How many monosyllabic words does English have? (estimations are fine) Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraIs there a list of syllables contained in US English?How many syllables are in the English language?How many syllables does “cry” have?Why does English have so many words when the grammar doesn't allow for concatenating?Are the words “sillily”, “uglily”, “friendlily”, “livelily”, etc., valid English?What are some synonyms for “mindbody” or “psychosomatic”?How many syllables does “Science” have?How many syllables are in “nights 'n' days”?Does English really have triphthongs?Is a syllable defined phonetically or etymologically?Are -èd adjectives still usèd words?How to calculate number of syllables in a word using only the IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet) spelling?

Errors in solving coupled pdes

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

Getting AggregateResult variables from Execute Anonymous Window

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

How can I wire a 9-position switch so that each position turns on one more LED than the one before?

When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

RIP Packet Format

What's called a person who works as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?

Where did Arya get these scars?

Writing a T-SQL stored procedure to receive 4 numbers and insert them into a table

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

How to check if string is entirely made of same substring?

Marquee sign letters

Will I be more secure with my own router behind my ISP's router?

What to do with someone that cheated their way though university and a PhD program?

Stretch a Tikz tree

Is there a verb for listening stealthily?

What's the difference between using dependency injection with a container and using a service locator?

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

Page Layouts : 1 column , 2 columns-left , 2 columns-right , 3 column

Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?

How would you suggest I follow up with coworkers about our deadline that's today?



How many monosyllabic words does English have? (estimations are fine)



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraIs there a list of syllables contained in US English?How many syllables are in the English language?How many syllables does “cry” have?Why does English have so many words when the grammar doesn't allow for concatenating?Are the words “sillily”, “uglily”, “friendlily”, “livelily”, etc., valid English?What are some synonyms for “mindbody” or “psychosomatic”?How many syllables does “Science” have?How many syllables are in “nights 'n' days”?Does English really have triphthongs?Is a syllable defined phonetically or etymologically?Are -èd adjectives still usèd words?How to calculate number of syllables in a word using only the IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet) spelling?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.










share|improve this question






















  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • By some measure, one could say that in Chinese all words are monosyllabic. Can you give an indication what knowing such a number for English would mean in comparison to other languages? (You've given a possible cause, I'm looking for your expected use of this number)

    – Mitch
    Sep 18 '15 at 17:35

















4















I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.










share|improve this question






















  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • By some measure, one could say that in Chinese all words are monosyllabic. Can you give an indication what knowing such a number for English would mean in comparison to other languages? (You've given a possible cause, I'm looking for your expected use of this number)

    – Mitch
    Sep 18 '15 at 17:35













4












4








4


3






I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.










share|improve this question














I'm writing a post about word length in various languages in the world. It seems that English have (relatively) a lot of one-syllable words. Is there a count or an estimate of how many one-syllable words exists in English?



*I think it's because English have a lot of vowels and possible consonant clusters, they are a lot of possible syllables. This allows English to have a lot of one-syllable words.







morphology syllables






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Jul 19 '15 at 16:49









user69715user69715

17415




17415












  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • By some measure, one could say that in Chinese all words are monosyllabic. Can you give an indication what knowing such a number for English would mean in comparison to other languages? (You've given a possible cause, I'm looking for your expected use of this number)

    – Mitch
    Sep 18 '15 at 17:35

















  • I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

    – Andrew Leach
    Jul 19 '15 at 18:23






  • 1





    @Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

    – TRomano
    Jul 19 '15 at 19:46











  • Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:19











  • Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:21











  • By some measure, one could say that in Chinese all words are monosyllabic. Can you give an indication what knowing such a number for English would mean in comparison to other languages? (You've given a possible cause, I'm looking for your expected use of this number)

    – Mitch
    Sep 18 '15 at 17:35
















I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

– Andrew Leach
Jul 19 '15 at 18:23





I suspect that it's because English retains a lot of Anglo-Saxon words, which are usually monosyllablic. (I think that English has kept a lot of old words, which tend to have just one sound.)

– Andrew Leach
Jul 19 '15 at 18:23




1




1





@Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

– TRomano
Jul 19 '15 at 19:46





@Andrew Leach: Maybe the ones you know are, but Anglo-Saxon words are not "usually monosyllabic".

– TRomano
Jul 19 '15 at 19:46













Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:19





Perhaps what he meant is that Anglo-Saxon words are more likely to be monosyllabic than Latinate words.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:19













Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:21





Of course, the ability to add numerous affixes to most words means that the total number of words will be many times more than the number of monosyllabic words, because you can create numerous variations of most of them.

– Barmar
Jul 20 '15 at 16:21













By some measure, one could say that in Chinese all words are monosyllabic. Can you give an indication what knowing such a number for English would mean in comparison to other languages? (You've given a possible cause, I'm looking for your expected use of this number)

– Mitch
Sep 18 '15 at 17:35





By some measure, one could say that in Chinese all words are monosyllabic. Can you give an indication what knowing such a number for English would mean in comparison to other languages? (You've given a possible cause, I'm looking for your expected use of this number)

– Mitch
Sep 18 '15 at 17:35










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



Some of these words have two pronunciations. For example, the database has both a one-syllable pronunciation and a two-syllable pronunciation of fire. So you should think of this as the number of words that can be pronounced with one syllable.



Further, many of these words are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    What's the base line? (Total number of words)

    – Mitch
    Mar 25 at 22:30











  • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

    – Peter Shor
    Mar 26 at 0:19







  • 2





    For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

    – Mitch
    Mar 26 at 1:00


















2














In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






share|improve this answer


















  • 3





    Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:25






  • 1





    It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











  • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











  • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

    – Lambie
    Mar 26 at 0:42


















2














It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



Definitional issues



Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:



  • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


  • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


  • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.


Upper limits



There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



Lower limits



The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260814%2fhow-many-monosyllabic-words-does-english-have-estimations-are-fine%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Some of these words have two pronunciations. For example, the database has both a one-syllable pronunciation and a two-syllable pronunciation of fire. So you should think of this as the number of words that can be pronounced with one syllable.



    Further, many of these words are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      Mar 25 at 22:30











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      Mar 26 at 0:19







    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      Mar 26 at 1:00















    3














    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Some of these words have two pronunciations. For example, the database has both a one-syllable pronunciation and a two-syllable pronunciation of fire. So you should think of this as the number of words that can be pronounced with one syllable.



    Further, many of these words are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      Mar 25 at 22:30











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      Mar 26 at 0:19







    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      Mar 26 at 1:00













    3












    3








    3







    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Some of these words have two pronunciations. For example, the database has both a one-syllable pronunciation and a two-syllable pronunciation of fire. So you should think of this as the number of words that can be pronounced with one syllable.



    Further, many of these words are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.






    share|improve this answer















    The Phonetic Word Search website returns nearly 12,000 one-syllable words — input !* @ !* to the search function.



    Some of these words have two pronunciations. For example, the database has both a one-syllable pronunciation and a two-syllable pronunciation of fire. So you should think of this as the number of words that can be pronounced with one syllable.



    Further, many of these words are extremely rare, so you should probably view this as an upper bound.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Mar 28 at 11:30

























    answered Mar 25 at 21:52









    Peter Shor Peter Shor

    63.4k5123230




    63.4k5123230







    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      Mar 25 at 22:30











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      Mar 26 at 0:19







    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      Mar 26 at 1:00












    • 1





      What's the base line? (Total number of words)

      – Mitch
      Mar 25 at 22:30











    • @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

      – Peter Shor
      Mar 26 at 0:19







    • 2





      For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

      – Mitch
      Mar 26 at 1:00







    1




    1





    What's the base line? (Total number of words)

    – Mitch
    Mar 25 at 22:30





    What's the base line? (Total number of words)

    – Mitch
    Mar 25 at 22:30













    @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

    – Peter Shor
    Mar 26 at 0:19






    @Mitch: there are around 80,000 words in it.

    – Peter Shor
    Mar 26 at 0:19





    2




    2





    For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

    – Mitch
    Mar 26 at 1:00





    For corroboration, I did the same on the pronunciation file from cmudict: egrep '^.+ [^0-9]+[0-9][^0-9]+$' ~/Downloads/pronc.txt | wc; I got: 14094 out of 116521 words

    – Mitch
    Mar 26 at 1:00













    2














    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25






    • 1





      It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      Mar 26 at 0:42















    2














    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25






    • 1





      It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      Mar 26 at 0:42













    2












    2








    2







    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.






    share|improve this answer













    In the Beginning was Information by Werner Gitt may provide you with a starting point for your investigation. Gitt claims that 71.5% of English words are monosyllabic. You'll have to decide whether Gitt's sampling universe is to your liking.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jul 19 '15 at 17:33









    deadratdeadrat

    42.2k25293




    42.2k25293







    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25






    • 1





      It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      Mar 26 at 0:42












    • 3





      Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:25






    • 1





      It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:28











    • In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

      – Barmar
      Jul 20 '15 at 16:29











    • Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

      – Lambie
      Mar 26 at 0:42







    3




    3





    Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:25





    Is Gitt calculating the percentage of words in the vocabulary, or the percentage of words in the corpus? Almost all of the 100 most common words in English are monosyllabic, and these top 100 words make up half of all written material in English.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:25




    1




    1





    It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:28





    It seems like he must be talking about the corpus. There are around a million words in the English language, but I can't believe there are over 700,000 words with just one syllable.

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:28













    In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:29





    In fact, reading the linked site carefully, he definitely is talking about that. He writes "These frequency distributions were obtained from fiction texts".

    – Barmar
    Jul 20 '15 at 16:29













    Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

    – Lambie
    Mar 26 at 0:42





    Sorry, but his name is Gitt? That's definitely homophonic.....:)

    – Lambie
    Mar 26 at 0:42











    2














    It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



    Definitional issues



    Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:



    • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


    • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


    • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.


    Upper limits



    There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



    Lower limits



    The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



    The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



    Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






    share|improve this answer





























      2














      It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



      Definitional issues



      Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:



      • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


      • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


      • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.


      Upper limits



      There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



      Lower limits



      The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



      The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



      Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






      share|improve this answer



























        2












        2








        2







        It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



        Definitional issues



        Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:



        • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


        • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


        • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.


        Upper limits



        There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



        Lower limits



        The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



        The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



        Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).






        share|improve this answer















        It seems certain that the number of monosyllabic English words is somewhere between 3000 and 40,000. If you exclude inflected forms (see below), I'm fairly certain that the number would be below 30,000.



        Definitional issues



        Past at certain point, you have to decide on a clear definition of "word" in order to get an accurate answer:



        • probably the most important thing is whether you count inflected forms like walks and walked as separate words from the word walk; because so many English words can inflect (nouns to make plural forms, verbs to make the past-tense form or the third-person present tense form) counting these as three words rather than one will probably substantially increase the number of monosyllabic words.


        • Many infrequent dictionary entries are proper nouns; you need to decide which, if any, of these are included in your definition of "English words".


        • Presumably, unrelated homophones (like steel and steal) will be counted separately. I would also count unrelated homonyms (like bat "flying mammal" and bat "club") separately. It may be a bit less clear whether related words that are homophones and homographs, like walk (n.) and walk (v.), or moved (v.) and moved (adj.), should all be counted separately.


        Upper limits



        There are probably fewer than 15,831, since Chris Barker gives that as an estimate for the total number of distinct syllables found in any position in real English words ("How many syllables does English have?", link to archived version found in Andrew J. Lintz's answer to the question How many syllables are in the English language?).



        Lower limits



        The abstract of "Sensory experience ratings for over 5,000 mono- and disyllabic words", by Barbara J. Juhasz and Melvin J. Yap, refers to "2,857 monosyllabic words used in the Juhasz et al. study" on "sensory experience ratings". I would infer that for a word to be useful in this kind of study, it would have to be reasonable to expect an English speaker to be familiar with it, so I think that we can say that there are definitely at least 2,857 monosyllabic words that are fairly well established in English vocabulary. The list of words is available to download in the "Supplementary material" section; I glanced at it, and it does not seem to contain inflected forms ending in -s or -ed.



        The Wiktionary category "English 1-syllable words" has 8,671 pages, but there are certainly erroneous inclusions; e.g. 50 or so suffixes (like -ous) and some polysyllabic terms where the pronunciation has only been entered for only part (e.g. slough of despond). It also includes a number of proper nouns and obscure acronyms like BRUK, which you might not want to include in a list of "words". So it's not a hard lower limit, but it might give you an approximate idea of how many single syllables might be considered by some definitions to be English words.



        Patrick Corliss wrote an answer to the earlier question "Is there a list of syllables contained in US English?" saying that he had found over 10,000 single syllable words (including names, adopted foreign words, and inflected forms of words).







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Mar 26 at 2:29

























        answered Mar 25 at 21:32









        sumelicsumelic

        51k8121229




        51k8121229



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f260814%2fhow-many-monosyllabic-words-does-english-have-estimations-are-fine%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum