My player wants to cast multiple charges of magic missile from a wand





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








15














$begingroup$


So I was GMing for the first time my custom Pathfinder campaign, and my Rogue uses a wand of magic missile with 8 charges left in it against the last opponent of the session, and vaporizes him. I instinctually said he couldn't do that, and he explained that he only needed to make his Use Magic Device (UMD) check to use the wand (which he succeeded) and he's using the wand, not the spell, so he can use multiple charges in the same turn with the same check. It was the end of the session so I didn't want to bog us down with an hour long rule check, so I allowed it and my villain was vaporized by the remaining 8 charges (we are low level still). I've been searching for a ruling on this all afternoon yesterday and this morning, and just cannot find a definitive answer.



My reasoning is:
Activating a wand




Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from
a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of
opportunity.




(We are in agreement here)



Spell Trigger Description:




Spell trigger activation is similar to spell completion, but it’s even
simpler. No gestures or spell finishing is needed, just a special
knowledge of spellcasting that an appropriate character would know,
and a single word that must be spoken. Spell trigger items can be used
by anyone whose class can cast the corresponding spell. This is the
case even for a character who can’t actually cast spells, such as a
3rd-level paladin. The user must still determine what spell is stored
in the item before she can activate it. Activating a spell trigger
item is a standard action and does not provoke attacks of opportunity.




(He still agrees with me up to this point)



UMD Description




Use a Wand, Staff, or Other Spell Trigger Item: Normally, to use a
wand, you must have the wand’s spell on your class spell list. This
use of the skill allows you to use a wand as if you had a particular
spell on your class spell list
. Failing the roll does not expend a
charge.




So magic missile is now as if it were on his class list. Magic Missile has a casting time of "1 standard action"



My understanding here is, is that you can only cast once per standard action. It would be the same in my mind, a wizard preparing magic missile 3x in one day, and expending them all in one turn just because he channeled the magic missile.



Neither of us can find anywhere it say that only 1 wand charge per round, and that is what I think his hangup is.



What stops someone from making a wand of magic missile and use all 50 charges from one turn on the next boss we fight?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! You can take the tour as an introduction to the site and check the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    May 28 at 16:13


















15














$begingroup$


So I was GMing for the first time my custom Pathfinder campaign, and my Rogue uses a wand of magic missile with 8 charges left in it against the last opponent of the session, and vaporizes him. I instinctually said he couldn't do that, and he explained that he only needed to make his Use Magic Device (UMD) check to use the wand (which he succeeded) and he's using the wand, not the spell, so he can use multiple charges in the same turn with the same check. It was the end of the session so I didn't want to bog us down with an hour long rule check, so I allowed it and my villain was vaporized by the remaining 8 charges (we are low level still). I've been searching for a ruling on this all afternoon yesterday and this morning, and just cannot find a definitive answer.



My reasoning is:
Activating a wand




Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from
a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of
opportunity.




(We are in agreement here)



Spell Trigger Description:




Spell trigger activation is similar to spell completion, but it’s even
simpler. No gestures or spell finishing is needed, just a special
knowledge of spellcasting that an appropriate character would know,
and a single word that must be spoken. Spell trigger items can be used
by anyone whose class can cast the corresponding spell. This is the
case even for a character who can’t actually cast spells, such as a
3rd-level paladin. The user must still determine what spell is stored
in the item before she can activate it. Activating a spell trigger
item is a standard action and does not provoke attacks of opportunity.




(He still agrees with me up to this point)



UMD Description




Use a Wand, Staff, or Other Spell Trigger Item: Normally, to use a
wand, you must have the wand’s spell on your class spell list. This
use of the skill allows you to use a wand as if you had a particular
spell on your class spell list
. Failing the roll does not expend a
charge.




So magic missile is now as if it were on his class list. Magic Missile has a casting time of "1 standard action"



My understanding here is, is that you can only cast once per standard action. It would be the same in my mind, a wizard preparing magic missile 3x in one day, and expending them all in one turn just because he channeled the magic missile.



Neither of us can find anywhere it say that only 1 wand charge per round, and that is what I think his hangup is.



What stops someone from making a wand of magic missile and use all 50 charges from one turn on the next boss we fight?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! You can take the tour as an introduction to the site and check the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    May 28 at 16:13














15












15








15


1



$begingroup$


So I was GMing for the first time my custom Pathfinder campaign, and my Rogue uses a wand of magic missile with 8 charges left in it against the last opponent of the session, and vaporizes him. I instinctually said he couldn't do that, and he explained that he only needed to make his Use Magic Device (UMD) check to use the wand (which he succeeded) and he's using the wand, not the spell, so he can use multiple charges in the same turn with the same check. It was the end of the session so I didn't want to bog us down with an hour long rule check, so I allowed it and my villain was vaporized by the remaining 8 charges (we are low level still). I've been searching for a ruling on this all afternoon yesterday and this morning, and just cannot find a definitive answer.



My reasoning is:
Activating a wand




Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from
a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of
opportunity.




(We are in agreement here)



Spell Trigger Description:




Spell trigger activation is similar to spell completion, but it’s even
simpler. No gestures or spell finishing is needed, just a special
knowledge of spellcasting that an appropriate character would know,
and a single word that must be spoken. Spell trigger items can be used
by anyone whose class can cast the corresponding spell. This is the
case even for a character who can’t actually cast spells, such as a
3rd-level paladin. The user must still determine what spell is stored
in the item before she can activate it. Activating a spell trigger
item is a standard action and does not provoke attacks of opportunity.




(He still agrees with me up to this point)



UMD Description




Use a Wand, Staff, or Other Spell Trigger Item: Normally, to use a
wand, you must have the wand’s spell on your class spell list. This
use of the skill allows you to use a wand as if you had a particular
spell on your class spell list
. Failing the roll does not expend a
charge.




So magic missile is now as if it were on his class list. Magic Missile has a casting time of "1 standard action"



My understanding here is, is that you can only cast once per standard action. It would be the same in my mind, a wizard preparing magic missile 3x in one day, and expending them all in one turn just because he channeled the magic missile.



Neither of us can find anywhere it say that only 1 wand charge per round, and that is what I think his hangup is.



What stops someone from making a wand of magic missile and use all 50 charges from one turn on the next boss we fight?










share|improve this question












$endgroup$




So I was GMing for the first time my custom Pathfinder campaign, and my Rogue uses a wand of magic missile with 8 charges left in it against the last opponent of the session, and vaporizes him. I instinctually said he couldn't do that, and he explained that he only needed to make his Use Magic Device (UMD) check to use the wand (which he succeeded) and he's using the wand, not the spell, so he can use multiple charges in the same turn with the same check. It was the end of the session so I didn't want to bog us down with an hour long rule check, so I allowed it and my villain was vaporized by the remaining 8 charges (we are low level still). I've been searching for a ruling on this all afternoon yesterday and this morning, and just cannot find a definitive answer.



My reasoning is:
Activating a wand




Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from
a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of
opportunity.




(We are in agreement here)



Spell Trigger Description:




Spell trigger activation is similar to spell completion, but it’s even
simpler. No gestures or spell finishing is needed, just a special
knowledge of spellcasting that an appropriate character would know,
and a single word that must be spoken. Spell trigger items can be used
by anyone whose class can cast the corresponding spell. This is the
case even for a character who can’t actually cast spells, such as a
3rd-level paladin. The user must still determine what spell is stored
in the item before she can activate it. Activating a spell trigger
item is a standard action and does not provoke attacks of opportunity.




(He still agrees with me up to this point)



UMD Description




Use a Wand, Staff, or Other Spell Trigger Item: Normally, to use a
wand, you must have the wand’s spell on your class spell list. This
use of the skill allows you to use a wand as if you had a particular
spell on your class spell list
. Failing the roll does not expend a
charge.




So magic missile is now as if it were on his class list. Magic Missile has a casting time of "1 standard action"



My understanding here is, is that you can only cast once per standard action. It would be the same in my mind, a wizard preparing magic missile 3x in one day, and expending them all in one turn just because he channeled the magic missile.



Neither of us can find anywhere it say that only 1 wand charge per round, and that is what I think his hangup is.



What stops someone from making a wand of magic missile and use all 50 charges from one turn on the next boss we fight?







pathfinder-1e spells magic-items






share|improve this question
















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 28 at 16:08









Rubiksmoose

74.8k11 gold badges376 silver badges514 bronze badges




74.8k11 gold badges376 silver badges514 bronze badges










asked May 28 at 16:06









FaderFader

785 bronze badges




785 bronze badges











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! You can take the tour as an introduction to the site and check the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    May 28 at 16:13














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Welcome! You can take the tour as an introduction to the site and check the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    May 28 at 16:13








1




1




$begingroup$
Welcome! You can take the tour as an introduction to the site and check the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
May 28 at 16:13




$begingroup$
Welcome! You can take the tour as an introduction to the site and check the help center for further guidance. Good luck and happy gaming!
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
May 28 at 16:13










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















35
















$begingroup$

You cast one instance of a spell at a time from a wand.



From the rules for wands:




Activation: Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. (If the spell being cast has a longer casting time than 1 action, however, it takes that long to cast the spell from a wand.) To activate a wand, a character must hold it in hand (or whatever passes for a hand, for non-humanoid creatures) and point it in the general direction of the target or area. A wand may be used while grappling or while swallowed whole.




When you use the wand to cast, you are casting a single instance of a spell, just as you are when you cast as a spellcaster. You cannot use up multiple charges at once to cast multiple instances of a spell.



Since you use 1 charge per instance of a spell you cast from a wand, and it takes at least a standard action to cast a spell from a wand (per the above rules), you can only use 1 charge a turn from a wand.†




:Pending other special abilities that let you do so, shorten the time to cast from a wand, or grant additional actions you can use to activate the wand.




share|improve this answer












$endgroup$











  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 28 at 16:32






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Gotta go fast :P
    $endgroup$
    – william porter
    May 28 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
    $endgroup$
    – khaoliang
    May 29 at 13:37






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
    $endgroup$
    – Hey I Can Chan
    May 30 at 1:33



















7
















$begingroup$

You most certainly can use more than one charge per round when using magic items. Some effects of the staves even require you to so. You can't find a limit in the rules because it is not here.



The reason why you cannot fire more than one missile from a wands per action is different. Per your own quote:




Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity.




Emphasis mine. Even if you use UMD, you are still casting a spell, so all of the usual limits of casting spells apply. And you can't combine three identical castings of a spell into one action, casting a spell (singular) takes an action. This was already discussed on this site recently.





Rule of fun and what would be the ruling at my table



UMD is all about doing impossible things with magic items. Let him do this, but pump up the difficulty, make it use 3d4 charges instead of 3, and make mishap easier. If he still wants to try, yeah, I'd totally agree. But it has nothing to do with the rules as written.






share|improve this answer












$endgroup$















  • $begingroup$
    Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
    $endgroup$
    – Acts7Seven
    May 28 at 17:08












  • $begingroup$
    When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    May 28 at 18:08





















3
















$begingroup$

No, you cannot use multiple charges from a Wand of Magic Missiles in one round.




Wand, Spell Trigger, and UMD citations all withstanding and agreed upon, using the wand is a standard action. The Caster Level (CL) would determine the power of the spell that can be released by the wand. If it is a standard magical item which is made using the minimal caster level required for the spell then it only releases one magic missile per casting/wand-use. If you want it to release 5 magic missiles per use of the wand then it needs to be manufactured with a CL9 with the appropriate raised costs.




Staves with options for using multiple charges at once do so to trigger spells higher than 4th level. Wands are restricted to 4th level spells or less. This allows Staves, which have a maximum of only 10 charges, to contain more powerful spells.




Using 50 charges would take 50 standard actions. Not possible in a single round.



The spell cap (4th) on wands prevents a quickened wand of magic missiles as the spell would be considered 5th level. You could quicken a wand of ray of frost I suppose as that only comes out to 4th level after the meta-magic. You could use the quickened wand of ray of frost twice in a round. Once as a swift action and once as a standard action.






share|improve this answer










$endgroup$























    0
















    $begingroup$

    So to wrap up, if the wand was crafted by a level 9 wizard,
    A wand of magic missle could
    cast 5 missiles as a single attack
    Via UMD (use magic device)
    from any PC succeeding at the UMD roll.
    Those could hit one or many targets
    As long as specified prior to the roll.
    And the lesser the level of the wizard crafting the wand,
    The less missiles could be fired.






    share|improve this answer










    $endgroup$

















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "122"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });















      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148837%2fmy-player-wants-to-cast-multiple-charges-of-magic-missile-from-a-wand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown


























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      35
















      $begingroup$

      You cast one instance of a spell at a time from a wand.



      From the rules for wands:




      Activation: Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. (If the spell being cast has a longer casting time than 1 action, however, it takes that long to cast the spell from a wand.) To activate a wand, a character must hold it in hand (or whatever passes for a hand, for non-humanoid creatures) and point it in the general direction of the target or area. A wand may be used while grappling or while swallowed whole.




      When you use the wand to cast, you are casting a single instance of a spell, just as you are when you cast as a spellcaster. You cannot use up multiple charges at once to cast multiple instances of a spell.



      Since you use 1 charge per instance of a spell you cast from a wand, and it takes at least a standard action to cast a spell from a wand (per the above rules), you can only use 1 charge a turn from a wand.†




      :Pending other special abilities that let you do so, shorten the time to cast from a wand, or grant additional actions you can use to activate the wand.




      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$











      • 1




        $begingroup$
        You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 16:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gotta go fast :P
        $endgroup$
        – william porter
        May 28 at 16:34










      • $begingroup$
        There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
        $endgroup$
        – khaoliang
        May 29 at 13:37






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
        $endgroup$
        – Hey I Can Chan
        May 30 at 1:33
















      35
















      $begingroup$

      You cast one instance of a spell at a time from a wand.



      From the rules for wands:




      Activation: Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. (If the spell being cast has a longer casting time than 1 action, however, it takes that long to cast the spell from a wand.) To activate a wand, a character must hold it in hand (or whatever passes for a hand, for non-humanoid creatures) and point it in the general direction of the target or area. A wand may be used while grappling or while swallowed whole.




      When you use the wand to cast, you are casting a single instance of a spell, just as you are when you cast as a spellcaster. You cannot use up multiple charges at once to cast multiple instances of a spell.



      Since you use 1 charge per instance of a spell you cast from a wand, and it takes at least a standard action to cast a spell from a wand (per the above rules), you can only use 1 charge a turn from a wand.†




      :Pending other special abilities that let you do so, shorten the time to cast from a wand, or grant additional actions you can use to activate the wand.




      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$











      • 1




        $begingroup$
        You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 16:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gotta go fast :P
        $endgroup$
        – william porter
        May 28 at 16:34










      • $begingroup$
        There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
        $endgroup$
        – khaoliang
        May 29 at 13:37






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
        $endgroup$
        – Hey I Can Chan
        May 30 at 1:33














      35














      35










      35







      $begingroup$

      You cast one instance of a spell at a time from a wand.



      From the rules for wands:




      Activation: Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. (If the spell being cast has a longer casting time than 1 action, however, it takes that long to cast the spell from a wand.) To activate a wand, a character must hold it in hand (or whatever passes for a hand, for non-humanoid creatures) and point it in the general direction of the target or area. A wand may be used while grappling or while swallowed whole.




      When you use the wand to cast, you are casting a single instance of a spell, just as you are when you cast as a spellcaster. You cannot use up multiple charges at once to cast multiple instances of a spell.



      Since you use 1 charge per instance of a spell you cast from a wand, and it takes at least a standard action to cast a spell from a wand (per the above rules), you can only use 1 charge a turn from a wand.†




      :Pending other special abilities that let you do so, shorten the time to cast from a wand, or grant additional actions you can use to activate the wand.




      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      You cast one instance of a spell at a time from a wand.



      From the rules for wands:




      Activation: Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity. (If the spell being cast has a longer casting time than 1 action, however, it takes that long to cast the spell from a wand.) To activate a wand, a character must hold it in hand (or whatever passes for a hand, for non-humanoid creatures) and point it in the general direction of the target or area. A wand may be used while grappling or while swallowed whole.




      When you use the wand to cast, you are casting a single instance of a spell, just as you are when you cast as a spellcaster. You cannot use up multiple charges at once to cast multiple instances of a spell.



      Since you use 1 charge per instance of a spell you cast from a wand, and it takes at least a standard action to cast a spell from a wand (per the above rules), you can only use 1 charge a turn from a wand.†




      :Pending other special abilities that let you do so, shorten the time to cast from a wand, or grant additional actions you can use to activate the wand.





      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited May 28 at 16:20









      Sdjz

      24.6k6 gold badges118 silver badges176 bronze badges




      24.6k6 gold badges118 silver badges176 bronze badges










      answered May 28 at 16:13









      william porterwilliam porter

      5,88013 silver badges34 bronze badges




      5,88013 silver badges34 bronze badges











      • 1




        $begingroup$
        You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 16:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gotta go fast :P
        $endgroup$
        – william porter
        May 28 at 16:34










      • $begingroup$
        There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
        $endgroup$
        – khaoliang
        May 29 at 13:37






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
        $endgroup$
        – Hey I Can Chan
        May 30 at 1:33














      • 1




        $begingroup$
        You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 16:32






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Gotta go fast :P
        $endgroup$
        – william porter
        May 28 at 16:34










      • $begingroup$
        There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
        $endgroup$
        – khaoliang
        May 29 at 13:37






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
        $endgroup$
        – Hey I Can Chan
        May 30 at 1:33








      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
      $endgroup$
      – Mołot
      May 28 at 16:32




      $begingroup$
      You posted when I was still writing. Still, +1
      $endgroup$
      – Mołot
      May 28 at 16:32




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Gotta go fast :P
      $endgroup$
      – william porter
      May 28 at 16:34




      $begingroup$
      Gotta go fast :P
      $endgroup$
      – william porter
      May 28 at 16:34












      $begingroup$
      There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
      $endgroup$
      – khaoliang
      May 29 at 13:37




      $begingroup$
      There is one way how this can be done, by using an optional rule: You can BREAK the wand, which results in all remaining charges being released at once. The reason this rule is optional is because it's up to GM fiat what happens when all that magic power is released. A wand of magic missile - if new - has 50 charges on average. Having to resolve 50 casts of magic missile would take... forever.
      $endgroup$
      – khaoliang
      May 29 at 13:37




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
      $endgroup$
      – Hey I Can Chan
      May 30 at 1:33




      $begingroup$
      @khaoliang That's probably a house rule that needs to be worded up significantly to avoid being overpowered. That is, 375 gp buys a wand of ray of frost that's good for a 50d3 1-shot attack!
      $endgroup$
      – Hey I Can Chan
      May 30 at 1:33













      7
















      $begingroup$

      You most certainly can use more than one charge per round when using magic items. Some effects of the staves even require you to so. You can't find a limit in the rules because it is not here.



      The reason why you cannot fire more than one missile from a wands per action is different. Per your own quote:




      Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity.




      Emphasis mine. Even if you use UMD, you are still casting a spell, so all of the usual limits of casting spells apply. And you can't combine three identical castings of a spell into one action, casting a spell (singular) takes an action. This was already discussed on this site recently.





      Rule of fun and what would be the ruling at my table



      UMD is all about doing impossible things with magic items. Let him do this, but pump up the difficulty, make it use 3d4 charges instead of 3, and make mishap easier. If he still wants to try, yeah, I'd totally agree. But it has nothing to do with the rules as written.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
        $endgroup$
        – Acts7Seven
        May 28 at 17:08












      • $begingroup$
        When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 18:08


















      7
















      $begingroup$

      You most certainly can use more than one charge per round when using magic items. Some effects of the staves even require you to so. You can't find a limit in the rules because it is not here.



      The reason why you cannot fire more than one missile from a wands per action is different. Per your own quote:




      Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity.




      Emphasis mine. Even if you use UMD, you are still casting a spell, so all of the usual limits of casting spells apply. And you can't combine three identical castings of a spell into one action, casting a spell (singular) takes an action. This was already discussed on this site recently.





      Rule of fun and what would be the ruling at my table



      UMD is all about doing impossible things with magic items. Let him do this, but pump up the difficulty, make it use 3d4 charges instead of 3, and make mishap easier. If he still wants to try, yeah, I'd totally agree. But it has nothing to do with the rules as written.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$















      • $begingroup$
        Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
        $endgroup$
        – Acts7Seven
        May 28 at 17:08












      • $begingroup$
        When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 18:08
















      7














      7










      7







      $begingroup$

      You most certainly can use more than one charge per round when using magic items. Some effects of the staves even require you to so. You can't find a limit in the rules because it is not here.



      The reason why you cannot fire more than one missile from a wands per action is different. Per your own quote:




      Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity.




      Emphasis mine. Even if you use UMD, you are still casting a spell, so all of the usual limits of casting spells apply. And you can't combine three identical castings of a spell into one action, casting a spell (singular) takes an action. This was already discussed on this site recently.





      Rule of fun and what would be the ruling at my table



      UMD is all about doing impossible things with magic items. Let him do this, but pump up the difficulty, make it use 3d4 charges instead of 3, and make mishap easier. If he still wants to try, yeah, I'd totally agree. But it has nothing to do with the rules as written.






      share|improve this answer












      $endgroup$



      You most certainly can use more than one charge per round when using magic items. Some effects of the staves even require you to so. You can't find a limit in the rules because it is not here.



      The reason why you cannot fire more than one missile from a wands per action is different. Per your own quote:




      Wands use the spell trigger activation method, so casting a spell from a wand is usually a standard action that doesn’t provoke attacks of opportunity.




      Emphasis mine. Even if you use UMD, you are still casting a spell, so all of the usual limits of casting spells apply. And you can't combine three identical castings of a spell into one action, casting a spell (singular) takes an action. This was already discussed on this site recently.





      Rule of fun and what would be the ruling at my table



      UMD is all about doing impossible things with magic items. Let him do this, but pump up the difficulty, make it use 3d4 charges instead of 3, and make mishap easier. If he still wants to try, yeah, I'd totally agree. But it has nothing to do with the rules as written.







      share|improve this answer















      share|improve this answer




      share|improve this answer








      edited May 28 at 16:29

























      answered May 28 at 16:22









      MołotMołot

      9,4543 gold badges44 silver badges82 bronze badges




      9,4543 gold badges44 silver badges82 bronze badges















      • $begingroup$
        Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
        $endgroup$
        – Acts7Seven
        May 28 at 17:08












      • $begingroup$
        When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 18:08




















      • $begingroup$
        Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
        $endgroup$
        – Acts7Seven
        May 28 at 17:08












      • $begingroup$
        When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
        $endgroup$
        – Mołot
        May 28 at 18:08


















      $begingroup$
      Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
      $endgroup$
      – Acts7Seven
      May 28 at 17:08






      $begingroup$
      Just to clarify, with UMD, the PC ... is not required to meet the other spell requirements when using a wand via UMD... correct? Because it says use the spell as if it were in your list of spells... which couldnt be if you didnt meet the criteria. And especially given that a rogue, the only magic I posses is my silver tongue and nimble fingers.
      $endgroup$
      – Acts7Seven
      May 28 at 17:08














      $begingroup$
      When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
      $endgroup$
      – Mołot
      May 28 at 18:08






      $begingroup$
      When casting from wand using umd you take casting rules, then apply changes made by wand rules, then changes made by UMD rules. Wand rules says that you don't need aby components as they are already spent by wand creator. Thus, you don't need that. UMD says you can cast from a wands as if you had this spell on your list so you can, no need to worry about this requirement. If spell had any requirements like you can only cast it if you are good — then you need to meet them.
      $endgroup$
      – Mołot
      May 28 at 18:08













      3
















      $begingroup$

      No, you cannot use multiple charges from a Wand of Magic Missiles in one round.




      Wand, Spell Trigger, and UMD citations all withstanding and agreed upon, using the wand is a standard action. The Caster Level (CL) would determine the power of the spell that can be released by the wand. If it is a standard magical item which is made using the minimal caster level required for the spell then it only releases one magic missile per casting/wand-use. If you want it to release 5 magic missiles per use of the wand then it needs to be manufactured with a CL9 with the appropriate raised costs.




      Staves with options for using multiple charges at once do so to trigger spells higher than 4th level. Wands are restricted to 4th level spells or less. This allows Staves, which have a maximum of only 10 charges, to contain more powerful spells.




      Using 50 charges would take 50 standard actions. Not possible in a single round.



      The spell cap (4th) on wands prevents a quickened wand of magic missiles as the spell would be considered 5th level. You could quicken a wand of ray of frost I suppose as that only comes out to 4th level after the meta-magic. You could use the quickened wand of ray of frost twice in a round. Once as a swift action and once as a standard action.






      share|improve this answer










      $endgroup$




















        3
















        $begingroup$

        No, you cannot use multiple charges from a Wand of Magic Missiles in one round.




        Wand, Spell Trigger, and UMD citations all withstanding and agreed upon, using the wand is a standard action. The Caster Level (CL) would determine the power of the spell that can be released by the wand. If it is a standard magical item which is made using the minimal caster level required for the spell then it only releases one magic missile per casting/wand-use. If you want it to release 5 magic missiles per use of the wand then it needs to be manufactured with a CL9 with the appropriate raised costs.




        Staves with options for using multiple charges at once do so to trigger spells higher than 4th level. Wands are restricted to 4th level spells or less. This allows Staves, which have a maximum of only 10 charges, to contain more powerful spells.




        Using 50 charges would take 50 standard actions. Not possible in a single round.



        The spell cap (4th) on wands prevents a quickened wand of magic missiles as the spell would be considered 5th level. You could quicken a wand of ray of frost I suppose as that only comes out to 4th level after the meta-magic. You could use the quickened wand of ray of frost twice in a round. Once as a swift action and once as a standard action.






        share|improve this answer










        $endgroup$


















          3














          3










          3







          $begingroup$

          No, you cannot use multiple charges from a Wand of Magic Missiles in one round.




          Wand, Spell Trigger, and UMD citations all withstanding and agreed upon, using the wand is a standard action. The Caster Level (CL) would determine the power of the spell that can be released by the wand. If it is a standard magical item which is made using the minimal caster level required for the spell then it only releases one magic missile per casting/wand-use. If you want it to release 5 magic missiles per use of the wand then it needs to be manufactured with a CL9 with the appropriate raised costs.




          Staves with options for using multiple charges at once do so to trigger spells higher than 4th level. Wands are restricted to 4th level spells or less. This allows Staves, which have a maximum of only 10 charges, to contain more powerful spells.




          Using 50 charges would take 50 standard actions. Not possible in a single round.



          The spell cap (4th) on wands prevents a quickened wand of magic missiles as the spell would be considered 5th level. You could quicken a wand of ray of frost I suppose as that only comes out to 4th level after the meta-magic. You could use the quickened wand of ray of frost twice in a round. Once as a swift action and once as a standard action.






          share|improve this answer










          $endgroup$



          No, you cannot use multiple charges from a Wand of Magic Missiles in one round.




          Wand, Spell Trigger, and UMD citations all withstanding and agreed upon, using the wand is a standard action. The Caster Level (CL) would determine the power of the spell that can be released by the wand. If it is a standard magical item which is made using the minimal caster level required for the spell then it only releases one magic missile per casting/wand-use. If you want it to release 5 magic missiles per use of the wand then it needs to be manufactured with a CL9 with the appropriate raised costs.




          Staves with options for using multiple charges at once do so to trigger spells higher than 4th level. Wands are restricted to 4th level spells or less. This allows Staves, which have a maximum of only 10 charges, to contain more powerful spells.




          Using 50 charges would take 50 standard actions. Not possible in a single round.



          The spell cap (4th) on wands prevents a quickened wand of magic missiles as the spell would be considered 5th level. You could quicken a wand of ray of frost I suppose as that only comes out to 4th level after the meta-magic. You could use the quickened wand of ray of frost twice in a round. Once as a swift action and once as a standard action.







          share|improve this answer













          share|improve this answer




          share|improve this answer










          answered May 29 at 1:49









          niekellniekell

          4253 silver badges13 bronze badges




          4253 silver badges13 bronze badges


























              0
















              $begingroup$

              So to wrap up, if the wand was crafted by a level 9 wizard,
              A wand of magic missle could
              cast 5 missiles as a single attack
              Via UMD (use magic device)
              from any PC succeeding at the UMD roll.
              Those could hit one or many targets
              As long as specified prior to the roll.
              And the lesser the level of the wizard crafting the wand,
              The less missiles could be fired.






              share|improve this answer










              $endgroup$




















                0
















                $begingroup$

                So to wrap up, if the wand was crafted by a level 9 wizard,
                A wand of magic missle could
                cast 5 missiles as a single attack
                Via UMD (use magic device)
                from any PC succeeding at the UMD roll.
                Those could hit one or many targets
                As long as specified prior to the roll.
                And the lesser the level of the wizard crafting the wand,
                The less missiles could be fired.






                share|improve this answer










                $endgroup$


















                  0














                  0










                  0







                  $begingroup$

                  So to wrap up, if the wand was crafted by a level 9 wizard,
                  A wand of magic missle could
                  cast 5 missiles as a single attack
                  Via UMD (use magic device)
                  from any PC succeeding at the UMD roll.
                  Those could hit one or many targets
                  As long as specified prior to the roll.
                  And the lesser the level of the wizard crafting the wand,
                  The less missiles could be fired.






                  share|improve this answer










                  $endgroup$



                  So to wrap up, if the wand was crafted by a level 9 wizard,
                  A wand of magic missle could
                  cast 5 missiles as a single attack
                  Via UMD (use magic device)
                  from any PC succeeding at the UMD roll.
                  Those could hit one or many targets
                  As long as specified prior to the roll.
                  And the lesser the level of the wizard crafting the wand,
                  The less missiles could be fired.







                  share|improve this answer













                  share|improve this answer




                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 29 at 19:54









                  Acts7SevenActs7Seven

                  4101 silver badge15 bronze badges




                  4101 silver badge15 bronze badges


































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded



















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f148837%2fmy-player-wants-to-cast-multiple-charges-of-magic-missile-from-a-wand%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown









                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029