How to sound more sophisticated without being pedantic?












0















I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.



I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.



My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.



But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?



Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?










share|improve this question























  • Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)

    – Lambie
    yesterday








  • 2





    To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.

    – Rusty Core
    yesterday











  • if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    yesterday


















0















I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.



I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.



My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.



But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?



Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?










share|improve this question























  • Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)

    – Lambie
    yesterday








  • 2





    To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.

    – Rusty Core
    yesterday











  • if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    yesterday
















0












0








0








I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.



I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.



My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.



But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?



Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?










share|improve this question














I read an article that said you should avoid certain words in writing such as really, you, feel, think, as, a lot, sort of, kind of, like, just, used to.



I think the intention is to be more direct and succinct.



My problem is not so much my writing but the spoken word, I'd like to improve my spoken vocabulary by replacing common empty words or phrases with more intelligent descriptions.



But what words should you replace them with without sounding pretentious?



Is there a valuable guide out there on the interwebs that would help someone improve their speaking skills in this manner?







synonyms vocabulary resources






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked yesterday









jjclarksonjjclarkson

7581516




7581516













  • Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)

    – Lambie
    yesterday








  • 2





    To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.

    – Rusty Core
    yesterday











  • if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    yesterday





















  • Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)

    – Lambie
    yesterday








  • 2





    To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.

    – Rusty Core
    yesterday











  • if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.

    – Jim
    yesterday











  • The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.

    – TaliesinMerlin
    yesterday



















Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.

– Jim
yesterday





Systematic search and replace of the words in that list with other words will not automatically elevate your speech.

– Jim
yesterday













Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)

– Lambie
yesterday







Read more novels, read more novels. That said, please provide an example of what you consider to be unsophisticated so I can gin it up for you. :)

– Lambie
yesterday






2




2





To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.

– Rusty Core
yesterday





To me, sophisticated speech uses allusion, irony, quotations, so that only one who is of the same cultural milieu could pick up the meaning. Vocabulary words used in otherwise straightforward phrases is not sophisticated speech.

– Rusty Core
yesterday













if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.

– Jim
yesterday





if you’re happy with your writing, then only say what you’d write. Before speaking, ask yourself if you’d write it- adjust accordingly.

– Jim
yesterday













The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.

– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday







The point of avoiding these words is that they are often used in fluffy, insubstantial ways. Here's an extreme example: Really, I feel that if you just sort of wrote a lot like people used to, you could really kind of improve. (...) The extra verbiage muddles the message. For an illustration of how to revise for clarity in a like manner, read Revising Prose by Richard Lanham. For suggestions on writing in more complex style, check out the MLA writing guide Line by Line. Otherwise, read and write daily.

– TaliesinMerlin
yesterday












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here



Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:




“Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”




Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.






share|improve this answer


























  • Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

    – jjclarkson
    44 mins ago





















0














Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.



But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"



That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.



But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.






share|improve this answer































    -2














    There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:



    Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
    As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
    They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.



    Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:




    The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.




    or




    Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.




    Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
    (Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:




    There are three things I particularly like about the
    pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
    rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
    comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
    insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
    and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
    those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
    inspiration to write with.




    I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.



    Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:



    Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.



    The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.



    [Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]






    share|improve this answer





















    • 2





      A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

      – Rusty Core
      yesterday











    • @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

      – Leon Conrad
      yesterday











    • Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

      – Rusty Core
      yesterday











    • So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

      – Leon Conrad
      yesterday













    • I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

      – Rusty Core
      yesterday














    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491712%2fhow-to-sound-more-sophisticated-without-being-pedantic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here



    Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:




    “Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”




    Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

      – jjclarkson
      44 mins ago


















    1














    I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here



    Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:




    “Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”




    Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.






    share|improve this answer


























    • Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

      – jjclarkson
      44 mins ago
















    1












    1








    1







    I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here



    Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:




    “Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”




    Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.






    share|improve this answer















    I would add to Leon's answer, a short, concise essay by George Orwell that will do wonders for your writing and critical thinking skills: Politics and the English Language. It is routinely cited as an authoritative text for academics to stop writing gibberish from overuse of academic jargon and would seem to fit your need nicely. While Orwell talks about political discourse, this example really can be extrapolated to almost any discipline. It addresses your points on empty phrases and coming off as intelligent and direct without being pedantic directly. You can read Orwell's Politics and the English Language here



    Enotes summarizes this important essay as follows:




    “Politics and the English Language,” though written in 1946, remains timely for modern students of language. In this essay, Orwell argues that the English language becomes “ugly and inaccurate because our thoughts are foolish, but the slovenliness of our language makes it easier for us to have foolish thoughts.” To illustrate his point, Orwell cites writing from two professors, a Communist pamphlet, an essay on psychology in Politics, and a letter in the Tribune. All these examples, Orwell argues, have two common faults: staleness of imagery and lack of precision. In his follow-up analysis, he discusses general characteristics of bad writing, including pretentious diction and meaningless words. His purpose in the analysis is to show “the special connection between politics and the debasement of language.”




    Also you can try reading this webpage on a regular basis which explores similar themes.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    K DogK Dog

    1,2791312




    1,2791312













    • Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

      – jjclarkson
      44 mins ago





















    • Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

      – jjclarkson
      44 mins ago



















    Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

    – jjclarkson
    44 mins ago







    Well the George Orwell essay is a bit convincing that it's the wrong idea to target simplicity as an evil. "I think..." is better than "In my opinion it is not an unjustifiable assumption..." My problem is that my mind works a bit slower than my mouth and so saying the right words in the right order seems nearly impossible during an organic conversation.

    – jjclarkson
    44 mins ago















    0














    Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.



    But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"



    That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.



    But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.






    share|improve this answer




























      0














      Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.



      But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"



      That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.



      But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.






      share|improve this answer


























        0












        0








        0







        Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.



        But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"



        That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.



        But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.






        share|improve this answer













        Firstly, the advice that you mention concerning the improvement of writing by the avoidance of certain words has little relevance to improving speaking. Many of the words you list are fillers that play an important role in spoken language - although of course it is possible to overuse them.



        But are you asking here about everyday conversation? Or are you thinking of specific contexts such as meetings at work or giving a speech? You are certainly going to sound pretentious if you ask your wife "May I request your assistance in the garden?"



        That said, the best advice is just to increase your vocabulary naturally by plenty of good-quality reading and by listening to (e.g. TED) talks by presenters whose eloquence you admire. You will then have an increased lexicon to work with.



        But any obvious straining to sound sophisticated is almost inevitably going to come across as pretentious.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 9 hours ago









        ShoeShoe

        25.9k43989




        25.9k43989























            -2














            There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:



            Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
            As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
            They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.



            Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:




            The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.




            or




            Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.




            Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
            (Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:




            There are three things I particularly like about the
            pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
            rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
            comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
            insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
            and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
            those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
            inspiration to write with.




            I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.



            Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:



            Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.



            The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.



            [Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]






            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday











            • Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday













            • I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday


















            -2














            There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:



            Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
            As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
            They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.



            Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:




            The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.




            or




            Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.




            Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
            (Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:




            There are three things I particularly like about the
            pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
            rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
            comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
            insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
            and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
            those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
            inspiration to write with.




            I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.



            Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:



            Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.



            The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.



            [Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]






            share|improve this answer





















            • 2





              A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday











            • Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday













            • I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday
















            -2












            -2








            -2







            There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:



            Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
            As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
            They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.



            Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:




            The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.




            or




            Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.




            Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
            (Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:




            There are three things I particularly like about the
            pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
            rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
            comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
            insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
            and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
            those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
            inspiration to write with.




            I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.



            Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:



            Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.



            The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.



            [Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]






            share|improve this answer















            There are many ways you can improve the clarity, concision, cohesion, and depth of your spoken discourse. Here are three techniques I particularly recommend:



            Firstly, and most importantly, get to grips with Aristotle's 10 Categories of Being.
            As a starting exercise, use them to describe a living thing at a particular point in time and space. See my TEDx talk on them here.
            They will give you a framework that will help you think more precisely, and you will have a motivation to find the words and phrases you need to express those more precise thoughts.



            Secondly, think of 3 things (adjectives or nouns) to say about an object (noun) and something about the object (predicate) - keep it simple. For instance:




            The small, gold, fountain pen is on the table.




            or




            Rusty says he's not happy with the Stack Exchange approach to combining forum, wiki and FAQ interfaces.




            Then expand the sentence into a paragraph with a clear topic sentence, body section, including signpost words (e.g. firstly, secondly, finally), and a clear conclusion.
            (Some people refer to this as a 'hamburger' paragraph). For instance, the first example could be expanded as follows:




            There are three things I particularly like about the
            pen on the table in front of me right now: firstly, it's gold, and I find the way it reflects the light
            rather beautiful. Secondly, it's small - small enough to hold
            comfortably, but not too small that it disappears in my hand, or feels
            insubstantial. Finally, it's a fountain pen - the ink flows smoothly
            and it's a pleasure to write with. All in all, the combination of
            those three things make it one of my favourite pens - it's an
            inspiration to write with.




            I suggest you try expanding the second, noun-based example yourself.



            Finally, slow down. Here's an example of how a simple yet deep thought can be communicated clearly and effectively when delivered at a thoughtful pace, with clear signpost words:



            Bertrand Russell's 'Advice for Future Generations'.



            The point of all of these exercises is to help awaken imagination, inspiration, and motivation in you, to deepen your experience of the world, so you can communicate that depth to others and wow them. Follow the advice above, and you'll be well on the way to doing just that.



            [Did you notice how I used an expanded 'hamburger paragraph' approach to structuring this answer? What was the effect it had on you?]







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 10 hours ago

























            answered yesterday









            Leon ConradLeon Conrad

            3,37121124




            3,37121124








            • 2





              A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday











            • Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday













            • I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday
















            • 2





              A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday











            • Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday











            • So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

              – Leon Conrad
              yesterday













            • I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

              – Rusty Core
              yesterday










            2




            2





            A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

            – Rusty Core
            yesterday





            A classic example how to make a puffy paragraph from a single concise sentence. This is awful. Also, regarding adjectives, Mark Twain said, “When you catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable. They weaken when they are close together. They give strength when they are far apart.”

            – Rusty Core
            yesterday













            @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

            – Leon Conrad
            yesterday





            @RustyCore - it's an exercise - you learn to do it and then chuck it away for something better. You've got to know the rules before you break them. Any rule (including Mark Twain's) can (and arguably should) be broken - for the right reasons. I take a Zen view of these things - they're all perfect: true perfection seems imperfect, yet it is perfectly itself. Also, Twain was referring to writing, not spoken discourse. Different rules apply. I'd argue Twain's rule is an awful one to follow in spoken discourse. Take Shakespeare's 'A strange invisible perfume' (Antony and Cleo) for instance ...

            – Leon Conrad
            yesterday













            Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

            – Rusty Core
            yesterday





            Spoken or written, "really", "a lot", "sort of", "like", "basically", "awesome" are garbage fillers and must be avoided. Lengthy expressions are also to be avoided if short ones suffice. The example you provided not only muddies the matter, it is stylistically poor.

            – Rusty Core
            yesterday













            So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

            – Leon Conrad
            yesterday







            So go on - show how to improve on it. And do listen to Russell - much can be learned from him.

            – Leon Conrad
            yesterday















            I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

            – Rusty Core
            yesterday







            I am not a writer. Also, I am not happy with the SE's combination of forum, wiki and FAQ where answers can be edited by someone else — I experienced a shock when someone edited my answer. This is why I prefer using comments, which can only be voted for deletion.

            – Rusty Core
            yesterday




















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491712%2fhow-to-sound-more-sophisticated-without-being-pedantic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Bunad

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum