With today's technology, could iron be smelted at La Rinconada?












13












$begingroup$


La Rinconada, Peru is notable because it has an effective oxygen concentration of only 11%, leading to the need for special techniques just to keep a fire going, and preventing the use of combustion-based heat for smelting iron, as they simply can't get hot enough under the oxygen-starved conditions.



However, with today's technology, and a big enough power line and/or natural gas pipe running up the mountain, would it be possible to convert iron ore into crude metallic iron (it only needs to be good enough for an electric arc furnace to use) under these conditions?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$


This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    They smelt gold there using combustion so obviously combustion is not that hard. The mercury contamination of the ground water posioning the locals is a bigger hurdle.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @John Gold melts around 1900°F. Iron melts around 2800°F.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    May 14 at 20:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The air of La Rinconada has 21% oxygen just like the air elsewhere. I do not understand what you mean by "effective concentration". I have never heard of a distinction between effective and ineffective concentration. I suppose you meant to say that the oxygen partial pressure is about 0.11 atm instead of the usual 0.21 atm.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 14 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexP yeah, its basically the same as saying the partial pressure is lower
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    May 14 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    @TKK The temprature difference does not make any difference for the question. If you can get sustained combustion to happen you can achieve the desired temprature.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 22:19
















13












$begingroup$


La Rinconada, Peru is notable because it has an effective oxygen concentration of only 11%, leading to the need for special techniques just to keep a fire going, and preventing the use of combustion-based heat for smelting iron, as they simply can't get hot enough under the oxygen-starved conditions.



However, with today's technology, and a big enough power line and/or natural gas pipe running up the mountain, would it be possible to convert iron ore into crude metallic iron (it only needs to be good enough for an electric arc furnace to use) under these conditions?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$


This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.










  • 1




    $begingroup$
    They smelt gold there using combustion so obviously combustion is not that hard. The mercury contamination of the ground water posioning the locals is a bigger hurdle.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @John Gold melts around 1900°F. Iron melts around 2800°F.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    May 14 at 20:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The air of La Rinconada has 21% oxygen just like the air elsewhere. I do not understand what you mean by "effective concentration". I have never heard of a distinction between effective and ineffective concentration. I suppose you meant to say that the oxygen partial pressure is about 0.11 atm instead of the usual 0.21 atm.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 14 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexP yeah, its basically the same as saying the partial pressure is lower
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    May 14 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    @TKK The temprature difference does not make any difference for the question. If you can get sustained combustion to happen you can achieve the desired temprature.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 22:19














13












13








13


4



$begingroup$


La Rinconada, Peru is notable because it has an effective oxygen concentration of only 11%, leading to the need for special techniques just to keep a fire going, and preventing the use of combustion-based heat for smelting iron, as they simply can't get hot enough under the oxygen-starved conditions.



However, with today's technology, and a big enough power line and/or natural gas pipe running up the mountain, would it be possible to convert iron ore into crude metallic iron (it only needs to be good enough for an electric arc furnace to use) under these conditions?










share|improve this question









$endgroup$




La Rinconada, Peru is notable because it has an effective oxygen concentration of only 11%, leading to the need for special techniques just to keep a fire going, and preventing the use of combustion-based heat for smelting iron, as they simply can't get hot enough under the oxygen-starved conditions.



However, with today's technology, and a big enough power line and/or natural gas pipe running up the mountain, would it be possible to convert iron ore into crude metallic iron (it only needs to be good enough for an electric arc furnace to use) under these conditions?







technology hard-science atmosphere metalworking






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 14 at 11:46









ShalvenayShalvenay

7,57842969




7,57842969



This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.




This question asks for hard science. All answers to this question should be backed up by equations, empirical evidence, scientific papers, other citations, etc. Answers that do not satisfy this requirement might be removed. See the tag description for more information.









  • 1




    $begingroup$
    They smelt gold there using combustion so obviously combustion is not that hard. The mercury contamination of the ground water posioning the locals is a bigger hurdle.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @John Gold melts around 1900°F. Iron melts around 2800°F.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    May 14 at 20:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The air of La Rinconada has 21% oxygen just like the air elsewhere. I do not understand what you mean by "effective concentration". I have never heard of a distinction between effective and ineffective concentration. I suppose you meant to say that the oxygen partial pressure is about 0.11 atm instead of the usual 0.21 atm.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 14 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexP yeah, its basically the same as saying the partial pressure is lower
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    May 14 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    @TKK The temprature difference does not make any difference for the question. If you can get sustained combustion to happen you can achieve the desired temprature.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 22:19














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    They smelt gold there using combustion so obviously combustion is not that hard. The mercury contamination of the ground water posioning the locals is a bigger hurdle.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 14:35






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @John Gold melts around 1900°F. Iron melts around 2800°F.
    $endgroup$
    – TKK
    May 14 at 20:56






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The air of La Rinconada has 21% oxygen just like the air elsewhere. I do not understand what you mean by "effective concentration". I have never heard of a distinction between effective and ineffective concentration. I suppose you meant to say that the oxygen partial pressure is about 0.11 atm instead of the usual 0.21 atm.
    $endgroup$
    – AlexP
    May 14 at 21:04










  • $begingroup$
    @AlexP yeah, its basically the same as saying the partial pressure is lower
    $endgroup$
    – Shalvenay
    May 14 at 22:08










  • $begingroup$
    @TKK The temprature difference does not make any difference for the question. If you can get sustained combustion to happen you can achieve the desired temprature.
    $endgroup$
    – John
    May 14 at 22:19








1




1




$begingroup$
They smelt gold there using combustion so obviously combustion is not that hard. The mercury contamination of the ground water posioning the locals is a bigger hurdle.
$endgroup$
– John
May 14 at 14:35




$begingroup$
They smelt gold there using combustion so obviously combustion is not that hard. The mercury contamination of the ground water posioning the locals is a bigger hurdle.
$endgroup$
– John
May 14 at 14:35




1




1




$begingroup$
@John Gold melts around 1900°F. Iron melts around 2800°F.
$endgroup$
– TKK
May 14 at 20:56




$begingroup$
@John Gold melts around 1900°F. Iron melts around 2800°F.
$endgroup$
– TKK
May 14 at 20:56




2




2




$begingroup$
The air of La Rinconada has 21% oxygen just like the air elsewhere. I do not understand what you mean by "effective concentration". I have never heard of a distinction between effective and ineffective concentration. I suppose you meant to say that the oxygen partial pressure is about 0.11 atm instead of the usual 0.21 atm.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
May 14 at 21:04




$begingroup$
The air of La Rinconada has 21% oxygen just like the air elsewhere. I do not understand what you mean by "effective concentration". I have never heard of a distinction between effective and ineffective concentration. I suppose you meant to say that the oxygen partial pressure is about 0.11 atm instead of the usual 0.21 atm.
$endgroup$
– AlexP
May 14 at 21:04












$begingroup$
@AlexP yeah, its basically the same as saying the partial pressure is lower
$endgroup$
– Shalvenay
May 14 at 22:08




$begingroup$
@AlexP yeah, its basically the same as saying the partial pressure is lower
$endgroup$
– Shalvenay
May 14 at 22:08












$begingroup$
@TKK The temprature difference does not make any difference for the question. If you can get sustained combustion to happen you can achieve the desired temprature.
$endgroup$
– John
May 14 at 22:19




$begingroup$
@TKK The temprature difference does not make any difference for the question. If you can get sustained combustion to happen you can achieve the desired temprature.
$endgroup$
– John
May 14 at 22:19










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















15












$begingroup$

Yes, just increase pressure



Effective oxygen concentration is low because air pressure is low at high altitude. But oxygen is still ~20% of whatever air you have. The solution to the problem with starting fires is just to increase air pressure in the blast environment.



Given the scale of modern blast furnace operations, a 50% over-pressure in the smelting area is not unreasonable. After all, there are already powerful fans at work; the blast in blast furnace is a blast of hot air sent in through a tuyere. The real changes would mostly be design of the facility to better restrict air flow out of the smelting area, so that the injected air results in a higher pressure region with a suitable oxygen concentration in contact with the molten iron.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    May 14 at 19:50






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    May 14 at 22:23





















5












$begingroup$

How about using an induction furnace like Cody from Cody'sLab did. You wouldn't need any oxygen at all. It's also not restricted to such low quantities Cody used in his video. According to wikipedia induction furnaces can hold up to 100 tonnes and can even melt steel.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 3




    $begingroup$
    You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    May 14 at 12:12












  • $begingroup$
    @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    May 14 at 19:07





















4












$begingroup$

Sure, as long as you're willing to pay for bottled or piped gas of some kind, you can run a fuel-air system either using pure oxygen or just compressed air. There's lots of options but you really only need one; a propane burner supplied with compressed air will apparently burn at around 1980°C, Iron smelters only need to get up to 1250°C to reliably reduce ore to metallic Iron, so such a system is more than sufficient. You'll still need to bring in a carbon source feed stock such as Charcoal or Coke to reduce the Iron oxides in the ore.



Short answer: You need to bring in Carbon feed stock as well as Iron ore and you need either piped or bottled gas and/or fuel to run a compressor but it's easily done with modern technology.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    You can carry use molten oxide electrolysis to make steel just about anywhere.steel production by Molten Oxide Electrolysis



    Even on the Moon or Mars where there isn't any oxygen at all.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      It will not be steel though, just iron.
      $endgroup$
      – Jan Hudec
      May 14 at 19:34










    • $begingroup$
      According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
      $endgroup$
      – EstimatorNoiseless
      May 14 at 20:13










    • $begingroup$
      Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
      $endgroup$
      – Jan Hudec
      May 14 at 20:29










    • $begingroup$
      @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
      $endgroup$
      – Shalvenay
      May 14 at 22:09












    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "579"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146984%2fwith-todays-technology-could-iron-be-smelted-at-la-rinconada%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    15












    $begingroup$

    Yes, just increase pressure



    Effective oxygen concentration is low because air pressure is low at high altitude. But oxygen is still ~20% of whatever air you have. The solution to the problem with starting fires is just to increase air pressure in the blast environment.



    Given the scale of modern blast furnace operations, a 50% over-pressure in the smelting area is not unreasonable. After all, there are already powerful fans at work; the blast in blast furnace is a blast of hot air sent in through a tuyere. The real changes would mostly be design of the facility to better restrict air flow out of the smelting area, so that the injected air results in a higher pressure region with a suitable oxygen concentration in contact with the molten iron.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
      $endgroup$
      – JMac
      May 14 at 19:50






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
      $endgroup$
      – Karl
      May 14 at 22:23


















    15












    $begingroup$

    Yes, just increase pressure



    Effective oxygen concentration is low because air pressure is low at high altitude. But oxygen is still ~20% of whatever air you have. The solution to the problem with starting fires is just to increase air pressure in the blast environment.



    Given the scale of modern blast furnace operations, a 50% over-pressure in the smelting area is not unreasonable. After all, there are already powerful fans at work; the blast in blast furnace is a blast of hot air sent in through a tuyere. The real changes would mostly be design of the facility to better restrict air flow out of the smelting area, so that the injected air results in a higher pressure region with a suitable oxygen concentration in contact with the molten iron.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
      $endgroup$
      – JMac
      May 14 at 19:50






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
      $endgroup$
      – Karl
      May 14 at 22:23
















    15












    15








    15





    $begingroup$

    Yes, just increase pressure



    Effective oxygen concentration is low because air pressure is low at high altitude. But oxygen is still ~20% of whatever air you have. The solution to the problem with starting fires is just to increase air pressure in the blast environment.



    Given the scale of modern blast furnace operations, a 50% over-pressure in the smelting area is not unreasonable. After all, there are already powerful fans at work; the blast in blast furnace is a blast of hot air sent in through a tuyere. The real changes would mostly be design of the facility to better restrict air flow out of the smelting area, so that the injected air results in a higher pressure region with a suitable oxygen concentration in contact with the molten iron.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    Yes, just increase pressure



    Effective oxygen concentration is low because air pressure is low at high altitude. But oxygen is still ~20% of whatever air you have. The solution to the problem with starting fires is just to increase air pressure in the blast environment.



    Given the scale of modern blast furnace operations, a 50% over-pressure in the smelting area is not unreasonable. After all, there are already powerful fans at work; the blast in blast furnace is a blast of hot air sent in through a tuyere. The real changes would mostly be design of the facility to better restrict air flow out of the smelting area, so that the injected air results in a higher pressure region with a suitable oxygen concentration in contact with the molten iron.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered May 14 at 12:56









    kingledionkingledion

    76.1k26251447




    76.1k26251447












    • $begingroup$
      I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
      $endgroup$
      – JMac
      May 14 at 19:50






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
      $endgroup$
      – Karl
      May 14 at 22:23




















    • $begingroup$
      I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
      $endgroup$
      – JMac
      May 14 at 19:50






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
      $endgroup$
      – Karl
      May 14 at 22:23


















    $begingroup$
    I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    May 14 at 19:50




    $begingroup$
    I had never considered the term "blast furnace" before. I never knew they were called that because they used pressurized air, but that makes a ton of sense.
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    May 14 at 19:50




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    May 14 at 22:23






    $begingroup$
    You do NOT want oxygen in contact with your already smelted, molten iron. The blast furnace needs a sufficiently high temperature so the iron oxide starts reacting with carbon monoxide, and the resulting dioxide reacts with more coal back to monoxide. Once you're there, you don't need much additional air. Blowing oxygen into molten iron is a modern method to make steel, to oxidise residual carbon (and sulfur etc.)
    $endgroup$
    – Karl
    May 14 at 22:23













    5












    $begingroup$

    How about using an induction furnace like Cody from Cody'sLab did. You wouldn't need any oxygen at all. It's also not restricted to such low quantities Cody used in his video. According to wikipedia induction furnaces can hold up to 100 tonnes and can even melt steel.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
      $endgroup$
      – Ash
      May 14 at 12:12












    • $begingroup$
      @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      May 14 at 19:07


















    5












    $begingroup$

    How about using an induction furnace like Cody from Cody'sLab did. You wouldn't need any oxygen at all. It's also not restricted to such low quantities Cody used in his video. According to wikipedia induction furnaces can hold up to 100 tonnes and can even melt steel.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
      $endgroup$
      – Ash
      May 14 at 12:12












    • $begingroup$
      @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      May 14 at 19:07
















    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$

    How about using an induction furnace like Cody from Cody'sLab did. You wouldn't need any oxygen at all. It's also not restricted to such low quantities Cody used in his video. According to wikipedia induction furnaces can hold up to 100 tonnes and can even melt steel.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    How about using an induction furnace like Cody from Cody'sLab did. You wouldn't need any oxygen at all. It's also not restricted to such low quantities Cody used in his video. According to wikipedia induction furnaces can hold up to 100 tonnes and can even melt steel.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited May 14 at 14:14

























    answered May 14 at 12:11









    TiwazTiwaz

    875




    875








    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
      $endgroup$
      – Ash
      May 14 at 12:12












    • $begingroup$
      @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      May 14 at 19:07
















    • 3




      $begingroup$
      You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
      $endgroup$
      – Ash
      May 14 at 12:12












    • $begingroup$
      @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
      $endgroup$
      – Chris Stratton
      May 14 at 19:07










    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    May 14 at 12:12






    $begingroup$
    You need Carbon Monoxide to smelt Iron not just heat, it's a chemical process as much as a thermal one.
    $endgroup$
    – Ash
    May 14 at 12:12














    $begingroup$
    @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    May 14 at 19:07






    $begingroup$
    @Ash but that is more a matter of speed, than a "you can't do it" like being unable to get something hot enough (which as other answers point out, is not the case either). There are also plenty of other ways of charging the necessary ingredients.
    $endgroup$
    – Chris Stratton
    May 14 at 19:07













    4












    $begingroup$

    Sure, as long as you're willing to pay for bottled or piped gas of some kind, you can run a fuel-air system either using pure oxygen or just compressed air. There's lots of options but you really only need one; a propane burner supplied with compressed air will apparently burn at around 1980°C, Iron smelters only need to get up to 1250°C to reliably reduce ore to metallic Iron, so such a system is more than sufficient. You'll still need to bring in a carbon source feed stock such as Charcoal or Coke to reduce the Iron oxides in the ore.



    Short answer: You need to bring in Carbon feed stock as well as Iron ore and you need either piped or bottled gas and/or fuel to run a compressor but it's easily done with modern technology.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      4












      $begingroup$

      Sure, as long as you're willing to pay for bottled or piped gas of some kind, you can run a fuel-air system either using pure oxygen or just compressed air. There's lots of options but you really only need one; a propane burner supplied with compressed air will apparently burn at around 1980°C, Iron smelters only need to get up to 1250°C to reliably reduce ore to metallic Iron, so such a system is more than sufficient. You'll still need to bring in a carbon source feed stock such as Charcoal or Coke to reduce the Iron oxides in the ore.



      Short answer: You need to bring in Carbon feed stock as well as Iron ore and you need either piped or bottled gas and/or fuel to run a compressor but it's easily done with modern technology.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        4












        4








        4





        $begingroup$

        Sure, as long as you're willing to pay for bottled or piped gas of some kind, you can run a fuel-air system either using pure oxygen or just compressed air. There's lots of options but you really only need one; a propane burner supplied with compressed air will apparently burn at around 1980°C, Iron smelters only need to get up to 1250°C to reliably reduce ore to metallic Iron, so such a system is more than sufficient. You'll still need to bring in a carbon source feed stock such as Charcoal or Coke to reduce the Iron oxides in the ore.



        Short answer: You need to bring in Carbon feed stock as well as Iron ore and you need either piped or bottled gas and/or fuel to run a compressor but it's easily done with modern technology.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Sure, as long as you're willing to pay for bottled or piped gas of some kind, you can run a fuel-air system either using pure oxygen or just compressed air. There's lots of options but you really only need one; a propane burner supplied with compressed air will apparently burn at around 1980°C, Iron smelters only need to get up to 1250°C to reliably reduce ore to metallic Iron, so such a system is more than sufficient. You'll still need to bring in a carbon source feed stock such as Charcoal or Coke to reduce the Iron oxides in the ore.



        Short answer: You need to bring in Carbon feed stock as well as Iron ore and you need either piped or bottled gas and/or fuel to run a compressor but it's easily done with modern technology.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered May 14 at 12:16









        AshAsh

        29.4k472161




        29.4k472161























            2












            $begingroup$

            You can carry use molten oxide electrolysis to make steel just about anywhere.steel production by Molten Oxide Electrolysis



            Even on the Moon or Mars where there isn't any oxygen at all.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              It will not be steel though, just iron.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 19:34










            • $begingroup$
              According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
              $endgroup$
              – EstimatorNoiseless
              May 14 at 20:13










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 20:29










            • $begingroup$
              @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
              $endgroup$
              – Shalvenay
              May 14 at 22:09
















            2












            $begingroup$

            You can carry use molten oxide electrolysis to make steel just about anywhere.steel production by Molten Oxide Electrolysis



            Even on the Moon or Mars where there isn't any oxygen at all.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              It will not be steel though, just iron.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 19:34










            • $begingroup$
              According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
              $endgroup$
              – EstimatorNoiseless
              May 14 at 20:13










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 20:29










            • $begingroup$
              @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
              $endgroup$
              – Shalvenay
              May 14 at 22:09














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            You can carry use molten oxide electrolysis to make steel just about anywhere.steel production by Molten Oxide Electrolysis



            Even on the Moon or Mars where there isn't any oxygen at all.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            You can carry use molten oxide electrolysis to make steel just about anywhere.steel production by Molten Oxide Electrolysis



            Even on the Moon or Mars where there isn't any oxygen at all.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 14 at 18:27









            EstimatorNoiselessEstimatorNoiseless

            68534




            68534












            • $begingroup$
              It will not be steel though, just iron.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 19:34










            • $begingroup$
              According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
              $endgroup$
              – EstimatorNoiseless
              May 14 at 20:13










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 20:29










            • $begingroup$
              @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
              $endgroup$
              – Shalvenay
              May 14 at 22:09


















            • $begingroup$
              It will not be steel though, just iron.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 19:34










            • $begingroup$
              According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
              $endgroup$
              – EstimatorNoiseless
              May 14 at 20:13










            • $begingroup$
              Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
              $endgroup$
              – Jan Hudec
              May 14 at 20:29










            • $begingroup$
              @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
              $endgroup$
              – Shalvenay
              May 14 at 22:09
















            $begingroup$
            It will not be steel though, just iron.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            May 14 at 19:34




            $begingroup$
            It will not be steel though, just iron.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            May 14 at 19:34












            $begingroup$
            According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
            $endgroup$
            – EstimatorNoiseless
            May 14 at 20:13




            $begingroup$
            According to this source carbon can be added in as the molten iron cools
            $endgroup$
            – EstimatorNoiseless
            May 14 at 20:13












            $begingroup$
            Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            May 14 at 20:29




            $begingroup$
            Yes, of course it can. But it has to be mentioned before you can say it produces steel.
            $endgroup$
            – Jan Hudec
            May 14 at 20:29












            $begingroup$
            @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
            $endgroup$
            – Shalvenay
            May 14 at 22:09




            $begingroup$
            @JanHudec -- the question only ever needed to ask for a way of doing primary smelting, as an electric arc furnace can do the rest of the work once you have raw iron metal to play with
            $endgroup$
            – Shalvenay
            May 14 at 22:09


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f146984%2fwith-todays-technology-could-iron-be-smelted-at-la-rinconada%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029