Using 'would' or 'used to' with a time reference in a different sentence Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is past perfect necessary when you are talking in chronological order?Using “An” and “A” in a sentencePast perfect/simple question in an exampleCan I use the past progressive here?Referring to results in past or present tenseCan “To Date” be used with a from date?“Would” for past eventsCan “should” be used to mean “if” and used to mean “would” in the same sentence?could past perfect tense and present perfect tense coexist in a compound sentence. Please do not mark as duplicate if you have not read the questionUse of would in past tense

Nose gear failure in single prop aircraft: belly landing or nose landing?

Why can't fire hurt Daenerys but it did to Jon Snow in season 1?

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

Centre cell vertically in tabularx

3D Masyu - A Die

systemd and copy (/bin/cp): no such file or directory

Why BitLocker does not use RSA

Problem with display of presentation

Is this Kuo-toa homebrew race balanced?

Why is a lens darker than other ones when applying the same settings?

Vertical ranges of Column Plots in 12

Random body shuffle every night—can we still function?

Why are current probes so expensive?

Putting class ranking in CV, but against dept guidelines

Can two people see the same photon?

The bible of geometry: Is there a modern treatment of geometries from the most primitive to the most advanced?

Marquee sign letters

What is a more techy Technical Writer job title that isn't cutesy or confusing?

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

How to evaluate this function?

latest version of QGIS fails to edit attribute table of GeoJSON file

How to achieve cat-like agility?

Did pre-Columbian Americans know the spherical shape of the Earth?

What did Turing mean when saying that "machines cannot give rise to surprises" is due to a fallacy?



Using 'would' or 'used to' with a time reference in a different sentence



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Is past perfect necessary when you are talking in chronological order?Using “An” and “A” in a sentencePast perfect/simple question in an exampleCan I use the past progressive here?Referring to results in past or present tenseCan “To Date” be used with a from date?“Would” for past eventsCan “should” be used to mean “if” and used to mean “would” in the same sentence?could past perfect tense and present perfect tense coexist in a compound sentence. Please do not mark as duplicate if you have not read the questionUse of would in past tense



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















In a test there are such sentences:



"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously

(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."



The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".



I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).



But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?



My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.

    – michael_timofeev
    Mar 26 at 4:24











  • Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 26 at 5:06












  • I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 10:49











  • @Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".

    – Ernest
    Mar 26 at 16:00












  • @Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 16:45

















1















In a test there are such sentences:



"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously

(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."



The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".



I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).



But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?



My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.

    – michael_timofeev
    Mar 26 at 4:24











  • Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 26 at 5:06












  • I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 10:49











  • @Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".

    – Ernest
    Mar 26 at 16:00












  • @Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 16:45













1












1








1








In a test there are such sentences:



"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously

(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."



The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".



I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).



But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?



My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?










share|improve this question
















In a test there are such sentences:



"When I was little, I shared a bedroom with my sister Catherine. As I was eight years her junior, I obviously

(used to go / would go) to bed earlier than her."



The test says that the only correct answer is "used to go".



I've read in the rules that we can use would "to talk about repeated past actions". Also the rules say that "would should not be used unless it has already been established that the time frame is in the past, while used to does not require this" (http://www.learnersdictionary.com/qa/the-difference-between-used-to-and-would).



But doesn't the phrase "When I was little" set a time reference? Or it's not related to the second sentence? Or it should be in the same sentence? Or maybe there is another rule I missed there?



My question is: can we use would go there, and, if not, why?







grammaticality past-tense phrase-usage would used-to






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 1:02







Ernest

















asked Mar 25 at 22:47









ErnestErnest

62




62







  • 1





    Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.

    – michael_timofeev
    Mar 26 at 4:24











  • Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 26 at 5:06












  • I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 10:49











  • @Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".

    – Ernest
    Mar 26 at 16:00












  • @Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 16:45












  • 1





    Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.

    – michael_timofeev
    Mar 26 at 4:24











  • Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 26 at 5:06












  • I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 10:49











  • @Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".

    – Ernest
    Mar 26 at 16:00












  • @Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.

    – Minty
    Mar 26 at 16:45







1




1





Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.

– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24





Oftentimes the "right" answer is based on what the teacher was recently teaching. In your example, I would have no problem using either. Also, keep in mind that the editor on Merriam Webster saying something is "awkward and ungrammatical" is just her way of saying "to me it doesn't sound right." Of course there are things that are definitely "wrong" such as saying "I are have a headache," but many things are flexible. A good teacher or test provider will see that the question is ambiguous and change it.

– michael_timofeev
Mar 26 at 4:24













Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06






Personally, I would actually tend to use would more. But both are perfectly acceptable. Unless there is something that's hasn't been made clear, the only objection here is based on subjective style, not on grammar.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 26 at 5:06














I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.

– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49





I think either word is fine, though when would is used to describe a past habitual action, an adverb like obviously usually comes before it - so I think used to go is a better answer, but I also think it's a bit unfair to mark would as wrong.

– Minty
Mar 26 at 10:49













@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".

– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00






@Minty, when you said "an adverb like obviously usually comes before it [would]", did you mean "Obviously I would"? The original phrase in question was "I obviously would go to bed earlier".

– Ernest
Mar 26 at 16:00














@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.

– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45





@Ernest yes, sorry I said before when I meant after. For me As I was eight years her junior, I would obviously go to bed earlier than her is the natural word order.

– Minty
Mar 26 at 16:45










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491331%2fusing-would-or-used-to-with-a-time-reference-in-a-different-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491331%2fusing-would-or-used-to-with-a-time-reference-in-a-different-sentence%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029