The term for the person/group a political party aligns themselves with to appear concerned about the general...





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








12

















A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.










share|improve this question
















We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28


















12

















A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.










share|improve this question
















We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.

















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28














12












12








12


3






A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.










share|improve this question















A good example would be a president bringing iron workers onstage at a rally to show that he has the workingman's interests at heart.



Sentence: the workers were the president's ____ in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a ____ to win over public support.



"Uncle tom" comes to mind, but it is too specific and implies fault on the group being used. I would prefer a term describing the appropriation going on.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question














share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 28 at 20:01









awsunitawsunit

661 silver badge5 bronze badges




661 silver badge5 bronze badges





We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.








We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.






We're looking for long answers that provide some explanation and context. Don't just give a one-line answer; explain why your answer is right, ideally with citations. Answers that don't include explanations may be removed.















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28



















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:28

















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– tchrist
Jun 2 at 22:28





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– tchrist
Jun 2 at 22:28










10 Answers
10






active

oldest

votes


















8


















A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



"The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






share|improve this answer
























  • 2





    "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

    – user888379
    May 28 at 20:29











  • @user888379, props is a very good word!

    – Steve
    May 28 at 21:18



















35


















I like the word prop.




Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






share|improve this answer






















  • 1





    But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 29 at 18:53











  • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

    – Cullub
    May 30 at 18:01



















14



















Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




token English Oxford Living Dictionaries





  1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..




This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






share|improve this answer
























  • 1





    Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    May 28 at 20:46








  • 3





    Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

    – user067531
    May 28 at 20:54











  • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

    – tchrist
    Jun 2 at 22:26



















9


















I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




-Cambridge Dictionary online






share|improve this answer
























  • 2





    This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 29 at 18:56








  • 2





    @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

    – Steve
    May 31 at 8:27



















7


















The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






share|improve this answer
























  • 1





    While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

    – eyeballfrog
    May 29 at 20:25



















3


















The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







share|improve this answer


































    2


















    Two different words, for two difference sentences.




    Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




    From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




    Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




    See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






    share|improve this answer






















    • 1





      Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

      – Mazura
      May 29 at 20:54



















    1


















    The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




    Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:




    • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.




    (Cambridge Dictionary)




    • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.






    share|improve this answer


































      1


















      A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




      something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




      So the second sentence would be




      The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




      This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




      “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




      "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




      The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




      "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






      share|improve this answer


































        0


















        The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






        share|improve this answer



























        • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

          – awsunit
          Jun 1 at 18:35











        • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

          – Joel Croteau
          Jun 2 at 22:34











        protected by tchrist Jun 2 at 22:25



        Thank you for your interest in this question.
        Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



        Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














        10 Answers
        10






        active

        oldest

        votes








        10 Answers
        10






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        8


















        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






        share|improve this answer
























        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18
















        8


















        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






        share|improve this answer
























        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18














        8














        8










        8









        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.






        share|improve this answer
















        A shill is probably the nearest word, although like with Uncle Tom, it is difficult to avoid the connotation that the shills are knowing participants, or at least that in all the circumstances they ought to know.



        You can also describe the role of the people involved. You could say they act as window dressing.



        "The president used the workers as window dressing to win over public support."



        Using this latter device tends to avoid the connotation that the people involved (the window dressing) are at fault.







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited May 28 at 20:33









        user067531

        32.6k14 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges




        32.6k14 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges










        answered May 28 at 20:17









        SteveSteve

        5021 silver badge6 bronze badges




        5021 silver badge6 bronze badges











        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18














        • 2





          "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

          – user888379
          May 28 at 20:29











        • @user888379, props is a very good word!

          – Steve
          May 28 at 21:18








        2




        2





        "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

        – user888379
        May 28 at 20:29





        "Props" serves a similar function. To me, it conveys more of the cynicism of exploiting people that are shortly to be forgotten again until the next election.

        – user888379
        May 28 at 20:29













        @user888379, props is a very good word!

        – Steve
        May 28 at 21:18





        @user888379, props is a very good word!

        – Steve
        May 28 at 21:18













        35


















        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






        share|improve this answer






















        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01
















        35


















        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






        share|improve this answer






















        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01














        35














        35










        35









        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.






        share|improve this answer














        I like the word prop.




        Prop: something used in creating or enhancing a desired effect




        Often it has a negative association because it is generally used like "The President used the iron workers as props"; using frequently means to take advantage of.







        share|improve this answer













        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer










        answered May 29 at 13:04









        UnhandledExcepSeanUnhandledExcepSean

        7014 silver badges7 bronze badges




        7014 silver badges7 bronze badges











        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01














        • 1





          But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:53











        • Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

          – Cullub
          May 30 at 18:01








        1




        1





        But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:53





        But sadly, it doesn't address the person/group a political party aligns themselves with or appearing concerned about the general public.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:53













        Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

        – Cullub
        May 30 at 18:01





        Maybe, but it fits the examples cited by the OP. It seems to fit the intent of the post, if not the exact words.

        – Cullub
        May 30 at 18:01











        14



















        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries





        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..




        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






        share|improve this answer
























        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46








        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user067531
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26
















        14



















        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries





        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..




        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






        share|improve this answer
























        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46








        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user067531
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26














        14














        14










        14










        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries





        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..




        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.






        share|improve this answer

















        Sentence: the workers were the president's token in attempt to win over public support.



        Sentence: the president used the workers as a token to win over public support




        token English Oxford Living Dictionaries





        1. a thing serving as a visible or tangible representation of a fact, quality, feeling, etc..




        This term contains the inference of appearing to align per the given context without implying fault on the group being used.







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited Jun 3 at 14:27

























        answered May 28 at 20:41









        David DDavid D

        1,5361 silver badge11 bronze badges




        1,5361 silver badge11 bronze badges











        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46








        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user067531
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26














        • 1





          Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

          – TaliesinMerlin
          May 28 at 20:46








        • 3





          Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

          – user067531
          May 28 at 20:54











        • Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

          – tchrist
          Jun 2 at 22:26








        1




        1





        Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        May 28 at 20:46







        Cf. token minority, which has a similar sense.

        – TaliesinMerlin
        May 28 at 20:46






        3




        3





        Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

        – user067531
        May 28 at 20:54





        Token doesn’t imply the attempt of the President to “use” workers just for his campaign, without any real concern for their fate.

        – user067531
        May 28 at 20:54













        Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

        – tchrist
        Jun 2 at 22:26





        Never say something is to the OED that does not link to oed.com

        – tchrist
        Jun 2 at 22:26











        9


















        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online






        share|improve this answer
























        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56








        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27
















        9


















        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online






        share|improve this answer
























        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56








        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27














        9














        9










        9









        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online






        share|improve this answer
















        I've usually heard them referred to as a "Poster Child," a reference to a proverbial propaganda poster.




        someone or something that is used to represent a particular quality:




        -Cambridge Dictionary online







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited May 29 at 19:57









        Cascabel

        10.7k6 gold badges38 silver badges68 bronze badges




        10.7k6 gold badges38 silver badges68 bronze badges










        answered May 29 at 18:49









        adamlaughlinadamlaughlin

        912 bronze badges




        912 bronze badges











        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56








        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27














        • 2





          This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

          – Edwin Ashworth
          May 29 at 18:56








        • 2





          @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

          – Steve
          May 31 at 8:27








        2




        2





        This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:56







        This is probably has the makings of the best answer here (the rest are so general [or refer to the 'poster children' being pawns etc when they could just be the 1% who are with the Government] they shouldn't be here), but needs a reference or two to show you're not just making it up.

        – Edwin Ashworth
        May 29 at 18:56






        2




        2





        @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

        – Steve
        May 31 at 8:27





        @EdwinAshworth, what have you been smoking? To describe the workers as the president's "poster children" cannot be more incongruous with the intended meaning here, and it is anything but "the best answer here". A poster child is an exemplar of something - e.g. "a poster child for decadence" - not a pawn in some else's scheme (unless the scheme is the thing being exemplified: "a poster child for dishonesty and blatant public manipulation", which is not the sense intended in the given sentence). You would not say "they were the president's poster children for winning over public support".

        – Steve
        May 31 at 8:27











        7


















        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






        share|improve this answer
























        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25
















        7


















        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






        share|improve this answer
























        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25














        7














        7










        7









        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.






        share|improve this answer
















        The people appearing on stage are the speaker's pawns. Consider the definitions from Merriam-Webster:




        1 : one of the chessmen of least value having the power to move only forward ordinarily one square at a time, to capture only diagonally forward, and to be promoted to any piece except a king upon reaching the eighth rank



        2 : one that can be used to further the purposes of another




        Literally, as in definition one, a pawn is a playing piece from the game of chess, often regarded as having little value but still able to be used strategically by a skilled player. Figuratively, as in definition two, a pawn is not unlike the chess piece, not really important, but able to be used by a shrewd and cunning political player to advance his or her agenda.







        share|improve this answer















        share|improve this answer




        share|improve this answer








        edited May 29 at 12:56

























        answered May 29 at 12:12









        cobaltduckcobaltduck

        11.8k1 gold badge34 silver badges75 bronze badges




        11.8k1 gold badge34 silver badges75 bronze badges











        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25














        • 1





          While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

          – eyeballfrog
          May 29 at 20:25








        1




        1





        While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

        – eyeballfrog
        May 29 at 20:25





        While this is true, it is also overly general and does not have any connotation of the specific scenario the OP envisions.

        – eyeballfrog
        May 29 at 20:25











        3


















        The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




        No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







        share|improve this answer































          3


















          The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




          No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







          share|improve this answer





























            3














            3










            3









            The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




            No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.







            share|improve this answer














            The term [Catspaw]1 (sometimes written "cat's paw") means a person who is unwittingly used as a tool by another person. It's similar to a pawn, but implies some gullibility on the part of the person being so used. The term supposedly originates from a fable about a monkey who tricks a cat into burning its paws for the monkey's gain.




            No Nigel, I shan't be your catspaw in this matter. You must deal with the consequences yourself this time.








            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer




            share|improve this answer










            answered May 30 at 14:45









            barbecuebarbecue

            4,99812 silver badges30 bronze badges




            4,99812 silver badges30 bronze badges


























                2


















                Two different words, for two difference sentences.




                Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




                From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




                Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




                See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






                share|improve this answer






















                • 1





                  Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

                  – Mazura
                  May 29 at 20:54
















                2


















                Two different words, for two difference sentences.




                Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




                From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




                Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




                See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






                share|improve this answer






















                • 1





                  Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

                  – Mazura
                  May 29 at 20:54














                2














                2










                2









                Two different words, for two difference sentences.




                Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




                From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




                Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




                See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.






                share|improve this answer














                Two different words, for two difference sentences.




                Sentence: the workers were the president's dupes in attempt to win over public support.




                From Merriam-Webster: A dupe is "one that is easily deceived or cheated".




                Sentence: the president used the workers as props to win over public support.




                See the @UnhandledExcepSean answer.







                share|improve this answer













                share|improve this answer




                share|improve this answer










                answered May 29 at 13:23









                RonJohnRonJohn

                3563 silver badges11 bronze badges




                3563 silver badges11 bronze badges











                • 1





                  Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

                  – Mazura
                  May 29 at 20:54














                • 1





                  Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

                  – Mazura
                  May 29 at 20:54








                1




                1





                Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

                – Mazura
                May 29 at 20:54





                Two different questions, +1. My answers would be lackeys and scaffold. The title is a third question, that only makes sense in the context of the body. Alone, its answer is (every definition of) subservient.

                – Mazura
                May 29 at 20:54











                1


















                The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:




                • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.




                (Cambridge Dictionary)




                • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.






                share|improve this answer































                  1


















                  The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                  Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:




                  • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.




                  (Cambridge Dictionary)




                  • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.






                  share|improve this answer





























                    1














                    1










                    1









                    The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                    Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:




                    • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.




                    (Cambridge Dictionary)




                    • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.






                    share|improve this answer














                    The expression smoke and mirrors may apply here:




                    Something that is described as smoke and mirrors is intended to make you believe that something is being done or is true, when it is not:




                    • The new budget isn't smoke and mirrors; it's an honest attempt to reduce the deficit.




                    (Cambridge Dictionary)




                    • the President used the workers as smoke and mirrors to win over public support.







                    share|improve this answer













                    share|improve this answer




                    share|improve this answer










                    answered May 28 at 20:06









                    user067531user067531

                    32.6k14 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges




                    32.6k14 gold badges91 silver badges193 bronze badges


























                        1


















                        A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                        something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                        So the second sentence would be




                        The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                        This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                        “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                        "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                        The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                        "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






                        share|improve this answer































                          1


















                          A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                          something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                          So the second sentence would be




                          The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                          This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                          “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                          "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                          The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                          "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






                          share|improve this answer





























                            1














                            1










                            1









                            A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                            something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                            So the second sentence would be




                            The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                            This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                            “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                            "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                            The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                            "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04






                            share|improve this answer














                            A fig leaf (sometimes hyphenated) is something that is used to (figuratively) cover up something that you do not want seen:




                            something that conceals or camouflages, usually inadequately or dishonestly




                            So the second sentence would be




                            The president used the workers as a fig leaf to win over public support.




                            This is an allusion to the book of Genesis, in which Adam and Eve cover their nakedness with literal leaves from fig trees. It has come to connote a transparent attempt to distract from one's true motivations, e.g.:




                            “Is Russia really committed to a peace process or is it using the peace process as a fig leaf to try to deliver some kind of military victory for Assad that creates an Alawite mini state in the northwest of Syria?” Hammond told reporters in Rome.




                            "Britain says Russia trying to carve out mini-state for Assad in Syria", Reuters, 2016-02-02




                            The austerity agenda has been seized by the Tories as the fig leaf behind which to progressively underfund health and social care, creating today’s crisis.




                            "Jeremy Hunt is still clinging to his job because he has big plans for April", New Statesman, 2019-02-04







                            share|improve this answer













                            share|improve this answer




                            share|improve this answer










                            answered May 29 at 18:13









                            Michael SeifertMichael Seifert

                            3,0769 silver badges24 bronze badges




                            3,0769 silver badges24 bronze badges


























                                0


















                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






                                share|improve this answer



























                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34
















                                0


















                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






                                share|improve this answer



























                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34














                                0














                                0










                                0









                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.






                                share|improve this answer














                                The word "claque" is close to what you want. It is defined bas a group of sycophantic followers, as in "The President was surrounded by a claque of scheming bureaucrats," or an organized body of professional applauders.







                                share|improve this answer













                                share|improve this answer




                                share|improve this answer










                                answered May 31 at 16:05









                                Joel CroteauJoel Croteau

                                1063 bronze badges




                                1063 bronze badges
















                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34



















                                • This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                  – awsunit
                                  Jun 1 at 18:35











                                • "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                  – Joel Croteau
                                  Jun 2 at 22:34

















                                This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                – awsunit
                                Jun 1 at 18:35





                                This implies that the third-party is in on the scheme. For the question's clarification I was looking for terms in which the third-party was innocent/ignorant of the plot. Perhaps my post really is asking for multiple words, as others have suggested.

                                – awsunit
                                Jun 1 at 18:35













                                "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                – Joel Croteau
                                Jun 2 at 22:34





                                "Pawns" might be a good word then. Or tokens. "Props" is probably the best.

                                – Joel Croteau
                                Jun 2 at 22:34





                                protected by tchrist Jun 2 at 22:25



                                Thank you for your interest in this question.
                                Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



                                Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029