Using non-participants as an excuse to prohibit something
So you often hear excuses or justifications to ban something to "protect children", e.g.
We should ban pornography in order to protect children
Is there a word that describes this sort of justification or is it some sort of fallacy (the specific fallacy would also help).
single-word-requests
add a comment |
So you often hear excuses or justifications to ban something to "protect children", e.g.
We should ban pornography in order to protect children
Is there a word that describes this sort of justification or is it some sort of fallacy (the specific fallacy would also help).
single-word-requests
Prohibit something as preventive care.
– Ubi hatt
3 mins ago
add a comment |
So you often hear excuses or justifications to ban something to "protect children", e.g.
We should ban pornography in order to protect children
Is there a word that describes this sort of justification or is it some sort of fallacy (the specific fallacy would also help).
single-word-requests
So you often hear excuses or justifications to ban something to "protect children", e.g.
We should ban pornography in order to protect children
Is there a word that describes this sort of justification or is it some sort of fallacy (the specific fallacy would also help).
single-word-requests
single-word-requests
asked 9 mins ago
A. LauA. Lau
158210
158210
Prohibit something as preventive care.
– Ubi hatt
3 mins ago
add a comment |
Prohibit something as preventive care.
– Ubi hatt
3 mins ago
Prohibit something as preventive care.
– Ubi hatt
3 mins ago
Prohibit something as preventive care.
– Ubi hatt
3 mins ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491659%2fusing-non-participants-as-an-excuse-to-prohibit-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491659%2fusing-non-participants-as-an-excuse-to-prohibit-something%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Prohibit something as preventive care.
– Ubi hatt
3 mins ago