File globbing pattern, !(*example), behaves differently in bash script than it does in bash shell





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








5















The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env










share|improve this question



























  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03


















5















The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env










share|improve this question



























  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03














5












5








5








The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env










share|improve this question
















The following works when pasted directly into my bash terminal (I call bash explicitly, bash version: 4.4.19(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu))



for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done


This command echoes back all of the txt files that do not have 'example' in the filename.



But when I convert this into a script called temp.sh, chmod +x temp.sh and call it by ./temp.sh:



#!/usr/bin/env bash

for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do
echo "${filename}"
done



I get the following error:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ ./temp.sh 
./temp.sh: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `('
./temp.sh: line 3: `for filename in /home/dean/Downloads/!(*example).txt; do'


I fail to understand the problem here. Why is it doing exactly what I want in the shell but not in the script.



Edit (to answer panki's question):



The difference between when env is called in shell/terminal and when env is called in shell/script:



dean@dean-thinkpad-p52s:~/Downloads$ diff example_myshell.txt example_called_script.txt 
5a6
> _=/usr/bin/env
36,37d36
< TERM=xterm-256color
< SHELL=/bin/bash
38a38,39
> SHELL=/bin/bash
> TERM=xterm-256color
45c46
< PYENV_SHELL=bash
---
> SHLVL=4
47c48
< SHLVL=3
---
> PYENV_SHELL=bash
61d61
< _=/usr/bin/env







bash shell-script wildcards bash-expansion






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 27 at 10:04







Dean Kayton

















asked May 27 at 9:53









Dean KaytonDean Kayton

535 bronze badges




535 bronze badges
















  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03



















  • Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

    – Panki
    May 27 at 9:56











  • Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

    – Dean Kayton
    May 27 at 10:03

















Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

– Panki
May 27 at 9:56





Does it work if you source the script? Is the bash returned by env the same as your shell?

– Panki
May 27 at 9:56













Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

– Dean Kayton
May 27 at 10:03





Sourcing the script works, but I need it to work when calling the script. I don't know if I follow your second question but I have included the difference of when env is called in script and when it is called in shell.

– Dean Kayton
May 27 at 10:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















13
















The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer























  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16













  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 2





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19








  • 2





    Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

    – mosvy
    May 29 at 21:02















Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});















draft saved

draft discarded
















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521287%2ffile-globbing-pattern-example-behaves-differently-in-bash-script-than-it-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









13
















The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer























  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16













  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 2





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19








  • 2





    Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

    – mosvy
    May 29 at 21:02


















13
















The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer























  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16













  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 2





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19








  • 2





    Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

    – mosvy
    May 29 at 21:02
















13














13










13









The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)





share|improve this answer















The !(...) Korn shell extended operator is only available in bash when you turn the extglob option on (it is off by default).



You may have extglob turned on in your interactive shell via ~/.bashrc or other initialization file, but notice that those files are not sourced when running scripts, and that option is not inherited from the calling shell (unless the BASHOPTS variable in the environment, but it would be a bad idea to have it there).



Explicitly turning it on with



shopt -s extglob


at the beginning of your script should work.



Notice that the shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line which wasn't already parsed. This means that you cannot use shopt -s extglob like set -f, to only turn the extended patterns on in a subshell:



# this won't work
(
shopt -s extglob
echo !(no such file)
)


You'd have to do something like:



(
shopt -s extglob
eval 'echo !(no such file)'
)






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited May 28 at 12:54









Stéphane Chazelas

336k58 gold badges656 silver badges1035 bronze badges




336k58 gold badges656 silver badges1035 bronze badges










answered May 27 at 10:02









mosvymosvy

17.6k2 gold badges24 silver badges55 bronze badges




17.6k2 gold badges24 silver badges55 bronze badges











  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16













  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 2





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19








  • 2





    Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

    – mosvy
    May 29 at 21:02
















  • 1





    @DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

    – Stéphane Chazelas
    May 27 at 10:16













  • I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

    – Dean Kayton
    May 28 at 8:40






  • 2





    That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 8:52











  • Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

    – mosvy
    May 28 at 9:19








  • 2





    Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

    – mosvy
    May 29 at 21:02










1




1





@DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

– Stéphane Chazelas
May 27 at 10:16







@DeanKayton, the (confusingly named) shopt command and the extglob option are "standard" in bash, not in sh. If you want a sh equivalent, you can always do for f in /path/to/*.txt; do case ${f##*/} in (*example.txt) continue; esac; ...; done

– Stéphane Chazelas
May 27 at 10:16















I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

– Dean Kayton
May 28 at 8:40





I made the mistake of putting shopt -s extglob command immediately before the !(...) Korn shell extended operator was needed. This did not work at all, the command works when it is on the first line of the script. Can you comment as to why that is the case?

– Dean Kayton
May 28 at 8:40




2




2





That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

– mosvy
May 28 at 8:52





That's a bug in bash. shopt -s extglob only has effect beginning with the next line. There's really nothing you can do about it, than putting them on separate lines.

– mosvy
May 28 at 8:52













Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

– mosvy
May 28 at 9:19







Notice that the extglob patterns in bash are not really like those from ksh93; you cannot write something like touch bar baar baaar baaaar; echo b{2,3}(a)r to do regex-like quantifiers.

– mosvy
May 28 at 9:19






2




2





Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

– mosvy
May 29 at 21:02







Yeah, you cannot turn it on in a function, because a function gets parsed as a single unit, just like the (...) subshell from my example. (And btw, the shopt options, unlike the set options, cannot be made local to the function with local -, anyways). Another similar quirk/bug is with the failglob option -- a failed glob will zap the whole line/parsing unit, not just the command it's used in, and not even an eval will help with it ;-) (shopt -s failglob; eval 'echo hehe*'; echo DONE)

– mosvy
May 29 at 21:02





















draft saved

draft discarded



















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f521287%2ffile-globbing-pattern-example-behaves-differently-in-bash-script-than-it-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029