Could not - was incapable of, was capable of not, or ambiguous?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















As per my understanding, 'can not' (present tense of 'able to not') has an entirely different meaning from 'cannot' (present tense of 'not able to').



However, what about past tense - 'could not'?



Which is its correct usage? Or is its usage ambiguous?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    In speaking, you can distinguish these two meanings by stress and rhythm. In print, there's no way to distinguish them (just like there was no way of distinguishing can not from cannot before people started contracting cannot).

    – Peter Shor
    May 14 at 13:50













  • Could not can possess the emphasis but can not as well. Couldn't cannot possess the emphasis.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    May 14 at 13:51




















0















As per my understanding, 'can not' (present tense of 'able to not') has an entirely different meaning from 'cannot' (present tense of 'not able to').



However, what about past tense - 'could not'?



Which is its correct usage? Or is its usage ambiguous?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    In speaking, you can distinguish these two meanings by stress and rhythm. In print, there's no way to distinguish them (just like there was no way of distinguishing can not from cannot before people started contracting cannot).

    – Peter Shor
    May 14 at 13:50













  • Could not can possess the emphasis but can not as well. Couldn't cannot possess the emphasis.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    May 14 at 13:51
















0












0








0








As per my understanding, 'can not' (present tense of 'able to not') has an entirely different meaning from 'cannot' (present tense of 'not able to').



However, what about past tense - 'could not'?



Which is its correct usage? Or is its usage ambiguous?










share|improve this question
















As per my understanding, 'can not' (present tense of 'able to not') has an entirely different meaning from 'cannot' (present tense of 'not able to').



However, what about past tense - 'could not'?



Which is its correct usage? Or is its usage ambiguous?







meaning ambiguity






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 14 at 13:53







Sarov

















asked May 14 at 13:28









SarovSarov

1176




1176








  • 1





    In speaking, you can distinguish these two meanings by stress and rhythm. In print, there's no way to distinguish them (just like there was no way of distinguishing can not from cannot before people started contracting cannot).

    – Peter Shor
    May 14 at 13:50













  • Could not can possess the emphasis but can not as well. Couldn't cannot possess the emphasis.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    May 14 at 13:51
















  • 1





    In speaking, you can distinguish these two meanings by stress and rhythm. In print, there's no way to distinguish them (just like there was no way of distinguishing can not from cannot before people started contracting cannot).

    – Peter Shor
    May 14 at 13:50













  • Could not can possess the emphasis but can not as well. Couldn't cannot possess the emphasis.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    May 14 at 13:51










1




1





In speaking, you can distinguish these two meanings by stress and rhythm. In print, there's no way to distinguish them (just like there was no way of distinguishing can not from cannot before people started contracting cannot).

– Peter Shor
May 14 at 13:50







In speaking, you can distinguish these two meanings by stress and rhythm. In print, there's no way to distinguish them (just like there was no way of distinguishing can not from cannot before people started contracting cannot).

– Peter Shor
May 14 at 13:50















Could not can possess the emphasis but can not as well. Couldn't cannot possess the emphasis.

– TaliesinMerlin
May 14 at 13:51







Could not can possess the emphasis but can not as well. Couldn't cannot possess the emphasis.

– TaliesinMerlin
May 14 at 13:51












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














The phrase "could not" can be used in several ways, which does make it ambiguous. However, its usage in a sentence is not usually ambiguous in context. The past tense of "can not" (meaning "was able to not") uses the past perfect tense with a participle of the main verb, while the past tense of "cannot" (meaning "was not able to") uses the simple past tense with an infinitive of the main verb.



For example, to say that it was possible for me to not go to the store in the past, I would say "I could have not gone to the store." In contrast, to say that it was not possible for me to go to the store in the past, I would say "I could not go to the store."



When the past perfect tense of "cannot" is used, the word order changes from the above to show that the negation belongs next to the "could": "I could not have gone to the store."



When using "could" in the present tense to indicate future possibility, the structure is the same as the simple past tense. "I could not go to the store." Being this is a different tense altogether, though, context should let the reader know what is intended.



"I needed to get flour but the car wouldn't start. I could not go to the store." (I was unable to go to the store)



"I could save some time on my way home by eliminating some stops. I could not go to the store." (It's a possibility that I do not go to the store)



Even with context, though, it's still possible for a sentence to be ambiguous. Consider the following:



"I need to get home before the kids do. I could not go to the store."



This could mean that I am considering the possibility of skipping a trip to the store in order to ensure that I get home more quickly. Alternatively, it could mean that because I was previously unable to go to the store, I now need to make sure that I get home first. Even though the first sentence is in present tense, the second could be in either present tense or past tense, depending on my intended meaning.



It's worth noting also that the contraction "couldn't" is always used as a form of "cannot," similarly to how "can't" is a contraction of "cannot" but never of "can not."






share|improve this answer


























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498391%2fcould-not-was-incapable-of-was-capable-of-not-or-ambiguous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    The phrase "could not" can be used in several ways, which does make it ambiguous. However, its usage in a sentence is not usually ambiguous in context. The past tense of "can not" (meaning "was able to not") uses the past perfect tense with a participle of the main verb, while the past tense of "cannot" (meaning "was not able to") uses the simple past tense with an infinitive of the main verb.



    For example, to say that it was possible for me to not go to the store in the past, I would say "I could have not gone to the store." In contrast, to say that it was not possible for me to go to the store in the past, I would say "I could not go to the store."



    When the past perfect tense of "cannot" is used, the word order changes from the above to show that the negation belongs next to the "could": "I could not have gone to the store."



    When using "could" in the present tense to indicate future possibility, the structure is the same as the simple past tense. "I could not go to the store." Being this is a different tense altogether, though, context should let the reader know what is intended.



    "I needed to get flour but the car wouldn't start. I could not go to the store." (I was unable to go to the store)



    "I could save some time on my way home by eliminating some stops. I could not go to the store." (It's a possibility that I do not go to the store)



    Even with context, though, it's still possible for a sentence to be ambiguous. Consider the following:



    "I need to get home before the kids do. I could not go to the store."



    This could mean that I am considering the possibility of skipping a trip to the store in order to ensure that I get home more quickly. Alternatively, it could mean that because I was previously unable to go to the store, I now need to make sure that I get home first. Even though the first sentence is in present tense, the second could be in either present tense or past tense, depending on my intended meaning.



    It's worth noting also that the contraction "couldn't" is always used as a form of "cannot," similarly to how "can't" is a contraction of "cannot" but never of "can not."






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      The phrase "could not" can be used in several ways, which does make it ambiguous. However, its usage in a sentence is not usually ambiguous in context. The past tense of "can not" (meaning "was able to not") uses the past perfect tense with a participle of the main verb, while the past tense of "cannot" (meaning "was not able to") uses the simple past tense with an infinitive of the main verb.



      For example, to say that it was possible for me to not go to the store in the past, I would say "I could have not gone to the store." In contrast, to say that it was not possible for me to go to the store in the past, I would say "I could not go to the store."



      When the past perfect tense of "cannot" is used, the word order changes from the above to show that the negation belongs next to the "could": "I could not have gone to the store."



      When using "could" in the present tense to indicate future possibility, the structure is the same as the simple past tense. "I could not go to the store." Being this is a different tense altogether, though, context should let the reader know what is intended.



      "I needed to get flour but the car wouldn't start. I could not go to the store." (I was unable to go to the store)



      "I could save some time on my way home by eliminating some stops. I could not go to the store." (It's a possibility that I do not go to the store)



      Even with context, though, it's still possible for a sentence to be ambiguous. Consider the following:



      "I need to get home before the kids do. I could not go to the store."



      This could mean that I am considering the possibility of skipping a trip to the store in order to ensure that I get home more quickly. Alternatively, it could mean that because I was previously unable to go to the store, I now need to make sure that I get home first. Even though the first sentence is in present tense, the second could be in either present tense or past tense, depending on my intended meaning.



      It's worth noting also that the contraction "couldn't" is always used as a form of "cannot," similarly to how "can't" is a contraction of "cannot" but never of "can not."






      share|improve this answer




























        1












        1








        1







        The phrase "could not" can be used in several ways, which does make it ambiguous. However, its usage in a sentence is not usually ambiguous in context. The past tense of "can not" (meaning "was able to not") uses the past perfect tense with a participle of the main verb, while the past tense of "cannot" (meaning "was not able to") uses the simple past tense with an infinitive of the main verb.



        For example, to say that it was possible for me to not go to the store in the past, I would say "I could have not gone to the store." In contrast, to say that it was not possible for me to go to the store in the past, I would say "I could not go to the store."



        When the past perfect tense of "cannot" is used, the word order changes from the above to show that the negation belongs next to the "could": "I could not have gone to the store."



        When using "could" in the present tense to indicate future possibility, the structure is the same as the simple past tense. "I could not go to the store." Being this is a different tense altogether, though, context should let the reader know what is intended.



        "I needed to get flour but the car wouldn't start. I could not go to the store." (I was unable to go to the store)



        "I could save some time on my way home by eliminating some stops. I could not go to the store." (It's a possibility that I do not go to the store)



        Even with context, though, it's still possible for a sentence to be ambiguous. Consider the following:



        "I need to get home before the kids do. I could not go to the store."



        This could mean that I am considering the possibility of skipping a trip to the store in order to ensure that I get home more quickly. Alternatively, it could mean that because I was previously unable to go to the store, I now need to make sure that I get home first. Even though the first sentence is in present tense, the second could be in either present tense or past tense, depending on my intended meaning.



        It's worth noting also that the contraction "couldn't" is always used as a form of "cannot," similarly to how "can't" is a contraction of "cannot" but never of "can not."






        share|improve this answer















        The phrase "could not" can be used in several ways, which does make it ambiguous. However, its usage in a sentence is not usually ambiguous in context. The past tense of "can not" (meaning "was able to not") uses the past perfect tense with a participle of the main verb, while the past tense of "cannot" (meaning "was not able to") uses the simple past tense with an infinitive of the main verb.



        For example, to say that it was possible for me to not go to the store in the past, I would say "I could have not gone to the store." In contrast, to say that it was not possible for me to go to the store in the past, I would say "I could not go to the store."



        When the past perfect tense of "cannot" is used, the word order changes from the above to show that the negation belongs next to the "could": "I could not have gone to the store."



        When using "could" in the present tense to indicate future possibility, the structure is the same as the simple past tense. "I could not go to the store." Being this is a different tense altogether, though, context should let the reader know what is intended.



        "I needed to get flour but the car wouldn't start. I could not go to the store." (I was unable to go to the store)



        "I could save some time on my way home by eliminating some stops. I could not go to the store." (It's a possibility that I do not go to the store)



        Even with context, though, it's still possible for a sentence to be ambiguous. Consider the following:



        "I need to get home before the kids do. I could not go to the store."



        This could mean that I am considering the possibility of skipping a trip to the store in order to ensure that I get home more quickly. Alternatively, it could mean that because I was previously unable to go to the store, I now need to make sure that I get home first. Even though the first sentence is in present tense, the second could be in either present tense or past tense, depending on my intended meaning.



        It's worth noting also that the contraction "couldn't" is always used as a form of "cannot," similarly to how "can't" is a contraction of "cannot" but never of "can not."







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited May 14 at 14:40

























        answered May 14 at 14:08









        geekahedrongeekahedron

        1,803213




        1,803213






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f498391%2fcould-not-was-incapable-of-was-capable-of-not-or-ambiguous%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029