How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to keep track of time spent helping others?How to respond to a “we'll call you when the position opens” response, when you see the position opened?Dealing with people that think they're more skilled than you when that's only partially trueShould you explain a technical issue to a non technical person or give them information and alternatives that would help them to make a decision?Should I help others or keep my knowledge to myself?How to deal with colleague that uses you as a crutch to complete their tasks?How to genuinely help someone when you have no skill in his department / specialtyPassive aggressive uncooperativenessHow to deal with colleagues who laugh at me when I study something?Can you be disciplined for how a work colleague interprets your communication to them?

How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET

Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?

Yu-Gi-Oh cards in Python 3

Film where the government was corrupt with aliens, people sent to kill aliens are given rigged visors not showing the right aliens

what's the use of '% to gdp' type of variables?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Easy to read palindrome checker

Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?

Spaces in which all closed sets are regular closed

Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?

Could a dragon use its wings to swim?

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

Is there such a thing as a proper verb, like a proper noun?

Can I calculate next year's exemptions based on this year's refund/amount owed?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious HTML file (e.g. email attachment)?

Small nick on power cord from an electric alarm clock, and copper wiring exposed but intact

Physiological effects of huge anime eyes

Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?

Traduction de « Life is a roller coaster »

Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)



How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowHow to keep track of time spent helping others?How to respond to a “we'll call you when the position opens” response, when you see the position opened?Dealing with people that think they're more skilled than you when that's only partially trueShould you explain a technical issue to a non technical person or give them information and alternatives that would help them to make a decision?Should I help others or keep my knowledge to myself?How to deal with colleague that uses you as a crutch to complete their tasks?How to genuinely help someone when you have no skill in his department / specialtyPassive aggressive uncooperativenessHow to deal with colleagues who laugh at me when I study something?Can you be disciplined for how a work colleague interprets your communication to them?










58















Here's the situation. There is a person on Team X. They share some hardware that I also work on.



They're trying to create a setup for something and struggling big time with it. It's none of my business, but I know that they are struggling. And on a couple of occasions they ping me asking for details about that machine's setup. Whenever they quiz me on something I provide the answers. But over time, I feel like helping them.



So finally, I ask them how their work is going because I know that they're struggling with it. They tell me their problem and I give them a solution. And what follows is a surprise. They start throwing their problems at me one after another. There's no please, or gratitude. In fact, it appears that they're speaking to me as if it is my job to solve their problems.



In the ongoing discussion I get the impression that they're turning around their problems into "I don't know the setup on this machine, but it's your job and you have to help me out with this" and "I need to do X for this setup, so how do I do it?" rather than searching for their own solutions.



I help out whatever I can and end the conversation. I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able.



At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".



How can I communicate that I just went out of my way to help them, and they took my help for granted and that I will not be helping them again tomorrow?










share|improve this question



















  • 24





    Talk to your manager maybe?

    – newguy
    Mar 22 at 12:06






  • 1





    Do you have a good relationship with the person's boss?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 12:06











  • @GregoryCurrie Nope. In fact this person's boss is an equally self-entitled person. She then just demanded that we share our hardware with her. When I took it up with my manager he said "We should let them use it. They need to use it." Overall, on multiple ocassions, I've found her to be quite rude and entitled.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:10












  • @newguy What do I tell me manager? I wasn't supposed to be helping them. I'm not expected to help them. I went out of my way to help because I saw them struggling. And now after their entitled behavior, I don't want to help them anymore.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:11






  • 4





    "I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able." How badly would they take it if you responded with a relevant LMGTFY link?

    – Mason Wheeler
    Mar 22 at 15:54















58















Here's the situation. There is a person on Team X. They share some hardware that I also work on.



They're trying to create a setup for something and struggling big time with it. It's none of my business, but I know that they are struggling. And on a couple of occasions they ping me asking for details about that machine's setup. Whenever they quiz me on something I provide the answers. But over time, I feel like helping them.



So finally, I ask them how their work is going because I know that they're struggling with it. They tell me their problem and I give them a solution. And what follows is a surprise. They start throwing their problems at me one after another. There's no please, or gratitude. In fact, it appears that they're speaking to me as if it is my job to solve their problems.



In the ongoing discussion I get the impression that they're turning around their problems into "I don't know the setup on this machine, but it's your job and you have to help me out with this" and "I need to do X for this setup, so how do I do it?" rather than searching for their own solutions.



I help out whatever I can and end the conversation. I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able.



At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".



How can I communicate that I just went out of my way to help them, and they took my help for granted and that I will not be helping them again tomorrow?










share|improve this question



















  • 24





    Talk to your manager maybe?

    – newguy
    Mar 22 at 12:06






  • 1





    Do you have a good relationship with the person's boss?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 12:06











  • @GregoryCurrie Nope. In fact this person's boss is an equally self-entitled person. She then just demanded that we share our hardware with her. When I took it up with my manager he said "We should let them use it. They need to use it." Overall, on multiple ocassions, I've found her to be quite rude and entitled.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:10












  • @newguy What do I tell me manager? I wasn't supposed to be helping them. I'm not expected to help them. I went out of my way to help because I saw them struggling. And now after their entitled behavior, I don't want to help them anymore.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:11






  • 4





    "I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able." How badly would they take it if you responded with a relevant LMGTFY link?

    – Mason Wheeler
    Mar 22 at 15:54













58












58








58


5






Here's the situation. There is a person on Team X. They share some hardware that I also work on.



They're trying to create a setup for something and struggling big time with it. It's none of my business, but I know that they are struggling. And on a couple of occasions they ping me asking for details about that machine's setup. Whenever they quiz me on something I provide the answers. But over time, I feel like helping them.



So finally, I ask them how their work is going because I know that they're struggling with it. They tell me their problem and I give them a solution. And what follows is a surprise. They start throwing their problems at me one after another. There's no please, or gratitude. In fact, it appears that they're speaking to me as if it is my job to solve their problems.



In the ongoing discussion I get the impression that they're turning around their problems into "I don't know the setup on this machine, but it's your job and you have to help me out with this" and "I need to do X for this setup, so how do I do it?" rather than searching for their own solutions.



I help out whatever I can and end the conversation. I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able.



At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".



How can I communicate that I just went out of my way to help them, and they took my help for granted and that I will not be helping them again tomorrow?










share|improve this question
















Here's the situation. There is a person on Team X. They share some hardware that I also work on.



They're trying to create a setup for something and struggling big time with it. It's none of my business, but I know that they are struggling. And on a couple of occasions they ping me asking for details about that machine's setup. Whenever they quiz me on something I provide the answers. But over time, I feel like helping them.



So finally, I ask them how their work is going because I know that they're struggling with it. They tell me their problem and I give them a solution. And what follows is a surprise. They start throwing their problems at me one after another. There's no please, or gratitude. In fact, it appears that they're speaking to me as if it is my job to solve their problems.



In the ongoing discussion I get the impression that they're turning around their problems into "I don't know the setup on this machine, but it's your job and you have to help me out with this" and "I need to do X for this setup, so how do I do it?" rather than searching for their own solutions.



I help out whatever I can and end the conversation. I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able.



At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".



How can I communicate that I just went out of my way to help them, and they took my help for granted and that I will not be helping them again tomorrow?







communication work-environment colleagues collaboration helping






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 17:28









Community

1




1










asked Mar 22 at 12:03









MugenMugen

5132616




5132616







  • 24





    Talk to your manager maybe?

    – newguy
    Mar 22 at 12:06






  • 1





    Do you have a good relationship with the person's boss?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 12:06











  • @GregoryCurrie Nope. In fact this person's boss is an equally self-entitled person. She then just demanded that we share our hardware with her. When I took it up with my manager he said "We should let them use it. They need to use it." Overall, on multiple ocassions, I've found her to be quite rude and entitled.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:10












  • @newguy What do I tell me manager? I wasn't supposed to be helping them. I'm not expected to help them. I went out of my way to help because I saw them struggling. And now after their entitled behavior, I don't want to help them anymore.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:11






  • 4





    "I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able." How badly would they take it if you responded with a relevant LMGTFY link?

    – Mason Wheeler
    Mar 22 at 15:54












  • 24





    Talk to your manager maybe?

    – newguy
    Mar 22 at 12:06






  • 1





    Do you have a good relationship with the person's boss?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 12:06











  • @GregoryCurrie Nope. In fact this person's boss is an equally self-entitled person. She then just demanded that we share our hardware with her. When I took it up with my manager he said "We should let them use it. They need to use it." Overall, on multiple ocassions, I've found her to be quite rude and entitled.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:10












  • @newguy What do I tell me manager? I wasn't supposed to be helping them. I'm not expected to help them. I went out of my way to help because I saw them struggling. And now after their entitled behavior, I don't want to help them anymore.

    – Mugen
    Mar 22 at 12:11






  • 4





    "I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able." How badly would they take it if you responded with a relevant LMGTFY link?

    – Mason Wheeler
    Mar 22 at 15:54







24




24





Talk to your manager maybe?

– newguy
Mar 22 at 12:06





Talk to your manager maybe?

– newguy
Mar 22 at 12:06




1




1





Do you have a good relationship with the person's boss?

– Gregory Currie
Mar 22 at 12:06





Do you have a good relationship with the person's boss?

– Gregory Currie
Mar 22 at 12:06













@GregoryCurrie Nope. In fact this person's boss is an equally self-entitled person. She then just demanded that we share our hardware with her. When I took it up with my manager he said "We should let them use it. They need to use it." Overall, on multiple ocassions, I've found her to be quite rude and entitled.

– Mugen
Mar 22 at 12:10






@GregoryCurrie Nope. In fact this person's boss is an equally self-entitled person. She then just demanded that we share our hardware with her. When I took it up with my manager he said "We should let them use it. They need to use it." Overall, on multiple ocassions, I've found her to be quite rude and entitled.

– Mugen
Mar 22 at 12:10














@newguy What do I tell me manager? I wasn't supposed to be helping them. I'm not expected to help them. I went out of my way to help because I saw them struggling. And now after their entitled behavior, I don't want to help them anymore.

– Mugen
Mar 22 at 12:11





@newguy What do I tell me manager? I wasn't supposed to be helping them. I'm not expected to help them. I went out of my way to help because I saw them struggling. And now after their entitled behavior, I don't want to help them anymore.

– Mugen
Mar 22 at 12:11




4




4





"I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able." How badly would they take it if you responded with a relevant LMGTFY link?

– Mason Wheeler
Mar 22 at 15:54





"I get the feeling that they don't want to put effort in figuring out how to go about doing stuff which is easily google-able." How badly would they take it if you responded with a relevant LMGTFY link?

– Mason Wheeler
Mar 22 at 15:54










9 Answers
9






active

oldest

votes


















70














It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed.



If the repeated requests are taking up your work time in a way that makes completing your own work difficult, please be firm and straight about it and push back. Say something like:




"Hey listen, I understand you got this problem, but I have this other assignment which is expected out of me. If you feel you are really stuck and can't progress without some help, why don't you talk to your boss about the help you needed? I'm sure (s)he will understand and make the necessary arrangements for you to get help. In case I am the chosen one, I'll be glad to discuss the same with my boss and have the assignments allocated accordingly. Till then, I really need to get back to what I was doing, thanks."




The case sounds like, they just want to use you and your expertise for "free", without investing any effort from their side. The moment you bring up the point to make it official, you'll see either



  • They will stop asking for help every now and then and try to revert to doing the trials at least.


  • or, in case they already tried, they will make it an official request, for which you'll be assigned the work officially.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

    – hyde
    Mar 23 at 7:21






  • 12





    It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

    – Fabian Blechschmidt
    Mar 23 at 7:52







  • 7





    "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

    – onurcanbektas
    Mar 23 at 19:31







  • 1





    @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

    – Flater
    Mar 25 at 10:23






  • 1





    It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

    – busman
    Mar 25 at 16:42



















23














Ask your manager what he or she wants you to do.



Obviously helping out another team is going to take time, particularly if they have an ongoing set of problems. It's going to cut into whatever else you are working on. It's your manager's job to decide whether you should take that time or not.



Talk to your manager, without bringing up the attitude of the other team or the other manager. Just lay it out... you've spent this amount of time so far, you think it will take this much more time, and likely there will be additional issues that will require more time. Should you break off what you are working on and help out the other team?



Your manager gets to decide, and is also up to date on how the schedule is impacted. And if the answer is "no", your manager is the one who talks to the other team's manager and lets them know you aren't available.






share|improve this answer


















  • 9





    This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

    – Kevin
    Mar 22 at 16:00






  • 1





    Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 16:59






  • 7





    @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

    – Kevin
    Mar 22 at 18:07






  • 3





    No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

    – smci
    Mar 23 at 2:05







  • 4





    @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

    – gnasher729
    Mar 23 at 13:08


















17















"Sorry, I'm busy with task X"




Don't elaborate. You want to keep the conversation firmly grounded in the current reality and avoid any comments that give credence to the idea that you might be in some way involved in their project (e.g. "I don't want to help this person who could use google" implies that you could or should help them).



If you are later accused of being unhelpful then stick to this line. Don't refuse to help, just say that you tried to help but felt obliged to prioritise your own work. i.e. to do the thing you were told to do.



Ultimately you might be tasked with babysitting the person but you can and should make them go through formal channels to request the babysitting.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 24 at 22:47












  • Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

    – P. Hopkinson
    Mar 25 at 9:09











  • @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 25 at 9:12












  • @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 25 at 9:26











  • @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 25 at 9:28


















8














I would take a couple approaches at the same time:



  1. First, teach her to find her own answers. This may seem odd and "not my job" but it's a way to help others help themselves and take some of the burden off of you to fix all their problems. Ask questions like, "What did you find when you googled that error message?", "Have you googled how to configure X?", etc. Given time, that will train others that you expect that before they ask you a question, they will do at least some initial research and won't receive help from you until they do.


  2. Second, put the responsibility back on her and explain (briefly) why.




    When I helped you before, I had hoped to offer a few quick tips to get you unstuck. I'm sorry I can't be more help but I haven't been tasked by my manager to help with your project and don't have more time to spend on it without my manager's approval.




At this point I think you can go a few ways, you can 1. approach your manager to ask for time to help, 2. put it back on her to ask your manager if you can help her, or 3. just leave it there.



If she persists, talk to your manager. Explain your initial attempts to help but that you don't have the kind of time to spend on a regular, ongoing basis to help her. That said... be prepared for your manager to say to help her. In that case I would stick to #1 but help after a reasonable effort has been put into finding a solution.






share|improve this answer























  • +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

    – aleppke
    Mar 22 at 20:18











  • +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

    – Peter Mortensen
    Mar 25 at 12:42



















8














This is a case where corporate bureaucracy can be your friend.




Them: How do I check if a file exists?



You: Great question. If you need our team's input, create a Task in Company Task App so my manager can put it in my queue. Thanks!







share|improve this answer




















  • 3





    This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

    – aidan.plenert.macdonald
    Mar 22 at 21:19











  • I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

    – Mugen
    Mar 23 at 4:53











  • But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:38











  • Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

    – Matthew Barber
    Mar 27 at 0:05



















3















At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".




Response:




Actually I'm going to be pretty busy tomorrow. I've been happy to help out so far but maybe you should talk to $Boss about getting some more assistance? I kinda need to focus on my own work now! Sorry…




This is deliberately tailored for the scenario you describe, and I wouldn't use it except that they've started bugging you frequently, with evidence that they've stopped really bothering to try to solve things on their own (right down to the declarative, and frankly entitled nature of their parting line). It's fine to be firm and to push back. And if that feels unfair, just remind yourself that you're also helping them in the long run.



I'd also casually mention what's been going on to your own manager, not by way of complaining, but by way of laying the groundwork in case the colleague doesn't stop and you have to bring in the heavy guns later on. Though this suggestion depends: if my manager were trigger-happy and I got the impression this might get the colleague into trouble or otherwise cause more of a reaction than necessary, I'd consider just keeping it to myself for the time being. After all, you don't have to report every workplace conversation to your manager, until it's genuinely become a problem.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    I faced the quite same situation, and I'd like to share how I get out of it.



    At first, I got asked for questions from time to time. Later, I became the "automatic" question solver man. Since this situation installed gradually, I started gradually pushing it back:



    Step 1: Delay my (too many) answers



    • "I can't check with you now, but you can get back later. Can you please come back at ...?"

    • "I may have a solution... I'll get back to you later."

    • "Can you please send me an email with details X and Y. I'll reply back."

    Step 2: Re-orient towards another problem solver



    • "The document 'XXX' has exactly your answer. Check page 7..."

    • "Let's check together. This web search engine spits out quite interesting links. What about you checking this result or this other one?"

    • "I'm sorry. Please see with person Z (or service Z). They know this subject better than me."

    Step 3: Give a clear push back (to the insisting askers)



    • "I don't know."

    • "I don't have a clue."

    • Check your head quickly from left to right as "no-no".

    This last action gets the last insisting askers out.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 24 at 18:43











    • Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

      – Mugen
      Mar 25 at 6:35











    • @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

      – Stephan
      Mar 25 at 7:00











    • How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

      – rkeet
      Mar 25 at 11:33











    • Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

      – Peter Mortensen
      Mar 25 at 13:09


















    0














    You have indicated that multiple people on another team have been floundering for days on a problem and that you could, in a day, resolve their setup issue.



    The right thing to do is to help them. It will, eventually, unlock their productivity and help your organization as a whole.



    That said, yes, I agree it was not right for them to take an entitled attitude with you, and they should NOT expect unlimited ad-hoc help from you whenever they request it.



    I totally disagree, however, with some other other answers and comments that each team has their work and that you should "cut them off". The proper thing to do, is to put a structure and limits on your labor to help them. This may mean management needs to be involved and that both you and the other team need to formalize the arrangement.



    I know folks on Stack Exchange sites like the Stack Overflow philosophy that dismisses questioning and knowledge-seeking without some very high standard of prior-proof-of-work demanded of the asker. But that's not how workplaces actually function.



    You're paid, they're paid, and the organization needs work done. If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

      – Mugen
      Mar 25 at 7:52












    • @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

      – teego1967
      Mar 25 at 10:07












    • I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

      – Mugen
      Mar 25 at 13:54


















    -2














    All of the above answers have been a "hold the high ground," but for someone who demands your help and gives nothing back, they will have a higher chance of eventually taking credit for your work too. The best outcome is for them to leave the company or group.



    Approach 1 - Their Boss Gets Mad



    The passive aggressive, highly competitive response is to provide answers that are wrong, unproductive, or will make them look stupid. If they are thinking about the problem and call you out on it right there, then treat them to an overpriced coffee[1] and talk about help being a two-way street.



    If they blindly take your deliberately bad advice, because they are in over their head only to fail, they will cast the blame on you for sabotaging them. If it's known that you have helped in the past, they will still blame you for their failure. If possible, you need to deny ever providing any substantial help at all, because you have clear direction to focus on your task, even though this may be a lie.



    Approach 2 - Your Boss Gets Mad



    Alternatively, you can start to tell your boss that they have been trying to sabotage your work because you refuse to sacrifice your project schedule. This is lying, but moves the focus back to the other employee. It also gives you a chance to be creative at work.



    Discussion



    Both cases assume that management on both sides lacks the backbone to resolve this problem, a situation I see frequently.



    I don't personally have the stomach for either approach as it goes against my ethos, but book and TV script authors[2] seem to think that these things work. I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management.



    But narcissistic and belligerent people can be unwilling to change and must ultimately be evicted; make them cost the company money or embarrassment if management lacks the courage to do the right thing early.



    Or, you can read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People". Learn. Apply.



    [1.] This is a psychology trick to incur a social debt which can simply be repaid by the individual learning to be grateful. When they learn to show gratitude, another psychology trick kicks in and they will learn to respect your time.
    [2.] The TV show Billions comes to mind.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 24 at 18:44









    protected by mcknz Mar 25 at 7:09



    Thank you for your interest in this question.
    Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



    Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














    9 Answers
    9






    active

    oldest

    votes








    9 Answers
    9






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    70














    It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed.



    If the repeated requests are taking up your work time in a way that makes completing your own work difficult, please be firm and straight about it and push back. Say something like:




    "Hey listen, I understand you got this problem, but I have this other assignment which is expected out of me. If you feel you are really stuck and can't progress without some help, why don't you talk to your boss about the help you needed? I'm sure (s)he will understand and make the necessary arrangements for you to get help. In case I am the chosen one, I'll be glad to discuss the same with my boss and have the assignments allocated accordingly. Till then, I really need to get back to what I was doing, thanks."




    The case sounds like, they just want to use you and your expertise for "free", without investing any effort from their side. The moment you bring up the point to make it official, you'll see either



    • They will stop asking for help every now and then and try to revert to doing the trials at least.


    • or, in case they already tried, they will make it an official request, for which you'll be assigned the work officially.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

      – hyde
      Mar 23 at 7:21






    • 12





      It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

      – Fabian Blechschmidt
      Mar 23 at 7:52







    • 7





      "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

      – onurcanbektas
      Mar 23 at 19:31







    • 1





      @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

      – Flater
      Mar 25 at 10:23






    • 1





      It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

      – busman
      Mar 25 at 16:42
















    70














    It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed.



    If the repeated requests are taking up your work time in a way that makes completing your own work difficult, please be firm and straight about it and push back. Say something like:




    "Hey listen, I understand you got this problem, but I have this other assignment which is expected out of me. If you feel you are really stuck and can't progress without some help, why don't you talk to your boss about the help you needed? I'm sure (s)he will understand and make the necessary arrangements for you to get help. In case I am the chosen one, I'll be glad to discuss the same with my boss and have the assignments allocated accordingly. Till then, I really need to get back to what I was doing, thanks."




    The case sounds like, they just want to use you and your expertise for "free", without investing any effort from their side. The moment you bring up the point to make it official, you'll see either



    • They will stop asking for help every now and then and try to revert to doing the trials at least.


    • or, in case they already tried, they will make it an official request, for which you'll be assigned the work officially.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

      – hyde
      Mar 23 at 7:21






    • 12





      It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

      – Fabian Blechschmidt
      Mar 23 at 7:52







    • 7





      "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

      – onurcanbektas
      Mar 23 at 19:31







    • 1





      @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

      – Flater
      Mar 25 at 10:23






    • 1





      It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

      – busman
      Mar 25 at 16:42














    70












    70








    70







    It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed.



    If the repeated requests are taking up your work time in a way that makes completing your own work difficult, please be firm and straight about it and push back. Say something like:




    "Hey listen, I understand you got this problem, but I have this other assignment which is expected out of me. If you feel you are really stuck and can't progress without some help, why don't you talk to your boss about the help you needed? I'm sure (s)he will understand and make the necessary arrangements for you to get help. In case I am the chosen one, I'll be glad to discuss the same with my boss and have the assignments allocated accordingly. Till then, I really need to get back to what I was doing, thanks."




    The case sounds like, they just want to use you and your expertise for "free", without investing any effort from their side. The moment you bring up the point to make it official, you'll see either



    • They will stop asking for help every now and then and try to revert to doing the trials at least.


    • or, in case they already tried, they will make it an official request, for which you'll be assigned the work officially.






    share|improve this answer















    It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed.



    If the repeated requests are taking up your work time in a way that makes completing your own work difficult, please be firm and straight about it and push back. Say something like:




    "Hey listen, I understand you got this problem, but I have this other assignment which is expected out of me. If you feel you are really stuck and can't progress without some help, why don't you talk to your boss about the help you needed? I'm sure (s)he will understand and make the necessary arrangements for you to get help. In case I am the chosen one, I'll be glad to discuss the same with my boss and have the assignments allocated accordingly. Till then, I really need to get back to what I was doing, thanks."




    The case sounds like, they just want to use you and your expertise for "free", without investing any effort from their side. The moment you bring up the point to make it official, you'll see either



    • They will stop asking for help every now and then and try to revert to doing the trials at least.


    • or, in case they already tried, they will make it an official request, for which you'll be assigned the work officially.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 22 at 12:28

























    answered Mar 22 at 12:09









    Sourav GhoshSourav Ghosh

    8,02843657




    8,02843657







    • 2





      I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

      – hyde
      Mar 23 at 7:21






    • 12





      It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

      – Fabian Blechschmidt
      Mar 23 at 7:52







    • 7





      "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

      – onurcanbektas
      Mar 23 at 19:31







    • 1





      @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

      – Flater
      Mar 25 at 10:23






    • 1





      It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

      – busman
      Mar 25 at 16:42













    • 2





      I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

      – hyde
      Mar 23 at 7:21






    • 12





      It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

      – Fabian Blechschmidt
      Mar 23 at 7:52







    • 7





      "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

      – onurcanbektas
      Mar 23 at 19:31







    • 1





      @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

      – Flater
      Mar 25 at 10:23






    • 1





      It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

      – busman
      Mar 25 at 16:42








    2




    2





    I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

    – hyde
    Mar 23 at 7:21





    I kinda disagree with this kind of "let's go through our bosses" approach, except as a last resort, in other words when personal communication doesn't solve the problem.

    – hyde
    Mar 23 at 7:21




    12




    12





    It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

    – Fabian Blechschmidt
    Mar 23 at 7:52






    It is your boss who decides what you work on, therefore if you invest hours into something, they need to know.

    – Fabian Blechschmidt
    Mar 23 at 7:52





    7




    7





    "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

    – onurcanbektas
    Mar 23 at 19:31






    "It's sad but true: people take the path of least resistance and effort needed."Well, ... considering the fact that nature also chooses the path of "minimum effort", expecting the opposite from a product of nature would not make sense.

    – onurcanbektas
    Mar 23 at 19:31





    1




    1





    @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

    – Flater
    Mar 25 at 10:23





    @hyde: When in such a situation, I'm usually willing to help as long as I don't get in trouble for not completing my own task. I don't mind taking a day to help someone get started as long as no one blames me for not doing other work during that same day. This is why getting your boss to sign off (or anyone with authority to make that call) covers your own ass.

    – Flater
    Mar 25 at 10:23




    1




    1





    It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

    – busman
    Mar 25 at 16:42






    It's not sad. I am very comfortable with it. Also, asking someone who knows a solution is a way of solving the problem.

    – busman
    Mar 25 at 16:42














    23














    Ask your manager what he or she wants you to do.



    Obviously helping out another team is going to take time, particularly if they have an ongoing set of problems. It's going to cut into whatever else you are working on. It's your manager's job to decide whether you should take that time or not.



    Talk to your manager, without bringing up the attitude of the other team or the other manager. Just lay it out... you've spent this amount of time so far, you think it will take this much more time, and likely there will be additional issues that will require more time. Should you break off what you are working on and help out the other team?



    Your manager gets to decide, and is also up to date on how the schedule is impacted. And if the answer is "no", your manager is the one who talks to the other team's manager and lets them know you aren't available.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 9





      This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 16:00






    • 1





      Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

      – Gregory Currie
      Mar 22 at 16:59






    • 7





      @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 18:07






    • 3





      No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

      – smci
      Mar 23 at 2:05







    • 4





      @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

      – gnasher729
      Mar 23 at 13:08















    23














    Ask your manager what he or she wants you to do.



    Obviously helping out another team is going to take time, particularly if they have an ongoing set of problems. It's going to cut into whatever else you are working on. It's your manager's job to decide whether you should take that time or not.



    Talk to your manager, without bringing up the attitude of the other team or the other manager. Just lay it out... you've spent this amount of time so far, you think it will take this much more time, and likely there will be additional issues that will require more time. Should you break off what you are working on and help out the other team?



    Your manager gets to decide, and is also up to date on how the schedule is impacted. And if the answer is "no", your manager is the one who talks to the other team's manager and lets them know you aren't available.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 9





      This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 16:00






    • 1





      Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

      – Gregory Currie
      Mar 22 at 16:59






    • 7





      @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 18:07






    • 3





      No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

      – smci
      Mar 23 at 2:05







    • 4





      @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

      – gnasher729
      Mar 23 at 13:08













    23












    23








    23







    Ask your manager what he or she wants you to do.



    Obviously helping out another team is going to take time, particularly if they have an ongoing set of problems. It's going to cut into whatever else you are working on. It's your manager's job to decide whether you should take that time or not.



    Talk to your manager, without bringing up the attitude of the other team or the other manager. Just lay it out... you've spent this amount of time so far, you think it will take this much more time, and likely there will be additional issues that will require more time. Should you break off what you are working on and help out the other team?



    Your manager gets to decide, and is also up to date on how the schedule is impacted. And if the answer is "no", your manager is the one who talks to the other team's manager and lets them know you aren't available.






    share|improve this answer













    Ask your manager what he or she wants you to do.



    Obviously helping out another team is going to take time, particularly if they have an ongoing set of problems. It's going to cut into whatever else you are working on. It's your manager's job to decide whether you should take that time or not.



    Talk to your manager, without bringing up the attitude of the other team or the other manager. Just lay it out... you've spent this amount of time so far, you think it will take this much more time, and likely there will be additional issues that will require more time. Should you break off what you are working on and help out the other team?



    Your manager gets to decide, and is also up to date on how the schedule is impacted. And if the answer is "no", your manager is the one who talks to the other team's manager and lets them know you aren't available.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 22 at 15:30









    DaveGDaveG

    1,570515




    1,570515







    • 9





      This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 16:00






    • 1





      Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

      – Gregory Currie
      Mar 22 at 16:59






    • 7





      @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 18:07






    • 3





      No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

      – smci
      Mar 23 at 2:05







    • 4





      @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

      – gnasher729
      Mar 23 at 13:08












    • 9





      This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 16:00






    • 1





      Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

      – Gregory Currie
      Mar 22 at 16:59






    • 7





      @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

      – Kevin
      Mar 22 at 18:07






    • 3





      No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

      – smci
      Mar 23 at 2:05







    • 4





      @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

      – gnasher729
      Mar 23 at 13:08







    9




    9





    This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

    – Kevin
    Mar 22 at 16:00





    This! This is the correct answer here. Saying "No" or "Yes" is wrong, because you're making a judgement call you're not in a position to make. Because this isn't really "Should you be spending X hours helping person Y" but "Should you be spending X hours getting project Z off the ground." And your manager is the one that needs to be making that decision. As someone who has often assisted other groups on tasks that are not at all related to my usual duties, I can tell you this: sometimes what you're asked to help with is surprisingly more important than the rest of the stuff on your plate.

    – Kevin
    Mar 22 at 16:00




    1




    1





    Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 16:59





    Presumably the OP has had tasks already allocated to them?

    – Gregory Currie
    Mar 22 at 16:59




    7




    7





    @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

    – Kevin
    Mar 22 at 18:07





    @GregoryCurrie - the problem with that logic is: it assumes the importance of the OP's tasks and the Requester's tasks. If the manager hasn't been asked or apprised of the situation, it's entirely possible they would respond, "Oh, Project XYZ? Yeah, that's a corporate level task - that has to be finished by end of year. Give Pat all the assistance they need, I'll understand if your other tasks slip because of it." Might not be likely, but the priorities are set by management. Saying "No" or "Yes" without getting their input isn't smart.

    – Kevin
    Mar 22 at 18:07




    3




    3





    No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

    – smci
    Mar 23 at 2:05






    No, this is the wrong approach. By definition their manager doesn't want them to do anything about it, because it's assigned to another employee on another team; OP has no dependency on that task for their own job, nor has their manager ever said "I want you to help Y with task Z". Asking this sort of question will only confuse /annoy your mgr that you are not working on your own tasks (this is extremely likely). (At most you might say "Coworker Y keeps bugging me for help with their team's task Z. Can you please ask them to stop?" But it's better to first directly say that in writing to Y)

    – smci
    Mar 23 at 2:05





    4




    4





    @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

    – gnasher729
    Mar 23 at 13:08





    @Mugen: What Kevin says is that your manager is the one who tells you whether to help them, and how much to help them. If your manager tells you to help them 40 hours a week, you do it. And if your manager tells you to not touch their work, then you don't touch it. That's his job as a manager.

    – gnasher729
    Mar 23 at 13:08











    17















    "Sorry, I'm busy with task X"




    Don't elaborate. You want to keep the conversation firmly grounded in the current reality and avoid any comments that give credence to the idea that you might be in some way involved in their project (e.g. "I don't want to help this person who could use google" implies that you could or should help them).



    If you are later accused of being unhelpful then stick to this line. Don't refuse to help, just say that you tried to help but felt obliged to prioritise your own work. i.e. to do the thing you were told to do.



    Ultimately you might be tasked with babysitting the person but you can and should make them go through formal channels to request the babysitting.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 24 at 22:47












    • Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Mar 25 at 9:09











    • @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

      – Rui F Ribeiro
      Mar 25 at 9:12












    • @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:26











    • @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:28















    17















    "Sorry, I'm busy with task X"




    Don't elaborate. You want to keep the conversation firmly grounded in the current reality and avoid any comments that give credence to the idea that you might be in some way involved in their project (e.g. "I don't want to help this person who could use google" implies that you could or should help them).



    If you are later accused of being unhelpful then stick to this line. Don't refuse to help, just say that you tried to help but felt obliged to prioritise your own work. i.e. to do the thing you were told to do.



    Ultimately you might be tasked with babysitting the person but you can and should make them go through formal channels to request the babysitting.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 24 at 22:47












    • Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Mar 25 at 9:09











    • @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

      – Rui F Ribeiro
      Mar 25 at 9:12












    • @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:26











    • @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:28













    17












    17








    17








    "Sorry, I'm busy with task X"




    Don't elaborate. You want to keep the conversation firmly grounded in the current reality and avoid any comments that give credence to the idea that you might be in some way involved in their project (e.g. "I don't want to help this person who could use google" implies that you could or should help them).



    If you are later accused of being unhelpful then stick to this line. Don't refuse to help, just say that you tried to help but felt obliged to prioritise your own work. i.e. to do the thing you were told to do.



    Ultimately you might be tasked with babysitting the person but you can and should make them go through formal channels to request the babysitting.






    share|improve this answer
















    "Sorry, I'm busy with task X"




    Don't elaborate. You want to keep the conversation firmly grounded in the current reality and avoid any comments that give credence to the idea that you might be in some way involved in their project (e.g. "I don't want to help this person who could use google" implies that you could or should help them).



    If you are later accused of being unhelpful then stick to this line. Don't refuse to help, just say that you tried to help but felt obliged to prioritise your own work. i.e. to do the thing you were told to do.



    Ultimately you might be tasked with babysitting the person but you can and should make them go through formal channels to request the babysitting.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 22 at 12:52

























    answered Mar 22 at 12:43









    P. HopkinsonP. Hopkinson

    97229




    97229







    • 1





      This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 24 at 22:47












    • Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Mar 25 at 9:09











    • @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

      – Rui F Ribeiro
      Mar 25 at 9:12












    • @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:26











    • @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:28












    • 1





      This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 24 at 22:47












    • Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

      – P. Hopkinson
      Mar 25 at 9:09











    • @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

      – Rui F Ribeiro
      Mar 25 at 9:12












    • @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:26











    • @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

      – Oddthinking
      Mar 25 at 9:28







    1




    1





    This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 24 at 22:47






    This might help with interpersonal relationships - like requests from your neighbour - but in a workplace, there is a common goal, and your boss might prefer that you do help them.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 24 at 22:47














    Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

    – P. Hopkinson
    Mar 25 at 9:09





    Sure. But the OP has already tried this and is being sucked into something less productive.

    – P. Hopkinson
    Mar 25 at 9:09













    @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 25 at 9:12






    @Oddthinking I work for the common goal in small things, or when having time to spare. If it is taking a significant amount of time or getting out of hand, as the OP describes, the right approach is escalating it to your manager as this answer suggests

    – Rui F Ribeiro
    Mar 25 at 9:12














    @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 25 at 9:26





    @P.Hopkinson: I am not convinced it is less productive. Take it to the boss to decide.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 25 at 9:26













    @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 25 at 9:28





    @RuiFRibeiro: This answer suggests being stubbornly unhelpful, and only relent if they go through the right channels. You are suggesting the first step is to escalate to one's own manager. They are quite different answers.

    – Oddthinking
    Mar 25 at 9:28











    8














    I would take a couple approaches at the same time:



    1. First, teach her to find her own answers. This may seem odd and "not my job" but it's a way to help others help themselves and take some of the burden off of you to fix all their problems. Ask questions like, "What did you find when you googled that error message?", "Have you googled how to configure X?", etc. Given time, that will train others that you expect that before they ask you a question, they will do at least some initial research and won't receive help from you until they do.


    2. Second, put the responsibility back on her and explain (briefly) why.




      When I helped you before, I had hoped to offer a few quick tips to get you unstuck. I'm sorry I can't be more help but I haven't been tasked by my manager to help with your project and don't have more time to spend on it without my manager's approval.




    At this point I think you can go a few ways, you can 1. approach your manager to ask for time to help, 2. put it back on her to ask your manager if you can help her, or 3. just leave it there.



    If she persists, talk to your manager. Explain your initial attempts to help but that you don't have the kind of time to spend on a regular, ongoing basis to help her. That said... be prepared for your manager to say to help her. In that case I would stick to #1 but help after a reasonable effort has been put into finding a solution.






    share|improve this answer























    • +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

      – aleppke
      Mar 22 at 20:18











    • +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

      – Peter Mortensen
      Mar 25 at 12:42
















    8














    I would take a couple approaches at the same time:



    1. First, teach her to find her own answers. This may seem odd and "not my job" but it's a way to help others help themselves and take some of the burden off of you to fix all their problems. Ask questions like, "What did you find when you googled that error message?", "Have you googled how to configure X?", etc. Given time, that will train others that you expect that before they ask you a question, they will do at least some initial research and won't receive help from you until they do.


    2. Second, put the responsibility back on her and explain (briefly) why.




      When I helped you before, I had hoped to offer a few quick tips to get you unstuck. I'm sorry I can't be more help but I haven't been tasked by my manager to help with your project and don't have more time to spend on it without my manager's approval.




    At this point I think you can go a few ways, you can 1. approach your manager to ask for time to help, 2. put it back on her to ask your manager if you can help her, or 3. just leave it there.



    If she persists, talk to your manager. Explain your initial attempts to help but that you don't have the kind of time to spend on a regular, ongoing basis to help her. That said... be prepared for your manager to say to help her. In that case I would stick to #1 but help after a reasonable effort has been put into finding a solution.






    share|improve this answer























    • +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

      – aleppke
      Mar 22 at 20:18











    • +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

      – Peter Mortensen
      Mar 25 at 12:42














    8












    8








    8







    I would take a couple approaches at the same time:



    1. First, teach her to find her own answers. This may seem odd and "not my job" but it's a way to help others help themselves and take some of the burden off of you to fix all their problems. Ask questions like, "What did you find when you googled that error message?", "Have you googled how to configure X?", etc. Given time, that will train others that you expect that before they ask you a question, they will do at least some initial research and won't receive help from you until they do.


    2. Second, put the responsibility back on her and explain (briefly) why.




      When I helped you before, I had hoped to offer a few quick tips to get you unstuck. I'm sorry I can't be more help but I haven't been tasked by my manager to help with your project and don't have more time to spend on it without my manager's approval.




    At this point I think you can go a few ways, you can 1. approach your manager to ask for time to help, 2. put it back on her to ask your manager if you can help her, or 3. just leave it there.



    If she persists, talk to your manager. Explain your initial attempts to help but that you don't have the kind of time to spend on a regular, ongoing basis to help her. That said... be prepared for your manager to say to help her. In that case I would stick to #1 but help after a reasonable effort has been put into finding a solution.






    share|improve this answer













    I would take a couple approaches at the same time:



    1. First, teach her to find her own answers. This may seem odd and "not my job" but it's a way to help others help themselves and take some of the burden off of you to fix all their problems. Ask questions like, "What did you find when you googled that error message?", "Have you googled how to configure X?", etc. Given time, that will train others that you expect that before they ask you a question, they will do at least some initial research and won't receive help from you until they do.


    2. Second, put the responsibility back on her and explain (briefly) why.




      When I helped you before, I had hoped to offer a few quick tips to get you unstuck. I'm sorry I can't be more help but I haven't been tasked by my manager to help with your project and don't have more time to spend on it without my manager's approval.




    At this point I think you can go a few ways, you can 1. approach your manager to ask for time to help, 2. put it back on her to ask your manager if you can help her, or 3. just leave it there.



    If she persists, talk to your manager. Explain your initial attempts to help but that you don't have the kind of time to spend on a regular, ongoing basis to help her. That said... be prepared for your manager to say to help her. In that case I would stick to #1 but help after a reasonable effort has been put into finding a solution.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Mar 22 at 15:37









    JeffCJeffC

    1,6081513




    1,6081513












    • +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

      – aleppke
      Mar 22 at 20:18











    • +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

      – Peter Mortensen
      Mar 25 at 12:42


















    • +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

      – aleppke
      Mar 22 at 20:18











    • +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

      – Peter Mortensen
      Mar 25 at 12:42

















    +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

    – aleppke
    Mar 22 at 20:18





    +1 for having a manager decide how much time to invest in helping her. There's always a chance that the work she's doing actually is more important than what you're doing and it's in the company's best interest for you to drop what you're doing and help her see her task through to completion. But because that affects your ability to deliver on your commitments, that's a decision your manager needs to make.

    – aleppke
    Mar 22 at 20:18













    +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

    – Peter Mortensen
    Mar 25 at 12:42






    +1 for 1., teaching someone to fish, etc. In this way, you provide help, but they have to take responsibility and complete the task, not you. Even if the question is What is 2 + 2?

    – Peter Mortensen
    Mar 25 at 12:42












    8














    This is a case where corporate bureaucracy can be your friend.




    Them: How do I check if a file exists?



    You: Great question. If you need our team's input, create a Task in Company Task App so my manager can put it in my queue. Thanks!







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

      – aidan.plenert.macdonald
      Mar 22 at 21:19











    • I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

      – Mugen
      Mar 23 at 4:53











    • But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 24 at 18:38











    • Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

      – Matthew Barber
      Mar 27 at 0:05
















    8














    This is a case where corporate bureaucracy can be your friend.




    Them: How do I check if a file exists?



    You: Great question. If you need our team's input, create a Task in Company Task App so my manager can put it in my queue. Thanks!







    share|improve this answer




















    • 3





      This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

      – aidan.plenert.macdonald
      Mar 22 at 21:19











    • I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

      – Mugen
      Mar 23 at 4:53











    • But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 24 at 18:38











    • Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

      – Matthew Barber
      Mar 27 at 0:05














    8












    8








    8







    This is a case where corporate bureaucracy can be your friend.




    Them: How do I check if a file exists?



    You: Great question. If you need our team's input, create a Task in Company Task App so my manager can put it in my queue. Thanks!







    share|improve this answer















    This is a case where corporate bureaucracy can be your friend.




    Them: How do I check if a file exists?



    You: Great question. If you need our team's input, create a Task in Company Task App so my manager can put it in my queue. Thanks!








    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 25 at 13:20

























    answered Mar 22 at 19:11









    Johns-305Johns-305

    4,50211019




    4,50211019







    • 3





      This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

      – aidan.plenert.macdonald
      Mar 22 at 21:19











    • I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

      – Mugen
      Mar 23 at 4:53











    • But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 24 at 18:38











    • Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

      – Matthew Barber
      Mar 27 at 0:05













    • 3





      This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

      – aidan.plenert.macdonald
      Mar 22 at 21:19











    • I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

      – Mugen
      Mar 23 at 4:53











    • But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

      – Lightness Races in Orbit
      Mar 24 at 18:38











    • Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

      – Matthew Barber
      Mar 27 at 0:05








    3




    3





    This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

    – aidan.plenert.macdonald
    Mar 22 at 21:19





    This is perfect. You can also have a team secret flag like "High priority" which the teams reads as "Don't worry about this", but keeps the other team from bugging you because they think you are doing your best to work on it.

    – aidan.plenert.macdonald
    Mar 22 at 21:19













    I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

    – Mugen
    Mar 23 at 4:53





    I literally laughed when I read this. Noice!

    – Mugen
    Mar 23 at 4:53













    But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:38





    But don't call it a "great question" when it isn't

    – Lightness Races in Orbit
    Mar 24 at 18:38













    Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

    – Matthew Barber
    Mar 27 at 0:05






    Yes, but don't overload the work queue with a string of trivial tasks that will chew up more of other people's time than they would of yours if you just helped out.

    – Matthew Barber
    Mar 27 at 0:05












    3















    At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".




    Response:




    Actually I'm going to be pretty busy tomorrow. I've been happy to help out so far but maybe you should talk to $Boss about getting some more assistance? I kinda need to focus on my own work now! Sorry…




    This is deliberately tailored for the scenario you describe, and I wouldn't use it except that they've started bugging you frequently, with evidence that they've stopped really bothering to try to solve things on their own (right down to the declarative, and frankly entitled nature of their parting line). It's fine to be firm and to push back. And if that feels unfair, just remind yourself that you're also helping them in the long run.



    I'd also casually mention what's been going on to your own manager, not by way of complaining, but by way of laying the groundwork in case the colleague doesn't stop and you have to bring in the heavy guns later on. Though this suggestion depends: if my manager were trigger-happy and I got the impression this might get the colleague into trouble or otherwise cause more of a reaction than necessary, I'd consider just keeping it to myself for the time being. After all, you don't have to report every workplace conversation to your manager, until it's genuinely become a problem.






    share|improve this answer



























      3















      At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".




      Response:




      Actually I'm going to be pretty busy tomorrow. I've been happy to help out so far but maybe you should talk to $Boss about getting some more assistance? I kinda need to focus on my own work now! Sorry…




      This is deliberately tailored for the scenario you describe, and I wouldn't use it except that they've started bugging you frequently, with evidence that they've stopped really bothering to try to solve things on their own (right down to the declarative, and frankly entitled nature of their parting line). It's fine to be firm and to push back. And if that feels unfair, just remind yourself that you're also helping them in the long run.



      I'd also casually mention what's been going on to your own manager, not by way of complaining, but by way of laying the groundwork in case the colleague doesn't stop and you have to bring in the heavy guns later on. Though this suggestion depends: if my manager were trigger-happy and I got the impression this might get the colleague into trouble or otherwise cause more of a reaction than necessary, I'd consider just keeping it to myself for the time being. After all, you don't have to report every workplace conversation to your manager, until it's genuinely become a problem.






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3








        At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".




        Response:




        Actually I'm going to be pretty busy tomorrow. I've been happy to help out so far but maybe you should talk to $Boss about getting some more assistance? I kinda need to focus on my own work now! Sorry…




        This is deliberately tailored for the scenario you describe, and I wouldn't use it except that they've started bugging you frequently, with evidence that they've stopped really bothering to try to solve things on their own (right down to the declarative, and frankly entitled nature of their parting line). It's fine to be firm and to push back. And if that feels unfair, just remind yourself that you're also helping them in the long run.



        I'd also casually mention what's been going on to your own manager, not by way of complaining, but by way of laying the groundwork in case the colleague doesn't stop and you have to bring in the heavy guns later on. Though this suggestion depends: if my manager were trigger-happy and I got the impression this might get the colleague into trouble or otherwise cause more of a reaction than necessary, I'd consider just keeping it to myself for the time being. After all, you don't have to report every workplace conversation to your manager, until it's genuinely become a problem.






        share|improve this answer














        At the end she says "I'm going to bug you again tomorrow".




        Response:




        Actually I'm going to be pretty busy tomorrow. I've been happy to help out so far but maybe you should talk to $Boss about getting some more assistance? I kinda need to focus on my own work now! Sorry…




        This is deliberately tailored for the scenario you describe, and I wouldn't use it except that they've started bugging you frequently, with evidence that they've stopped really bothering to try to solve things on their own (right down to the declarative, and frankly entitled nature of their parting line). It's fine to be firm and to push back. And if that feels unfair, just remind yourself that you're also helping them in the long run.



        I'd also casually mention what's been going on to your own manager, not by way of complaining, but by way of laying the groundwork in case the colleague doesn't stop and you have to bring in the heavy guns later on. Though this suggestion depends: if my manager were trigger-happy and I got the impression this might get the colleague into trouble or otherwise cause more of a reaction than necessary, I'd consider just keeping it to myself for the time being. After all, you don't have to report every workplace conversation to your manager, until it's genuinely become a problem.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Mar 24 at 18:41









        Lightness Races in OrbitLightness Races in Orbit

        9,78741938




        9,78741938





















            1














            I faced the quite same situation, and I'd like to share how I get out of it.



            At first, I got asked for questions from time to time. Later, I became the "automatic" question solver man. Since this situation installed gradually, I started gradually pushing it back:



            Step 1: Delay my (too many) answers



            • "I can't check with you now, but you can get back later. Can you please come back at ...?"

            • "I may have a solution... I'll get back to you later."

            • "Can you please send me an email with details X and Y. I'll reply back."

            Step 2: Re-orient towards another problem solver



            • "The document 'XXX' has exactly your answer. Check page 7..."

            • "Let's check together. This web search engine spits out quite interesting links. What about you checking this result or this other one?"

            • "I'm sorry. Please see with person Z (or service Z). They know this subject better than me."

            Step 3: Give a clear push back (to the insisting askers)



            • "I don't know."

            • "I don't have a clue."

            • Check your head quickly from left to right as "no-no".

            This last action gets the last insisting askers out.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:43











            • Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 6:35











            • @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

              – Stephan
              Mar 25 at 7:00











            • How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

              – rkeet
              Mar 25 at 11:33











            • Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

              – Peter Mortensen
              Mar 25 at 13:09















            1














            I faced the quite same situation, and I'd like to share how I get out of it.



            At first, I got asked for questions from time to time. Later, I became the "automatic" question solver man. Since this situation installed gradually, I started gradually pushing it back:



            Step 1: Delay my (too many) answers



            • "I can't check with you now, but you can get back later. Can you please come back at ...?"

            • "I may have a solution... I'll get back to you later."

            • "Can you please send me an email with details X and Y. I'll reply back."

            Step 2: Re-orient towards another problem solver



            • "The document 'XXX' has exactly your answer. Check page 7..."

            • "Let's check together. This web search engine spits out quite interesting links. What about you checking this result or this other one?"

            • "I'm sorry. Please see with person Z (or service Z). They know this subject better than me."

            Step 3: Give a clear push back (to the insisting askers)



            • "I don't know."

            • "I don't have a clue."

            • Check your head quickly from left to right as "no-no".

            This last action gets the last insisting askers out.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 2





              The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:43











            • Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 6:35











            • @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

              – Stephan
              Mar 25 at 7:00











            • How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

              – rkeet
              Mar 25 at 11:33











            • Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

              – Peter Mortensen
              Mar 25 at 13:09













            1












            1








            1







            I faced the quite same situation, and I'd like to share how I get out of it.



            At first, I got asked for questions from time to time. Later, I became the "automatic" question solver man. Since this situation installed gradually, I started gradually pushing it back:



            Step 1: Delay my (too many) answers



            • "I can't check with you now, but you can get back later. Can you please come back at ...?"

            • "I may have a solution... I'll get back to you later."

            • "Can you please send me an email with details X and Y. I'll reply back."

            Step 2: Re-orient towards another problem solver



            • "The document 'XXX' has exactly your answer. Check page 7..."

            • "Let's check together. This web search engine spits out quite interesting links. What about you checking this result or this other one?"

            • "I'm sorry. Please see with person Z (or service Z). They know this subject better than me."

            Step 3: Give a clear push back (to the insisting askers)



            • "I don't know."

            • "I don't have a clue."

            • Check your head quickly from left to right as "no-no".

            This last action gets the last insisting askers out.






            share|improve this answer















            I faced the quite same situation, and I'd like to share how I get out of it.



            At first, I got asked for questions from time to time. Later, I became the "automatic" question solver man. Since this situation installed gradually, I started gradually pushing it back:



            Step 1: Delay my (too many) answers



            • "I can't check with you now, but you can get back later. Can you please come back at ...?"

            • "I may have a solution... I'll get back to you later."

            • "Can you please send me an email with details X and Y. I'll reply back."

            Step 2: Re-orient towards another problem solver



            • "The document 'XXX' has exactly your answer. Check page 7..."

            • "Let's check together. This web search engine spits out quite interesting links. What about you checking this result or this other one?"

            • "I'm sorry. Please see with person Z (or service Z). They know this subject better than me."

            Step 3: Give a clear push back (to the insisting askers)



            • "I don't know."

            • "I don't have a clue."

            • Check your head quickly from left to right as "no-no".

            This last action gets the last insisting askers out.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 25 at 13:51









            Peter Mortensen

            58847




            58847










            answered Mar 24 at 14:52









            StephanStephan

            1113




            1113







            • 2





              The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:43











            • Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 6:35











            • @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

              – Stephan
              Mar 25 at 7:00











            • How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

              – rkeet
              Mar 25 at 11:33











            • Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

              – Peter Mortensen
              Mar 25 at 13:09












            • 2





              The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:43











            • Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 6:35











            • @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

              – Stephan
              Mar 25 at 7:00











            • How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

              – rkeet
              Mar 25 at 11:33











            • Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

              – Peter Mortensen
              Mar 25 at 13:09







            2




            2





            The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Mar 24 at 18:43





            The last action, while good, does not work unless you're face to face.

            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Mar 24 at 18:43













            Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

            – Mugen
            Mar 25 at 6:35





            Thanks for sharing this. I use the delay method but I find the re-orient one tougher to implement because half the time they usually mention how much time going through the document is going to cost them and request that I explain it to them because it will only take me 5 mins max.

            – Mugen
            Mar 25 at 6:35













            @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

            – Stephan
            Mar 25 at 7:00





            @Mugen "CTRL+F" is their friend. Show them how to go through the (potentially huge) document fast. Bookmarks (either physical or in browser) can help them. If the document is read on screen, virtual print (pdf creator) the interesting parts...

            – Stephan
            Mar 25 at 7:00













            How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

            – rkeet
            Mar 25 at 11:33





            How about simply linking them: stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask and or whathaveyoutried.com if they don't get the first hint? When I become the de-facto problem solver for someone, I start doing that. Don't mind helping people, unless they haven't done anything to solve it themselves.

            – rkeet
            Mar 25 at 11:33













            Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

            – Peter Mortensen
            Mar 25 at 13:09





            Re "Check your head quickly from left to right as 'no-no'": This is not true in all parts of the world. In some it has the opposite meaning (literally).

            – Peter Mortensen
            Mar 25 at 13:09











            0














            You have indicated that multiple people on another team have been floundering for days on a problem and that you could, in a day, resolve their setup issue.



            The right thing to do is to help them. It will, eventually, unlock their productivity and help your organization as a whole.



            That said, yes, I agree it was not right for them to take an entitled attitude with you, and they should NOT expect unlimited ad-hoc help from you whenever they request it.



            I totally disagree, however, with some other other answers and comments that each team has their work and that you should "cut them off". The proper thing to do, is to put a structure and limits on your labor to help them. This may mean management needs to be involved and that both you and the other team need to formalize the arrangement.



            I know folks on Stack Exchange sites like the Stack Overflow philosophy that dismisses questioning and knowledge-seeking without some very high standard of prior-proof-of-work demanded of the asker. But that's not how workplaces actually function.



            You're paid, they're paid, and the organization needs work done. If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 7:52












            • @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

              – teego1967
              Mar 25 at 10:07












            • I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 13:54















            0














            You have indicated that multiple people on another team have been floundering for days on a problem and that you could, in a day, resolve their setup issue.



            The right thing to do is to help them. It will, eventually, unlock their productivity and help your organization as a whole.



            That said, yes, I agree it was not right for them to take an entitled attitude with you, and they should NOT expect unlimited ad-hoc help from you whenever they request it.



            I totally disagree, however, with some other other answers and comments that each team has their work and that you should "cut them off". The proper thing to do, is to put a structure and limits on your labor to help them. This may mean management needs to be involved and that both you and the other team need to formalize the arrangement.



            I know folks on Stack Exchange sites like the Stack Overflow philosophy that dismisses questioning and knowledge-seeking without some very high standard of prior-proof-of-work demanded of the asker. But that's not how workplaces actually function.



            You're paid, they're paid, and the organization needs work done. If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 1





              "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 7:52












            • @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

              – teego1967
              Mar 25 at 10:07












            • I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 13:54













            0












            0








            0







            You have indicated that multiple people on another team have been floundering for days on a problem and that you could, in a day, resolve their setup issue.



            The right thing to do is to help them. It will, eventually, unlock their productivity and help your organization as a whole.



            That said, yes, I agree it was not right for them to take an entitled attitude with you, and they should NOT expect unlimited ad-hoc help from you whenever they request it.



            I totally disagree, however, with some other other answers and comments that each team has their work and that you should "cut them off". The proper thing to do, is to put a structure and limits on your labor to help them. This may mean management needs to be involved and that both you and the other team need to formalize the arrangement.



            I know folks on Stack Exchange sites like the Stack Overflow philosophy that dismisses questioning and knowledge-seeking without some very high standard of prior-proof-of-work demanded of the asker. But that's not how workplaces actually function.



            You're paid, they're paid, and the organization needs work done. If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them.






            share|improve this answer















            You have indicated that multiple people on another team have been floundering for days on a problem and that you could, in a day, resolve their setup issue.



            The right thing to do is to help them. It will, eventually, unlock their productivity and help your organization as a whole.



            That said, yes, I agree it was not right for them to take an entitled attitude with you, and they should NOT expect unlimited ad-hoc help from you whenever they request it.



            I totally disagree, however, with some other other answers and comments that each team has their work and that you should "cut them off". The proper thing to do, is to put a structure and limits on your labor to help them. This may mean management needs to be involved and that both you and the other team need to formalize the arrangement.



            I know folks on Stack Exchange sites like the Stack Overflow philosophy that dismisses questioning and knowledge-seeking without some very high standard of prior-proof-of-work demanded of the asker. But that's not how workplaces actually function.



            You're paid, they're paid, and the organization needs work done. If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 25 at 14:37









            Peter Mortensen

            58847




            58847










            answered Mar 23 at 13:25









            teego1967teego1967

            13.8k63453




            13.8k63453







            • 1





              "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 7:52












            • @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

              – teego1967
              Mar 25 at 10:07












            • I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 13:54












            • 1





              "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 7:52












            • @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

              – teego1967
              Mar 25 at 10:07












            • I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

              – Mugen
              Mar 25 at 13:54







            1




            1





            "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

            – Mugen
            Mar 25 at 7:52






            "If you refuse helping them and it is later discovered that they burned months of time doing something that you could have helped clear up in hours, that will reflect badly upon you more than them." No it will NOT be judged that way. This answer is invalidating, it completely negates my feelings, it ignores what was asked in the question and I find it to be along the lines of "flying monkeys" speaking. It adds to the abuse that I explained in my original post.

            – Mugen
            Mar 25 at 7:52














            @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

            – teego1967
            Mar 25 at 10:07






            @Mugen, sorry that mine wasn't the answer you wanted, but the main "what to do" aspect is the same as the accepted answer. The difference is that in the last paragraph I have explained the rationale for why the organization could want you to assist the other team. For people who are responsible for the success of the business as a whole, it is an unacceptable to have one department flounder simply because having another department help them out is "not their job". If you don't understand that, that's OK, just do what your boss says.

            – teego1967
            Mar 25 at 10:07














            I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

            – Mugen
            Mar 25 at 13:54





            I haven't heard of such selfless acts of helping from other companies in my country, less alone having seen them in offices. However, I have read about such great co-operation between teams being present in Japan.

            – Mugen
            Mar 25 at 13:54











            -2














            All of the above answers have been a "hold the high ground," but for someone who demands your help and gives nothing back, they will have a higher chance of eventually taking credit for your work too. The best outcome is for them to leave the company or group.



            Approach 1 - Their Boss Gets Mad



            The passive aggressive, highly competitive response is to provide answers that are wrong, unproductive, or will make them look stupid. If they are thinking about the problem and call you out on it right there, then treat them to an overpriced coffee[1] and talk about help being a two-way street.



            If they blindly take your deliberately bad advice, because they are in over their head only to fail, they will cast the blame on you for sabotaging them. If it's known that you have helped in the past, they will still blame you for their failure. If possible, you need to deny ever providing any substantial help at all, because you have clear direction to focus on your task, even though this may be a lie.



            Approach 2 - Your Boss Gets Mad



            Alternatively, you can start to tell your boss that they have been trying to sabotage your work because you refuse to sacrifice your project schedule. This is lying, but moves the focus back to the other employee. It also gives you a chance to be creative at work.



            Discussion



            Both cases assume that management on both sides lacks the backbone to resolve this problem, a situation I see frequently.



            I don't personally have the stomach for either approach as it goes against my ethos, but book and TV script authors[2] seem to think that these things work. I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management.



            But narcissistic and belligerent people can be unwilling to change and must ultimately be evicted; make them cost the company money or embarrassment if management lacks the courage to do the right thing early.



            Or, you can read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People". Learn. Apply.



            [1.] This is a psychology trick to incur a social debt which can simply be repaid by the individual learning to be grateful. When they learn to show gratitude, another psychology trick kicks in and they will learn to respect your time.
            [2.] The TV show Billions comes to mind.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:44















            -2














            All of the above answers have been a "hold the high ground," but for someone who demands your help and gives nothing back, they will have a higher chance of eventually taking credit for your work too. The best outcome is for them to leave the company or group.



            Approach 1 - Their Boss Gets Mad



            The passive aggressive, highly competitive response is to provide answers that are wrong, unproductive, or will make them look stupid. If they are thinking about the problem and call you out on it right there, then treat them to an overpriced coffee[1] and talk about help being a two-way street.



            If they blindly take your deliberately bad advice, because they are in over their head only to fail, they will cast the blame on you for sabotaging them. If it's known that you have helped in the past, they will still blame you for their failure. If possible, you need to deny ever providing any substantial help at all, because you have clear direction to focus on your task, even though this may be a lie.



            Approach 2 - Your Boss Gets Mad



            Alternatively, you can start to tell your boss that they have been trying to sabotage your work because you refuse to sacrifice your project schedule. This is lying, but moves the focus back to the other employee. It also gives you a chance to be creative at work.



            Discussion



            Both cases assume that management on both sides lacks the backbone to resolve this problem, a situation I see frequently.



            I don't personally have the stomach for either approach as it goes against my ethos, but book and TV script authors[2] seem to think that these things work. I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management.



            But narcissistic and belligerent people can be unwilling to change and must ultimately be evicted; make them cost the company money or embarrassment if management lacks the courage to do the right thing early.



            Or, you can read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People". Learn. Apply.



            [1.] This is a psychology trick to incur a social debt which can simply be repaid by the individual learning to be grateful. When they learn to show gratitude, another psychology trick kicks in and they will learn to respect your time.
            [2.] The TV show Billions comes to mind.






            share|improve this answer




















            • 3





              "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:44













            -2












            -2








            -2







            All of the above answers have been a "hold the high ground," but for someone who demands your help and gives nothing back, they will have a higher chance of eventually taking credit for your work too. The best outcome is for them to leave the company or group.



            Approach 1 - Their Boss Gets Mad



            The passive aggressive, highly competitive response is to provide answers that are wrong, unproductive, or will make them look stupid. If they are thinking about the problem and call you out on it right there, then treat them to an overpriced coffee[1] and talk about help being a two-way street.



            If they blindly take your deliberately bad advice, because they are in over their head only to fail, they will cast the blame on you for sabotaging them. If it's known that you have helped in the past, they will still blame you for their failure. If possible, you need to deny ever providing any substantial help at all, because you have clear direction to focus on your task, even though this may be a lie.



            Approach 2 - Your Boss Gets Mad



            Alternatively, you can start to tell your boss that they have been trying to sabotage your work because you refuse to sacrifice your project schedule. This is lying, but moves the focus back to the other employee. It also gives you a chance to be creative at work.



            Discussion



            Both cases assume that management on both sides lacks the backbone to resolve this problem, a situation I see frequently.



            I don't personally have the stomach for either approach as it goes against my ethos, but book and TV script authors[2] seem to think that these things work. I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management.



            But narcissistic and belligerent people can be unwilling to change and must ultimately be evicted; make them cost the company money or embarrassment if management lacks the courage to do the right thing early.



            Or, you can read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People". Learn. Apply.



            [1.] This is a psychology trick to incur a social debt which can simply be repaid by the individual learning to be grateful. When they learn to show gratitude, another psychology trick kicks in and they will learn to respect your time.
            [2.] The TV show Billions comes to mind.






            share|improve this answer















            All of the above answers have been a "hold the high ground," but for someone who demands your help and gives nothing back, they will have a higher chance of eventually taking credit for your work too. The best outcome is for them to leave the company or group.



            Approach 1 - Their Boss Gets Mad



            The passive aggressive, highly competitive response is to provide answers that are wrong, unproductive, or will make them look stupid. If they are thinking about the problem and call you out on it right there, then treat them to an overpriced coffee[1] and talk about help being a two-way street.



            If they blindly take your deliberately bad advice, because they are in over their head only to fail, they will cast the blame on you for sabotaging them. If it's known that you have helped in the past, they will still blame you for their failure. If possible, you need to deny ever providing any substantial help at all, because you have clear direction to focus on your task, even though this may be a lie.



            Approach 2 - Your Boss Gets Mad



            Alternatively, you can start to tell your boss that they have been trying to sabotage your work because you refuse to sacrifice your project schedule. This is lying, but moves the focus back to the other employee. It also gives you a chance to be creative at work.



            Discussion



            Both cases assume that management on both sides lacks the backbone to resolve this problem, a situation I see frequently.



            I don't personally have the stomach for either approach as it goes against my ethos, but book and TV script authors[2] seem to think that these things work. I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management.



            But narcissistic and belligerent people can be unwilling to change and must ultimately be evicted; make them cost the company money or embarrassment if management lacks the courage to do the right thing early.



            Or, you can read Dale Carnegie's "How to Win Friends and Influence People". Learn. Apply.



            [1.] This is a psychology trick to incur a social debt which can simply be repaid by the individual learning to be grateful. When they learn to show gratitude, another psychology trick kicks in and they will learn to respect your time.
            [2.] The TV show Billions comes to mind.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Mar 25 at 14:37









            Peter Mortensen

            58847




            58847










            answered Mar 24 at 4:47









            zerolagtimezerolagtime

            131




            131







            • 3





              "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:44












            • 3





              "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

              – Lightness Races in Orbit
              Mar 24 at 18:44







            3




            3





            "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Mar 24 at 18:44





            "I would probably end up complaining to HR that this individual is creating a hostile work environment. A competent HR manager should recognize as a threat of lawsuit brewing and work down through senior management." This is way overkill, zerolagtime. If anything, it's actions like this that provoke a hostile work environment.

            – Lightness Races in Orbit
            Mar 24 at 18:44





            protected by mcknz Mar 25 at 7:09



            Thank you for your interest in this question.
            Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



            Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029