_latex_options(scale=1.0,graphic_size=(3,3))
end{sagesilent}
Consider the three graphs below:\\
begin{tabular}{ccc}
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{H}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{J}
end{tikzpicture} &
begin{tikzpicture}
GraphInit[vstyle=Normal]
SetVertexNormal[Shape=circle,LineWidth = 1pt]
tikzset{EdgeStyle/.append style = {color = black, line width=1pt}}
sage{K}
end{tikzpicture}\
$sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{J.adjacency_matrix()}$ & $sage{K.adjacency_matrix()}$\\
(a) & (b) & (c)\
end{tabular}
end{document}
The output is:
I set up the graph as a list of what a vertex is adjacent to; eg, H = Graph({1:[2], 2:[3], 3:[4], 4:[5], 5:1}) says that vertex 1 is adjacent to 2, vertex 2 is adjacent to 3, and so until vertex 5 is adjacent to 1. Setting a circular layout makes Sage place the vertices for you, and by setting options we can change the size of the graphic. So Sage creates the graph with sage{H}
and the adjacency matrix with $sage{H.adjacency_matrix()}$
.
By having a CAS do the work you can change the graph and SAGE will do the work without mistakes. This saves you having to code other examples and possibly making a mistake along the way.
answered 15 hours ago
DJPDJP
7,91921732
7,91921732
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
Not bad, not bad. Cocalc, huh? I use Overleaf (formerly ShareLaTeX). I'll check it out. Thanks.
– tjt263
5 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f481289%2fgenerating-adjacency-matrices-from-isomorphic-graphs%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Shouldn't it be the other way around: you construct the diagrams from the adjacency matrices?
– marmot
yesterday
@marmot Probably, normally. Actually I don't think so. I mean.. Either way is probably good. But I have some graphs drawn up, and I want to draw the matrices to suit them. If I can't figure it out programmatically, I'll just draw them up separately. Either with LaTeX somehow or with Adobe Illustrator, or some spreadsheet/word processor. LaTeX would be nice though.
– tjt263
yesterday
1
Your graphics would be more informative if you did not shuffle vertex locations around between (a), (b) and (c).
– Szabolcs
yesterday
@Szabolcs that's exactly what I've done. Just need to draw the adjacency matrix. The image I posted was just a screenshot I had on my phone. But I've drawn them like you say. The vertices and labels stay the same, and the edges change.
– tjt263
yesterday