“And” vs “Or” in a list with a negative modifier





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








-1

















If a given set of instructions says, for example:




Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




Does that indicate that failure to do all of those assignments and only all of those assignments will result in the punishment, or that failure to complete any of the assignments will result in punishment?



I feel like it would mean that one must fail to complete all of the assignments, and I want to say that the statement is equivalent to "Failure to complete A and Failure to complete B and failure to complete C...", but I am unable to find an example of that equivalency online.



I am also unsure of how the negative modifier comes into play. For instance, does the sentence mean "Failure to complete (A, B, and C)..." or does it mean "Failure to (complete A, B, and C)..." Is there even a definite interpretation of this sentence?










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    If it says and, the simple answer is that it means and. If you complete (say) assignments A and C but don't complete B, then you have not completed assignments A, B, and C. If you have tried, but have not completed all of them, then you have failed to complete them.

    – John Lawler
    May 28 at 23:20











  • Is the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment." then the same as the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment."? I feel like your description of the statement is best suited by the version that says or.

    – Brad L.
    May 28 at 23:32











  • And I want to add that the phrase does not say "You MUST complete assignments, A, B, and C..." in which case it is simply "and" and you'd be correct. However it begins with "Failure to complete", which I believe indicates that the sentence's intention signifies failure to complete assignments to receive a punishment, instead of simply needing to complete assignments to avoid punishment.

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 0:11













  • Plenty of people use this type of construction to mean that it is true of assignments A, B and C that failure to complete will lead to punishment - so in practical terms it is ambiguous. I would have thought there would be a parse that corresponds to that meaning, but in light of John Lawler's comment, maybe not.

    – user339660
    May 29 at 0:37






  • 1





    You can parse it that way if you like, but it comes out the same either way. Finish all or be punished, your choice.

    – John Lawler
    May 29 at 1:45


















-1

















If a given set of instructions says, for example:




Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




Does that indicate that failure to do all of those assignments and only all of those assignments will result in the punishment, or that failure to complete any of the assignments will result in punishment?



I feel like it would mean that one must fail to complete all of the assignments, and I want to say that the statement is equivalent to "Failure to complete A and Failure to complete B and failure to complete C...", but I am unable to find an example of that equivalency online.



I am also unsure of how the negative modifier comes into play. For instance, does the sentence mean "Failure to complete (A, B, and C)..." or does it mean "Failure to (complete A, B, and C)..." Is there even a definite interpretation of this sentence?










share|improve this question






















  • 2





    If it says and, the simple answer is that it means and. If you complete (say) assignments A and C but don't complete B, then you have not completed assignments A, B, and C. If you have tried, but have not completed all of them, then you have failed to complete them.

    – John Lawler
    May 28 at 23:20











  • Is the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment." then the same as the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment."? I feel like your description of the statement is best suited by the version that says or.

    – Brad L.
    May 28 at 23:32











  • And I want to add that the phrase does not say "You MUST complete assignments, A, B, and C..." in which case it is simply "and" and you'd be correct. However it begins with "Failure to complete", which I believe indicates that the sentence's intention signifies failure to complete assignments to receive a punishment, instead of simply needing to complete assignments to avoid punishment.

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 0:11













  • Plenty of people use this type of construction to mean that it is true of assignments A, B and C that failure to complete will lead to punishment - so in practical terms it is ambiguous. I would have thought there would be a parse that corresponds to that meaning, but in light of John Lawler's comment, maybe not.

    – user339660
    May 29 at 0:37






  • 1





    You can parse it that way if you like, but it comes out the same either way. Finish all or be punished, your choice.

    – John Lawler
    May 29 at 1:45














-1












-1








-1








If a given set of instructions says, for example:




Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




Does that indicate that failure to do all of those assignments and only all of those assignments will result in the punishment, or that failure to complete any of the assignments will result in punishment?



I feel like it would mean that one must fail to complete all of the assignments, and I want to say that the statement is equivalent to "Failure to complete A and Failure to complete B and failure to complete C...", but I am unable to find an example of that equivalency online.



I am also unsure of how the negative modifier comes into play. For instance, does the sentence mean "Failure to complete (A, B, and C)..." or does it mean "Failure to (complete A, B, and C)..." Is there even a definite interpretation of this sentence?










share|improve this question















If a given set of instructions says, for example:




Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




Does that indicate that failure to do all of those assignments and only all of those assignments will result in the punishment, or that failure to complete any of the assignments will result in punishment?



I feel like it would mean that one must fail to complete all of the assignments, and I want to say that the statement is equivalent to "Failure to complete A and Failure to complete B and failure to complete C...", but I am unable to find an example of that equivalency online.



I am also unsure of how the negative modifier comes into play. For instance, does the sentence mean "Failure to complete (A, B, and C)..." or does it mean "Failure to (complete A, B, and C)..." Is there even a definite interpretation of this sentence?







meaning grammar conjunctions lists coordination






share|improve this question














share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 28 at 22:58









Brad L.Brad L.

1




1











  • 2





    If it says and, the simple answer is that it means and. If you complete (say) assignments A and C but don't complete B, then you have not completed assignments A, B, and C. If you have tried, but have not completed all of them, then you have failed to complete them.

    – John Lawler
    May 28 at 23:20











  • Is the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment." then the same as the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment."? I feel like your description of the statement is best suited by the version that says or.

    – Brad L.
    May 28 at 23:32











  • And I want to add that the phrase does not say "You MUST complete assignments, A, B, and C..." in which case it is simply "and" and you'd be correct. However it begins with "Failure to complete", which I believe indicates that the sentence's intention signifies failure to complete assignments to receive a punishment, instead of simply needing to complete assignments to avoid punishment.

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 0:11













  • Plenty of people use this type of construction to mean that it is true of assignments A, B and C that failure to complete will lead to punishment - so in practical terms it is ambiguous. I would have thought there would be a parse that corresponds to that meaning, but in light of John Lawler's comment, maybe not.

    – user339660
    May 29 at 0:37






  • 1





    You can parse it that way if you like, but it comes out the same either way. Finish all or be punished, your choice.

    – John Lawler
    May 29 at 1:45














  • 2





    If it says and, the simple answer is that it means and. If you complete (say) assignments A and C but don't complete B, then you have not completed assignments A, B, and C. If you have tried, but have not completed all of them, then you have failed to complete them.

    – John Lawler
    May 28 at 23:20











  • Is the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment." then the same as the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment."? I feel like your description of the statement is best suited by the version that says or.

    – Brad L.
    May 28 at 23:32











  • And I want to add that the phrase does not say "You MUST complete assignments, A, B, and C..." in which case it is simply "and" and you'd be correct. However it begins with "Failure to complete", which I believe indicates that the sentence's intention signifies failure to complete assignments to receive a punishment, instead of simply needing to complete assignments to avoid punishment.

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 0:11













  • Plenty of people use this type of construction to mean that it is true of assignments A, B and C that failure to complete will lead to punishment - so in practical terms it is ambiguous. I would have thought there would be a parse that corresponds to that meaning, but in light of John Lawler's comment, maybe not.

    – user339660
    May 29 at 0:37






  • 1





    You can parse it that way if you like, but it comes out the same either way. Finish all or be punished, your choice.

    – John Lawler
    May 29 at 1:45








2




2





If it says and, the simple answer is that it means and. If you complete (say) assignments A and C but don't complete B, then you have not completed assignments A, B, and C. If you have tried, but have not completed all of them, then you have failed to complete them.

– John Lawler
May 28 at 23:20





If it says and, the simple answer is that it means and. If you complete (say) assignments A and C but don't complete B, then you have not completed assignments A, B, and C. If you have tried, but have not completed all of them, then you have failed to complete them.

– John Lawler
May 28 at 23:20













Is the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment." then the same as the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment."? I feel like your description of the statement is best suited by the version that says or.

– Brad L.
May 28 at 23:32





Is the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment." then the same as the statement "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment."? I feel like your description of the statement is best suited by the version that says or.

– Brad L.
May 28 at 23:32













And I want to add that the phrase does not say "You MUST complete assignments, A, B, and C..." in which case it is simply "and" and you'd be correct. However it begins with "Failure to complete", which I believe indicates that the sentence's intention signifies failure to complete assignments to receive a punishment, instead of simply needing to complete assignments to avoid punishment.

– Brad L.
May 29 at 0:11







And I want to add that the phrase does not say "You MUST complete assignments, A, B, and C..." in which case it is simply "and" and you'd be correct. However it begins with "Failure to complete", which I believe indicates that the sentence's intention signifies failure to complete assignments to receive a punishment, instead of simply needing to complete assignments to avoid punishment.

– Brad L.
May 29 at 0:11















Plenty of people use this type of construction to mean that it is true of assignments A, B and C that failure to complete will lead to punishment - so in practical terms it is ambiguous. I would have thought there would be a parse that corresponds to that meaning, but in light of John Lawler's comment, maybe not.

– user339660
May 29 at 0:37





Plenty of people use this type of construction to mean that it is true of assignments A, B and C that failure to complete will lead to punishment - so in practical terms it is ambiguous. I would have thought there would be a parse that corresponds to that meaning, but in light of John Lawler's comment, maybe not.

– user339660
May 29 at 0:37




1




1





You can parse it that way if you like, but it comes out the same either way. Finish all or be punished, your choice.

– John Lawler
May 29 at 1:45





You can parse it that way if you like, but it comes out the same either way. Finish all or be punished, your choice.

– John Lawler
May 29 at 1:45










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0



















Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




means all three assignments must be completed: if one or more of them is not completed punishment will follow.



The construction "to complete assignments A, B, and C" is in the form of a noun infinitive ("to complete") followed by "assignments A, B, and C" as the object of complete. And "A", "B" and "C" are being used as postpositive adjectives describing "assignments" in the plural.



While "failure" and "punishment" have negative connotations they are not boolean operators - trying to use boolean logic reduction as if they were appears more hopeful than warranted - and removing the negative terms does not significantly change the instruction. Consider that:




Be sure to complete assignments A, B and C




does not mean the same thing to a teacher as




Be sure to complete assignment A, B or C




and




Be sure to complete assignments A, B or C




with assignments in the plural would need rewording to convey its meaning unambiguously .






share|improve this answer



























  • If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 11:23











  • Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

    – traktor53
    May 29 at 12:35















Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500044%2fand-vs-or-in-a-list-with-a-negative-modifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown


























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0



















Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




means all three assignments must be completed: if one or more of them is not completed punishment will follow.



The construction "to complete assignments A, B, and C" is in the form of a noun infinitive ("to complete") followed by "assignments A, B, and C" as the object of complete. And "A", "B" and "C" are being used as postpositive adjectives describing "assignments" in the plural.



While "failure" and "punishment" have negative connotations they are not boolean operators - trying to use boolean logic reduction as if they were appears more hopeful than warranted - and removing the negative terms does not significantly change the instruction. Consider that:




Be sure to complete assignments A, B and C




does not mean the same thing to a teacher as




Be sure to complete assignment A, B or C




and




Be sure to complete assignments A, B or C




with assignments in the plural would need rewording to convey its meaning unambiguously .






share|improve this answer



























  • If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 11:23











  • Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

    – traktor53
    May 29 at 12:35


















0



















Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




means all three assignments must be completed: if one or more of them is not completed punishment will follow.



The construction "to complete assignments A, B, and C" is in the form of a noun infinitive ("to complete") followed by "assignments A, B, and C" as the object of complete. And "A", "B" and "C" are being used as postpositive adjectives describing "assignments" in the plural.



While "failure" and "punishment" have negative connotations they are not boolean operators - trying to use boolean logic reduction as if they were appears more hopeful than warranted - and removing the negative terms does not significantly change the instruction. Consider that:




Be sure to complete assignments A, B and C




does not mean the same thing to a teacher as




Be sure to complete assignment A, B or C




and




Be sure to complete assignments A, B or C




with assignments in the plural would need rewording to convey its meaning unambiguously .






share|improve this answer



























  • If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 11:23











  • Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

    – traktor53
    May 29 at 12:35
















0














0










0










Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




means all three assignments must be completed: if one or more of them is not completed punishment will follow.



The construction "to complete assignments A, B, and C" is in the form of a noun infinitive ("to complete") followed by "assignments A, B, and C" as the object of complete. And "A", "B" and "C" are being used as postpositive adjectives describing "assignments" in the plural.



While "failure" and "punishment" have negative connotations they are not boolean operators - trying to use boolean logic reduction as if they were appears more hopeful than warranted - and removing the negative terms does not significantly change the instruction. Consider that:




Be sure to complete assignments A, B and C




does not mean the same thing to a teacher as




Be sure to complete assignment A, B or C




and




Be sure to complete assignments A, B or C




with assignments in the plural would need rewording to convey its meaning unambiguously .






share|improve this answer















Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment.




means all three assignments must be completed: if one or more of them is not completed punishment will follow.



The construction "to complete assignments A, B, and C" is in the form of a noun infinitive ("to complete") followed by "assignments A, B, and C" as the object of complete. And "A", "B" and "C" are being used as postpositive adjectives describing "assignments" in the plural.



While "failure" and "punishment" have negative connotations they are not boolean operators - trying to use boolean logic reduction as if they were appears more hopeful than warranted - and removing the negative terms does not significantly change the instruction. Consider that:




Be sure to complete assignments A, B and C




does not mean the same thing to a teacher as




Be sure to complete assignment A, B or C




and




Be sure to complete assignments A, B or C




with assignments in the plural would need rewording to convey its meaning unambiguously .







share|improve this answer













share|improve this answer




share|improve this answer










answered May 29 at 7:52









traktor53traktor53

6334 silver badges8 bronze badges




6334 silver badges8 bronze badges
















  • If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 11:23











  • Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

    – traktor53
    May 29 at 12:35





















  • If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

    – Brad L.
    May 29 at 11:23











  • Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

    – traktor53
    May 29 at 12:35



















If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

– Brad L.
May 29 at 11:23





If "Failure to complete assignments A, B, and C will result in punishment" results in punishment upon failure to complete one or more assignments, then what does the phrase "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" mean?

– Brad L.
May 29 at 11:23













Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

– traktor53
May 29 at 12:35







Usually "or" denotes one of a group and "assignments A, B or C" conflicts with this. The meaning of "Failure to complete assignments A, B, or C will result in punishment" is badly worded and needs further clarification of what it is supposed to mean from its originator.

– traktor53
May 29 at 12:35





















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f500044%2fand-vs-or-in-a-list-with-a-negative-modifier%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown









Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029