Is “…taken to be scholarly authority” missing a preposition or an article?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.











share|improve this question



























  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48


















0















The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.











share|improve this question



























  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48














0












0








0








The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.











share|improve this question
















The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.








word-usage nouns uncountable-nouns countable-nouns






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 18:12









Laurel

36.9k7 gold badges74 silver badges126 bronze badges




36.9k7 gold badges74 silver badges126 bronze badges










asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:11









Eddie KalEddie Kal

2471 silver badge11 bronze badges




2471 silver badge11 bronze badges
















  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48



















  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48

















My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09





My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09













@Lambie Duly noted.

– Eddie Kal
Jan 27 at 4:48





@Lambie Duly noted.

– Eddie Kal
Jan 27 at 4:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478745%2fis-taken-to-be-scholarly-authority-missing-a-preposition-or-an-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09
















0














Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09














0












0








0







Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer













Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:20









tyler1tyler1

1873 bronze badges




1873 bronze badges
















  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09



















  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09

















I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09





I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478745%2fis-taken-to-be-scholarly-authority-missing-a-preposition-or-an-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Bunad

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum