(un)expected vs. (un)surprising Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?Repeated vs Repeating“Supposed” versus “expected”“Expected of” vs. “expected from”“Surprising to” vs. “surprising for”How to tell if an adjective is attributive or predicative [EFL context]?Better than expected as an adjective?.comma / surprising / capitalizationWord that describes something that performs as advertised or expectedSingle Adjective? “Better than expected” -NegativeFunctionality is working “fine” or “as expected”“Expected” in future and present

How can I introduce the names of fantasy creatures to the reader?

Etymology of 見舞い

Reflections in a Square

Would I be safe to drive a 23 year old truck for 7 hours / 450 miles?

Why are two-digit numbers in Jonathan Swift's "Gulliver's Travels" (1726) written in "German style"?

How to mute a string and play another at the same time

How to break 信じようとしていただけかも知れない into separate parts?

How to charge percentage of transaction cost?

Assertions In A Mock Callout Test

Why aren't these two solutions equivalent? Combinatorics problem

Recursive calls to a function - why is the address of the parameter passed to it lowering with each call?

A journey... into the MIND

Why doesn't the university give past final exams' answers?

Why does my GNOME settings mention "Moto C Plus"?

Are bags of holding fireproof?

Does the Pact of the Blade warlock feature allow me to customize the properties of the pact weapon I create?

Trying to enter the Fox's den

Why do people think Winterfell crypts is the safest place for women, children & old people?

Can a Knight grant Knighthood to another?

"Destructive force" carried by a B-52?

/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls

How to leave only the following strings?

Are Flameskulls resistant to magical piercing damage?

Why is one lightbulb in a string illuminated?



(un)expected vs. (un)surprising



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern)What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?Repeated vs Repeating“Supposed” versus “expected”“Expected of” vs. “expected from”“Surprising to” vs. “surprising for”How to tell if an adjective is attributive or predicative [EFL context]?Better than expected as an adjective?.comma / surprising / capitalizationWord that describes something that performs as advertised or expectedSingle Adjective? “Better than expected” -NegativeFunctionality is working “fine” or “as expected”“Expected” in future and present



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








0















There's a rule put forth in our textbook for language learners:




  • We use '-ed' adjectives to describe how people feel.


  • We use '-ing' adjectives to describe how something or someone makes people feel.


e.g. The film is very touching. All of us are touched.




However, I'm not sure how to explain why the adjective 'unexpected' doesn't fit the pattern above when a synonym -- 'surprising' -- does.




  • That was surprising.


  • That was unexpected.




I suppose a surprising thing makes people feel surprised, but an unexpected thing doesn't make people feel unexpected.



My hang-up is that I don't want to frame this as merely an exception to a rule when it very well may not be.



How can we explain this? Do we classify these two adjectives differently? Is it simply an exception to a flawed "rule"?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    If you are learning English, you may find our sister site English Language Learners more suited to your needs.

    – TrevorD
    Mar 26 at 1:03






  • 2





    Well, it's not just a one-off exception: that rule is fundamentally flawed. It's more difficult, but more accurate to give a rule that relates the use of -ed vs. -ing to whether the modified noun would be used as the subject or object of the related verb.

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:24












  • Some related questions: What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?, Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?, Repeated vs Repeating

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:28












  • @TrevorD thanks, I did look at that because my students are learners. My assessment was that this question was more suited to the English usage site just judging from the nature of the questions on both site, along with the fact that I'm a native user.

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 1:51











  • @sumelic I suppose you're right about the rule being flawed. As you mention in that other post, there's unintended, unexpected, unsuspected. Are there any other commonalities these words that would explain why they break from this pattern?

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 2:20

















0















There's a rule put forth in our textbook for language learners:




  • We use '-ed' adjectives to describe how people feel.


  • We use '-ing' adjectives to describe how something or someone makes people feel.


e.g. The film is very touching. All of us are touched.




However, I'm not sure how to explain why the adjective 'unexpected' doesn't fit the pattern above when a synonym -- 'surprising' -- does.




  • That was surprising.


  • That was unexpected.




I suppose a surprising thing makes people feel surprised, but an unexpected thing doesn't make people feel unexpected.



My hang-up is that I don't want to frame this as merely an exception to a rule when it very well may not be.



How can we explain this? Do we classify these two adjectives differently? Is it simply an exception to a flawed "rule"?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    If you are learning English, you may find our sister site English Language Learners more suited to your needs.

    – TrevorD
    Mar 26 at 1:03






  • 2





    Well, it's not just a one-off exception: that rule is fundamentally flawed. It's more difficult, but more accurate to give a rule that relates the use of -ed vs. -ing to whether the modified noun would be used as the subject or object of the related verb.

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:24












  • Some related questions: What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?, Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?, Repeated vs Repeating

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:28












  • @TrevorD thanks, I did look at that because my students are learners. My assessment was that this question was more suited to the English usage site just judging from the nature of the questions on both site, along with the fact that I'm a native user.

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 1:51











  • @sumelic I suppose you're right about the rule being flawed. As you mention in that other post, there's unintended, unexpected, unsuspected. Are there any other commonalities these words that would explain why they break from this pattern?

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 2:20













0












0








0


1






There's a rule put forth in our textbook for language learners:




  • We use '-ed' adjectives to describe how people feel.


  • We use '-ing' adjectives to describe how something or someone makes people feel.


e.g. The film is very touching. All of us are touched.




However, I'm not sure how to explain why the adjective 'unexpected' doesn't fit the pattern above when a synonym -- 'surprising' -- does.




  • That was surprising.


  • That was unexpected.




I suppose a surprising thing makes people feel surprised, but an unexpected thing doesn't make people feel unexpected.



My hang-up is that I don't want to frame this as merely an exception to a rule when it very well may not be.



How can we explain this? Do we classify these two adjectives differently? Is it simply an exception to a flawed "rule"?










share|improve this question
















There's a rule put forth in our textbook for language learners:




  • We use '-ed' adjectives to describe how people feel.


  • We use '-ing' adjectives to describe how something or someone makes people feel.


e.g. The film is very touching. All of us are touched.




However, I'm not sure how to explain why the adjective 'unexpected' doesn't fit the pattern above when a synonym -- 'surprising' -- does.




  • That was surprising.


  • That was unexpected.




I suppose a surprising thing makes people feel surprised, but an unexpected thing doesn't make people feel unexpected.



My hang-up is that I don't want to frame this as merely an exception to a rule when it very well may not be.



How can we explain this? Do we classify these two adjectives differently? Is it simply an exception to a flawed "rule"?







word-choice adjectives






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 26 at 1:58







Oiohwah

















asked Mar 26 at 0:43









OiohwahOiohwah

43




43







  • 1





    If you are learning English, you may find our sister site English Language Learners more suited to your needs.

    – TrevorD
    Mar 26 at 1:03






  • 2





    Well, it's not just a one-off exception: that rule is fundamentally flawed. It's more difficult, but more accurate to give a rule that relates the use of -ed vs. -ing to whether the modified noun would be used as the subject or object of the related verb.

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:24












  • Some related questions: What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?, Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?, Repeated vs Repeating

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:28












  • @TrevorD thanks, I did look at that because my students are learners. My assessment was that this question was more suited to the English usage site just judging from the nature of the questions on both site, along with the fact that I'm a native user.

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 1:51











  • @sumelic I suppose you're right about the rule being flawed. As you mention in that other post, there's unintended, unexpected, unsuspected. Are there any other commonalities these words that would explain why they break from this pattern?

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 2:20












  • 1





    If you are learning English, you may find our sister site English Language Learners more suited to your needs.

    – TrevorD
    Mar 26 at 1:03






  • 2





    Well, it's not just a one-off exception: that rule is fundamentally flawed. It's more difficult, but more accurate to give a rule that relates the use of -ed vs. -ing to whether the modified noun would be used as the subject or object of the related verb.

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:24












  • Some related questions: What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?, Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?, Repeated vs Repeating

    – sumelic
    Mar 26 at 1:28












  • @TrevorD thanks, I did look at that because my students are learners. My assessment was that this question was more suited to the English usage site just judging from the nature of the questions on both site, along with the fact that I'm a native user.

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 1:51











  • @sumelic I suppose you're right about the rule being flawed. As you mention in that other post, there's unintended, unexpected, unsuspected. Are there any other commonalities these words that would explain why they break from this pattern?

    – Oiohwah
    Mar 26 at 2:20







1




1





If you are learning English, you may find our sister site English Language Learners more suited to your needs.

– TrevorD
Mar 26 at 1:03





If you are learning English, you may find our sister site English Language Learners more suited to your needs.

– TrevorD
Mar 26 at 1:03




2




2





Well, it's not just a one-off exception: that rule is fundamentally flawed. It's more difficult, but more accurate to give a rule that relates the use of -ed vs. -ing to whether the modified noun would be used as the subject or object of the related verb.

– sumelic
Mar 26 at 1:24






Well, it's not just a one-off exception: that rule is fundamentally flawed. It's more difficult, but more accurate to give a rule that relates the use of -ed vs. -ing to whether the modified noun would be used as the subject or object of the related verb.

– sumelic
Mar 26 at 1:24














Some related questions: What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?, Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?, Repeated vs Repeating

– sumelic
Mar 26 at 1:28






Some related questions: What is the grammatical difference behind “is interesting” and “is interested”?, Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and “boring”, etc?, Repeated vs Repeating

– sumelic
Mar 26 at 1:28














@TrevorD thanks, I did look at that because my students are learners. My assessment was that this question was more suited to the English usage site just judging from the nature of the questions on both site, along with the fact that I'm a native user.

– Oiohwah
Mar 26 at 1:51





@TrevorD thanks, I did look at that because my students are learners. My assessment was that this question was more suited to the English usage site just judging from the nature of the questions on both site, along with the fact that I'm a native user.

– Oiohwah
Mar 26 at 1:51













@sumelic I suppose you're right about the rule being flawed. As you mention in that other post, there's unintended, unexpected, unsuspected. Are there any other commonalities these words that would explain why they break from this pattern?

– Oiohwah
Mar 26 at 2:20





@sumelic I suppose you're right about the rule being flawed. As you mention in that other post, there's unintended, unexpected, unsuspected. Are there any other commonalities these words that would explain why they break from this pattern?

– Oiohwah
Mar 26 at 2:20










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491339%2funexpected-vs-unsurprising%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f491339%2funexpected-vs-unsurprising%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029