How to sound more sophisticated without being pedantic?
I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.
I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.
My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.
But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?
Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?
synonyms vocabulary resources
add a comment |
I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.
I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.
My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.
But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?
Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?
synonyms vocabulary resources
Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.
– Jim
yesterday
Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)
– Lambie
yesterday
2
To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.
– Jim
yesterday
The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.
– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday
add a comment |
I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.
I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.
My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.
But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?
Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?
synonyms vocabulary resources
I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.
I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.
My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.
But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?
Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?
synonyms vocabulary resources
synonyms vocabulary resources
asked yesterday
jjclarksonjjclarkson
7581516
7581516
Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.
– Jim
yesterday
Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)
– Lambie
yesterday
2
To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.
– Jim
yesterday
The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.
– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday
add a comment |
Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.
– Jim
yesterday
Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)
– Lambie
yesterday
2
To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.
– Jim
yesterday
The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.
– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday
Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.
– Jim
yesterday
Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.
– Jim
yesterday
Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)
– Lambie
yesterday
Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)
– Lambie
yesterday
2
2
To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.
– Jim
yesterday
if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.
– Jim
yesterday
The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.
– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday
The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.
– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here
Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:
“Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”
Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.
But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"
That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.
But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.
add a comment |
There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:
Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.
Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:
The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.
or
Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.
Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
(Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:
There are three things I particularly like about the
pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
inspiration to write with.
I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.
Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:
Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.
The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.
[Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]
2
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491712%2fhow-to-sound-more-sophisticated-without-being-pedantic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here
Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:
“Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”
Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
add a comment |
I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here
Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:
“Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”
Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
add a comment |
I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here
Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:
“Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”
Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.
I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here
Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:
“Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”
Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
K DogK Dog
1,2791312
1,2791312
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.
– jjclarkson
44 mins ago
add a comment |
Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.
But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"
That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.
But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.
add a comment |
Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.
But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"
That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.
But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.
add a comment |
Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.
But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"
That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.
But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.
Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.
But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"
That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.
But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.
answered 9 hours ago
ShoeShoe
25.9k43989
25.9k43989
add a comment |
add a comment |
There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:
Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.
Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:
The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.
or
Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.
Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
(Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:
There are three things I particularly like about the
pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
inspiration to write with.
I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.
Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:
Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.
The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.
[Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]
2
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:
Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.
Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:
The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.
or
Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.
Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
(Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:
There are three things I particularly like about the
pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
inspiration to write with.
I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.
Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:
Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.
The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.
[Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]
2
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:
Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.
Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:
The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.
or
Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.
Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
(Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:
There are three things I particularly like about the
pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
inspiration to write with.
I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.
Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:
Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.
The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.
[Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]
There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:
Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.
Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:
The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.
or
Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.
Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
(Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:
There are three things I particularly like about the
pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
inspiration to write with.
I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.
Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:
Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.
The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.
[Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]
edited 10 hours ago
answered yesterday
Leon ConradLeon Conrad
3,37121124
3,37121124
2
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
2
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
2
2
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”
– Rusty Core
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
@RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.
– Leon Conrad
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491712%2fhow-to-sound-more-sophisticated-without-being-pedantic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.
– Jim
yesterday
Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)
– Lambie
yesterday
2
To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.
– Rusty Core
yesterday
if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.
– Jim
yesterday
The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.
– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday