Doubt Between the usage of Which vs That [duplicate]When to use “that” and when to use “which”?“for which” vs. “for what”?“that which” used togetherconfusing use of “of which”“Money is all what/that I need.”Should I use 'which' or 'that'?Is it wrong: “in which is the man”?“The one what is blue” - WHAT versus THAT“one of the cables that runs” or “one of the cables that run”?When to use “that clause” or “preposition + which clause”Omitting Which / That in a Sentence
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?
Personal or impersonal in a technical resume
How can I safely use "Thalidomide" in my novel while respecting the trademark?
Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match
Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos breaking the Tesseract and claiming the stone?
The Digit Triangles
Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?
Can I run 125kHz RF circuit on a breadboard?
Usage of an old photo with expired copyright
Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks
Typing CO_2 easily
How were servants to the Kaiser of Imperial Germany treated and where may I find more information on them
Ways of geometrical multiplication
In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?
Why is the principal energy of an electron lower for excited electrons in a higher energy state?
How much do grades matter for a future academia position?
Alignment of six matrices
Do people actually use the word "kaputt" in conversation?
How many people need to be born every 8 years to sustain population?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Using streams for a null-safe conversion from an array to list
Doubt Between the usage of Which vs That [duplicate]
When to use “that” and when to use “which”?“for which” vs. “for what”?“that which” used togetherconfusing use of “of which”“Money is all what/that I need.”Should I use 'which' or 'that'?Is it wrong: “in which is the man”?“The one what is blue” - WHAT versus THAT“one of the cables that runs” or “one of the cables that run”?When to use “that clause” or “preposition + which clause”Omitting Which / That in a Sentence
This question already has an answer here:
When to use “that” and when to use “which”?
12 answers
I am having a doubt between the usage of which and that.
Which one of the following is correct and why?
The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length.
or
The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
Hope you can clarify it ASAP.
relative-clauses
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Dan Bron, tchrist♦ 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
|
show 2 more comments
This question already has an answer here:
When to use “that” and when to use “which”?
12 answers
I am having a doubt between the usage of which and that.
Which one of the following is correct and why?
The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length.
or
The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
Hope you can clarify it ASAP.
relative-clauses
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Dan Bron, tchrist♦ 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
This is an incredibly broad question. Can you give an example, or explain why all the webpages that explain the grammar of which and that aren't adequate.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Which one of the following is correct and why? The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length. or The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
– Kaushik
2 days ago
They're both correct in that sentence.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
See this blog post.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
2
It's a free choice. "Which grows to around 8 feet in length and "that grows to around 8 feet in length" show no show no semantic differences, and no syntactic differences (other than what follows from "that" not being a pronoun).
– BillJ
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
This question already has an answer here:
When to use “that” and when to use “which”?
12 answers
I am having a doubt between the usage of which and that.
Which one of the following is correct and why?
The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length.
or
The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
Hope you can clarify it ASAP.
relative-clauses
New contributor
This question already has an answer here:
When to use “that” and when to use “which”?
12 answers
I am having a doubt between the usage of which and that.
Which one of the following is correct and why?
The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length.
or
The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
Hope you can clarify it ASAP.
This question already has an answer here:
When to use “that” and when to use “which”?
12 answers
relative-clauses
relative-clauses
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Kaushik
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
KaushikKaushik
218
218
New contributor
New contributor
marked as duplicate by Dan Bron, tchrist♦ 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Dan Bron, tchrist♦ 2 days ago
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
This is an incredibly broad question. Can you give an example, or explain why all the webpages that explain the grammar of which and that aren't adequate.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Which one of the following is correct and why? The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length. or The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
– Kaushik
2 days ago
They're both correct in that sentence.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
See this blog post.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
2
It's a free choice. "Which grows to around 8 feet in length and "that grows to around 8 feet in length" show no show no semantic differences, and no syntactic differences (other than what follows from "that" not being a pronoun).
– BillJ
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
This is an incredibly broad question. Can you give an example, or explain why all the webpages that explain the grammar of which and that aren't adequate.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Which one of the following is correct and why? The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length. or The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
– Kaushik
2 days ago
They're both correct in that sentence.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
See this blog post.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
2
It's a free choice. "Which grows to around 8 feet in length and "that grows to around 8 feet in length" show no show no semantic differences, and no syntactic differences (other than what follows from "that" not being a pronoun).
– BillJ
2 days ago
This is an incredibly broad question. Can you give an example, or explain why all the webpages that explain the grammar of which and that aren't adequate.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
This is an incredibly broad question. Can you give an example, or explain why all the webpages that explain the grammar of which and that aren't adequate.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Which one of the following is correct and why? The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length. or The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
– Kaushik
2 days ago
Which one of the following is correct and why? The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length. or The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
– Kaushik
2 days ago
They're both correct in that sentence.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
They're both correct in that sentence.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
See this blog post.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
See this blog post.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
2
2
It's a free choice. "Which grows to around 8 feet in length and "that grows to around 8 feet in length" show no show no semantic differences, and no syntactic differences (other than what follows from "that" not being a pronoun).
– BillJ
2 days ago
It's a free choice. "Which grows to around 8 feet in length and "that grows to around 8 feet in length" show no show no semantic differences, and no syntactic differences (other than what follows from "that" not being a pronoun).
– BillJ
2 days ago
|
show 2 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
To understand the use of "that" & "which" like the way you sentenced, you need to know about restrictive/nonrestrictive modifiers.
For example, the following two sentences are both correct. But conveys totally different meaning.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
A restrictive modifier restricts the scope of the noun to a subset. This is where "that" comes into play. In the first statement, "The cars that are expensive often get stolen" it means only those cars that are expensive get stolen. Not all cars!
We are pointing out a subset of cars called "expensive cars".
A non-restrictive modifier adds more information to the noun. Even if you remove the modifier the core meaning stays the same. In our example, "The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen" it means all cars are expensive and they get stolen. And it also means all cars get stolen.
Both of the below statement means the same. But the first merely adds more information.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
The cars often get stolen.
Also a non-restrictive modifier needs to be set off from the noun it modifies by commas. Whereas restrictive modifier should not have any commas. This is also a prime differentiating factor.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
New contributor
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
add a comment |
I have two tests. [1] Bear in mind that 'that' defines, while 'which' describes. To remember this you can mutter to yourself the phrase: "This is the house that Jack built."
[2] The comma test; if you would be inclined to put commas round the clause then 'which' is likely to be more appropriate.
"The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length." Does not need commas, so 'that' can stand. The phrase suggest that at 5 foot the cat cannot be a cougar.
The cougar, which frequently grows to around 8 feet in length, is a member of the cat family. This can take commas and 'which'. (Unfortunate the borderline is indistinct.)
New contributor
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
To understand the use of "that" & "which" like the way you sentenced, you need to know about restrictive/nonrestrictive modifiers.
For example, the following two sentences are both correct. But conveys totally different meaning.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
A restrictive modifier restricts the scope of the noun to a subset. This is where "that" comes into play. In the first statement, "The cars that are expensive often get stolen" it means only those cars that are expensive get stolen. Not all cars!
We are pointing out a subset of cars called "expensive cars".
A non-restrictive modifier adds more information to the noun. Even if you remove the modifier the core meaning stays the same. In our example, "The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen" it means all cars are expensive and they get stolen. And it also means all cars get stolen.
Both of the below statement means the same. But the first merely adds more information.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
The cars often get stolen.
Also a non-restrictive modifier needs to be set off from the noun it modifies by commas. Whereas restrictive modifier should not have any commas. This is also a prime differentiating factor.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
New contributor
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
add a comment |
To understand the use of "that" & "which" like the way you sentenced, you need to know about restrictive/nonrestrictive modifiers.
For example, the following two sentences are both correct. But conveys totally different meaning.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
A restrictive modifier restricts the scope of the noun to a subset. This is where "that" comes into play. In the first statement, "The cars that are expensive often get stolen" it means only those cars that are expensive get stolen. Not all cars!
We are pointing out a subset of cars called "expensive cars".
A non-restrictive modifier adds more information to the noun. Even if you remove the modifier the core meaning stays the same. In our example, "The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen" it means all cars are expensive and they get stolen. And it also means all cars get stolen.
Both of the below statement means the same. But the first merely adds more information.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
The cars often get stolen.
Also a non-restrictive modifier needs to be set off from the noun it modifies by commas. Whereas restrictive modifier should not have any commas. This is also a prime differentiating factor.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
New contributor
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
add a comment |
To understand the use of "that" & "which" like the way you sentenced, you need to know about restrictive/nonrestrictive modifiers.
For example, the following two sentences are both correct. But conveys totally different meaning.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
A restrictive modifier restricts the scope of the noun to a subset. This is where "that" comes into play. In the first statement, "The cars that are expensive often get stolen" it means only those cars that are expensive get stolen. Not all cars!
We are pointing out a subset of cars called "expensive cars".
A non-restrictive modifier adds more information to the noun. Even if you remove the modifier the core meaning stays the same. In our example, "The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen" it means all cars are expensive and they get stolen. And it also means all cars get stolen.
Both of the below statement means the same. But the first merely adds more information.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
The cars often get stolen.
Also a non-restrictive modifier needs to be set off from the noun it modifies by commas. Whereas restrictive modifier should not have any commas. This is also a prime differentiating factor.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
New contributor
To understand the use of "that" & "which" like the way you sentenced, you need to know about restrictive/nonrestrictive modifiers.
For example, the following two sentences are both correct. But conveys totally different meaning.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
A restrictive modifier restricts the scope of the noun to a subset. This is where "that" comes into play. In the first statement, "The cars that are expensive often get stolen" it means only those cars that are expensive get stolen. Not all cars!
We are pointing out a subset of cars called "expensive cars".
A non-restrictive modifier adds more information to the noun. Even if you remove the modifier the core meaning stays the same. In our example, "The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen" it means all cars are expensive and they get stolen. And it also means all cars get stolen.
Both of the below statement means the same. But the first merely adds more information.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
The cars often get stolen.
Also a non-restrictive modifier needs to be set off from the noun it modifies by commas. Whereas restrictive modifier should not have any commas. This is also a prime differentiating factor.
The cars that are expensive often get stolen.
The cars, which are expensive, often get stolen.
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
yenkaykayyenkaykay
32614
32614
New contributor
New contributor
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
add a comment |
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
I don't think we'd say The cars that are expensive ... If it's a restrictive clause, we'd just say Cars that are expensive ... And if it's a non-restrictive clause, we would need a comma after cars and before expensive.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
Why comma before expensive?
– Kaushik
2 days ago
add a comment |
I have two tests. [1] Bear in mind that 'that' defines, while 'which' describes. To remember this you can mutter to yourself the phrase: "This is the house that Jack built."
[2] The comma test; if you would be inclined to put commas round the clause then 'which' is likely to be more appropriate.
"The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length." Does not need commas, so 'that' can stand. The phrase suggest that at 5 foot the cat cannot be a cougar.
The cougar, which frequently grows to around 8 feet in length, is a member of the cat family. This can take commas and 'which'. (Unfortunate the borderline is indistinct.)
New contributor
add a comment |
I have two tests. [1] Bear in mind that 'that' defines, while 'which' describes. To remember this you can mutter to yourself the phrase: "This is the house that Jack built."
[2] The comma test; if you would be inclined to put commas round the clause then 'which' is likely to be more appropriate.
"The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length." Does not need commas, so 'that' can stand. The phrase suggest that at 5 foot the cat cannot be a cougar.
The cougar, which frequently grows to around 8 feet in length, is a member of the cat family. This can take commas and 'which'. (Unfortunate the borderline is indistinct.)
New contributor
add a comment |
I have two tests. [1] Bear in mind that 'that' defines, while 'which' describes. To remember this you can mutter to yourself the phrase: "This is the house that Jack built."
[2] The comma test; if you would be inclined to put commas round the clause then 'which' is likely to be more appropriate.
"The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length." Does not need commas, so 'that' can stand. The phrase suggest that at 5 foot the cat cannot be a cougar.
The cougar, which frequently grows to around 8 feet in length, is a member of the cat family. This can take commas and 'which'. (Unfortunate the borderline is indistinct.)
New contributor
I have two tests. [1] Bear in mind that 'that' defines, while 'which' describes. To remember this you can mutter to yourself the phrase: "This is the house that Jack built."
[2] The comma test; if you would be inclined to put commas round the clause then 'which' is likely to be more appropriate.
"The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length." Does not need commas, so 'that' can stand. The phrase suggest that at 5 foot the cat cannot be a cougar.
The cougar, which frequently grows to around 8 feet in length, is a member of the cat family. This can take commas and 'which'. (Unfortunate the borderline is indistinct.)
New contributor
New contributor
answered 2 days ago
Ian WestIan West
112
112
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
This is an incredibly broad question. Can you give an example, or explain why all the webpages that explain the grammar of which and that aren't adequate.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
Which one of the following is correct and why? The cougar is a member of the cat family that grows around 8 feet in length. or The cougar is a member of the cat family which grows around 8 feet in length.
– Kaushik
2 days ago
They're both correct in that sentence.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
See this blog post.
– Peter Shor
2 days ago
2
It's a free choice. "Which grows to around 8 feet in length and "that grows to around 8 feet in length" show no show no semantic differences, and no syntactic differences (other than what follows from "that" not being a pronoun).
– BillJ
2 days ago