Meaning of this passage from nytimes [closed]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







1
















China has long prevented many American internet giants from providing
services within its borders, and it has placed tight strictures on how
other American technology firms can operate. The enormous commercial
potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put
up much of a fight as Beijing declared, in effect, that their business
interests were subservient to China’s national security interests.




First line is clear to me, but the second line creates confusion. From "The enormous commercial potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put up much of a fight as Beijing declared", I understand that there is a lot of business potential for US companies in China and thus they didn't object much to the restrictions imposed by Chinese government. After this I am completely lost. I can't understand second line as a whole.



Can anyone please explain me this? Can we replace "in effect" with any other term? What does "in effect" mean exactly in this context?










share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, lbf, Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka May 24 at 13:14


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • Is it just in effect you have a problem with (it means what it normally means) or is it "the second line as a whole"? If it's still more than a particular word or phrase, you need to be more specific in terms of identifying the concept or part of grammar that's confusing. If you put a period after fight and start another sentence with Beijing, does it help?

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:22













  • I have problem in understanding second line as a whole, and I think it's because I can't get a clear meaning of "in effect". Putting the period after fight didn't help. Thanks.

    – shiva
    May 22 at 9:43













  • The link in my first comment shows that in effect means "in substance : VIRTUALLY // the … committee agreed to what was in effect a reduction in the hourly wage." But it's also parenthetical information—so it can simply be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:52











  • So Beijing explicitly declared that "in reality" their national security was more of an important concern. Is it correct?

    – shiva
    May 22 at 10:02






  • 3





    @shiva - no, not explicitly. "In effect" means it was implicit, not explicit.

    – AndyT
    May 22 at 10:33


















1
















China has long prevented many American internet giants from providing
services within its borders, and it has placed tight strictures on how
other American technology firms can operate. The enormous commercial
potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put
up much of a fight as Beijing declared, in effect, that their business
interests were subservient to China’s national security interests.




First line is clear to me, but the second line creates confusion. From "The enormous commercial potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put up much of a fight as Beijing declared", I understand that there is a lot of business potential for US companies in China and thus they didn't object much to the restrictions imposed by Chinese government. After this I am completely lost. I can't understand second line as a whole.



Can anyone please explain me this? Can we replace "in effect" with any other term? What does "in effect" mean exactly in this context?










share|improve this question














closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, lbf, Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka May 24 at 13:14


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















  • Is it just in effect you have a problem with (it means what it normally means) or is it "the second line as a whole"? If it's still more than a particular word or phrase, you need to be more specific in terms of identifying the concept or part of grammar that's confusing. If you put a period after fight and start another sentence with Beijing, does it help?

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:22













  • I have problem in understanding second line as a whole, and I think it's because I can't get a clear meaning of "in effect". Putting the period after fight didn't help. Thanks.

    – shiva
    May 22 at 9:43













  • The link in my first comment shows that in effect means "in substance : VIRTUALLY // the … committee agreed to what was in effect a reduction in the hourly wage." But it's also parenthetical information—so it can simply be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:52











  • So Beijing explicitly declared that "in reality" their national security was more of an important concern. Is it correct?

    – shiva
    May 22 at 10:02






  • 3





    @shiva - no, not explicitly. "In effect" means it was implicit, not explicit.

    – AndyT
    May 22 at 10:33














1












1








1









China has long prevented many American internet giants from providing
services within its borders, and it has placed tight strictures on how
other American technology firms can operate. The enormous commercial
potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put
up much of a fight as Beijing declared, in effect, that their business
interests were subservient to China’s national security interests.




First line is clear to me, but the second line creates confusion. From "The enormous commercial potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put up much of a fight as Beijing declared", I understand that there is a lot of business potential for US companies in China and thus they didn't object much to the restrictions imposed by Chinese government. After this I am completely lost. I can't understand second line as a whole.



Can anyone please explain me this? Can we replace "in effect" with any other term? What does "in effect" mean exactly in this context?










share|improve this question















China has long prevented many American internet giants from providing
services within its borders, and it has placed tight strictures on how
other American technology firms can operate. The enormous commercial
potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put
up much of a fight as Beijing declared, in effect, that their business
interests were subservient to China’s national security interests.




First line is clear to me, but the second line creates confusion. From "The enormous commercial potential of the Chinese market made it hard for the companies to put up much of a fight as Beijing declared", I understand that there is a lot of business potential for US companies in China and thus they didn't object much to the restrictions imposed by Chinese government. After this I am completely lost. I can't understand second line as a whole.



Can anyone please explain me this? Can we replace "in effect" with any other term? What does "in effect" mean exactly in this context?







meaning meaning-in-context phrase-meaning






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 22 at 9:03









shivashiva

1144 bronze badges




1144 bronze badges





closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, lbf, Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka May 24 at 13:14


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, lbf, Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka May 24 at 13:14


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, lbf, Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka May 24 at 13:14


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ, Chenmunka

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Is it just in effect you have a problem with (it means what it normally means) or is it "the second line as a whole"? If it's still more than a particular word or phrase, you need to be more specific in terms of identifying the concept or part of grammar that's confusing. If you put a period after fight and start another sentence with Beijing, does it help?

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:22













  • I have problem in understanding second line as a whole, and I think it's because I can't get a clear meaning of "in effect". Putting the period after fight didn't help. Thanks.

    – shiva
    May 22 at 9:43













  • The link in my first comment shows that in effect means "in substance : VIRTUALLY // the … committee agreed to what was in effect a reduction in the hourly wage." But it's also parenthetical information—so it can simply be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:52











  • So Beijing explicitly declared that "in reality" their national security was more of an important concern. Is it correct?

    – shiva
    May 22 at 10:02






  • 3





    @shiva - no, not explicitly. "In effect" means it was implicit, not explicit.

    – AndyT
    May 22 at 10:33



















  • Is it just in effect you have a problem with (it means what it normally means) or is it "the second line as a whole"? If it's still more than a particular word or phrase, you need to be more specific in terms of identifying the concept or part of grammar that's confusing. If you put a period after fight and start another sentence with Beijing, does it help?

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:22













  • I have problem in understanding second line as a whole, and I think it's because I can't get a clear meaning of "in effect". Putting the period after fight didn't help. Thanks.

    – shiva
    May 22 at 9:43













  • The link in my first comment shows that in effect means "in substance : VIRTUALLY // the … committee agreed to what was in effect a reduction in the hourly wage." But it's also parenthetical information—so it can simply be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 22 at 9:52











  • So Beijing explicitly declared that "in reality" their national security was more of an important concern. Is it correct?

    – shiva
    May 22 at 10:02






  • 3





    @shiva - no, not explicitly. "In effect" means it was implicit, not explicit.

    – AndyT
    May 22 at 10:33

















Is it just in effect you have a problem with (it means what it normally means) or is it "the second line as a whole"? If it's still more than a particular word or phrase, you need to be more specific in terms of identifying the concept or part of grammar that's confusing. If you put a period after fight and start another sentence with Beijing, does it help?

– Jason Bassford
May 22 at 9:22







Is it just in effect you have a problem with (it means what it normally means) or is it "the second line as a whole"? If it's still more than a particular word or phrase, you need to be more specific in terms of identifying the concept or part of grammar that's confusing. If you put a period after fight and start another sentence with Beijing, does it help?

– Jason Bassford
May 22 at 9:22















I have problem in understanding second line as a whole, and I think it's because I can't get a clear meaning of "in effect". Putting the period after fight didn't help. Thanks.

– shiva
May 22 at 9:43







I have problem in understanding second line as a whole, and I think it's because I can't get a clear meaning of "in effect". Putting the period after fight didn't help. Thanks.

– shiva
May 22 at 9:43















The link in my first comment shows that in effect means "in substance : VIRTUALLY // the … committee agreed to what was in effect a reduction in the hourly wage." But it's also parenthetical information—so it can simply be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence.

– Jason Bassford
May 22 at 9:52





The link in my first comment shows that in effect means "in substance : VIRTUALLY // the … committee agreed to what was in effect a reduction in the hourly wage." But it's also parenthetical information—so it can simply be removed from the sentence without changing the meaning of the sentence.

– Jason Bassford
May 22 at 9:52













So Beijing explicitly declared that "in reality" their national security was more of an important concern. Is it correct?

– shiva
May 22 at 10:02





So Beijing explicitly declared that "in reality" their national security was more of an important concern. Is it correct?

– shiva
May 22 at 10:02




3




3





@shiva - no, not explicitly. "In effect" means it was implicit, not explicit.

– AndyT
May 22 at 10:33





@shiva - no, not explicitly. "In effect" means it was implicit, not explicit.

– AndyT
May 22 at 10:33










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














The second sentence is making two points, and it's a bit confusing that they put them both in the same sentence, as they're not really directly related.



The first point is that American businesses put up with China's tight restrictions because there's so much business opportunity there.



The second point is that China apparently has all these restrictions to make it clear that their national security interests are more important than the business interests of these companies. "in effect" means that they don't state this explicitly anywhere, it's just the obvious implication.






share|improve this answer


































    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The second sentence is making two points, and it's a bit confusing that they put them both in the same sentence, as they're not really directly related.



    The first point is that American businesses put up with China's tight restrictions because there's so much business opportunity there.



    The second point is that China apparently has all these restrictions to make it clear that their national security interests are more important than the business interests of these companies. "in effect" means that they don't state this explicitly anywhere, it's just the obvious implication.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      The second sentence is making two points, and it's a bit confusing that they put them both in the same sentence, as they're not really directly related.



      The first point is that American businesses put up with China's tight restrictions because there's so much business opportunity there.



      The second point is that China apparently has all these restrictions to make it clear that their national security interests are more important than the business interests of these companies. "in effect" means that they don't state this explicitly anywhere, it's just the obvious implication.






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        The second sentence is making two points, and it's a bit confusing that they put them both in the same sentence, as they're not really directly related.



        The first point is that American businesses put up with China's tight restrictions because there's so much business opportunity there.



        The second point is that China apparently has all these restrictions to make it clear that their national security interests are more important than the business interests of these companies. "in effect" means that they don't state this explicitly anywhere, it's just the obvious implication.






        share|improve this answer













        The second sentence is making two points, and it's a bit confusing that they put them both in the same sentence, as they're not really directly related.



        The first point is that American businesses put up with China's tight restrictions because there's so much business opportunity there.



        The second point is that China apparently has all these restrictions to make it clear that their national security interests are more important than the business interests of these companies. "in effect" means that they don't state this explicitly anywhere, it's just the obvious implication.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 22 at 19:43









        BarmarBarmar

        10.7k16 silver badges33 bronze badges




        10.7k16 silver badges33 bronze badges


















            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum