Is “be” really required after “may” in this sentence? [closed]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







-1















I read a sentence in "The Hindu" which was:




Age maybe has slowed down MT Vasudevan Nair but his creativity remains undiminished.




I think it is an egregious error to use may be this style. Shouldn't there be just "may" before "slowed down"?










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Chappo, JJJ, jimm101, Mark Beadles May 17 at 14:36


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1





    It is needed if you wish to phrase the sentence like that. If you want to get rid of the 'be', 'has' must be converted to 'have'.

    – Deonyi
    May 14 at 13:53











  • The single-word form maybe is effectively an adverbial element (either modifying the specific verb to slow down, or a "sentence adverb" modifying the entire assertion up to but here). But may is a kind of degenerate "modal" verb itself, so it requires an [unmarked] infinitive verb form, as in The groom may kiss the bride (as opposed to The groom kisses the bride).

    – FumbleFingers
    May 14 at 14:10






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's a cross-post of the identical question at ELL.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 14 at 17:04


















-1















I read a sentence in "The Hindu" which was:




Age maybe has slowed down MT Vasudevan Nair but his creativity remains undiminished.




I think it is an egregious error to use may be this style. Shouldn't there be just "may" before "slowed down"?










share|improve this question













closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Chappo, JJJ, jimm101, Mark Beadles May 17 at 14:36


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • 1





    It is needed if you wish to phrase the sentence like that. If you want to get rid of the 'be', 'has' must be converted to 'have'.

    – Deonyi
    May 14 at 13:53











  • The single-word form maybe is effectively an adverbial element (either modifying the specific verb to slow down, or a "sentence adverb" modifying the entire assertion up to but here). But may is a kind of degenerate "modal" verb itself, so it requires an [unmarked] infinitive verb form, as in The groom may kiss the bride (as opposed to The groom kisses the bride).

    – FumbleFingers
    May 14 at 14:10






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's a cross-post of the identical question at ELL.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 14 at 17:04














-1












-1








-1


1






I read a sentence in "The Hindu" which was:




Age maybe has slowed down MT Vasudevan Nair but his creativity remains undiminished.




I think it is an egregious error to use may be this style. Shouldn't there be just "may" before "slowed down"?










share|improve this question














I read a sentence in "The Hindu" which was:




Age maybe has slowed down MT Vasudevan Nair but his creativity remains undiminished.




I think it is an egregious error to use may be this style. Shouldn't there be just "may" before "slowed down"?







grammar






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked May 14 at 13:39









KelvinKelvin

11




11




closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Chappo, JJJ, jimm101, Mark Beadles May 17 at 14:36


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.







closed as off-topic by Jason Bassford, Chappo, JJJ, jimm101, Mark Beadles May 17 at 14:36


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Please include the research you’ve done, or consider if your question suits our English Language Learners site better. Questions that can be answered using commonly-available references are off-topic." – Chappo, JJJ

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1





    It is needed if you wish to phrase the sentence like that. If you want to get rid of the 'be', 'has' must be converted to 'have'.

    – Deonyi
    May 14 at 13:53











  • The single-word form maybe is effectively an adverbial element (either modifying the specific verb to slow down, or a "sentence adverb" modifying the entire assertion up to but here). But may is a kind of degenerate "modal" verb itself, so it requires an [unmarked] infinitive verb form, as in The groom may kiss the bride (as opposed to The groom kisses the bride).

    – FumbleFingers
    May 14 at 14:10






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's a cross-post of the identical question at ELL.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 14 at 17:04














  • 1





    It is needed if you wish to phrase the sentence like that. If you want to get rid of the 'be', 'has' must be converted to 'have'.

    – Deonyi
    May 14 at 13:53











  • The single-word form maybe is effectively an adverbial element (either modifying the specific verb to slow down, or a "sentence adverb" modifying the entire assertion up to but here). But may is a kind of degenerate "modal" verb itself, so it requires an [unmarked] infinitive verb form, as in The groom may kiss the bride (as opposed to The groom kisses the bride).

    – FumbleFingers
    May 14 at 14:10






  • 2





    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's a cross-post of the identical question at ELL.

    – Jason Bassford
    May 14 at 17:04








1




1





It is needed if you wish to phrase the sentence like that. If you want to get rid of the 'be', 'has' must be converted to 'have'.

– Deonyi
May 14 at 13:53





It is needed if you wish to phrase the sentence like that. If you want to get rid of the 'be', 'has' must be converted to 'have'.

– Deonyi
May 14 at 13:53













The single-word form maybe is effectively an adverbial element (either modifying the specific verb to slow down, or a "sentence adverb" modifying the entire assertion up to but here). But may is a kind of degenerate "modal" verb itself, so it requires an [unmarked] infinitive verb form, as in The groom may kiss the bride (as opposed to The groom kisses the bride).

– FumbleFingers
May 14 at 14:10





The single-word form maybe is effectively an adverbial element (either modifying the specific verb to slow down, or a "sentence adverb" modifying the entire assertion up to but here). But may is a kind of degenerate "modal" verb itself, so it requires an [unmarked] infinitive verb form, as in The groom may kiss the bride (as opposed to The groom kisses the bride).

– FumbleFingers
May 14 at 14:10




2




2





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's a cross-post of the identical question at ELL.

– Jason Bassford
May 14 at 17:04





I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it's a cross-post of the identical question at ELL.

– Jason Bassford
May 14 at 17:04










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














Maybe is fine.



It functions as an adverb meaning "possibly" and modifies the verb phrase "has slowed down." I can't speak for Indian English, but in American English "maybe" immediately preceding a verb would hit a lower register than "maybe" at the head of a clause. (Compare: "Maybe age has slowed down ...")



Here are two other examples found through the Corpus of Contemporary American English out of several dozen. "Maybe" preceding a verb crops up in more speech than writing (most results involve live news programs):




("Rebel on the Edge," Time, 1/23/2006.) He is the world's best ski racer, but whatever the result, he laughs it off and maybe has a beer afterward.



("United Shades of America: Off the Grid," CNN, 5/22/2016.) And so what would you say to somebody whose sitting at home right now, who maybe has just seen this for the first time and is going huh?







share|improve this answer































    0














    It's poor (or at least very informal). I would prefer something like:




    Age has perhaps slowed down...




    I'd prefer that over "Age may have slowed down..." also.






    share|improve this answer






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      Maybe is fine.



      It functions as an adverb meaning "possibly" and modifies the verb phrase "has slowed down." I can't speak for Indian English, but in American English "maybe" immediately preceding a verb would hit a lower register than "maybe" at the head of a clause. (Compare: "Maybe age has slowed down ...")



      Here are two other examples found through the Corpus of Contemporary American English out of several dozen. "Maybe" preceding a verb crops up in more speech than writing (most results involve live news programs):




      ("Rebel on the Edge," Time, 1/23/2006.) He is the world's best ski racer, but whatever the result, he laughs it off and maybe has a beer afterward.



      ("United Shades of America: Off the Grid," CNN, 5/22/2016.) And so what would you say to somebody whose sitting at home right now, who maybe has just seen this for the first time and is going huh?







      share|improve this answer




























        1














        Maybe is fine.



        It functions as an adverb meaning "possibly" and modifies the verb phrase "has slowed down." I can't speak for Indian English, but in American English "maybe" immediately preceding a verb would hit a lower register than "maybe" at the head of a clause. (Compare: "Maybe age has slowed down ...")



        Here are two other examples found through the Corpus of Contemporary American English out of several dozen. "Maybe" preceding a verb crops up in more speech than writing (most results involve live news programs):




        ("Rebel on the Edge," Time, 1/23/2006.) He is the world's best ski racer, but whatever the result, he laughs it off and maybe has a beer afterward.



        ("United Shades of America: Off the Grid," CNN, 5/22/2016.) And so what would you say to somebody whose sitting at home right now, who maybe has just seen this for the first time and is going huh?







        share|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1







          Maybe is fine.



          It functions as an adverb meaning "possibly" and modifies the verb phrase "has slowed down." I can't speak for Indian English, but in American English "maybe" immediately preceding a verb would hit a lower register than "maybe" at the head of a clause. (Compare: "Maybe age has slowed down ...")



          Here are two other examples found through the Corpus of Contemporary American English out of several dozen. "Maybe" preceding a verb crops up in more speech than writing (most results involve live news programs):




          ("Rebel on the Edge," Time, 1/23/2006.) He is the world's best ski racer, but whatever the result, he laughs it off and maybe has a beer afterward.



          ("United Shades of America: Off the Grid," CNN, 5/22/2016.) And so what would you say to somebody whose sitting at home right now, who maybe has just seen this for the first time and is going huh?







          share|improve this answer













          Maybe is fine.



          It functions as an adverb meaning "possibly" and modifies the verb phrase "has slowed down." I can't speak for Indian English, but in American English "maybe" immediately preceding a verb would hit a lower register than "maybe" at the head of a clause. (Compare: "Maybe age has slowed down ...")



          Here are two other examples found through the Corpus of Contemporary American English out of several dozen. "Maybe" preceding a verb crops up in more speech than writing (most results involve live news programs):




          ("Rebel on the Edge," Time, 1/23/2006.) He is the world's best ski racer, but whatever the result, he laughs it off and maybe has a beer afterward.



          ("United Shades of America: Off the Grid," CNN, 5/22/2016.) And so what would you say to somebody whose sitting at home right now, who maybe has just seen this for the first time and is going huh?








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 14 at 14:07









          TaliesinMerlinTaliesinMerlin

          10.6k2042




          10.6k2042

























              0














              It's poor (or at least very informal). I would prefer something like:




              Age has perhaps slowed down...




              I'd prefer that over "Age may have slowed down..." also.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                It's poor (or at least very informal). I would prefer something like:




                Age has perhaps slowed down...




                I'd prefer that over "Age may have slowed down..." also.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  It's poor (or at least very informal). I would prefer something like:




                  Age has perhaps slowed down...




                  I'd prefer that over "Age may have slowed down..." also.






                  share|improve this answer













                  It's poor (or at least very informal). I would prefer something like:




                  Age has perhaps slowed down...




                  I'd prefer that over "Age may have slowed down..." also.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 14 at 14:01









                  DeliusDelius

                  713




                  713















                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029