Consequences + of + to / for












1















While learning some new words recently, I've come across the word "consequence" which has caused me some trouble. I understand the meaning of the word but linking it with other words is a bit problematic.




  1. I`m not sure if it could be followed by "of"



Negative consequences of fast-developing tourism...





  1. I don`t know if it should be followed by "for" or "to"



Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for/to the enviroment and local societies











share|improve this question





























    1















    While learning some new words recently, I've come across the word "consequence" which has caused me some trouble. I understand the meaning of the word but linking it with other words is a bit problematic.




    1. I`m not sure if it could be followed by "of"



    Negative consequences of fast-developing tourism...





    1. I don`t know if it should be followed by "for" or "to"



    Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for/to the enviroment and local societies











    share|improve this question



























      1












      1








      1








      While learning some new words recently, I've come across the word "consequence" which has caused me some trouble. I understand the meaning of the word but linking it with other words is a bit problematic.




      1. I`m not sure if it could be followed by "of"



      Negative consequences of fast-developing tourism...





      1. I don`t know if it should be followed by "for" or "to"



      Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for/to the enviroment and local societies











      share|improve this question
















      While learning some new words recently, I've come across the word "consequence" which has caused me some trouble. I understand the meaning of the word but linking it with other words is a bit problematic.




      1. I`m not sure if it could be followed by "of"



      Negative consequences of fast-developing tourism...





      1. I don`t know if it should be followed by "for" or "to"



      Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for/to the enviroment and local societies








      prepositions to-for






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Aug 22 '16 at 22:25









      choster

      38k1486139




      38k1486139










      asked Aug 22 '16 at 20:36









      IGOIGO

      1332514




      1332514






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2















          1. Yes. Negative consequences of tourism are things that happen as a result of tourism, they are caused by tourism: overpriced restaurants, crowded beaches, pollution...

          2. for : "negative consequences for..." would indicate who is harmed or inconvenienced by the tourism: the locals, the environment


          I can't think of any time I would use "consequences to"






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

            – IGO
            Aug 22 '16 at 21:24













          • It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

            – Sarah
            Aug 23 '16 at 23:20













          • I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

            – Barmar
            Aug 24 '16 at 21:50











          • @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

            – phoog
            Oct 22 '16 at 4:01













          • In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago



















          0














          There is the legal usage:



          "... such an appellant/applicant was entitled to a remedy in public law, which will prevent the decision of the administrator from having any adverse consequences on an applicant."



          Should one use 'on' or 'for'? I tend to want to change 'having' to 'holding' and therefore say 'will prevent the decision ... from holding any adverse consequences for an applicant'.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















          • 1





            This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago













          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344207%2fconsequences-of-to-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2















          1. Yes. Negative consequences of tourism are things that happen as a result of tourism, they are caused by tourism: overpriced restaurants, crowded beaches, pollution...

          2. for : "negative consequences for..." would indicate who is harmed or inconvenienced by the tourism: the locals, the environment


          I can't think of any time I would use "consequences to"






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

            – IGO
            Aug 22 '16 at 21:24













          • It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

            – Sarah
            Aug 23 '16 at 23:20













          • I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

            – Barmar
            Aug 24 '16 at 21:50











          • @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

            – phoog
            Oct 22 '16 at 4:01













          • In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago
















          2















          1. Yes. Negative consequences of tourism are things that happen as a result of tourism, they are caused by tourism: overpriced restaurants, crowded beaches, pollution...

          2. for : "negative consequences for..." would indicate who is harmed or inconvenienced by the tourism: the locals, the environment


          I can't think of any time I would use "consequences to"






          share|improve this answer
























          • Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

            – IGO
            Aug 22 '16 at 21:24













          • It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

            – Sarah
            Aug 23 '16 at 23:20













          • I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

            – Barmar
            Aug 24 '16 at 21:50











          • @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

            – phoog
            Oct 22 '16 at 4:01













          • In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago














          2












          2








          2








          1. Yes. Negative consequences of tourism are things that happen as a result of tourism, they are caused by tourism: overpriced restaurants, crowded beaches, pollution...

          2. for : "negative consequences for..." would indicate who is harmed or inconvenienced by the tourism: the locals, the environment


          I can't think of any time I would use "consequences to"






          share|improve this answer














          1. Yes. Negative consequences of tourism are things that happen as a result of tourism, they are caused by tourism: overpriced restaurants, crowded beaches, pollution...

          2. for : "negative consequences for..." would indicate who is harmed or inconvenienced by the tourism: the locals, the environment


          I can't think of any time I would use "consequences to"







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 22 '16 at 21:15









          SarahSarah

          212




          212













          • Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

            – IGO
            Aug 22 '16 at 21:24













          • It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

            – Sarah
            Aug 23 '16 at 23:20













          • I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

            – Barmar
            Aug 24 '16 at 21:50











          • @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

            – phoog
            Oct 22 '16 at 4:01













          • In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago



















          • Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

            – IGO
            Aug 22 '16 at 21:24













          • It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

            – Sarah
            Aug 23 '16 at 23:20













          • I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

            – Barmar
            Aug 24 '16 at 21:50











          • @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

            – phoog
            Oct 22 '16 at 4:01













          • In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago

















          Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

          – IGO
          Aug 22 '16 at 21:24







          Thank you for your answer Sarah. Do you think it's gramatically and/or stylistically correct to use "Consequences" with both "OF" and "FOR" in one sentence? Like in the example I gave: "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies" ? It sounds a little off to my ear but I can`t tell why

          – IGO
          Aug 22 '16 at 21:24















          It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

          – Sarah
          Aug 23 '16 at 23:20







          It is fine to use both. There are some examples on Linguee that use both linguee.com/english-german/…

          – Sarah
          Aug 23 '16 at 23:20















          I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

          – Barmar
          Aug 24 '16 at 21:50





          I think you can also say consequences on the environment.

          – Barmar
          Aug 24 '16 at 21:50













          @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

          – phoog
          Oct 22 '16 at 4:01







          @Barmar consequences on the environment sounds very weird to this native speaker. To make it work it needs a specific context like a particular verb taking the position on, such as the teacher imposed several negative consequences on the students. But that's still rather odd.

          – phoog
          Oct 22 '16 at 4:01















          In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

          – TrevorD
          14 hours ago





          In "Negative consequences of fast-developing toursim for the enviroment and local societies", it's consequences of and tourism for. So, consequences is not being used with for.

          – TrevorD
          14 hours ago













          0














          There is the legal usage:



          "... such an appellant/applicant was entitled to a remedy in public law, which will prevent the decision of the administrator from having any adverse consequences on an applicant."



          Should one use 'on' or 'for'? I tend to want to change 'having' to 'holding' and therefore say 'will prevent the decision ... from holding any adverse consequences for an applicant'.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















          • 1





            This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago


















          0














          There is the legal usage:



          "... such an appellant/applicant was entitled to a remedy in public law, which will prevent the decision of the administrator from having any adverse consequences on an applicant."



          Should one use 'on' or 'for'? I tend to want to change 'having' to 'holding' and therefore say 'will prevent the decision ... from holding any adverse consequences for an applicant'.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.
















          • 1





            This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago
















          0












          0








          0







          There is the legal usage:



          "... such an appellant/applicant was entitled to a remedy in public law, which will prevent the decision of the administrator from having any adverse consequences on an applicant."



          Should one use 'on' or 'for'? I tend to want to change 'having' to 'holding' and therefore say 'will prevent the decision ... from holding any adverse consequences for an applicant'.






          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.










          There is the legal usage:



          "... such an appellant/applicant was entitled to a remedy in public law, which will prevent the decision of the administrator from having any adverse consequences on an applicant."



          Should one use 'on' or 'for'? I tend to want to change 'having' to 'holding' and therefore say 'will prevent the decision ... from holding any adverse consequences for an applicant'.







          share|improve this answer








          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer






          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered 15 hours ago









          Marlette van der MerweMarlette van der Merwe

          1




          1




          New contributor




          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Marlette van der Merwe is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.








          • 1





            This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago
















          • 1





            This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

            – TrevorD
            14 hours ago










          1




          1





          This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

          – TrevorD
          14 hours ago







          This is a new & separate question. If you want to ask a new question, then please start a new question & please refer to english.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask.

          – TrevorD
          14 hours ago




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344207%2fconsequences-of-to-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Bunad

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum