Is “laser-focused” a new word?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








11















I found the word “laser-focused on the bottom line” in the following sentence of the New York Times (August 6) op ed titled, “Dream, Baby, Dream!”




“We also know – look at Syria – dictators who have spent decades ruling through fear do not go quietly into the night any more than great powers readily abandon their profitable dominions. And I thought these finance guys were hard-nosed realists laser-focused on the bottom line.



Dream on, Mitt, dream on! Even if your dreams, to use that word you let drop on the Olympics in London and then scrambled to retract, are “disconcerting.”




I think laser-focused simply means “pinpointed” or “sharply focused.” It doesn’t seem to be any foreign word to me. However, curiously enough, this apparently easy-to-relate word is not found in any of Oxford, Cambridge, and Merriam-Webster online dictionary, or in Ngram inventory.



Other online vocabulary site e.g. www.wordnik.com says 'laser-focused' hasn't been added to any lists yet.



But I found the catch phrase, “Wal-Mart ‘gets laser-focused’ on lowest prices again” in DailyFinance.



Is laser-focused a received English word, or a business jargon, or just an up-and-coming word?










share|improve this question

































    11















    I found the word “laser-focused on the bottom line” in the following sentence of the New York Times (August 6) op ed titled, “Dream, Baby, Dream!”




    “We also know – look at Syria – dictators who have spent decades ruling through fear do not go quietly into the night any more than great powers readily abandon their profitable dominions. And I thought these finance guys were hard-nosed realists laser-focused on the bottom line.



    Dream on, Mitt, dream on! Even if your dreams, to use that word you let drop on the Olympics in London and then scrambled to retract, are “disconcerting.”




    I think laser-focused simply means “pinpointed” or “sharply focused.” It doesn’t seem to be any foreign word to me. However, curiously enough, this apparently easy-to-relate word is not found in any of Oxford, Cambridge, and Merriam-Webster online dictionary, or in Ngram inventory.



    Other online vocabulary site e.g. www.wordnik.com says 'laser-focused' hasn't been added to any lists yet.



    But I found the catch phrase, “Wal-Mart ‘gets laser-focused’ on lowest prices again” in DailyFinance.



    Is laser-focused a received English word, or a business jargon, or just an up-and-coming word?










    share|improve this question





























      11












      11








      11


      1






      I found the word “laser-focused on the bottom line” in the following sentence of the New York Times (August 6) op ed titled, “Dream, Baby, Dream!”




      “We also know – look at Syria – dictators who have spent decades ruling through fear do not go quietly into the night any more than great powers readily abandon their profitable dominions. And I thought these finance guys were hard-nosed realists laser-focused on the bottom line.



      Dream on, Mitt, dream on! Even if your dreams, to use that word you let drop on the Olympics in London and then scrambled to retract, are “disconcerting.”




      I think laser-focused simply means “pinpointed” or “sharply focused.” It doesn’t seem to be any foreign word to me. However, curiously enough, this apparently easy-to-relate word is not found in any of Oxford, Cambridge, and Merriam-Webster online dictionary, or in Ngram inventory.



      Other online vocabulary site e.g. www.wordnik.com says 'laser-focused' hasn't been added to any lists yet.



      But I found the catch phrase, “Wal-Mart ‘gets laser-focused’ on lowest prices again” in DailyFinance.



      Is laser-focused a received English word, or a business jargon, or just an up-and-coming word?










      share|improve this question
















      I found the word “laser-focused on the bottom line” in the following sentence of the New York Times (August 6) op ed titled, “Dream, Baby, Dream!”




      “We also know – look at Syria – dictators who have spent decades ruling through fear do not go quietly into the night any more than great powers readily abandon their profitable dominions. And I thought these finance guys were hard-nosed realists laser-focused on the bottom line.



      Dream on, Mitt, dream on! Even if your dreams, to use that word you let drop on the Olympics in London and then scrambled to retract, are “disconcerting.”




      I think laser-focused simply means “pinpointed” or “sharply focused.” It doesn’t seem to be any foreign word to me. However, curiously enough, this apparently easy-to-relate word is not found in any of Oxford, Cambridge, and Merriam-Webster online dictionary, or in Ngram inventory.



      Other online vocabulary site e.g. www.wordnik.com says 'laser-focused' hasn't been added to any lists yet.



      But I found the catch phrase, “Wal-Mart ‘gets laser-focused’ on lowest prices again” in DailyFinance.



      Is laser-focused a received English word, or a business jargon, or just an up-and-coming word?







      word-choice is-it-a-word






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 30 '13 at 20:19









      tchrist

      112k30 gold badges308 silver badges488 bronze badges




      112k30 gold badges308 silver badges488 bronze badges










      asked Aug 8 '12 at 3:10









      Yoichi OishiYoichi Oishi

      35.3k121 gold badges387 silver badges785 bronze badges




      35.3k121 gold badges387 silver badges785 bronze badges

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          7
















          I used Google books to see if I could figure out how quickly this phrase is catching on, and how long it's been in widespread use. That's difficult to ascertain, because a great majority of the time, “laser focused” is found in a scientific journal, and is referring to, well, focused lasers – i.e., stuff like this:




          A 50-mW laser focused into a cell with a 10-cm focal length lens is no more effective than a 5-mW laser focused with a 1-cm focal length lens.




          By the year 2005, though, metaphorical use the phrase crops up more and more; I'd venture a guess that, by that time, using laser-focused to describe someone's mind or concentration was no longer novel or uncommon. As you might imagine, the phrase shows up quite a few times in the very unscientific 2006 book Focus Like a Laser Beam: 10 Ways to Do What Matters Most; a blogger headlined a 2009 entry with Steve Jobs Is Laser Focused on the Apple Tablet.



          The earliest entry I could find to this more metaphorical usage of the term was in a 1995 book called The Kennedy Women by Laurence Leamer:



          enter image description here



          (I'm not insisting that's the first use of the term, I'm just saying that's the earliest one I could find, after spending 10 minutes or so leafing through the search results. Nonetheless, it's interesting how Leamer chose to hyphenate the two-word term, but, fourteen years later, the blogger did not. That fits what some have said in other ELU threads: early uses of a newly-coined phrase are often hyphenated, while that hyphen tends to get dropped as the usage becomes more widespread.)



          My final answer? Ten years ago, I might have said that laser-focused was an up-and-coming word, but today, I think it's more deeply rooted and firmly established.






          share|improve this answer




























          • I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 20:47











          • As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

            – Andrew Grimm
            Jan 16 '16 at 14:22



















          4
















          Whether or not it's in common usage (it is), it's a phrase. :P I've been seeing this for years, so I'd assert quite strongly that this is in common usage.



          HOWEVER, the science pedant in me insists on pointing out that lasers are not, in fact, focused! Focusing electromagnetic signals works by taking divergent information and bouncing or curving it so that it converges, strengthening or sharpening the signal. Lasers don't really have divergent information - all of the photons are emitted with the same direction and wavelength.



          Focusing white light versus "focusing" a laser would be a bit like trying to funnel a splash versus trying to funnel water from a water gun. One will be focused by the lens/funnel, one comes out already focused.



          Focusing light is a process. A laser's direction exists as a constant state of being.



          In most day-to-day life, you're going to encounter unfocused lasers. These lasers are created cohesive and need no focusing. In some applications, there are lasers that are focused. These tend to be pretty rad applications like weapons, surgical tools, and physics labs.



          Thank you J.R. for the correction.






          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:24






          • 1





            Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

            – rsegal
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:27











          • if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:31






          • 2





            My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

            – coleopterist
            Aug 8 '12 at 5:27






          • 1





            While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 18:54



















          3
















          It is an example of "a turn of phrase". A descriptive phrase to provide an alternate or more expressive way to say something.



          Granted for the anal or pedantic, lasers are made up of parallel light waves so can't technically be focused. But to most of us it refers to concentrated light turned on to a normally very small spot.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

            – Bill Rosmus
            Aug 8 '12 at 6:45













          • I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 7:33








          • 1





            It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 19:27











          protected by Mitch May 27 at 18:00



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?














          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          7
















          I used Google books to see if I could figure out how quickly this phrase is catching on, and how long it's been in widespread use. That's difficult to ascertain, because a great majority of the time, “laser focused” is found in a scientific journal, and is referring to, well, focused lasers – i.e., stuff like this:




          A 50-mW laser focused into a cell with a 10-cm focal length lens is no more effective than a 5-mW laser focused with a 1-cm focal length lens.




          By the year 2005, though, metaphorical use the phrase crops up more and more; I'd venture a guess that, by that time, using laser-focused to describe someone's mind or concentration was no longer novel or uncommon. As you might imagine, the phrase shows up quite a few times in the very unscientific 2006 book Focus Like a Laser Beam: 10 Ways to Do What Matters Most; a blogger headlined a 2009 entry with Steve Jobs Is Laser Focused on the Apple Tablet.



          The earliest entry I could find to this more metaphorical usage of the term was in a 1995 book called The Kennedy Women by Laurence Leamer:



          enter image description here



          (I'm not insisting that's the first use of the term, I'm just saying that's the earliest one I could find, after spending 10 minutes or so leafing through the search results. Nonetheless, it's interesting how Leamer chose to hyphenate the two-word term, but, fourteen years later, the blogger did not. That fits what some have said in other ELU threads: early uses of a newly-coined phrase are often hyphenated, while that hyphen tends to get dropped as the usage becomes more widespread.)



          My final answer? Ten years ago, I might have said that laser-focused was an up-and-coming word, but today, I think it's more deeply rooted and firmly established.






          share|improve this answer




























          • I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 20:47











          • As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

            – Andrew Grimm
            Jan 16 '16 at 14:22
















          7
















          I used Google books to see if I could figure out how quickly this phrase is catching on, and how long it's been in widespread use. That's difficult to ascertain, because a great majority of the time, “laser focused” is found in a scientific journal, and is referring to, well, focused lasers – i.e., stuff like this:




          A 50-mW laser focused into a cell with a 10-cm focal length lens is no more effective than a 5-mW laser focused with a 1-cm focal length lens.




          By the year 2005, though, metaphorical use the phrase crops up more and more; I'd venture a guess that, by that time, using laser-focused to describe someone's mind or concentration was no longer novel or uncommon. As you might imagine, the phrase shows up quite a few times in the very unscientific 2006 book Focus Like a Laser Beam: 10 Ways to Do What Matters Most; a blogger headlined a 2009 entry with Steve Jobs Is Laser Focused on the Apple Tablet.



          The earliest entry I could find to this more metaphorical usage of the term was in a 1995 book called The Kennedy Women by Laurence Leamer:



          enter image description here



          (I'm not insisting that's the first use of the term, I'm just saying that's the earliest one I could find, after spending 10 minutes or so leafing through the search results. Nonetheless, it's interesting how Leamer chose to hyphenate the two-word term, but, fourteen years later, the blogger did not. That fits what some have said in other ELU threads: early uses of a newly-coined phrase are often hyphenated, while that hyphen tends to get dropped as the usage becomes more widespread.)



          My final answer? Ten years ago, I might have said that laser-focused was an up-and-coming word, but today, I think it's more deeply rooted and firmly established.






          share|improve this answer




























          • I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 20:47











          • As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

            – Andrew Grimm
            Jan 16 '16 at 14:22














          7














          7










          7









          I used Google books to see if I could figure out how quickly this phrase is catching on, and how long it's been in widespread use. That's difficult to ascertain, because a great majority of the time, “laser focused” is found in a scientific journal, and is referring to, well, focused lasers – i.e., stuff like this:




          A 50-mW laser focused into a cell with a 10-cm focal length lens is no more effective than a 5-mW laser focused with a 1-cm focal length lens.




          By the year 2005, though, metaphorical use the phrase crops up more and more; I'd venture a guess that, by that time, using laser-focused to describe someone's mind or concentration was no longer novel or uncommon. As you might imagine, the phrase shows up quite a few times in the very unscientific 2006 book Focus Like a Laser Beam: 10 Ways to Do What Matters Most; a blogger headlined a 2009 entry with Steve Jobs Is Laser Focused on the Apple Tablet.



          The earliest entry I could find to this more metaphorical usage of the term was in a 1995 book called The Kennedy Women by Laurence Leamer:



          enter image description here



          (I'm not insisting that's the first use of the term, I'm just saying that's the earliest one I could find, after spending 10 minutes or so leafing through the search results. Nonetheless, it's interesting how Leamer chose to hyphenate the two-word term, but, fourteen years later, the blogger did not. That fits what some have said in other ELU threads: early uses of a newly-coined phrase are often hyphenated, while that hyphen tends to get dropped as the usage becomes more widespread.)



          My final answer? Ten years ago, I might have said that laser-focused was an up-and-coming word, but today, I think it's more deeply rooted and firmly established.






          share|improve this answer















          I used Google books to see if I could figure out how quickly this phrase is catching on, and how long it's been in widespread use. That's difficult to ascertain, because a great majority of the time, “laser focused” is found in a scientific journal, and is referring to, well, focused lasers – i.e., stuff like this:




          A 50-mW laser focused into a cell with a 10-cm focal length lens is no more effective than a 5-mW laser focused with a 1-cm focal length lens.




          By the year 2005, though, metaphorical use the phrase crops up more and more; I'd venture a guess that, by that time, using laser-focused to describe someone's mind or concentration was no longer novel or uncommon. As you might imagine, the phrase shows up quite a few times in the very unscientific 2006 book Focus Like a Laser Beam: 10 Ways to Do What Matters Most; a blogger headlined a 2009 entry with Steve Jobs Is Laser Focused on the Apple Tablet.



          The earliest entry I could find to this more metaphorical usage of the term was in a 1995 book called The Kennedy Women by Laurence Leamer:



          enter image description here



          (I'm not insisting that's the first use of the term, I'm just saying that's the earliest one I could find, after spending 10 minutes or so leafing through the search results. Nonetheless, it's interesting how Leamer chose to hyphenate the two-word term, but, fourteen years later, the blogger did not. That fits what some have said in other ELU threads: early uses of a newly-coined phrase are often hyphenated, while that hyphen tends to get dropped as the usage becomes more widespread.)



          My final answer? Ten years ago, I might have said that laser-focused was an up-and-coming word, but today, I think it's more deeply rooted and firmly established.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:38









          Community

          1




          1










          answered Aug 8 '12 at 10:47









          J.R.J.R.

          55.8k5 gold badges86 silver badges184 bronze badges




          55.8k5 gold badges86 silver badges184 bronze badges
















          • I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 20:47











          • As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

            – Andrew Grimm
            Jan 16 '16 at 14:22



















          • I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 20:47











          • As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

            – Andrew Grimm
            Jan 16 '16 at 14:22

















          I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

          – Yoichi Oishi
          Aug 8 '12 at 20:47





          I wish I could give such an elaborate, thorough and valuable input one day to the question I think I can cover, but never will be able to.

          – Yoichi Oishi
          Aug 8 '12 at 20:47













          As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

          – Andrew Grimm
          Jan 16 '16 at 14:22





          As background, the metaphor has gone back further in time. For example, this journal from 1977 has "laser-like focus".

          – Andrew Grimm
          Jan 16 '16 at 14:22













          4
















          Whether or not it's in common usage (it is), it's a phrase. :P I've been seeing this for years, so I'd assert quite strongly that this is in common usage.



          HOWEVER, the science pedant in me insists on pointing out that lasers are not, in fact, focused! Focusing electromagnetic signals works by taking divergent information and bouncing or curving it so that it converges, strengthening or sharpening the signal. Lasers don't really have divergent information - all of the photons are emitted with the same direction and wavelength.



          Focusing white light versus "focusing" a laser would be a bit like trying to funnel a splash versus trying to funnel water from a water gun. One will be focused by the lens/funnel, one comes out already focused.



          Focusing light is a process. A laser's direction exists as a constant state of being.



          In most day-to-day life, you're going to encounter unfocused lasers. These lasers are created cohesive and need no focusing. In some applications, there are lasers that are focused. These tend to be pretty rad applications like weapons, surgical tools, and physics labs.



          Thank you J.R. for the correction.






          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:24






          • 1





            Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

            – rsegal
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:27











          • if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:31






          • 2





            My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

            – coleopterist
            Aug 8 '12 at 5:27






          • 1





            While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 18:54
















          4
















          Whether or not it's in common usage (it is), it's a phrase. :P I've been seeing this for years, so I'd assert quite strongly that this is in common usage.



          HOWEVER, the science pedant in me insists on pointing out that lasers are not, in fact, focused! Focusing electromagnetic signals works by taking divergent information and bouncing or curving it so that it converges, strengthening or sharpening the signal. Lasers don't really have divergent information - all of the photons are emitted with the same direction and wavelength.



          Focusing white light versus "focusing" a laser would be a bit like trying to funnel a splash versus trying to funnel water from a water gun. One will be focused by the lens/funnel, one comes out already focused.



          Focusing light is a process. A laser's direction exists as a constant state of being.



          In most day-to-day life, you're going to encounter unfocused lasers. These lasers are created cohesive and need no focusing. In some applications, there are lasers that are focused. These tend to be pretty rad applications like weapons, surgical tools, and physics labs.



          Thank you J.R. for the correction.






          share|improve this answer























          • 1





            Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:24






          • 1





            Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

            – rsegal
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:27











          • if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:31






          • 2





            My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

            – coleopterist
            Aug 8 '12 at 5:27






          • 1





            While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 18:54














          4














          4










          4









          Whether or not it's in common usage (it is), it's a phrase. :P I've been seeing this for years, so I'd assert quite strongly that this is in common usage.



          HOWEVER, the science pedant in me insists on pointing out that lasers are not, in fact, focused! Focusing electromagnetic signals works by taking divergent information and bouncing or curving it so that it converges, strengthening or sharpening the signal. Lasers don't really have divergent information - all of the photons are emitted with the same direction and wavelength.



          Focusing white light versus "focusing" a laser would be a bit like trying to funnel a splash versus trying to funnel water from a water gun. One will be focused by the lens/funnel, one comes out already focused.



          Focusing light is a process. A laser's direction exists as a constant state of being.



          In most day-to-day life, you're going to encounter unfocused lasers. These lasers are created cohesive and need no focusing. In some applications, there are lasers that are focused. These tend to be pretty rad applications like weapons, surgical tools, and physics labs.



          Thank you J.R. for the correction.






          share|improve this answer















          Whether or not it's in common usage (it is), it's a phrase. :P I've been seeing this for years, so I'd assert quite strongly that this is in common usage.



          HOWEVER, the science pedant in me insists on pointing out that lasers are not, in fact, focused! Focusing electromagnetic signals works by taking divergent information and bouncing or curving it so that it converges, strengthening or sharpening the signal. Lasers don't really have divergent information - all of the photons are emitted with the same direction and wavelength.



          Focusing white light versus "focusing" a laser would be a bit like trying to funnel a splash versus trying to funnel water from a water gun. One will be focused by the lens/funnel, one comes out already focused.



          Focusing light is a process. A laser's direction exists as a constant state of being.



          In most day-to-day life, you're going to encounter unfocused lasers. These lasers are created cohesive and need no focusing. In some applications, there are lasers that are focused. These tend to be pretty rad applications like weapons, surgical tools, and physics labs.



          Thank you J.R. for the correction.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Aug 8 '12 at 20:42

























          answered Aug 8 '12 at 3:22









          rsegalrsegal

          2,22210 silver badges15 bronze badges




          2,22210 silver badges15 bronze badges











          • 1





            Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:24






          • 1





            Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

            – rsegal
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:27











          • if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:31






          • 2





            My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

            – coleopterist
            Aug 8 '12 at 5:27






          • 1





            While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 18:54














          • 1





            Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:24






          • 1





            Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

            – rsegal
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:27











          • if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

            – mgb
            Aug 8 '12 at 3:31






          • 2





            My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

            – coleopterist
            Aug 8 '12 at 5:27






          • 1





            While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 18:54








          1




          1





          Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

          – mgb
          Aug 8 '12 at 3:24





          Even worse it's impossible to focus coherent (laser) light as well as you can focus incoherent light. To focus a laser to a very small spot you need to go to a lot of effort to de-laser the laser!

          – mgb
          Aug 8 '12 at 3:24




          1




          1





          Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

          – rsegal
          Aug 8 '12 at 3:27





          Although, technically, there's minor diffraction due to impure media, but you're probably not going to be able to fix that with a lens.

          – rsegal
          Aug 8 '12 at 3:27













          if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

          – mgb
          Aug 8 '12 at 3:31





          if you can make a simple solid-state laser de-speckler lots of people would like to talk to you ;-)

          – mgb
          Aug 8 '12 at 3:31




          2




          2





          My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

          – coleopterist
          Aug 8 '12 at 5:27





          My initial reaction was that this came from the use of laser pointers in corporate meetings and such.

          – coleopterist
          Aug 8 '12 at 5:27




          1




          1





          While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

          – J.R.
          Aug 8 '12 at 18:54





          While some applications have non-focused lasers (laser pointers, laser light shows), many other lasers are focused (laser weapons, surgical lasers, manufacturing lasers, CD player lasers). It depends on how the laser is constructed, and its purpose. Many would take exception to the pedantic assertion that "lasers are not focused."

          – J.R.
          Aug 8 '12 at 18:54











          3
















          It is an example of "a turn of phrase". A descriptive phrase to provide an alternate or more expressive way to say something.



          Granted for the anal or pedantic, lasers are made up of parallel light waves so can't technically be focused. But to most of us it refers to concentrated light turned on to a normally very small spot.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

            – Bill Rosmus
            Aug 8 '12 at 6:45













          • I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 7:33








          • 1





            It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 19:27
















          3
















          It is an example of "a turn of phrase". A descriptive phrase to provide an alternate or more expressive way to say something.



          Granted for the anal or pedantic, lasers are made up of parallel light waves so can't technically be focused. But to most of us it refers to concentrated light turned on to a normally very small spot.






          share|improve this answer





















          • 1





            Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

            – Bill Rosmus
            Aug 8 '12 at 6:45













          • I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 7:33








          • 1





            It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 19:27














          3














          3










          3









          It is an example of "a turn of phrase". A descriptive phrase to provide an alternate or more expressive way to say something.



          Granted for the anal or pedantic, lasers are made up of parallel light waves so can't technically be focused. But to most of us it refers to concentrated light turned on to a normally very small spot.






          share|improve this answer













          It is an example of "a turn of phrase". A descriptive phrase to provide an alternate or more expressive way to say something.



          Granted for the anal or pedantic, lasers are made up of parallel light waves so can't technically be focused. But to most of us it refers to concentrated light turned on to a normally very small spot.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 8 '12 at 5:43









          Bill RosmusBill Rosmus

          3401 silver badge8 bronze badges




          3401 silver badge8 bronze badges











          • 1





            Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

            – Bill Rosmus
            Aug 8 '12 at 6:45













          • I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 7:33








          • 1





            It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 19:27














          • 1





            Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

            – Bill Rosmus
            Aug 8 '12 at 6:45













          • I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

            – Yoichi Oishi
            Aug 8 '12 at 7:33








          • 1





            It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

            – J.R.
            Aug 8 '12 at 19:27








          1




          1





          Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

          – Bill Rosmus
          Aug 8 '12 at 6:45







          Give a reason for the down vote. This answer is correct and is merely stating a simple truth.

          – Bill Rosmus
          Aug 8 '12 at 6:45















          I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

          – Yoichi Oishi
          Aug 8 '12 at 7:33







          I appreciate your answer and think worth for upvote.

          – Yoichi Oishi
          Aug 8 '12 at 7:33






          1




          1





          It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

          – J.R.
          Aug 8 '12 at 19:27





          It wasn't my downvote, but lasers can be - and often are - focused. But the O.P. was inquiring about English, not science, and I agree that laser-focused can be a turn of phrase.

          – J.R.
          Aug 8 '12 at 19:27





          protected by Mitch May 27 at 18:00



          Thank you for your interest in this question.
          Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).



          Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?



          Popular posts from this blog

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Bunad

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum