Is “should be” talking about the past or the present or the future? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowThe order of tenses“could sought” in a conditional statementWould & could in the present tense'should have + past participle' for expectationWhere to use “must/should/might/may/could/shouldn't have ”in a sentence?Is can+have+V3 by some time in future possible?Using the present continuous or “going to” in “He is sure that he will be working for them next year”Meaning of “should have past particle”Should I use “lay” or “laid” when someone is actively lying down?“could” in the past referring to a single possibility/opportunity

Keeping you safe

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?

How to make a variable always equal to the result of some calculations?

How to draw dotted circle in Inkscape?

What happens if you roll doubles 3 times then land on "Go to jail?"

Was a professor correct to chastise me for writing "Prof. X" rather than "Professor X"?

Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?

Modern-day genetically engineered monsters – what's possible?

How can I quit an app using Terminal?

What flight has the highest ratio of time difference to flight time?

Why is there a PLL in CPU?

WOW air has ceased operation, can I get my tickets refunded?

How do I go from 300 unfinished/half written blog posts, to published posts?

How should I support this large drywall patch?

How to prepend a string to only the lines of text which are numbers

Reduce array of object to totals by property object

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

On model categories where every object is bifibrant

How to make a software documentation "officially" citable?

What benefits would be gained by using human laborers instead of drones in deep sea mining?

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

Why does the UK parliament need a vote on the political declaration?

BOOM! All Clear for Mr. T



Is “should be” talking about the past or the present or the future?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowThe order of tenses“could sought” in a conditional statementWould & could in the present tense'should have + past participle' for expectationWhere to use “must/should/might/may/could/shouldn't have ”in a sentence?Is can+have+V3 by some time in future possible?Using the present continuous or “going to” in “He is sure that he will be working for them next year”Meaning of “should have past particle”Should I use “lay” or “laid” when someone is actively lying down?“could” in the past referring to a single possibility/opportunity










0
















Not sure who’s working but this should be resolved.




Does that should be resolved part mean (1) that it has already been resolved in the past, or (2) that he is expecting or needing it to be resolved now in the present, or (3) that he is asking for it to be resolved at some point in the future?



Was its resolution completed in the past, or is it still happening now in the present, or will it happen the future?



Is it the done case, the doing now, or the yet to do case?










share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com Mar 22 at 5:37


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.













  • 5





    It can mean all of those things. The sentence is ambiguous without any context.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:25















0
















Not sure who’s working but this should be resolved.




Does that should be resolved part mean (1) that it has already been resolved in the past, or (2) that he is expecting or needing it to be resolved now in the present, or (3) that he is asking for it to be resolved at some point in the future?



Was its resolution completed in the past, or is it still happening now in the present, or will it happen the future?



Is it the done case, the doing now, or the yet to do case?










share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com Mar 22 at 5:37


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.













  • 5





    It can mean all of those things. The sentence is ambiguous without any context.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:25













0












0








0









Not sure who’s working but this should be resolved.




Does that should be resolved part mean (1) that it has already been resolved in the past, or (2) that he is expecting or needing it to be resolved now in the present, or (3) that he is asking for it to be resolved at some point in the future?



Was its resolution completed in the past, or is it still happening now in the present, or will it happen the future?



Is it the done case, the doing now, or the yet to do case?










share|improve this question















Not sure who’s working but this should be resolved.




Does that should be resolved part mean (1) that it has already been resolved in the past, or (2) that he is expecting or needing it to be resolved now in the present, or (3) that he is asking for it to be resolved at some point in the future?



Was its resolution completed in the past, or is it still happening now in the present, or will it happen the future?



Is it the done case, the doing now, or the yet to do case?







verbs ambiguity modal-verbs






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Mar 21 at 1:53







Ram











migrated from english.stackexchange.com Mar 22 at 5:37


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.









migrated from english.stackexchange.com Mar 22 at 5:37


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.









  • 5





    It can mean all of those things. The sentence is ambiguous without any context.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:25












  • 5





    It can mean all of those things. The sentence is ambiguous without any context.

    – Jason Bassford
    Mar 21 at 5:25







5




5





It can mean all of those things. The sentence is ambiguous without any context.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 21 at 5:25





It can mean all of those things. The sentence is ambiguous without any context.

– Jason Bassford
Mar 21 at 5:25










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














It can mean multiple things, and you have to judge it from context.



It can mean that the person thinks it has been resolved:




You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, I just deployed the new build.




It can mean they think that someone ought to fix it:




You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, we can't have people unable to log in.




It can mean that there is a specific point in time they expect it to be resolved by:




You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved by about 5pm, we're working on it now.







share|improve this answer






























    0














    It simply means that the person wants it to be resolved, either in the present or near future.






    share|improve this answer























    • It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

      – SamBC
      Mar 22 at 12:06











    • @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

      – Bella Swan
      Mar 22 at 12:16











    • That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

      – SamBC
      Mar 22 at 12:24


















    -1














    To mean:



    • past: ...this should have been resolved


    • present: ...this is being resolved


    • future: ...this should be resolved






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "481"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201759%2fis-should-be-talking-about-the-past-or-the-present-or-the-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown
























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      It can mean multiple things, and you have to judge it from context.



      It can mean that the person thinks it has been resolved:




      You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, I just deployed the new build.




      It can mean they think that someone ought to fix it:




      You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, we can't have people unable to log in.




      It can mean that there is a specific point in time they expect it to be resolved by:




      You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved by about 5pm, we're working on it now.







      share|improve this answer



























        1














        It can mean multiple things, and you have to judge it from context.



        It can mean that the person thinks it has been resolved:




        You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, I just deployed the new build.




        It can mean they think that someone ought to fix it:




        You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, we can't have people unable to log in.




        It can mean that there is a specific point in time they expect it to be resolved by:




        You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved by about 5pm, we're working on it now.







        share|improve this answer

























          1












          1








          1







          It can mean multiple things, and you have to judge it from context.



          It can mean that the person thinks it has been resolved:




          You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, I just deployed the new build.




          It can mean they think that someone ought to fix it:




          You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, we can't have people unable to log in.




          It can mean that there is a specific point in time they expect it to be resolved by:




          You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved by about 5pm, we're working on it now.







          share|improve this answer













          It can mean multiple things, and you have to judge it from context.



          It can mean that the person thinks it has been resolved:




          You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, I just deployed the new build.




          It can mean they think that someone ought to fix it:




          You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved, we can't have people unable to log in.




          It can mean that there is a specific point in time they expect it to be resolved by:




          You're still having problems logging in? That should be resolved by about 5pm, we're working on it now.








          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 22 at 12:06









          SamBCSamBC

          15.4k2159




          15.4k2159























              0














              It simply means that the person wants it to be resolved, either in the present or near future.






              share|improve this answer























              • It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:06











              • @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

                – Bella Swan
                Mar 22 at 12:16











              • That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:24















              0














              It simply means that the person wants it to be resolved, either in the present or near future.






              share|improve this answer























              • It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:06











              • @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

                – Bella Swan
                Mar 22 at 12:16











              • That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:24













              0












              0








              0







              It simply means that the person wants it to be resolved, either in the present or near future.






              share|improve this answer













              It simply means that the person wants it to be resolved, either in the present or near future.







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Mar 22 at 6:10









              Bella SwanBella Swan

              1,08511




              1,08511












              • It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:06











              • @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

                – Bella Swan
                Mar 22 at 12:16











              • That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:24

















              • It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:06











              • @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

                – Bella Swan
                Mar 22 at 12:16











              • That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

                – SamBC
                Mar 22 at 12:24
















              It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

              – SamBC
              Mar 22 at 12:06





              It can also mean that they thought it had already been resolved, but are expressing doubt.

              – SamBC
              Mar 22 at 12:06













              @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

              – Bella Swan
              Mar 22 at 12:16





              @SamBC the he would have used "should have been resolved"

              – Bella Swan
              Mar 22 at 12:16













              That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

              – SamBC
              Mar 22 at 12:24





              That is not my experience. They are effectively using resolved as an adjective in such cases, not as a verb.

              – SamBC
              Mar 22 at 12:24











              -1














              To mean:



              • past: ...this should have been resolved


              • present: ...this is being resolved


              • future: ...this should be resolved






              share|improve this answer



























                -1














                To mean:



                • past: ...this should have been resolved


                • present: ...this is being resolved


                • future: ...this should be resolved






                share|improve this answer

























                  -1












                  -1








                  -1







                  To mean:



                  • past: ...this should have been resolved


                  • present: ...this is being resolved


                  • future: ...this should be resolved






                  share|improve this answer













                  To mean:



                  • past: ...this should have been resolved


                  • present: ...this is being resolved


                  • future: ...this should be resolved







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Mar 22 at 6:26









                  Paul S. LeePaul S. Lee

                  101




                  101



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f201759%2fis-should-be-talking-about-the-past-or-the-present-or-the-future%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Bruad Bilen | Luke uk diar | NawigatsjuunCommonskategorii: BruadCommonskategorii: RunstükenWikiquote: Bruad

                      What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029