Which tense to use when describing a blueprint of sorts?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1















I thought I might ask here as well.



So I'm writing a paper and I want to define the experimental process. I have two challenges.



Firstly, when I define the experimental process, I want to write it in a way that is independent of its execution, i.e., a generic process definition. So, which tense should I use? Past doesn't sound right, because it's actually a blueprint for an experiment and not something that was already done. I was thinking present simple? For example, I don't want to say "In the first step, participants had to answer the question" but something in the manner of "in the first step, participants answer the questions". I'm not sure which tense to use.



Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use? I'm using the "instances" noun, e.g., "Three instances of the experimental process were performed across three days". Is this an OK choice for what I'm writing about? Also, I want to stress that the same experiment was completed three times, once each day and not that one experiment lasted for 3 days.



Thanks for the advice!










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 10 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 2





    This is already asked on Academia and has an answer. Please don't cross-post. Choose the most relevant site and ask your question there. Just because it might be relevant on another site does not justify asking twice.

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:07











  • I made that clear with the first sentence. However, the response I got here, was way better than that in academia and I guess I should have posted here firstly. Sadly, I wasn't even aware this community exists.

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:24


















1















I thought I might ask here as well.



So I'm writing a paper and I want to define the experimental process. I have two challenges.



Firstly, when I define the experimental process, I want to write it in a way that is independent of its execution, i.e., a generic process definition. So, which tense should I use? Past doesn't sound right, because it's actually a blueprint for an experiment and not something that was already done. I was thinking present simple? For example, I don't want to say "In the first step, participants had to answer the question" but something in the manner of "in the first step, participants answer the questions". I'm not sure which tense to use.



Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use? I'm using the "instances" noun, e.g., "Three instances of the experimental process were performed across three days". Is this an OK choice for what I'm writing about? Also, I want to stress that the same experiment was completed three times, once each day and not that one experiment lasted for 3 days.



Thanks for the advice!










share|improve this question














bumped to the homepage by Community 10 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 2





    This is already asked on Academia and has an answer. Please don't cross-post. Choose the most relevant site and ask your question there. Just because it might be relevant on another site does not justify asking twice.

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:07











  • I made that clear with the first sentence. However, the response I got here, was way better than that in academia and I guess I should have posted here firstly. Sadly, I wasn't even aware this community exists.

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:24














1












1








1








I thought I might ask here as well.



So I'm writing a paper and I want to define the experimental process. I have two challenges.



Firstly, when I define the experimental process, I want to write it in a way that is independent of its execution, i.e., a generic process definition. So, which tense should I use? Past doesn't sound right, because it's actually a blueprint for an experiment and not something that was already done. I was thinking present simple? For example, I don't want to say "In the first step, participants had to answer the question" but something in the manner of "in the first step, participants answer the questions". I'm not sure which tense to use.



Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use? I'm using the "instances" noun, e.g., "Three instances of the experimental process were performed across three days". Is this an OK choice for what I'm writing about? Also, I want to stress that the same experiment was completed three times, once each day and not that one experiment lasted for 3 days.



Thanks for the advice!










share|improve this question














I thought I might ask here as well.



So I'm writing a paper and I want to define the experimental process. I have two challenges.



Firstly, when I define the experimental process, I want to write it in a way that is independent of its execution, i.e., a generic process definition. So, which tense should I use? Past doesn't sound right, because it's actually a blueprint for an experiment and not something that was already done. I was thinking present simple? For example, I don't want to say "In the first step, participants had to answer the question" but something in the manner of "in the first step, participants answer the questions". I'm not sure which tense to use.



Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use? I'm using the "instances" noun, e.g., "Three instances of the experimental process were performed across three days". Is this an OK choice for what I'm writing about? Also, I want to stress that the same experiment was completed three times, once each day and not that one experiment lasted for 3 days.



Thanks for the advice!







tenses






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 21 '18 at 8:26









curiouscatcuriouscat

61




61





bumped to the homepage by Community 10 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 10 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 2





    This is already asked on Academia and has an answer. Please don't cross-post. Choose the most relevant site and ask your question there. Just because it might be relevant on another site does not justify asking twice.

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:07











  • I made that clear with the first sentence. However, the response I got here, was way better than that in academia and I guess I should have posted here firstly. Sadly, I wasn't even aware this community exists.

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:24














  • 2





    This is already asked on Academia and has an answer. Please don't cross-post. Choose the most relevant site and ask your question there. Just because it might be relevant on another site does not justify asking twice.

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:07











  • I made that clear with the first sentence. However, the response I got here, was way better than that in academia and I guess I should have posted here firstly. Sadly, I wasn't even aware this community exists.

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:24








2




2





This is already asked on Academia and has an answer. Please don't cross-post. Choose the most relevant site and ask your question there. Just because it might be relevant on another site does not justify asking twice.

– Andrew Leach
Jul 21 '18 at 9:07





This is already asked on Academia and has an answer. Please don't cross-post. Choose the most relevant site and ask your question there. Just because it might be relevant on another site does not justify asking twice.

– Andrew Leach
Jul 21 '18 at 9:07













I made that clear with the first sentence. However, the response I got here, was way better than that in academia and I guess I should have posted here firstly. Sadly, I wasn't even aware this community exists.

– curiouscat
Jul 21 '18 at 9:24





I made that clear with the first sentence. However, the response I got here, was way better than that in academia and I guess I should have posted here firstly. Sadly, I wasn't even aware this community exists.

– curiouscat
Jul 21 '18 at 9:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0















I want to define the experimental process.




Ok, although you should be aware that the actual process varies from the version taught in middle-school science.




So, which tense should I use?




If you're describing actions, use the present simple, the tense for action outside of time: Participants do this.



If you're giving instructions, use the imperative present: Do this.




"In the first step, participants answer the questions".




This is the right tense, but not part of any scientific method. If you're talking about offering hypotheses, they suggest possible answers. They don't announce the correct ones.




Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use?




This also makes no sense. You just said you were talking about a process, not a specific instance in the past. Do you mean they should repeat the experiment three times to obtain an averaged result?






share|improve this answer


























  • thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:23











  • Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

    – Robbie Goodwin
    Aug 4 '18 at 22:03














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456730%2fwhich-tense-to-use-when-describing-a-blueprint-of-sorts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0















I want to define the experimental process.




Ok, although you should be aware that the actual process varies from the version taught in middle-school science.




So, which tense should I use?




If you're describing actions, use the present simple, the tense for action outside of time: Participants do this.



If you're giving instructions, use the imperative present: Do this.




"In the first step, participants answer the questions".




This is the right tense, but not part of any scientific method. If you're talking about offering hypotheses, they suggest possible answers. They don't announce the correct ones.




Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use?




This also makes no sense. You just said you were talking about a process, not a specific instance in the past. Do you mean they should repeat the experiment three times to obtain an averaged result?






share|improve this answer


























  • thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:23











  • Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

    – Robbie Goodwin
    Aug 4 '18 at 22:03


















0















I want to define the experimental process.




Ok, although you should be aware that the actual process varies from the version taught in middle-school science.




So, which tense should I use?




If you're describing actions, use the present simple, the tense for action outside of time: Participants do this.



If you're giving instructions, use the imperative present: Do this.




"In the first step, participants answer the questions".




This is the right tense, but not part of any scientific method. If you're talking about offering hypotheses, they suggest possible answers. They don't announce the correct ones.




Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use?




This also makes no sense. You just said you were talking about a process, not a specific instance in the past. Do you mean they should repeat the experiment three times to obtain an averaged result?






share|improve this answer


























  • thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:23











  • Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

    – Robbie Goodwin
    Aug 4 '18 at 22:03
















0












0








0








I want to define the experimental process.




Ok, although you should be aware that the actual process varies from the version taught in middle-school science.




So, which tense should I use?




If you're describing actions, use the present simple, the tense for action outside of time: Participants do this.



If you're giving instructions, use the imperative present: Do this.




"In the first step, participants answer the questions".




This is the right tense, but not part of any scientific method. If you're talking about offering hypotheses, they suggest possible answers. They don't announce the correct ones.




Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use?




This also makes no sense. You just said you were talking about a process, not a specific instance in the past. Do you mean they should repeat the experiment three times to obtain an averaged result?






share|improve this answer
















I want to define the experimental process.




Ok, although you should be aware that the actual process varies from the version taught in middle-school science.




So, which tense should I use?




If you're describing actions, use the present simple, the tense for action outside of time: Participants do this.



If you're giving instructions, use the imperative present: Do this.




"In the first step, participants answer the questions".




This is the right tense, but not part of any scientific method. If you're talking about offering hypotheses, they suggest possible answers. They don't announce the correct ones.




Secondly, I want to state that the experimental process was executed three times. What noun should I use?




This also makes no sense. You just said you were talking about a process, not a specific instance in the past. Do you mean they should repeat the experiment three times to obtain an averaged result?







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jul 21 '18 at 9:31

























answered Jul 21 '18 at 9:18









llylly

7,890836




7,890836













  • thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:23











  • Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

    – Robbie Goodwin
    Aug 4 '18 at 22:03





















  • thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

    – curiouscat
    Jul 21 '18 at 9:23











  • Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

    – Robbie Goodwin
    Aug 4 '18 at 22:03



















thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

– curiouscat
Jul 21 '18 at 9:23





thanks for your response! Let me clarify this: I already have the hypotheses defined, and dependent variables too. Now I want to describe which steps were foreseen in the experiment. For example, there's a survey which 3 sections and I want to describe what participants will have to do in each section. Then, in another chapter, called "Research execution" I will actually describe how this defined steps were executed. I obtained 90 responses, 30 participants per day. So the defined steps were executed 3 times separately

– curiouscat
Jul 21 '18 at 9:23













Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

– Robbie Goodwin
Aug 4 '18 at 22:03







Sorry, curiouscat; if you have the hypotheses defined, with dependent variables, what are you asking, please? Surveying three sections you describe what participants do… In the chapter “whatever you like” you describe how the steps were executed. Could you explain how they mattered, please? Do you know a Professor of any discipline who would support any research involving 90 responses, please? 900 perhaps but 90? Why would you even ask a Question about 90 subjects? Again, 30 participants per day boils down to what? How many minutes does each person take to process?

– Robbie Goodwin
Aug 4 '18 at 22:03




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f456730%2fwhich-tense-to-use-when-describing-a-blueprint-of-sorts%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029