How to discuss my unexpected experimental results? [on hold]
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ yesterday
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ yesterday
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
yesterday
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
yesterday
add a comment |
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
In my research, I found that my proposed scheme does not provide very "high performance" gains as compared to the conventional scheme I was testing against.
Still, my results are better and I am submitting them to a conference. How can I rephrase the following in an apt manner?
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation.
phrase-requests writing-style research
phrase-requests writing-style research
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
asked yesterday
SjaffrySjaffry
1124
1124
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ yesterday
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as primarily opinion-based by Jason Bassford, tchrist♦ yesterday
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
yesterday
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
yesterday
add a comment |
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
yesterday
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
yesterday
1
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
yesterday
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
yesterday
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
yesterday
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
add a comment |
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
add a comment |
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
It sounds fine to me. I might suggest adding a few additional words - "but is still significant nevertheless". It gives direction to the ultimate idea you are trying to convey.
Here, we would like to mention that this increase is lower than our
initial expectation, but is still significant nevertheless.
https://www.thefreedictionary.com/nevertheless
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
answered yesterday
user22542user22542
3,3421411
3,3421411
add a comment |
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
add a comment |
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
I am going to drift a little away with this link to your question, but I thought it could be useful or wide-eye open to you. replication crisis
I hesitate if significant is the right word since it must imply a statistic calculus and it means the variables have a certain correlation either positive or negative.
I would just say:
as soon as the scheme is amended the performance is lower. (that has to have an explanation).
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
answered yesterday
NicoleNicole
213
213
add a comment |
add a comment |
1
There are many ways to express the idea. The one you have suggested is OK. Unless you give some guidance as to what idea, other than the basic fact, you wish to convey, we have nothing to base advice on. Do you wish to say "We were so wrong!" or "We had hoped for more"?
– TRomano
yesterday
I mean to say, "We had hoped for more"
– Sjaffry
yesterday