Is “…taken to be scholarly authority” missing a preposition or an article?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.











share|improve this question



























  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48


















0















The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.











share|improve this question



























  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48














0












0








0








The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.











share|improve this question
















The sentence is from Harold Bloom's book Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human.




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be scholarly authority.




I find this sentence strange as it stands, because among the noun authority's multiple meanings, the sense "the power to make decisions or tell people what to do" is uncountable, while the usage "expert" is countable--as corroborated by Cambridge and Macmillan dictionaries. So shouldn't the sentence be either:




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be of scholarly authority.




or




This chronology, necessarily tentative, partly follows what is generally taken to be a scholarly authority.








word-usage nouns uncountable-nouns countable-nouns






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 18:12









Laurel

36.9k7 gold badges74 silver badges126 bronze badges




36.9k7 gold badges74 silver badges126 bronze badges










asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:11









Eddie KalEddie Kal

2471 silver badge11 bronze badges




2471 silver badge11 bronze badges
















  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48



















  • My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09











  • @Lambie Duly noted.

    – Eddie Kal
    Jan 27 at 4:48

















My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09





My advice: prior to questioning a writer such as this, you might want to pause. Anything can be taken to be [any noun]. Scholarly authority is an adjective plus a noun.

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09













@Lambie Duly noted.

– Eddie Kal
Jan 27 at 4:48





@Lambie Duly noted.

– Eddie Kal
Jan 27 at 4:48










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09














Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478745%2fis-taken-to-be-scholarly-authority-missing-a-preposition-or-an-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09
















0














Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer


























  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09














0












0








0







Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.






share|improve this answer













Moneta!



I think that the sentence used in the book is fully correct. This stems from the fact that authority is an uncountable noun just like water or salt. Therefore it doesn't require any articles in the general case. We can construct a similar sentence as follows:
"This liquid is thought of as healthy water."
Here you can see that the uncountability of the water makes this sentence correct.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:20









tyler1tyler1

1873 bronze badges




1873 bronze badges
















  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09



















  • I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

    – Lambie
    Jan 26 at 19:09

















I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09





I would have been worried had it been partially correct....[joke]

– Lambie
Jan 26 at 19:09


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478745%2fis-taken-to-be-scholarly-authority-missing-a-preposition-or-an-article%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029