How to discuss my unexpected experimental results? [on hold]












0















In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.



Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?




Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.











share|improve this question













put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist yesterday


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 1





    There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday













  • I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"

    – Sjaffry
    yesterday
















0















In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.



Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?




Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.











share|improve this question













put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist yesterday


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.














  • 1





    There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday













  • I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"

    – Sjaffry
    yesterday














0












0








0








In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.



Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?




Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.











share|improve this question














In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.



Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?




Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.








phrase-requests writing-style research






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









SjaffrySjaffry

1124




1124




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist yesterday


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist yesterday


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.










  • 1





    There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday













  • I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"

    – Sjaffry
    yesterday














  • 1





    There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?

    – TRomano
    yesterday













  • I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"

    – Sjaffry
    yesterday








1




1





There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?

– TRomano
yesterday







There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?

– TRomano
yesterday















I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"

– Sjaffry
yesterday





I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"

– Sjaffry
yesterday










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.




Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.




https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless






share|improve this answer































    0














    I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis



    I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.



    I would just say:




    as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).







    share|improve this answer






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.




      Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
      initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.




      https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless






      share|improve this answer




























        1














        It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.




        Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
        initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.




        https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless






        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.




          Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
          initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.




          https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless






          share|improve this answer













          It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.




          Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
          initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.




          https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          user22542user22542

          3,3421411




          3,3421411

























              0














              I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis



              I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.



              I would just say:




              as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).







              share|improve this answer




























                0














                I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis



                I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.



                I would just say:




                as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).







                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis



                  I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.



                  I would just say:




                  as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).







                  share|improve this answer













                  I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis



                  I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.



                  I would just say:




                  as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  NicoleNicole

                  213




                  213















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Bunad

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum