Single word to change groupsA word to mean “To murder your colleague”Word for “all the groups an item belongs to”?Terms to describe age groupsWord for change of opinionWord for groups of periods of timeIs there a single word that means a life change for the worse?Is there a single word that describes someone who has delivered positive change to society?Is there a single-word term for a major change in a word's meaning?Word for a network of groups/societiesMilitary term or maneuver that describes focusing all your efforts on one enemy at a timeWord for “Change Over Time”
Would this string work as string?
Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match
Is there a reason to prefer HFS+ over APFS for disk images in High Sierra and/or Mojave?
Using streams for a null-safe conversion from an array to list
Do I have to take mana from my deck or hand when tapping a dual land?
Difference between shutdown options
How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors
"Oh no!" in Latin
Why didn't Voldemort know what Grindelwald looked like?
When is "ei" a diphthong?
Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment
Does the Crossbow Expert feat's extra crossbow attack work with the reaction attack from a Hunter ranger's Giant Killer feature?
Typing CO_2 easily
Isolating an audio line connection with two capacitors
Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?
Is there a distance limit for minecart tracks?
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?
Quoting Keynes in a lecture
What is the meaning of "You've never met a graph you didn't like?"
Can I cause damage to electrical appliances by unplugging them when they are turned on?
What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?
Single word to change groups
A word to mean “To murder your colleague”Word for “all the groups an item belongs to”?Terms to describe age groupsWord for change of opinionWord for groups of periods of timeIs there a single word that means a life change for the worse?Is there a single word that describes someone who has delivered positive change to society?Is there a single-word term for a major change in a word's meaning?Word for a network of groups/societiesMilitary term or maneuver that describes focusing all your efforts on one enemy at a timeWord for “Change Over Time”
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 4 more comments
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
2 days ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
2 days ago
1
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
2 days ago
1
Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)
– A C
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
In a table top RPG there exists a spell which forces the target to do what is commanded but the word count available is one. For example, "Rampage" would cause the target to see everyone as a foe. Also, "Cower" causes the target to go into the fetal position.
I am looking to turn one target into my personal bodyguard, or ally with a single word. In the example "Attack" would not work because it would require a second word as a target, like "Attack them" or "Attack humans".
Is there a single word that effectively states a "180 degree change in view" (morally) or to state "your enemies are my enemies"?
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
asked 2 days ago
ReedReed
1284
1284
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
2 days ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
2 days ago
1
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
2 days ago
1
Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)
– A C
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
1
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
2 days ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
2 days ago
1
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
2 days ago
1
Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)
– A C
2 days ago
1
1
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
2 days ago
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
2 days ago
2
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
1
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
2 days ago
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
2 days ago
1
1
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
2 days ago
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
2 days ago
1
1
Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)
– A C
2 days ago
Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)
– A C
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
3
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
add a comment |
Collude (origin per M-W):
...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
"secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
than good-natured fun.
Example sentence:
The two companies had colluded to fix prices.
So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.
I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
2
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
3
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
add a comment |
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
3
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
add a comment |
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
Defect! might work:
1 : to forsake one cause, party, or nation for another often because of a change in ideology
// a former KGB agent who defected to America
(source: Merriam-Webster)
and another verb which conveys the same idea is to renegade:
: to become a renegade (a deserter from one faith, cause, or allegiance to another)
(source: Merriam-Webster)
but I'm not sure if this can actually be used in imperative form.
Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party.
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
answered 2 days ago
GlorfindelGlorfindel
8,359103842
8,359103842
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
3
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
add a comment |
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
3
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
"Of course, your Game Master is free to have the enemy interpret either option as taking the sides of another (third) party." Or drop their arms entirely, since renegading from one side could mean simply doing nothing more to aid that side.
– TaliesinMerlin
2 days ago
3
3
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
How about renege as the imperative? It literally means going back on a promise, but game words like these are often very metaphoric
– Barmar
2 days ago
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
The word has to be understandable to the target. Personally, if someone told me to renegade, I wouldn't understand that as I'm not aware of its use as a verb so the spell would fail.
– Richard
yesterday
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
add a comment |
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
The trickiness here is that you're asking for a verb to do two distinct functions:
Be your ally.
Be their enemy.
1 is especially tricky because customarily English would use a grammatical object to signal who should be allied. Omitting the direct object from "Befriend me," "Guard me," and "Protect me" would either lead to ambiguity ("Befriend" and "Protect" could default to a number of targets) or a less productive action ("Guard" - the target would take a defensive stance).
However, if you wanted (2) the target to oppose their masters (so "their enemies would be your enemies"), try revolt. It is intransitive. Merriam-Webster:
: to renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government) : REBEL
And here's the also-good choice of rebel:
: to renounce and resist by force the authority of one's government
In other words, to revolt or to rebel have a strong sense of using violence ("resist by force") against the people one once owed allegiance to. That sense is strong enough that a "bloodless revolution" is a remarkable event. A character who took that command and didn't attack their former soldiers or leaders would be taking an unusual step.
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
answered 2 days ago
TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin
5,8541127
5,8541127
add a comment |
add a comment |
Collude (origin per M-W):
...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
"secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
than good-natured fun.
Example sentence:
The two companies had colluded to fix prices.
So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.
I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
add a comment |
Collude (origin per M-W):
...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
"secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
than good-natured fun.
Example sentence:
The two companies had colluded to fix prices.
So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.
I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
add a comment |
Collude (origin per M-W):
...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
"secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
than good-natured fun.
Example sentence:
The two companies had colluded to fix prices.
So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.
I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
Collude (origin per M-W):
...based on the Latin verb ludere, meaning "to play." Collude dates
back to 1525 and combines ludere and the prefix col-, meaning "with"
or "together." The verb is younger than the related noun collusion,
which appeared sometime in the 14th century with the specific meaning
"secret agreement or cooperation." Despite their playful history,
collude and collusion have always suggested deceit or trickery rather
than good-natured fun.
Example sentence:
The two companies had colluded to fix prices.
So, it could mean rivals (former or present) joining forces to pursue a common interest.
I think that's what you meant. I was really good at Centipede and Q*Bert (because even Sears had an arcade back then, really). With that in mind, I offer defy as a backup (because it's easy to yell quickly and loudly...if that matters at all). That's the best I can do without a trackball or joystick. YW. Enjoy.
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
answered 2 days ago
KannEKannE
1,378215
1,378215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
2
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
2
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
add a comment |
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Betray
Convert
Realign
Turn
Forsake
Spurn
Revolt
All these basically mean leave one side and join another.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
answered 2 days ago
user340641user340641
191
191
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user340641 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
2
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
2
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
1
1
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
These are good words, but they are too ambiguous for the context given.
– Davo
2 days ago
2
2
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
This could be a solid answer, but its at the moment it is just a smattering of words. I would take the time and do something similar to what the other two answers have.
– Reed
2 days ago
add a comment |
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Reed is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f490231%2fsingle-word-to-change-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
A zillion years ago I was in the same position myself. We, uh, mislead the DM with a command of "turncoat," which is a single word, although not actually a verb.
– Chaim
2 days ago
2
If the limit really is "single word" rather than an upper limit on number of charcters, you could use "CamelCase" for things like AttackHumans. But assuming it's contextually obvious that your "target" was originally an enemy, you could perhaps consider commanding him to Defect!
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
1
Not that I am aware of; however, you may find assistance with the Command spell at The RPG Stack
– Davo
2 days ago
1
@FumbleFingers the "CamalCase" example is to far out there, but there is not limit on the number of characters available for the word. although, "Defect" is a good start and could work given the situation.
– Reed
2 days ago
1
Does it have to be English? Some languages already come dangerously close to the CamelCase approach with their compound words (I'm looking at you, German). Otherwise it'll be fairly hard to target a specific third party, as most verbs you'd use for that in English would expect a subject. (p.s.: mutiny?)
– A C
2 days ago