What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraCan anyone learn to sing?How to sing “like a girl” for men?Keyboard and Voice: What is the keyboard playing?Learning how to sight sing without prior singingWhy does singing high notes seem to strain my vocal chords more than low notes?What is “Upbeat Music”?What comes after vocal warm ups and Exercises?What is the best method to being able to sing again?Why I cannot sing always well?Are most male pop singers really tenors?
Protagonist's race is hidden - should I reveal it?
Raising a bilingual kid. When should we introduce the majority language?
Philosophers who were composers?
What *exactly* is electrical current, voltage, and resistance?
Marquee sign letters
France's Public Holidays' Puzzle
Putting Ant-Man on house arrest
Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department
What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?
What was Apollo 13's "Little Jolt" after MECO?
Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?
TV series episode where humans nuke aliens before decrypting their message that states they come in peace
What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management
Determinant of a matrix with 2 equal rows
"Working on a knee"
Co-worker works way more than he should
Is it accepted to use working hours to read general interest books?
What is /etc/mtab in Linux?
What's called a person who works as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?
false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'
Why isPrototypeOf() returns false?
Guitar neck keeps tilting down
Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever
What happened to Viserion in Season 7?
What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraCan anyone learn to sing?How to sing “like a girl” for men?Keyboard and Voice: What is the keyboard playing?Learning how to sight sing without prior singingWhy does singing high notes seem to strain my vocal chords more than low notes?What is “Upbeat Music”?What comes after vocal warm ups and Exercises?What is the best method to being able to sing again?Why I cannot sing always well?Are most male pop singers really tenors?
I'm not a musician, and I know basically nothing about music, and music theory and what-not. (I basically just know a few common terms, and how to play chords)
In most songs with two or more people singing, (Duets specifically) the singers almost always sing in harmony, but not the same notes. What term is used to describe this? I want to be able to learn how to do it, but I don't know the specific term to do more research on it.
voice terminology
add a comment |
I'm not a musician, and I know basically nothing about music, and music theory and what-not. (I basically just know a few common terms, and how to play chords)
In most songs with two or more people singing, (Duets specifically) the singers almost always sing in harmony, but not the same notes. What term is used to describe this? I want to be able to learn how to do it, but I don't know the specific term to do more research on it.
voice terminology
57
That's called singing in harmony.
– AJFaraday
Mar 25 at 15:34
12
If they're singing the same note, they are not singing in harmony—they're just singing the same note.
– only_pro
Mar 25 at 15:35
A good place to start might be the wikipedia page on 'vocal harmony'. And then watch a bunch of episodes of "Glee" for examples. :)
– Brian D
Mar 25 at 16:55
11
Singing the same note is unison
– Matthew Morrissette
Mar 25 at 18:18
I would just note that the word "harmony" as a musical term of art means specifically that singers are singing different notes, as implied in the comments. But the word "harmony" was formerly used more broadly to denote pleasant sounds, and for a lay person it could still reasonably be used that way today. In Micrologus, Guido d'Arezzo calls the octave the most harmonious of intervals, saying that other intervals can never be fully harmonious; this does not agree with modern use of the word.
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:53
add a comment |
I'm not a musician, and I know basically nothing about music, and music theory and what-not. (I basically just know a few common terms, and how to play chords)
In most songs with two or more people singing, (Duets specifically) the singers almost always sing in harmony, but not the same notes. What term is used to describe this? I want to be able to learn how to do it, but I don't know the specific term to do more research on it.
voice terminology
I'm not a musician, and I know basically nothing about music, and music theory and what-not. (I basically just know a few common terms, and how to play chords)
In most songs with two or more people singing, (Duets specifically) the singers almost always sing in harmony, but not the same notes. What term is used to describe this? I want to be able to learn how to do it, but I don't know the specific term to do more research on it.
voice terminology
voice terminology
asked Mar 25 at 13:42
E. HuckabeeE. Huckabee
16116
16116
57
That's called singing in harmony.
– AJFaraday
Mar 25 at 15:34
12
If they're singing the same note, they are not singing in harmony—they're just singing the same note.
– only_pro
Mar 25 at 15:35
A good place to start might be the wikipedia page on 'vocal harmony'. And then watch a bunch of episodes of "Glee" for examples. :)
– Brian D
Mar 25 at 16:55
11
Singing the same note is unison
– Matthew Morrissette
Mar 25 at 18:18
I would just note that the word "harmony" as a musical term of art means specifically that singers are singing different notes, as implied in the comments. But the word "harmony" was formerly used more broadly to denote pleasant sounds, and for a lay person it could still reasonably be used that way today. In Micrologus, Guido d'Arezzo calls the octave the most harmonious of intervals, saying that other intervals can never be fully harmonious; this does not agree with modern use of the word.
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:53
add a comment |
57
That's called singing in harmony.
– AJFaraday
Mar 25 at 15:34
12
If they're singing the same note, they are not singing in harmony—they're just singing the same note.
– only_pro
Mar 25 at 15:35
A good place to start might be the wikipedia page on 'vocal harmony'. And then watch a bunch of episodes of "Glee" for examples. :)
– Brian D
Mar 25 at 16:55
11
Singing the same note is unison
– Matthew Morrissette
Mar 25 at 18:18
I would just note that the word "harmony" as a musical term of art means specifically that singers are singing different notes, as implied in the comments. But the word "harmony" was formerly used more broadly to denote pleasant sounds, and for a lay person it could still reasonably be used that way today. In Micrologus, Guido d'Arezzo calls the octave the most harmonious of intervals, saying that other intervals can never be fully harmonious; this does not agree with modern use of the word.
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:53
57
57
That's called singing in harmony.
– AJFaraday
Mar 25 at 15:34
That's called singing in harmony.
– AJFaraday
Mar 25 at 15:34
12
12
If they're singing the same note, they are not singing in harmony—they're just singing the same note.
– only_pro
Mar 25 at 15:35
If they're singing the same note, they are not singing in harmony—they're just singing the same note.
– only_pro
Mar 25 at 15:35
A good place to start might be the wikipedia page on 'vocal harmony'. And then watch a bunch of episodes of "Glee" for examples. :)
– Brian D
Mar 25 at 16:55
A good place to start might be the wikipedia page on 'vocal harmony'. And then watch a bunch of episodes of "Glee" for examples. :)
– Brian D
Mar 25 at 16:55
11
11
Singing the same note is unison
– Matthew Morrissette
Mar 25 at 18:18
Singing the same note is unison
– Matthew Morrissette
Mar 25 at 18:18
I would just note that the word "harmony" as a musical term of art means specifically that singers are singing different notes, as implied in the comments. But the word "harmony" was formerly used more broadly to denote pleasant sounds, and for a lay person it could still reasonably be used that way today. In Micrologus, Guido d'Arezzo calls the octave the most harmonious of intervals, saying that other intervals can never be fully harmonious; this does not agree with modern use of the word.
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:53
I would just note that the word "harmony" as a musical term of art means specifically that singers are singing different notes, as implied in the comments. But the word "harmony" was formerly used more broadly to denote pleasant sounds, and for a lay person it could still reasonably be used that way today. In Micrologus, Guido d'Arezzo calls the octave the most harmonious of intervals, saying that other intervals can never be fully harmonious; this does not agree with modern use of the word.
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:53
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
The term "harmony" itself is what you are looking for.
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison (same notes, only one voice) because everyone learns "his notes" as he would do singing alone. The only thing I could think of is having a good ear, maybe good relative pitch, but that is required for soloists singers too.
The hard part is composing or improvising the harmony and that requires a lot of different music theory skills, not only the harmony part. If this is what you are looking for, I would suggest to start with generic music theory or if you are really serious about it, take piano lessons.
31
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.
– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
add a comment |
Singing together but different notes is singing in harmony. Singing the same notes would be singing in unison.
8
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
1
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
1
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
add a comment |
From a strictly music theory point of view, one might call it counterpoint. The original Latin phrase "punctus contra punctum" (note against note) denotes just that. The term indicates two or more voices, each having their own independent melody (the horizontal aspect in written music), resulting in a harmony (the vertical aspect).
1
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
10
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
1
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
add a comment |
It is called polyphonic singing aka overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing. Bjork does some (but NOT all) of her singing in a polyphonic manner.
Also refer to Wikipedia documentation as follows:
Overtone singing – also known as overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing – is a type of singing in which the singer manipulates the resonances (or formants) created as air travels from the lungs, past the vocal folds, and out of the lips to produce a melody.
The harmonics (fundamental and overtones) of a sound wave made by the human voice can be selectively amplified by changing the shape of the resonant cavities of the mouth, larynx, and pharynx.[1] This resonant tuning allows singers to create apparently more than one pitch at the same time (the fundamental and a selected overtone), while actually generating only a single fundamental frequency with their vocal folds.
Each note is like a rainbow of sound. When you shoot a light beam through a prism, you get a rainbow. You think of a rainbow of sounds when you sing one note. If you can use your throat as a prism, you can expose the rainbow – through positioning the throat in a certain physical way, which will reveal the harmonic series note by note.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_singing#Mongolia_and_Buryatia
2
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
1
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81921%2fwhat-is-the-term-when-two-people-sing-in-harmony-but-they-arent-singing-the-sa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The term "harmony" itself is what you are looking for.
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison (same notes, only one voice) because everyone learns "his notes" as he would do singing alone. The only thing I could think of is having a good ear, maybe good relative pitch, but that is required for soloists singers too.
The hard part is composing or improvising the harmony and that requires a lot of different music theory skills, not only the harmony part. If this is what you are looking for, I would suggest to start with generic music theory or if you are really serious about it, take piano lessons.
31
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.
– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
add a comment |
The term "harmony" itself is what you are looking for.
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison (same notes, only one voice) because everyone learns "his notes" as he would do singing alone. The only thing I could think of is having a good ear, maybe good relative pitch, but that is required for soloists singers too.
The hard part is composing or improvising the harmony and that requires a lot of different music theory skills, not only the harmony part. If this is what you are looking for, I would suggest to start with generic music theory or if you are really serious about it, take piano lessons.
31
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.
– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
add a comment |
The term "harmony" itself is what you are looking for.
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison (same notes, only one voice) because everyone learns "his notes" as he would do singing alone. The only thing I could think of is having a good ear, maybe good relative pitch, but that is required for soloists singers too.
The hard part is composing or improvising the harmony and that requires a lot of different music theory skills, not only the harmony part. If this is what you are looking for, I would suggest to start with generic music theory or if you are really serious about it, take piano lessons.
The term "harmony" itself is what you are looking for.
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison (same notes, only one voice) because everyone learns "his notes" as he would do singing alone. The only thing I could think of is having a good ear, maybe good relative pitch, but that is required for soloists singers too.
The hard part is composing or improvising the harmony and that requires a lot of different music theory skills, not only the harmony part. If this is what you are looking for, I would suggest to start with generic music theory or if you are really serious about it, take piano lessons.
edited Mar 25 at 14:25
answered Mar 25 at 14:19
XandruXandru
542312
542312
31
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.
– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
add a comment |
31
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.
– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
31
31
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Being able to sing in harmony (2 or more different voices) with someone however doesn't require any more skills or theory than singing alone or in unison
I don't know that this is true. I've seen people who are used to singing in unison and have great difficulty "ignoring" the notes that other people are singing and not matching them.– Peter Olson
Mar 25 at 16:08
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
– Doktor Mayhem♦
Mar 26 at 16:26
add a comment |
Singing together but different notes is singing in harmony. Singing the same notes would be singing in unison.
8
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
1
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
1
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
add a comment |
Singing together but different notes is singing in harmony. Singing the same notes would be singing in unison.
8
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
1
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
1
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
add a comment |
Singing together but different notes is singing in harmony. Singing the same notes would be singing in unison.
Singing together but different notes is singing in harmony. Singing the same notes would be singing in unison.
answered Mar 25 at 14:07
b3kob3ko
4,91011121
4,91011121
8
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
1
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
1
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
add a comment |
8
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
1
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
1
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
8
8
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
Singing the same note might also be called "doubling".
– Todd Wilcox
Mar 25 at 14:36
1
1
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
@ToddWilcox Interesting. In my 30 years of singing and recording I've never heard that. When recording, yes, you double it, when singing live (meaning multiple people singing the same notes), they're singing in unison. Might be a stateside thing.
– Darren Sweeney
Mar 25 at 20:04
1
1
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
@DarrenSweeney doubling is commonly used in orchestration, as in, "the second flute doubles the first violin section" or "the clarinet doubles the tenor part."
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:57
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
"Doubling" also sometimes implies that two voices or instruments are playing the same note but one or more octaves apart. Most often used when said voices are not in the same range, e.g. "The trombone part is doubling the trumpets."
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 26 at 18:29
add a comment |
From a strictly music theory point of view, one might call it counterpoint. The original Latin phrase "punctus contra punctum" (note against note) denotes just that. The term indicates two or more voices, each having their own independent melody (the horizontal aspect in written music), resulting in a harmony (the vertical aspect).
1
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
10
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
1
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
add a comment |
From a strictly music theory point of view, one might call it counterpoint. The original Latin phrase "punctus contra punctum" (note against note) denotes just that. The term indicates two or more voices, each having their own independent melody (the horizontal aspect in written music), resulting in a harmony (the vertical aspect).
1
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
10
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
1
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
add a comment |
From a strictly music theory point of view, one might call it counterpoint. The original Latin phrase "punctus contra punctum" (note against note) denotes just that. The term indicates two or more voices, each having their own independent melody (the horizontal aspect in written music), resulting in a harmony (the vertical aspect).
From a strictly music theory point of view, one might call it counterpoint. The original Latin phrase "punctus contra punctum" (note against note) denotes just that. The term indicates two or more voices, each having their own independent melody (the horizontal aspect in written music), resulting in a harmony (the vertical aspect).
edited Mar 25 at 20:44
answered Mar 25 at 20:34
Now_whatNow_what
273
273
1
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
10
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
1
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
add a comment |
1
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
10
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
1
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
1
1
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
Exactly what I was thinking, if "not the same notes" means "a harmonizing melody in a different rhythm" for the OP.
– Joe McMahon
Mar 25 at 23:34
10
10
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Counterpoint's usually much more than simple parallel harmony, though; with lines that are independent, usually with contrasting rhythms and/or shapes, and can stand alone as melodies in their own right.
– gidds
Mar 25 at 23:36
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
Contrapuntal, and it is seen for guitar.
– mckenzm
Mar 26 at 1:44
1
1
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
@gidds is correct, counterpoint is generally in reference to a very specific set of strictures with regard to how one constructs interdependent yet individual melodic lines that, when combined, create specific harmonies.
– LSM07
Mar 26 at 3:45
add a comment |
It is called polyphonic singing aka overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing. Bjork does some (but NOT all) of her singing in a polyphonic manner.
Also refer to Wikipedia documentation as follows:
Overtone singing – also known as overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing – is a type of singing in which the singer manipulates the resonances (or formants) created as air travels from the lungs, past the vocal folds, and out of the lips to produce a melody.
The harmonics (fundamental and overtones) of a sound wave made by the human voice can be selectively amplified by changing the shape of the resonant cavities of the mouth, larynx, and pharynx.[1] This resonant tuning allows singers to create apparently more than one pitch at the same time (the fundamental and a selected overtone), while actually generating only a single fundamental frequency with their vocal folds.
Each note is like a rainbow of sound. When you shoot a light beam through a prism, you get a rainbow. You think of a rainbow of sounds when you sing one note. If you can use your throat as a prism, you can expose the rainbow – through positioning the throat in a certain physical way, which will reveal the harmonic series note by note.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_singing#Mongolia_and_Buryatia
2
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
1
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
add a comment |
It is called polyphonic singing aka overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing. Bjork does some (but NOT all) of her singing in a polyphonic manner.
Also refer to Wikipedia documentation as follows:
Overtone singing – also known as overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing – is a type of singing in which the singer manipulates the resonances (or formants) created as air travels from the lungs, past the vocal folds, and out of the lips to produce a melody.
The harmonics (fundamental and overtones) of a sound wave made by the human voice can be selectively amplified by changing the shape of the resonant cavities of the mouth, larynx, and pharynx.[1] This resonant tuning allows singers to create apparently more than one pitch at the same time (the fundamental and a selected overtone), while actually generating only a single fundamental frequency with their vocal folds.
Each note is like a rainbow of sound. When you shoot a light beam through a prism, you get a rainbow. You think of a rainbow of sounds when you sing one note. If you can use your throat as a prism, you can expose the rainbow – through positioning the throat in a certain physical way, which will reveal the harmonic series note by note.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_singing#Mongolia_and_Buryatia
2
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
1
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
add a comment |
It is called polyphonic singing aka overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing. Bjork does some (but NOT all) of her singing in a polyphonic manner.
Also refer to Wikipedia documentation as follows:
Overtone singing – also known as overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing – is a type of singing in which the singer manipulates the resonances (or formants) created as air travels from the lungs, past the vocal folds, and out of the lips to produce a melody.
The harmonics (fundamental and overtones) of a sound wave made by the human voice can be selectively amplified by changing the shape of the resonant cavities of the mouth, larynx, and pharynx.[1] This resonant tuning allows singers to create apparently more than one pitch at the same time (the fundamental and a selected overtone), while actually generating only a single fundamental frequency with their vocal folds.
Each note is like a rainbow of sound. When you shoot a light beam through a prism, you get a rainbow. You think of a rainbow of sounds when you sing one note. If you can use your throat as a prism, you can expose the rainbow – through positioning the throat in a certain physical way, which will reveal the harmonic series note by note.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_singing#Mongolia_and_Buryatia
It is called polyphonic singing aka overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing. Bjork does some (but NOT all) of her singing in a polyphonic manner.
Also refer to Wikipedia documentation as follows:
Overtone singing – also known as overtone chanting, harmonic singing, or throat singing – is a type of singing in which the singer manipulates the resonances (or formants) created as air travels from the lungs, past the vocal folds, and out of the lips to produce a melody.
The harmonics (fundamental and overtones) of a sound wave made by the human voice can be selectively amplified by changing the shape of the resonant cavities of the mouth, larynx, and pharynx.[1] This resonant tuning allows singers to create apparently more than one pitch at the same time (the fundamental and a selected overtone), while actually generating only a single fundamental frequency with their vocal folds.
Each note is like a rainbow of sound. When you shoot a light beam through a prism, you get a rainbow. You think of a rainbow of sounds when you sing one note. If you can use your throat as a prism, you can expose the rainbow – through positioning the throat in a certain physical way, which will reveal the harmonic series note by note.[2]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overtone_singing#Mongolia_and_Buryatia
answered Mar 26 at 7:58
NRGSurgeNRGSurge
111
111
2
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
1
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
add a comment |
2
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
1
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
2
2
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
This seems to refer to a single person producing multiple tones apparently at once. The question is rather about two different people singing together but different notes.
– GalacticCowboy
Mar 26 at 15:20
1
1
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
This is a great answer written for the wrong question. The question mentions two people.
– user45266
Mar 26 at 17:15
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Music: Practice & Theory Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f81921%2fwhat-is-the-term-when-two-people-sing-in-harmony-but-they-arent-singing-the-sa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
57
That's called singing in harmony.
– AJFaraday
Mar 25 at 15:34
12
If they're singing the same note, they are not singing in harmony—they're just singing the same note.
– only_pro
Mar 25 at 15:35
A good place to start might be the wikipedia page on 'vocal harmony'. And then watch a bunch of episodes of "Glee" for examples. :)
– Brian D
Mar 25 at 16:55
11
Singing the same note is unison
– Matthew Morrissette
Mar 25 at 18:18
I would just note that the word "harmony" as a musical term of art means specifically that singers are singing different notes, as implied in the comments. But the word "harmony" was formerly used more broadly to denote pleasant sounds, and for a lay person it could still reasonably be used that way today. In Micrologus, Guido d'Arezzo calls the octave the most harmonious of intervals, saying that other intervals can never be fully harmonious; this does not agree with modern use of the word.
– phoog
Mar 26 at 15:53