Knew, realized + the past/present Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Adjective + the present/pastCan we use past perfect progressive in the context where present tense is predominantly used?Present tense in a question with verb in past tensePast present future all in one word?When to use the present or the past perfect tense?Using “literary present” with past perfectSimple Present. They build a house next to mine. Why is it wrong?An event in 2009, disconnected to the present day, yet present tense is used. Why?When do you use “this is because” in the present tense versus “this was because” in the past tense?Present tense in the narrative past tenseAdjective + the present/past

"Destructive force" carried by a B-52?

What helicopter has the most rotor blades?

What is the ongoing value of the Kanban board to the developers as opposed to management

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

How to leave only the following strings?

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Why is one lightbulb in a string illuminated?

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

Pointing to problems without suggesting solutions

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

2 sample t test for sample sizes - 30,000 and 150,000

Compiling and throwing simple dynamic exceptions at runtime for JVM

false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'

tabularx column has extra padding at right?

How to create a command for the "strange m" symbol in latex?

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Does GDPR cover the collection of data by websites that crawl the web and resell user data

Why do C and C++ allow the expression (int) + 4*5?

Are Flameskulls resistant to magical piercing damage?

Etymology of 見舞い

Weaponising the Grasp-at-a-Distance spell

Can gravitational waves pass through a black hole?

How to break 信じようとしていただけかも知れない into separate parts?



Knew, realized + the past/present



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)Adjective + the present/pastCan we use past perfect progressive in the context where present tense is predominantly used?Present tense in a question with verb in past tensePast present future all in one word?When to use the present or the past perfect tense?Using “literary present” with past perfectSimple Present. They build a house next to mine. Why is it wrong?An event in 2009, disconnected to the present day, yet present tense is used. Why?When do you use “this is because” in the present tense versus “this was because” in the past tense?Present tense in the narrative past tenseAdjective + the present/past



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








2















Please consider the following:




  1. I knew the building (IS/WAS) thirty feet tall.

  2. They realized I (AM/WAS) his son.



My question: both those clauses contain general truths. So, do I need to use the present, or the past?










share|improve this question






























    2















    Please consider the following:




    1. I knew the building (IS/WAS) thirty feet tall.

    2. They realized I (AM/WAS) his son.



    My question: both those clauses contain general truths. So, do I need to use the present, or the past?










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2


      1






      Please consider the following:




      1. I knew the building (IS/WAS) thirty feet tall.

      2. They realized I (AM/WAS) his son.



      My question: both those clauses contain general truths. So, do I need to use the present, or the past?










      share|improve this question
















      Please consider the following:




      1. I knew the building (IS/WAS) thirty feet tall.

      2. They realized I (AM/WAS) his son.



      My question: both those clauses contain general truths. So, do I need to use the present, or the past?







      tenses past-tense present-tense sequence-of-tenses agreement






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Apr 6 at 16:08









      TrevorD

      10.7k22658




      10.7k22658










      asked Mar 26 at 1:26









      Fadli SheikhFadli Sheikh

      123




      123




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          If the clause after knew or realized is a general truth, or more specifically, if it is still true, we can use either the past or the present.



          This website, talking about backshifting, says




          Backshifting occurs not only with indirect speech, but also with reported feelings and thoughts expressed frequently with verbs such as know, think, realize, and forget.




          and




          In certain situations, the sequence of tense rules are relaxed and backshifting is not required. Essentially, backshifting is not required if a statement about the present or future still holds. . . .




          So the rules for verbs like realized and knew are the same as the reported speech: if the fact is still true, then you can use either the past or the present. In speech and writing,
          we usually use the past unless there is some reason to emphasize that the fact is still true.



          If you want an actual example in print, in New York Magazine, in 1972, Mario Puzo says about Francis Ford Coppola:




          That's when I knew he was really a director.




          Coppola never stopped being a director. And Mario Puzo presumably spoke English well: he was born in New York, and is the author of the book The Godfather, and coauthor of The Godfather screenplay, which Coppola directed.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 10:28











          • @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 11:05











          • @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 13:02











          • Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

            – Peter Shor
            Mar 27 at 13:08












          • @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 13:09











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491344%2fknew-realized-the-past-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          If the clause after knew or realized is a general truth, or more specifically, if it is still true, we can use either the past or the present.



          This website, talking about backshifting, says




          Backshifting occurs not only with indirect speech, but also with reported feelings and thoughts expressed frequently with verbs such as know, think, realize, and forget.




          and




          In certain situations, the sequence of tense rules are relaxed and backshifting is not required. Essentially, backshifting is not required if a statement about the present or future still holds. . . .




          So the rules for verbs like realized and knew are the same as the reported speech: if the fact is still true, then you can use either the past or the present. In speech and writing,
          we usually use the past unless there is some reason to emphasize that the fact is still true.



          If you want an actual example in print, in New York Magazine, in 1972, Mario Puzo says about Francis Ford Coppola:




          That's when I knew he was really a director.




          Coppola never stopped being a director. And Mario Puzo presumably spoke English well: he was born in New York, and is the author of the book The Godfather, and coauthor of The Godfather screenplay, which Coppola directed.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 10:28











          • @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 11:05











          • @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 13:02











          • Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

            – Peter Shor
            Mar 27 at 13:08












          • @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 13:09















          1














          If the clause after knew or realized is a general truth, or more specifically, if it is still true, we can use either the past or the present.



          This website, talking about backshifting, says




          Backshifting occurs not only with indirect speech, but also with reported feelings and thoughts expressed frequently with verbs such as know, think, realize, and forget.




          and




          In certain situations, the sequence of tense rules are relaxed and backshifting is not required. Essentially, backshifting is not required if a statement about the present or future still holds. . . .




          So the rules for verbs like realized and knew are the same as the reported speech: if the fact is still true, then you can use either the past or the present. In speech and writing,
          we usually use the past unless there is some reason to emphasize that the fact is still true.



          If you want an actual example in print, in New York Magazine, in 1972, Mario Puzo says about Francis Ford Coppola:




          That's when I knew he was really a director.




          Coppola never stopped being a director. And Mario Puzo presumably spoke English well: he was born in New York, and is the author of the book The Godfather, and coauthor of The Godfather screenplay, which Coppola directed.






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 10:28











          • @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 11:05











          • @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 13:02











          • Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

            – Peter Shor
            Mar 27 at 13:08












          • @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 13:09













          1












          1








          1







          If the clause after knew or realized is a general truth, or more specifically, if it is still true, we can use either the past or the present.



          This website, talking about backshifting, says




          Backshifting occurs not only with indirect speech, but also with reported feelings and thoughts expressed frequently with verbs such as know, think, realize, and forget.




          and




          In certain situations, the sequence of tense rules are relaxed and backshifting is not required. Essentially, backshifting is not required if a statement about the present or future still holds. . . .




          So the rules for verbs like realized and knew are the same as the reported speech: if the fact is still true, then you can use either the past or the present. In speech and writing,
          we usually use the past unless there is some reason to emphasize that the fact is still true.



          If you want an actual example in print, in New York Magazine, in 1972, Mario Puzo says about Francis Ford Coppola:




          That's when I knew he was really a director.




          Coppola never stopped being a director. And Mario Puzo presumably spoke English well: he was born in New York, and is the author of the book The Godfather, and coauthor of The Godfather screenplay, which Coppola directed.






          share|improve this answer















          If the clause after knew or realized is a general truth, or more specifically, if it is still true, we can use either the past or the present.



          This website, talking about backshifting, says




          Backshifting occurs not only with indirect speech, but also with reported feelings and thoughts expressed frequently with verbs such as know, think, realize, and forget.




          and




          In certain situations, the sequence of tense rules are relaxed and backshifting is not required. Essentially, backshifting is not required if a statement about the present or future still holds. . . .




          So the rules for verbs like realized and knew are the same as the reported speech: if the fact is still true, then you can use either the past or the present. In speech and writing,
          we usually use the past unless there is some reason to emphasize that the fact is still true.



          If you want an actual example in print, in New York Magazine, in 1972, Mario Puzo says about Francis Ford Coppola:




          That's when I knew he was really a director.




          Coppola never stopped being a director. And Mario Puzo presumably spoke English well: he was born in New York, and is the author of the book The Godfather, and coauthor of The Godfather screenplay, which Coppola directed.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Mar 27 at 10:25

























          answered Mar 27 at 10:05









          Peter Shor Peter Shor

          63.4k5123230




          63.4k5123230







          • 1





            Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 10:28











          • @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 11:05











          • @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 13:02











          • Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

            – Peter Shor
            Mar 27 at 13:08












          • @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 13:09












          • 1





            Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 10:28











          • @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 11:05











          • @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

            – Shoe
            Mar 27 at 13:02











          • Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

            – Peter Shor
            Mar 27 at 13:08












          • @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

            – michael_timofeev
            Mar 27 at 13:09







          1




          1





          Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

          – Shoe
          Mar 27 at 10:28





          Yes. Swan in Practical English Usage (p276) says: After past reporting verbs, we usually change the original tenses even if the things the original speaker says are still true. 'I told the police I was British. (The speaker still is British').

          – Shoe
          Mar 27 at 10:28













          @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

          – michael_timofeev
          Mar 27 at 11:05





          @Shoe I agree with Peter’s answer but I think it can’t be supported to say what most English speakers say. I’ve seen a lot of variations and situations which necessitate changing “rules.”

          – michael_timofeev
          Mar 27 at 11:05













          @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

          – Shoe
          Mar 27 at 13:02





          @michael_timofeev. Both Peter Shor above and Swan state that backshift 'usually' takes place. And both Swan and ThoughtCo say that backshift is not required if, in Swan's words, "the original speaker's present and future are still present and future". So in general I agree that it is unhelpful to talk of rules at all in this context. But I'm not sure I agree that Peter's answer 'can't be supported by what most English speakers say'. Perhaps I'll do some research on this if I can find the time.

          – Shoe
          Mar 27 at 13:02













          Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

          – Peter Shor
          Mar 27 at 13:08






          Maybe I should comment more on that word "usually". I would say that backshift is the default, but there are lots of situations where you make an exception because the fact that it's still true is relevant, important, or even just interesting.

          – Peter Shor
          Mar 27 at 13:08














          @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

          – michael_timofeev
          Mar 27 at 13:09





          @Shoe I respect Swan as a source but the problem with researching this is how does one find out what st least a billion people consider normal or usually say? It treats language as some kind of mathematical law which people are compelled to obey. I think the answer is fine but this one is more open than other questions which are more cut and dried so to speak. Google books is the wrong place to go for support as it is written language.

          – michael_timofeev
          Mar 27 at 13:09

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491344%2fknew-realized-the-past-present%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029