Make “apt-get update” show the exact output as `apt update`
I'm learning the CLI interface of Advanced Packaging Tool. From the output of apt(8)
when its stdout isn't a terminal, it isn't suitable for "scripts expecting stable programming interface", so I'm taking a look at apt-get(8)
.
One difference between apt update
and apt-get update
is that the latter is missing a final line after all cache has been updated:
8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
I want to know how I can get this exact line displayed with apt-get(8)
.
apt
add a comment |
I'm learning the CLI interface of Advanced Packaging Tool. From the output of apt(8)
when its stdout isn't a terminal, it isn't suitable for "scripts expecting stable programming interface", so I'm taking a look at apt-get(8)
.
One difference between apt update
and apt-get update
is that the latter is missing a final line after all cache has been updated:
8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
I want to know how I can get this exact line displayed with apt-get(8)
.
apt
add a comment |
I'm learning the CLI interface of Advanced Packaging Tool. From the output of apt(8)
when its stdout isn't a terminal, it isn't suitable for "scripts expecting stable programming interface", so I'm taking a look at apt-get(8)
.
One difference between apt update
and apt-get update
is that the latter is missing a final line after all cache has been updated:
8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
I want to know how I can get this exact line displayed with apt-get(8)
.
apt
I'm learning the CLI interface of Advanced Packaging Tool. From the output of apt(8)
when its stdout isn't a terminal, it isn't suitable for "scripts expecting stable programming interface", so I'm taking a look at apt-get(8)
.
One difference between apt update
and apt-get update
is that the latter is missing a final line after all cache has been updated:
8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
I want to know how I can get this exact line displayed with apt-get(8)
.
apt
apt
edited yesterday
iBug
asked yesterday
iBugiBug
1741212
1741212
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
man apt-get
shows:
-s, --simulate, --just-print, --dry-run, --recon, --no-act
No action; perform a simulation of events that would occur based on
the current system state but do not actually change the system.
Locking will be disabled (Debug::NoLocking) so the system state
could change while apt-get is running. Simulations can also be
executed by non-root users which might not have read access to all
apt configuration distorting the simulation. A notice expressing
this warning is also shown by default for non-root users
(APT::Get::Show-User-Simulation-Note). Configuration Item:
APT::Get::Simulate.
So if you just do:
apt-get upgrade --dry-run
it will output:
...
4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
...
Yeah, I went throughman 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different fromapt
.
– iBug
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical becauseapt
is really a programmatic wrapper aroundapt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.
– tudor
yesterday
apt
shows8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
1
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
4
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number.apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to acceptapt-get
's output or you can| sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).
– tudor
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Guessing you need to handle the number of available updates, here is a suggestion:
# With no option, returns two numbers, no CR nor LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
# With --human-readable, returns numbers, locale LANG text & CR/LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --human-readable
No need to sudo
The output is easy to work with
More options:
> /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --help
Usage: apt-check [options]
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-p, --package-names Show the packages that are going to be
installed/upgraded
--human-readable Show human readable output on stdout
--security-updates-unattended
Return the time in days when security updates are
installed unattended (0 means disabled)
Is this the exact thing used to generatemotd
on SSH login?
– iBug
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
add a comment |
From man 8 apt
:
... enables some options ...
Then I went through /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
(using zcat(1)
to show text content) and noticed this option:
apt::cmd::show-update-stats
So I worked out the following command that did exactly what I wanted:
# apt-get -o apt::cmd::show-update-stats=true update
Tested to be working on Xenial and Bionic.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1128447%2fmake-apt-get-update-show-the-exact-output-as-apt-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
man apt-get
shows:
-s, --simulate, --just-print, --dry-run, --recon, --no-act
No action; perform a simulation of events that would occur based on
the current system state but do not actually change the system.
Locking will be disabled (Debug::NoLocking) so the system state
could change while apt-get is running. Simulations can also be
executed by non-root users which might not have read access to all
apt configuration distorting the simulation. A notice expressing
this warning is also shown by default for non-root users
(APT::Get::Show-User-Simulation-Note). Configuration Item:
APT::Get::Simulate.
So if you just do:
apt-get upgrade --dry-run
it will output:
...
4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
...
Yeah, I went throughman 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different fromapt
.
– iBug
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical becauseapt
is really a programmatic wrapper aroundapt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.
– tudor
yesterday
apt
shows8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
1
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
4
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number.apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to acceptapt-get
's output or you can| sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).
– tudor
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
man apt-get
shows:
-s, --simulate, --just-print, --dry-run, --recon, --no-act
No action; perform a simulation of events that would occur based on
the current system state but do not actually change the system.
Locking will be disabled (Debug::NoLocking) so the system state
could change while apt-get is running. Simulations can also be
executed by non-root users which might not have read access to all
apt configuration distorting the simulation. A notice expressing
this warning is also shown by default for non-root users
(APT::Get::Show-User-Simulation-Note). Configuration Item:
APT::Get::Simulate.
So if you just do:
apt-get upgrade --dry-run
it will output:
...
4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
...
Yeah, I went throughman 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different fromapt
.
– iBug
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical becauseapt
is really a programmatic wrapper aroundapt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.
– tudor
yesterday
apt
shows8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
1
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
4
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number.apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to acceptapt-get
's output or you can| sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).
– tudor
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
man apt-get
shows:
-s, --simulate, --just-print, --dry-run, --recon, --no-act
No action; perform a simulation of events that would occur based on
the current system state but do not actually change the system.
Locking will be disabled (Debug::NoLocking) so the system state
could change while apt-get is running. Simulations can also be
executed by non-root users which might not have read access to all
apt configuration distorting the simulation. A notice expressing
this warning is also shown by default for non-root users
(APT::Get::Show-User-Simulation-Note). Configuration Item:
APT::Get::Simulate.
So if you just do:
apt-get upgrade --dry-run
it will output:
...
4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
...
man apt-get
shows:
-s, --simulate, --just-print, --dry-run, --recon, --no-act
No action; perform a simulation of events that would occur based on
the current system state but do not actually change the system.
Locking will be disabled (Debug::NoLocking) so the system state
could change while apt-get is running. Simulations can also be
executed by non-root users which might not have read access to all
apt configuration distorting the simulation. A notice expressing
this warning is also shown by default for non-root users
(APT::Get::Show-User-Simulation-Note). Configuration Item:
APT::Get::Simulate.
So if you just do:
apt-get upgrade --dry-run
it will output:
...
4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
...
answered yesterday
tudortudor
3,05651948
3,05651948
Yeah, I went throughman 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different fromapt
.
– iBug
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical becauseapt
is really a programmatic wrapper aroundapt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.
– tudor
yesterday
apt
shows8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
1
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
4
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number.apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to acceptapt-get
's output or you can| sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).
– tudor
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Yeah, I went throughman 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different fromapt
.
– iBug
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical becauseapt
is really a programmatic wrapper aroundapt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.
– tudor
yesterday
apt
shows8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
1
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
4
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number.apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to acceptapt-get
's output or you can| sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).
– tudor
yesterday
Yeah, I went through
man 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different from apt
.– iBug
yesterday
Yeah, I went through
man 8 apt-get
and found that option, but the output was different from apt
.– iBug
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical because
apt
is really a programmatic wrapper around apt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.– tudor
yesterday
Different how? I just checked on my system and it's identical. I thought it was identical because
apt
is really a programmatic wrapper around apt-get
and that's the reason why the warning exists.– tudor
yesterday
apt
shows 8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows 4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
apt
shows 8 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them.
, while your answer shows 4 to upgrade, 0 to newly install, 0 to remove and 0 not to upgrade.
– iBug
yesterday
1
1
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
Yes, that's because you have 8 to upgrade where I have 4. Or are you referring to the text being different?
– tudor
yesterday
4
4
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.
apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number. apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to accept apt-get
's output or you can | sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).– tudor
yesterday
Yes, that's exactly what the warning is about.
apt
will not guarantee you that text, and they may not even guarantee you that number. apt-get
however has a strict output requirement because it's used by other softwares (like UIs and daemons) to process it in various ways. So you can either change your code to accept apt-get
's output or you can | sed 's/to upgrade/packages can be upgraded/g'
, for example (and risk your code breaking later).– tudor
yesterday
|
show 4 more comments
Guessing you need to handle the number of available updates, here is a suggestion:
# With no option, returns two numbers, no CR nor LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
# With --human-readable, returns numbers, locale LANG text & CR/LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --human-readable
No need to sudo
The output is easy to work with
More options:
> /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --help
Usage: apt-check [options]
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-p, --package-names Show the packages that are going to be
installed/upgraded
--human-readable Show human readable output on stdout
--security-updates-unattended
Return the time in days when security updates are
installed unattended (0 means disabled)
Is this the exact thing used to generatemotd
on SSH login?
– iBug
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
add a comment |
Guessing you need to handle the number of available updates, here is a suggestion:
# With no option, returns two numbers, no CR nor LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
# With --human-readable, returns numbers, locale LANG text & CR/LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --human-readable
No need to sudo
The output is easy to work with
More options:
> /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --help
Usage: apt-check [options]
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-p, --package-names Show the packages that are going to be
installed/upgraded
--human-readable Show human readable output on stdout
--security-updates-unattended
Return the time in days when security updates are
installed unattended (0 means disabled)
Is this the exact thing used to generatemotd
on SSH login?
– iBug
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
add a comment |
Guessing you need to handle the number of available updates, here is a suggestion:
# With no option, returns two numbers, no CR nor LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
# With --human-readable, returns numbers, locale LANG text & CR/LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --human-readable
No need to sudo
The output is easy to work with
More options:
> /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --help
Usage: apt-check [options]
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-p, --package-names Show the packages that are going to be
installed/upgraded
--human-readable Show human readable output on stdout
--security-updates-unattended
Return the time in days when security updates are
installed unattended (0 means disabled)
Guessing you need to handle the number of available updates, here is a suggestion:
# With no option, returns two numbers, no CR nor LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check
# With --human-readable, returns numbers, locale LANG text & CR/LF
/usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --human-readable
No need to sudo
The output is easy to work with
More options:
> /usr/lib/update-notifier/apt-check --help
Usage: apt-check [options]
Options:
-h, --help show this help message and exit
-p, --package-names Show the packages that are going to be
installed/upgraded
--human-readable Show human readable output on stdout
--security-updates-unattended
Return the time in days when security updates are
installed unattended (0 means disabled)
answered yesterday
cmak.frcmak.fr
2,3341121
2,3341121
Is this the exact thing used to generatemotd
on SSH login?
– iBug
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
add a comment |
Is this the exact thing used to generatemotd
on SSH login?
– iBug
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
Is this the exact thing used to generate
motd
on SSH login?– iBug
yesterday
Is this the exact thing used to generate
motd
on SSH login?– iBug
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
yes it looks like the same output, but i dunno how does motd
– cmak.fr
yesterday
add a comment |
From man 8 apt
:
... enables some options ...
Then I went through /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
(using zcat(1)
to show text content) and noticed this option:
apt::cmd::show-update-stats
So I worked out the following command that did exactly what I wanted:
# apt-get -o apt::cmd::show-update-stats=true update
Tested to be working on Xenial and Bionic.
add a comment |
From man 8 apt
:
... enables some options ...
Then I went through /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
(using zcat(1)
to show text content) and noticed this option:
apt::cmd::show-update-stats
So I worked out the following command that did exactly what I wanted:
# apt-get -o apt::cmd::show-update-stats=true update
Tested to be working on Xenial and Bionic.
add a comment |
From man 8 apt
:
... enables some options ...
Then I went through /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
(using zcat(1)
to show text content) and noticed this option:
apt::cmd::show-update-stats
So I worked out the following command that did exactly what I wanted:
# apt-get -o apt::cmd::show-update-stats=true update
Tested to be working on Xenial and Bionic.
From man 8 apt
:
... enables some options ...
Then I went through /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/configure-index.gz
(using zcat(1)
to show text content) and noticed this option:
apt::cmd::show-update-stats
So I worked out the following command that did exactly what I wanted:
# apt-get -o apt::cmd::show-update-stats=true update
Tested to be working on Xenial and Bionic.
answered yesterday
iBugiBug
1741212
1741212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Ask Ubuntu!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1128447%2fmake-apt-get-update-show-the-exact-output-as-apt-update%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown