A formal way to place the emphasis on myself












-2















I want the person to feel they can contact me directly but also give them the option to get in touch with other colleagues. It is a big benefit to them to have the capacity to contact me directly.



Usually, I would say something like "my colleagues and I" but this time it needs to be less deferential and the emphasis need to be on me.



The below looks wrong.




Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues.




Does anyone know a formal way of putting the emphasis on me?










share|improve this question

























  • Why does "Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues" look wrong to you?

    – Juhasz
    yesterday











  • @Julhasz it sounds juvenile to my ears.

    – SeanJ
    18 hours ago











  • Not sure why you think your sentence is juvenile - ? It’s perfectly fine English. My suggestion was meant to emphasize you as the preferred contact, but there’s nothing wrong with your original sentence.

    – Mixolydian
    17 hours ago











  • It may be grammatically correct but lacks eloquence... to my ears at least.

    – SeanJ
    14 hours ago
















-2















I want the person to feel they can contact me directly but also give them the option to get in touch with other colleagues. It is a big benefit to them to have the capacity to contact me directly.



Usually, I would say something like "my colleagues and I" but this time it needs to be less deferential and the emphasis need to be on me.



The below looks wrong.




Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues.




Does anyone know a formal way of putting the emphasis on me?










share|improve this question

























  • Why does "Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues" look wrong to you?

    – Juhasz
    yesterday











  • @Julhasz it sounds juvenile to my ears.

    – SeanJ
    18 hours ago











  • Not sure why you think your sentence is juvenile - ? It’s perfectly fine English. My suggestion was meant to emphasize you as the preferred contact, but there’s nothing wrong with your original sentence.

    – Mixolydian
    17 hours ago











  • It may be grammatically correct but lacks eloquence... to my ears at least.

    – SeanJ
    14 hours ago














-2












-2








-2








I want the person to feel they can contact me directly but also give them the option to get in touch with other colleagues. It is a big benefit to them to have the capacity to contact me directly.



Usually, I would say something like "my colleagues and I" but this time it needs to be less deferential and the emphasis need to be on me.



The below looks wrong.




Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues.




Does anyone know a formal way of putting the emphasis on me?










share|improve this question
















I want the person to feel they can contact me directly but also give them the option to get in touch with other colleagues. It is a big benefit to them to have the capacity to contact me directly.



Usually, I would say something like "my colleagues and I" but this time it needs to be less deferential and the emphasis need to be on me.



The below looks wrong.




Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues.




Does anyone know a formal way of putting the emphasis on me?







grammar expressions syntax






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Lambie

7,4861933




7,4861933










asked yesterday









SeanJSeanJ

975




975













  • Why does "Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues" look wrong to you?

    – Juhasz
    yesterday











  • @Julhasz it sounds juvenile to my ears.

    – SeanJ
    18 hours ago











  • Not sure why you think your sentence is juvenile - ? It’s perfectly fine English. My suggestion was meant to emphasize you as the preferred contact, but there’s nothing wrong with your original sentence.

    – Mixolydian
    17 hours ago











  • It may be grammatically correct but lacks eloquence... to my ears at least.

    – SeanJ
    14 hours ago



















  • Why does "Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues" look wrong to you?

    – Juhasz
    yesterday











  • @Julhasz it sounds juvenile to my ears.

    – SeanJ
    18 hours ago











  • Not sure why you think your sentence is juvenile - ? It’s perfectly fine English. My suggestion was meant to emphasize you as the preferred contact, but there’s nothing wrong with your original sentence.

    – Mixolydian
    17 hours ago











  • It may be grammatically correct but lacks eloquence... to my ears at least.

    – SeanJ
    14 hours ago

















Why does "Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues" look wrong to you?

– Juhasz
yesterday





Why does "Please get in touch directly with me or my colleagues" look wrong to you?

– Juhasz
yesterday













@Julhasz it sounds juvenile to my ears.

– SeanJ
18 hours ago





@Julhasz it sounds juvenile to my ears.

– SeanJ
18 hours ago













Not sure why you think your sentence is juvenile - ? It’s perfectly fine English. My suggestion was meant to emphasize you as the preferred contact, but there’s nothing wrong with your original sentence.

– Mixolydian
17 hours ago





Not sure why you think your sentence is juvenile - ? It’s perfectly fine English. My suggestion was meant to emphasize you as the preferred contact, but there’s nothing wrong with your original sentence.

– Mixolydian
17 hours ago













It may be grammatically correct but lacks eloquence... to my ears at least.

– SeanJ
14 hours ago





It may be grammatically correct but lacks eloquence... to my ears at least.

– SeanJ
14 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














How about: “Please get in touch directly with me (preferably) or my colleagues if I am unavailable”?






share|improve this answer
























  • That sounds much better.

    – SeanJ
    yesterday











  • @SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

    – Jason Bassford
    12 hours ago













  • I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

    – SeanJ
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    “Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

    – Mixolydian
    5 hours ago













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491257%2fa-formal-way-to-place-the-emphasis-on-myself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














How about: “Please get in touch directly with me (preferably) or my colleagues if I am unavailable”?






share|improve this answer
























  • That sounds much better.

    – SeanJ
    yesterday











  • @SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

    – Jason Bassford
    12 hours ago













  • I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

    – SeanJ
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    “Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

    – Mixolydian
    5 hours ago


















0














How about: “Please get in touch directly with me (preferably) or my colleagues if I am unavailable”?






share|improve this answer
























  • That sounds much better.

    – SeanJ
    yesterday











  • @SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

    – Jason Bassford
    12 hours ago













  • I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

    – SeanJ
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    “Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

    – Mixolydian
    5 hours ago
















0












0








0







How about: “Please get in touch directly with me (preferably) or my colleagues if I am unavailable”?






share|improve this answer













How about: “Please get in touch directly with me (preferably) or my colleagues if I am unavailable”?







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









MixolydianMixolydian

1444




1444













  • That sounds much better.

    – SeanJ
    yesterday











  • @SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

    – Jason Bassford
    12 hours ago













  • I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

    – SeanJ
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    “Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

    – Mixolydian
    5 hours ago





















  • That sounds much better.

    – SeanJ
    yesterday











  • @SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

    – Jason Bassford
    12 hours ago













  • I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

    – SeanJ
    7 hours ago






  • 1





    “Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

    – Mixolydian
    5 hours ago



















That sounds much better.

– SeanJ
yesterday





That sounds much better.

– SeanJ
yesterday













@SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

– Jason Bassford
12 hours ago







@SeanJ I don't see how this sounds better at all. Assuming you don't like your original sentence, all this does is add more verbiage. This version is less succinct, less formal, and more deferential. As far as I can tell, it doesn't address your question. But since you accepted it, I can only think you meant something different than what you actually asked for.

– Jason Bassford
12 hours ago















I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

– SeanJ
7 hours ago





I disagree on the notion that it is less formal. I would always opt for my friends and I but it doesn't suit. Me and my friends is very informal and typical of a child, at least in my age bracket. Adding verbiage formalises the statement. I would prefer something that is succinct and not dressed up. If you have a better answer....

– SeanJ
7 hours ago




1




1





“Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

– Mixolydian
5 hours ago







“Me and my friends” sounds juvenile when it’s used as a subject, because it shows that the speaker doesn’t know the difference between subject and object pronouns. As an object, though, it’s fine- “my friends and me” would usually be preferable but the reverse is not wrong. Likewise, “me or my colleagues” would sound juvenile as a subject but not as an object. The order of words here is fine (“me” first) because you want to emphasize “me” as the preferred contact. (To be clear, I am talking about your original sentence.)

– Mixolydian
5 hours ago




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491257%2fa-formal-way-to-place-the-emphasis-on-myself%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029