Usage of an old photo with expired copyright The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAre music lyrics copyrighted?Dealing with potential copyright issues: mangaCopyright of a TV series when used as reference?Use of copyright across nationscopyright issues and permissionsHow to license my translation to be published under my copyright?Is copyright implied when you self publish?Can a copyright be shared with narrator and ilustrator?How important is owning the copyright on illustrations as a first time author of a children's book?At what point is permission needed to reference meta-characters and works in my own?

Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!

When "be it" is at the beginning of a sentence, what kind of structure do you call it?

How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?

What is the difference between Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics

What would be the main consequences for a country leaving the WTO?

Film where the government was corrupt with aliens, people sent to kill aliens are given rigged visors not showing the right aliens

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

Lucky Feat: How can "more than one creature spend a luck point to influence the outcome of a roll"?

Is dried pee considered dirt?

Towers in the ocean; How deep can they be built?

Purpose of level-shifter with same in and out voltages

Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?

Won the lottery - how do I keep the money?

Traveling with my 5 year old daughter (as the father) without the mother from Germany to Mexico

How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule

(How) Could a medieval fantasy world survive a magic-induced "nuclear winter"?

What was Carter Burkes job for "the company" in "Aliens"?

AB diagonalizable then BA also diagonalizable

Easy to read palindrome checker

Is it correct to say moon starry nights?

What flight has the highest ratio of timezone difference to flight time?



Usage of an old photo with expired copyright



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowAre music lyrics copyrighted?Dealing with potential copyright issues: mangaCopyright of a TV series when used as reference?Use of copyright across nationscopyright issues and permissionsHow to license my translation to be published under my copyright?Is copyright implied when you self publish?Can a copyright be shared with narrator and ilustrator?How important is owning the copyright on illustrations as a first time author of a children's book?At what point is permission needed to reference meta-characters and works in my own?










5















I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The poster is for a school assignment. The photo would illustrate a map and text about the history of the Flying Bluenose. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Hi Thomas, welcome to Writing.SE. I'm happy you liked my answer. I will ask you though to wait at least a full day or two before accepting any answer as best. Accepting too early discourages people from answering and of course your goal is to get as many helpful answers as possible. If you still like mine best in a couple of days, please go ahead and click that checkmark.

    – Cyn
    Mar 21 at 5:27






  • 1





    How is this question about writing?

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:52






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not about writing

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:53






  • 2





    I disagree. This question is about writing. We don't send questions about the legality of using quotes/etc to legal, so that part is definitely okay here. And we have a brand-new spanking tag for artwork which is specifically for illustrations that accompany writing (we had an old tag that covered it, the new tag just clarifies). The question here is about legal issues with illustrating a written piece of work. Completely on topic for Writing.SE.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:05






  • 2





    @Galastel I assumed it based on context. If the assignment is entirely graphic (including a few words does not make it non-graphic), then it's off topic because of that. That being said, it is a question and answers that are potentially very useful to writers, even if it turns out I was wrong and the OP did not mean a writing assignment.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:15















5















I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The poster is for a school assignment. The photo would illustrate a map and text about the history of the Flying Bluenose. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Hi Thomas, welcome to Writing.SE. I'm happy you liked my answer. I will ask you though to wait at least a full day or two before accepting any answer as best. Accepting too early discourages people from answering and of course your goal is to get as many helpful answers as possible. If you still like mine best in a couple of days, please go ahead and click that checkmark.

    – Cyn
    Mar 21 at 5:27






  • 1





    How is this question about writing?

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:52






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not about writing

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:53






  • 2





    I disagree. This question is about writing. We don't send questions about the legality of using quotes/etc to legal, so that part is definitely okay here. And we have a brand-new spanking tag for artwork which is specifically for illustrations that accompany writing (we had an old tag that covered it, the new tag just clarifies). The question here is about legal issues with illustrating a written piece of work. Completely on topic for Writing.SE.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:05






  • 2





    @Galastel I assumed it based on context. If the assignment is entirely graphic (including a few words does not make it non-graphic), then it's off topic because of that. That being said, it is a question and answers that are potentially very useful to writers, even if it turns out I was wrong and the OP did not mean a writing assignment.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:15













5












5








5








I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The poster is for a school assignment. The photo would illustrate a map and text about the history of the Flying Bluenose. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.










share|improve this question
















I would like to use an old photo/postcard (example 1, example 2) for a non-commercial poster. The poster is for a school assignment. The photo would illustrate a map and text about the history of the Flying Bluenose. The copyright of the original photo has already expired.



However, since someone else has scanned the photo, do I require explicitly permission from the "file owner" beside citing the source?



I am residing in Canada.







copyright artwork international






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 22 at 23:03









bruglesco

2,454742




2,454742










asked Mar 21 at 2:32









Thomas ZuberbühlerThomas Zuberbühler

1286




1286







  • 2





    Hi Thomas, welcome to Writing.SE. I'm happy you liked my answer. I will ask you though to wait at least a full day or two before accepting any answer as best. Accepting too early discourages people from answering and of course your goal is to get as many helpful answers as possible. If you still like mine best in a couple of days, please go ahead and click that checkmark.

    – Cyn
    Mar 21 at 5:27






  • 1





    How is this question about writing?

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:52






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not about writing

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:53






  • 2





    I disagree. This question is about writing. We don't send questions about the legality of using quotes/etc to legal, so that part is definitely okay here. And we have a brand-new spanking tag for artwork which is specifically for illustrations that accompany writing (we had an old tag that covered it, the new tag just clarifies). The question here is about legal issues with illustrating a written piece of work. Completely on topic for Writing.SE.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:05






  • 2





    @Galastel I assumed it based on context. If the assignment is entirely graphic (including a few words does not make it non-graphic), then it's off topic because of that. That being said, it is a question and answers that are potentially very useful to writers, even if it turns out I was wrong and the OP did not mean a writing assignment.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:15












  • 2





    Hi Thomas, welcome to Writing.SE. I'm happy you liked my answer. I will ask you though to wait at least a full day or two before accepting any answer as best. Accepting too early discourages people from answering and of course your goal is to get as many helpful answers as possible. If you still like mine best in a couple of days, please go ahead and click that checkmark.

    – Cyn
    Mar 21 at 5:27






  • 1





    How is this question about writing?

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:52






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not about writing

    – NofP
    Mar 22 at 8:53






  • 2





    I disagree. This question is about writing. We don't send questions about the legality of using quotes/etc to legal, so that part is definitely okay here. And we have a brand-new spanking tag for artwork which is specifically for illustrations that accompany writing (we had an old tag that covered it, the new tag just clarifies). The question here is about legal issues with illustrating a written piece of work. Completely on topic for Writing.SE.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:05






  • 2





    @Galastel I assumed it based on context. If the assignment is entirely graphic (including a few words does not make it non-graphic), then it's off topic because of that. That being said, it is a question and answers that are potentially very useful to writers, even if it turns out I was wrong and the OP did not mean a writing assignment.

    – Cyn
    Mar 22 at 16:15







2




2





Hi Thomas, welcome to Writing.SE. I'm happy you liked my answer. I will ask you though to wait at least a full day or two before accepting any answer as best. Accepting too early discourages people from answering and of course your goal is to get as many helpful answers as possible. If you still like mine best in a couple of days, please go ahead and click that checkmark.

– Cyn
Mar 21 at 5:27





Hi Thomas, welcome to Writing.SE. I'm happy you liked my answer. I will ask you though to wait at least a full day or two before accepting any answer as best. Accepting too early discourages people from answering and of course your goal is to get as many helpful answers as possible. If you still like mine best in a couple of days, please go ahead and click that checkmark.

– Cyn
Mar 21 at 5:27




1




1





How is this question about writing?

– NofP
Mar 22 at 8:52





How is this question about writing?

– NofP
Mar 22 at 8:52




2




2





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not about writing

– NofP
Mar 22 at 8:53





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is not about writing

– NofP
Mar 22 at 8:53




2




2





I disagree. This question is about writing. We don't send questions about the legality of using quotes/etc to legal, so that part is definitely okay here. And we have a brand-new spanking tag for artwork which is specifically for illustrations that accompany writing (we had an old tag that covered it, the new tag just clarifies). The question here is about legal issues with illustrating a written piece of work. Completely on topic for Writing.SE.

– Cyn
Mar 22 at 16:05





I disagree. This question is about writing. We don't send questions about the legality of using quotes/etc to legal, so that part is definitely okay here. And we have a brand-new spanking tag for artwork which is specifically for illustrations that accompany writing (we had an old tag that covered it, the new tag just clarifies). The question here is about legal issues with illustrating a written piece of work. Completely on topic for Writing.SE.

– Cyn
Mar 22 at 16:05




2




2





@Galastel I assumed it based on context. If the assignment is entirely graphic (including a few words does not make it non-graphic), then it's off topic because of that. That being said, it is a question and answers that are potentially very useful to writers, even if it turns out I was wrong and the OP did not mean a writing assignment.

– Cyn
Mar 22 at 16:15





@Galastel I assumed it based on context. If the assignment is entirely graphic (including a few words does not make it non-graphic), then it's off topic because of that. That being said, it is a question and answers that are potentially very useful to writers, even if it turns out I was wrong and the OP did not mean a writing assignment.

– Cyn
Mar 22 at 16:15










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















8














Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
site without his express permission.




The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
creative works that are in the Public Domain.



Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
image, then you must abide by this restriction.




In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

    – Thomas Zuberbühler
    Mar 21 at 22:38












  • Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

    – Thomas Zuberbühler
    Mar 21 at 22:40



















4














Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



  • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






share|improve this answer
































    2














    That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



    I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



    It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "166"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43836%2fusage-of-an-old-photo-with-expired-copyright%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      8














      Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



      The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




      Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
      and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
      D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
      any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
      site without his express permission.




      The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




      Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
      photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
      print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




      You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



      The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



      But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




      Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
      are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
      art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
      these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
      creative works that are in the Public Domain.



      Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
      sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
      it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
      reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
      conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



      More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
      the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
      restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
      accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
      includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
      website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
      image, then you must abide by this restriction.




      In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






      share|improve this answer























      • Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:38












      • Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:40
















      8














      Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



      The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




      Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
      and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
      D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
      any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
      site without his express permission.




      The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




      Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
      photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
      print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




      You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



      The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



      But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




      Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
      are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
      art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
      these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
      creative works that are in the Public Domain.



      Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
      sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
      it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
      reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
      conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



      More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
      the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
      restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
      accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
      includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
      website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
      image, then you must abide by this restriction.




      In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






      share|improve this answer























      • Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:38












      • Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:40














      8












      8








      8







      Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



      The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




      Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
      and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
      D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
      any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
      site without his express permission.




      The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




      Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
      photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
      print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




      You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



      The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



      But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




      Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
      are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
      art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
      these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
      creative works that are in the Public Domain.



      Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
      sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
      it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
      reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
      conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



      More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
      the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
      restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
      accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
      includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
      website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
      image, then you must abide by this restriction.




      In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.






      share|improve this answer













      Follow the rules set out on the page you want to copy from.



      The railway schedule is part of the Bob MacIntosh Collection.




      Bob has given the DARDPI wiki permission to use his image collection
      and for individuals to enjoy them for their own personal study of the
      D.A.R. Bob MacIntosh reserves all rights on his image collection for
      any commercial use and forbids the use of these images on any other
      site without his express permission.




      The train picture comes from a book, Canadian Pacific's Dominion Atlantic Railway, Vol 2.




      Both volumes are 26 pages inside. Each 8 1/2 x 11 page is a full sized
      photograph with description. Nearly every photo is the first time in
      print. Excellent photos and excellent details on the descriptions.




      You can't just say "oh the copyright has expired" because you don't know if that's true. Items do pass into the public domain but not necessarily in straight-forward ways. For example the train schedule itself is almost certainly public domain (and probably was never copyrighted) but the scan or photo of it belongs to the person who took it. Which was a lot more recently (and might be Bob MacIntosh). Just like a picture of an old public building belongs to the person who took it.



      The train picture is from the 1920's but the one on the site belongs to Ken McIlvoy. If you could get another original, you'd maybe be fine. In the US, anything from 1923 or earlier, that otherwise would have qualified for public domain, is now in the public domain. For other works, it can be a lot more complicated. In Canada, works enter public domain 50 years after the death of the artist/writer. I would not assume that the photographer died before 1969, or that the copyright has lapsed for any other reason.



      But what you want to use is a photo of that photo. Here's what Canadian law has to say about that:




      Many websites provide access to digital reproductions of works that
      are in the Public Domain. For instance, the websites of museums and
      art galleries often include online collections of images, and many of
      these images depict manuscripts, paintings, sculptures, and other
      creative works that are in the Public Domain.



      Although the act of digitizing a Public Domain work is not itself
      sufficient to create a new, copyrighted version of the original work,
      it is important to exercise caution when using such digital
      reproductions, as they are often made available subject to terms and
      conditions in legally enforceable license agreements.



      More specifically, if a website’s terms of use specifically restrict
      the ways in which you can use the website’s content, then these
      restrictions would prevail over your right to use that content in
      accordance with the Copyright Act. For example, if a museum’s website
      includes an image of a painting that is in the Public Domain, but the
      website’s terms of use prohibit you from copying or distributing the
      image, then you must abide by this restriction.




      In other words, follow the rules of the page you got it from. If you aren't sure, ask.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Mar 21 at 4:36









      CynCyn

      16.3k13377




      16.3k13377












      • Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:38












      • Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:40


















      • Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:38












      • Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

        – Thomas Zuberbühler
        Mar 21 at 22:40

















      Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

      – Thomas Zuberbühler
      Mar 21 at 22:38






      Thank you. I refrain from using those photo and timetable due to a lack of contact information and the due date of my assignment.

      – Thomas Zuberbühler
      Mar 21 at 22:38














      Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

      – Thomas Zuberbühler
      Mar 21 at 22:40






      Off topic: It is mind blowing how complex the law of copyrights are and that a photo is protected 50 years after someone death BUT someone's privacy (if someone takes a photo of you without consents and publish it) is not.

      – Thomas Zuberbühler
      Mar 21 at 22:40












      4














      Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



      Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



      • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

      And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



      All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






      share|improve this answer





























        4














        Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



        Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



        • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

        And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



        All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






        share|improve this answer



























          4












          4








          4







          Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



          Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



          • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

          And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



          All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.






          share|improve this answer















          Contacting a legal professional familiar with Canadian copyright law is strongly advised - The act of scanning a work frequently establishes a new copyright of that scan, and is not something easily decided by a quick paragraph from a random website. So while you may scan a public domain document and freely use it as you wish, you often can't download someone else's scan of the same document.



          Also, keep in mind the dates involved! You would want to be very careful on looking into the image in question and the actual legal standing of copyright on material from that era.



          • Canadian copyright is currently established as 50 years After The Death Of the Creator. The 20's may be covered by a different law that would allow an earlier expiry on the copyright, but you would have to be sure the photographer passed away before the 60s to safely assume the image has lapsed into public domain here.

          And you would also have to check if the rights were defined by Canadian law - If the image was actually produced by someone from another country, they potentially took the rights back to that country when they left and may be respected under copyright treaty.



          All that said, contacting the hosts to track down any copyright holder and asking permission is likely your best bet in any case, just do your best to confirm that whoever actually holds the rights is giving you permission - Holding the photo isn't the same as the copyright.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 21 at 3:52

























          answered Mar 21 at 3:42









          TheLucklessTheLuckless

          4294




          4294





















              2














              That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



              I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



              It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






              share|improve this answer



























                2














                That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






                share|improve this answer

























                  2












                  2








                  2







                  That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                  I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                  It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.






                  share|improve this answer













                  That photograph is very clean for such a vintage photo. I used photoshop to clean up my grandparents’ wedding photo and ended up with a result with the same clarity. Ninety two years dropped away and details emerged that had seemed to have been lost.



                  I would suggest contacting the person who scanned it. If they did clean it up, that is quite the task and deserves the respect of an inquiry. Just ask their permission.



                  It says that it is described in a book, so it has been used before.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 21 at 3:13









                  RasdashanRasdashan

                  9,0441156




                  9,0441156



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Writing Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwriting.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f43836%2fusage-of-an-old-photo-with-expired-copyright%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029