Are all 'prospects' always 'potential' by their nature?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{
margin-bottom:0;
}








1















When using the word 'prospect' is it ok to combine it with the word 'potential' or is it unnecessary, since all the 'prospects' are indeed always 'potential'?



Can / should we say 'potential prospects' or simply 'prospects' is sufficient and have the same meaning?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    Hello, soocki. These Google Ngram results show that 'potential prospects' isn't used at all often. What do dictionaries say about the meaning of 'prospects': don't they, as you imply, indicate that potentiality is already implied?

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 9:06











  • I am having trouble figuring this out, hence the question. Mind you I am not a native English speaker so the exact nuances of the language are somewhat unfamiliar and unclear. I am trying to figure out if all the 'prospects' are always potential or it can be assumed that some 'prospects' can be taken for granted, which would justify the usage of the word 'potential' in this context.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:15






  • 1





    I think it depends on context. For example, in a corporation I worked for, a 'prospect' was someone you were in contact with that might generate a sale and a 'potential prospect' was someone who might become a prospect (but who you hadn't yet contacted).

    – KillingTime
    May 27 at 9:20











  • The 'prospects' I am referring to are the expected outcomes of a particular project I hope to engage in.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:25













  • @Killing Time Even my wife, who predictably hates my (thankfully not me) foisting the nuances of the English language on her far too frequently, laughed at this unforeseen (to business virgins) complication.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 10:24


















1















When using the word 'prospect' is it ok to combine it with the word 'potential' or is it unnecessary, since all the 'prospects' are indeed always 'potential'?



Can / should we say 'potential prospects' or simply 'prospects' is sufficient and have the same meaning?










share|improve this question






















  • 1





    Hello, soocki. These Google Ngram results show that 'potential prospects' isn't used at all often. What do dictionaries say about the meaning of 'prospects': don't they, as you imply, indicate that potentiality is already implied?

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 9:06











  • I am having trouble figuring this out, hence the question. Mind you I am not a native English speaker so the exact nuances of the language are somewhat unfamiliar and unclear. I am trying to figure out if all the 'prospects' are always potential or it can be assumed that some 'prospects' can be taken for granted, which would justify the usage of the word 'potential' in this context.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:15






  • 1





    I think it depends on context. For example, in a corporation I worked for, a 'prospect' was someone you were in contact with that might generate a sale and a 'potential prospect' was someone who might become a prospect (but who you hadn't yet contacted).

    – KillingTime
    May 27 at 9:20











  • The 'prospects' I am referring to are the expected outcomes of a particular project I hope to engage in.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:25













  • @Killing Time Even my wife, who predictably hates my (thankfully not me) foisting the nuances of the English language on her far too frequently, laughed at this unforeseen (to business virgins) complication.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 10:24














1












1








1








When using the word 'prospect' is it ok to combine it with the word 'potential' or is it unnecessary, since all the 'prospects' are indeed always 'potential'?



Can / should we say 'potential prospects' or simply 'prospects' is sufficient and have the same meaning?










share|improve this question
















When using the word 'prospect' is it ok to combine it with the word 'potential' or is it unnecessary, since all the 'prospects' are indeed always 'potential'?



Can / should we say 'potential prospects' or simply 'prospects' is sufficient and have the same meaning?







synonyms pleonasms






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited May 28 at 10:56







soocki

















asked May 27 at 9:00









soockisoocki

83 bronze badges




83 bronze badges











  • 1





    Hello, soocki. These Google Ngram results show that 'potential prospects' isn't used at all often. What do dictionaries say about the meaning of 'prospects': don't they, as you imply, indicate that potentiality is already implied?

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 9:06











  • I am having trouble figuring this out, hence the question. Mind you I am not a native English speaker so the exact nuances of the language are somewhat unfamiliar and unclear. I am trying to figure out if all the 'prospects' are always potential or it can be assumed that some 'prospects' can be taken for granted, which would justify the usage of the word 'potential' in this context.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:15






  • 1





    I think it depends on context. For example, in a corporation I worked for, a 'prospect' was someone you were in contact with that might generate a sale and a 'potential prospect' was someone who might become a prospect (but who you hadn't yet contacted).

    – KillingTime
    May 27 at 9:20











  • The 'prospects' I am referring to are the expected outcomes of a particular project I hope to engage in.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:25













  • @Killing Time Even my wife, who predictably hates my (thankfully not me) foisting the nuances of the English language on her far too frequently, laughed at this unforeseen (to business virgins) complication.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 10:24














  • 1





    Hello, soocki. These Google Ngram results show that 'potential prospects' isn't used at all often. What do dictionaries say about the meaning of 'prospects': don't they, as you imply, indicate that potentiality is already implied?

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 9:06











  • I am having trouble figuring this out, hence the question. Mind you I am not a native English speaker so the exact nuances of the language are somewhat unfamiliar and unclear. I am trying to figure out if all the 'prospects' are always potential or it can be assumed that some 'prospects' can be taken for granted, which would justify the usage of the word 'potential' in this context.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:15






  • 1





    I think it depends on context. For example, in a corporation I worked for, a 'prospect' was someone you were in contact with that might generate a sale and a 'potential prospect' was someone who might become a prospect (but who you hadn't yet contacted).

    – KillingTime
    May 27 at 9:20











  • The 'prospects' I am referring to are the expected outcomes of a particular project I hope to engage in.

    – soocki
    May 27 at 9:25













  • @Killing Time Even my wife, who predictably hates my (thankfully not me) foisting the nuances of the English language on her far too frequently, laughed at this unforeseen (to business virgins) complication.

    – Edwin Ashworth
    May 27 at 10:24








1




1





Hello, soocki. These Google Ngram results show that 'potential prospects' isn't used at all often. What do dictionaries say about the meaning of 'prospects': don't they, as you imply, indicate that potentiality is already implied?

– Edwin Ashworth
May 27 at 9:06





Hello, soocki. These Google Ngram results show that 'potential prospects' isn't used at all often. What do dictionaries say about the meaning of 'prospects': don't they, as you imply, indicate that potentiality is already implied?

– Edwin Ashworth
May 27 at 9:06













I am having trouble figuring this out, hence the question. Mind you I am not a native English speaker so the exact nuances of the language are somewhat unfamiliar and unclear. I am trying to figure out if all the 'prospects' are always potential or it can be assumed that some 'prospects' can be taken for granted, which would justify the usage of the word 'potential' in this context.

– soocki
May 27 at 9:15





I am having trouble figuring this out, hence the question. Mind you I am not a native English speaker so the exact nuances of the language are somewhat unfamiliar and unclear. I am trying to figure out if all the 'prospects' are always potential or it can be assumed that some 'prospects' can be taken for granted, which would justify the usage of the word 'potential' in this context.

– soocki
May 27 at 9:15




1




1





I think it depends on context. For example, in a corporation I worked for, a 'prospect' was someone you were in contact with that might generate a sale and a 'potential prospect' was someone who might become a prospect (but who you hadn't yet contacted).

– KillingTime
May 27 at 9:20





I think it depends on context. For example, in a corporation I worked for, a 'prospect' was someone you were in contact with that might generate a sale and a 'potential prospect' was someone who might become a prospect (but who you hadn't yet contacted).

– KillingTime
May 27 at 9:20













The 'prospects' I am referring to are the expected outcomes of a particular project I hope to engage in.

– soocki
May 27 at 9:25







The 'prospects' I am referring to are the expected outcomes of a particular project I hope to engage in.

– soocki
May 27 at 9:25















@Killing Time Even my wife, who predictably hates my (thankfully not me) foisting the nuances of the English language on her far too frequently, laughed at this unforeseen (to business virgins) complication.

– Edwin Ashworth
May 27 at 10:24





@Killing Time Even my wife, who predictably hates my (thankfully not me) foisting the nuances of the English language on her far too frequently, laughed at this unforeseen (to business virgins) complication.

– Edwin Ashworth
May 27 at 10:24










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0
















A prospect that is potential is potentially pleonastic.



That is, it is a fine distinction that works if in context there are potential prospects and actual prospects, but outside of any context, all prospects are potential.



Is the idea of 'potential' necessarily part of 'prospect'? No, but it does invoke some quizzical 'Isn't that already potential?'.



If you look at definitions of 'prospect' (where definitions aren't authorities, but are well-studied attempts at capturing meaning in other words), they all mention something having to do with future events. And the future is, implicatively, all potential.



If your boss makes a distinction between potential sales prospects and actual ones, then it's not redundant. Otherwise, 'potential' will be taken as already understood in 'prospect'.






share|improve this answer

































    1
















    While a prospect is a potential customer/client/buyer, a potential prospect is not yet at that stage:




    There are two types of prospects; those that have an identified a need and are therefore potential buyers, and potential prospects who may or may not be viable. Usually you start with potential prospects, prospects that use or could use your product or service, but have no identified need. Through a series of questions, you narrow down the field to true prospects, a percentage you will convert to buyers. — James J. Kolins, Salesman to Superstar: Out Sell, Out Close, Out Earn Your Competition!, 2013.




    Potential prospects can also be called leads:




    Qualifying is the process that allows you to find out whether a lead is actually a prospect. A prospect is someone who has the potential to become a customer. Leads, on the other hand, are just potential prospects. If you don't qualify a lead, you may be wasting your time with someone who literally can't buy from you. — Wendy Connock, “What Is Qualifying?” BalanceCareers.com, 2 Dec. 2018.




    Using the term potential prospects is thus not a tautology and makes a valid distinction between potential and actual prospects who may buy/contract for your goods or services.






    share|improve this answer



























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"u003ecc by-sa 4.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });















      draft saved

      draft discarded
















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499832%2fare-all-prospects-always-potential-by-their-nature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0
















      A prospect that is potential is potentially pleonastic.



      That is, it is a fine distinction that works if in context there are potential prospects and actual prospects, but outside of any context, all prospects are potential.



      Is the idea of 'potential' necessarily part of 'prospect'? No, but it does invoke some quizzical 'Isn't that already potential?'.



      If you look at definitions of 'prospect' (where definitions aren't authorities, but are well-studied attempts at capturing meaning in other words), they all mention something having to do with future events. And the future is, implicatively, all potential.



      If your boss makes a distinction between potential sales prospects and actual ones, then it's not redundant. Otherwise, 'potential' will be taken as already understood in 'prospect'.






      share|improve this answer






























        0
















        A prospect that is potential is potentially pleonastic.



        That is, it is a fine distinction that works if in context there are potential prospects and actual prospects, but outside of any context, all prospects are potential.



        Is the idea of 'potential' necessarily part of 'prospect'? No, but it does invoke some quizzical 'Isn't that already potential?'.



        If you look at definitions of 'prospect' (where definitions aren't authorities, but are well-studied attempts at capturing meaning in other words), they all mention something having to do with future events. And the future is, implicatively, all potential.



        If your boss makes a distinction between potential sales prospects and actual ones, then it's not redundant. Otherwise, 'potential' will be taken as already understood in 'prospect'.






        share|improve this answer




























          0














          0










          0









          A prospect that is potential is potentially pleonastic.



          That is, it is a fine distinction that works if in context there are potential prospects and actual prospects, but outside of any context, all prospects are potential.



          Is the idea of 'potential' necessarily part of 'prospect'? No, but it does invoke some quizzical 'Isn't that already potential?'.



          If you look at definitions of 'prospect' (where definitions aren't authorities, but are well-studied attempts at capturing meaning in other words), they all mention something having to do with future events. And the future is, implicatively, all potential.



          If your boss makes a distinction between potential sales prospects and actual ones, then it's not redundant. Otherwise, 'potential' will be taken as already understood in 'prospect'.






          share|improve this answer













          A prospect that is potential is potentially pleonastic.



          That is, it is a fine distinction that works if in context there are potential prospects and actual prospects, but outside of any context, all prospects are potential.



          Is the idea of 'potential' necessarily part of 'prospect'? No, but it does invoke some quizzical 'Isn't that already potential?'.



          If you look at definitions of 'prospect' (where definitions aren't authorities, but are well-studied attempts at capturing meaning in other words), they all mention something having to do with future events. And the future is, implicatively, all potential.



          If your boss makes a distinction between potential sales prospects and actual ones, then it's not redundant. Otherwise, 'potential' will be taken as already understood in 'prospect'.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 27 at 15:56









          MitchMitch

          55.6k17 gold badges112 silver badges230 bronze badges




          55.6k17 gold badges112 silver badges230 bronze badges




























              1
















              While a prospect is a potential customer/client/buyer, a potential prospect is not yet at that stage:




              There are two types of prospects; those that have an identified a need and are therefore potential buyers, and potential prospects who may or may not be viable. Usually you start with potential prospects, prospects that use or could use your product or service, but have no identified need. Through a series of questions, you narrow down the field to true prospects, a percentage you will convert to buyers. — James J. Kolins, Salesman to Superstar: Out Sell, Out Close, Out Earn Your Competition!, 2013.




              Potential prospects can also be called leads:




              Qualifying is the process that allows you to find out whether a lead is actually a prospect. A prospect is someone who has the potential to become a customer. Leads, on the other hand, are just potential prospects. If you don't qualify a lead, you may be wasting your time with someone who literally can't buy from you. — Wendy Connock, “What Is Qualifying?” BalanceCareers.com, 2 Dec. 2018.




              Using the term potential prospects is thus not a tautology and makes a valid distinction between potential and actual prospects who may buy/contract for your goods or services.






              share|improve this answer






























                1
















                While a prospect is a potential customer/client/buyer, a potential prospect is not yet at that stage:




                There are two types of prospects; those that have an identified a need and are therefore potential buyers, and potential prospects who may or may not be viable. Usually you start with potential prospects, prospects that use or could use your product or service, but have no identified need. Through a series of questions, you narrow down the field to true prospects, a percentage you will convert to buyers. — James J. Kolins, Salesman to Superstar: Out Sell, Out Close, Out Earn Your Competition!, 2013.




                Potential prospects can also be called leads:




                Qualifying is the process that allows you to find out whether a lead is actually a prospect. A prospect is someone who has the potential to become a customer. Leads, on the other hand, are just potential prospects. If you don't qualify a lead, you may be wasting your time with someone who literally can't buy from you. — Wendy Connock, “What Is Qualifying?” BalanceCareers.com, 2 Dec. 2018.




                Using the term potential prospects is thus not a tautology and makes a valid distinction between potential and actual prospects who may buy/contract for your goods or services.






                share|improve this answer




























                  1














                  1










                  1









                  While a prospect is a potential customer/client/buyer, a potential prospect is not yet at that stage:




                  There are two types of prospects; those that have an identified a need and are therefore potential buyers, and potential prospects who may or may not be viable. Usually you start with potential prospects, prospects that use or could use your product or service, but have no identified need. Through a series of questions, you narrow down the field to true prospects, a percentage you will convert to buyers. — James J. Kolins, Salesman to Superstar: Out Sell, Out Close, Out Earn Your Competition!, 2013.




                  Potential prospects can also be called leads:




                  Qualifying is the process that allows you to find out whether a lead is actually a prospect. A prospect is someone who has the potential to become a customer. Leads, on the other hand, are just potential prospects. If you don't qualify a lead, you may be wasting your time with someone who literally can't buy from you. — Wendy Connock, “What Is Qualifying?” BalanceCareers.com, 2 Dec. 2018.




                  Using the term potential prospects is thus not a tautology and makes a valid distinction between potential and actual prospects who may buy/contract for your goods or services.






                  share|improve this answer













                  While a prospect is a potential customer/client/buyer, a potential prospect is not yet at that stage:




                  There are two types of prospects; those that have an identified a need and are therefore potential buyers, and potential prospects who may or may not be viable. Usually you start with potential prospects, prospects that use or could use your product or service, but have no identified need. Through a series of questions, you narrow down the field to true prospects, a percentage you will convert to buyers. — James J. Kolins, Salesman to Superstar: Out Sell, Out Close, Out Earn Your Competition!, 2013.




                  Potential prospects can also be called leads:




                  Qualifying is the process that allows you to find out whether a lead is actually a prospect. A prospect is someone who has the potential to become a customer. Leads, on the other hand, are just potential prospects. If you don't qualify a lead, you may be wasting your time with someone who literally can't buy from you. — Wendy Connock, “What Is Qualifying?” BalanceCareers.com, 2 Dec. 2018.




                  Using the term potential prospects is thus not a tautology and makes a valid distinction between potential and actual prospects who may buy/contract for your goods or services.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered May 27 at 15:33









                  KarlGKarlG

                  26.2k7 gold badges38 silver badges76 bronze badges




                  26.2k7 gold badges38 silver badges76 bronze badges


































                      draft saved

                      draft discarded



















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f499832%2fare-all-prospects-always-potential-by-their-nature%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                      He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                      Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029