Is this the correct explanation of the difference between “excited” and “exciting”, “bored” and...












0















Ok, there are many websites that explain this, but I think they are not clear.



Here is what I came up with:



-the adjective with "-ed" like excited or bored: a person or other animal has received the feeling.



-the adjective with "-ing" like exciting or boring: something is generating the feeling.



Ex: She is bored because she met a boring man.



The party is boring so we are bored.



Is that a correct explanation of the difference between "excited" and "exciting", "bored" and "boring", etc?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Yes, this is correct.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 13:42











  • Exactly right. In fact, the -ed form in this sort of context is sometimes called the passive participle, and the -ing form the active participle, which expresses the same idea.

    – StoneyB
    Jul 11 '15 at 14:53
















0















Ok, there are many websites that explain this, but I think they are not clear.



Here is what I came up with:



-the adjective with "-ed" like excited or bored: a person or other animal has received the feeling.



-the adjective with "-ing" like exciting or boring: something is generating the feeling.



Ex: She is bored because she met a boring man.



The party is boring so we are bored.



Is that a correct explanation of the difference between "excited" and "exciting", "bored" and "boring", etc?










share|improve this question




















  • 1





    Yes, this is correct.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 13:42











  • Exactly right. In fact, the -ed form in this sort of context is sometimes called the passive participle, and the -ing form the active participle, which expresses the same idea.

    – StoneyB
    Jul 11 '15 at 14:53














0












0








0


1






Ok, there are many websites that explain this, but I think they are not clear.



Here is what I came up with:



-the adjective with "-ed" like excited or bored: a person or other animal has received the feeling.



-the adjective with "-ing" like exciting or boring: something is generating the feeling.



Ex: She is bored because she met a boring man.



The party is boring so we are bored.



Is that a correct explanation of the difference between "excited" and "exciting", "bored" and "boring", etc?










share|improve this question
















Ok, there are many websites that explain this, but I think they are not clear.



Here is what I came up with:



-the adjective with "-ed" like excited or bored: a person or other animal has received the feeling.



-the adjective with "-ing" like exciting or boring: something is generating the feeling.



Ex: She is bored because she met a boring man.



The party is boring so we are bored.



Is that a correct explanation of the difference between "excited" and "exciting", "bored" and "boring", etc?







word-usage adjectives participles participial-adjectives






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jul 13 '15 at 8:23









Araucaria

35.6k1071149




35.6k1071149










asked Jul 11 '15 at 13:26









TomTom

2,019134792




2,019134792








  • 1





    Yes, this is correct.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 13:42











  • Exactly right. In fact, the -ed form in this sort of context is sometimes called the passive participle, and the -ing form the active participle, which expresses the same idea.

    – StoneyB
    Jul 11 '15 at 14:53














  • 1





    Yes, this is correct.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 13:42











  • Exactly right. In fact, the -ed form in this sort of context is sometimes called the passive participle, and the -ing form the active participle, which expresses the same idea.

    – StoneyB
    Jul 11 '15 at 14:53








1




1





Yes, this is correct.

– Caleb
Jul 11 '15 at 13:42





Yes, this is correct.

– Caleb
Jul 11 '15 at 13:42













Exactly right. In fact, the -ed form in this sort of context is sometimes called the passive participle, and the -ing form the active participle, which expresses the same idea.

– StoneyB
Jul 11 '15 at 14:53





Exactly right. In fact, the -ed form in this sort of context is sometimes called the passive participle, and the -ing form the active participle, which expresses the same idea.

– StoneyB
Jul 11 '15 at 14:53










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














The Original Poster's explanation is fairly accurate. Here is a more in depth account:



Agents and patients



In the sentence:




  • Bob punched me.


Bob is the person doing the action. In grammar, we say that Bob is the AGENT of the punching action. Me, the person receiving the punches, I'm the PATIENT. I am the recipient of the punching action. Now look at this sentence:




  • I was punched by Bob.


The grammar of this sentence is different, but Bob is still the agent, and I am still the patient of this sentence. Bob is doing the action. The action is being done to me.



Adjectives



Now, some adjectives explain how nouns do things, sometimes to other people or things. Here are some examples:




  • The DJ played annoying music all night.

  • The elephant told us an interesting story.

  • Rain supplies life-giving water to the plants in the forest.


Notice that in these examples the music has the effect of annoying people. The story has the property of interesting people. The water has the property of giving life to other things. These -ING adjectives describe potential actions:




  • annoying, interesting, giving life


The nouns that these adjectives describe, are the potential AGENTS of the actions. In the phrase




  • annoying music


.. the word music describes the agent of the annoying action. ING-adjectives usually describe the AGENTS of the potential action.



However, adjectives ending in -ED are different! This is because ED-adjectives normally describe the PATIENTS of actions.




  • The bored students went to sleep.

  • The excited monkeys started howling.

  • Happy customers are easier to talk to than annoyed customers


In the sentences above, the students didn't bore anybody. Something or somebody bored them. They were the recipients of a boring people action. Similarly, something excited the monkeys. The monkeys didn't excite anybody. In the last sentence, something annoyed the customers. They did not annoy somebody else.



Conclusion





  • annoying habit


  • exciting news


  • *annoyed habit (wrong)


  • *excited news (wrong)





ING adjectives describe the AGENTS of actions. But ED ones describe the PATIENTS of actions. Annoyed habit is wrong, because nothing annoyed the habit! Habits don't have feelings, so it is very difficult to annoy habits! In the same way, "news" doesn't have feelings. We can't excite the news! Of course the news can excite people and habits can annoy people. For this reason, exciting news and annoying habits would be correct.



In other words, the Original Poster is correct.



This is frightenING:



enter image description here



This is frightenED



enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 15:09



















1














Araucaria's answer is accurate as far as it goes, but I wanted to add a bit more.



Things can be patients of many verbs, like finish, polish, cook, bury, so we say e.g. "unfinished work", "polished stone", "cooked food", "buried treasure".



Participles ending in -ed generally can be used whenever the modified noun would be the object of the verb in a sentence. Sometimes, the object of a verb is the recipient of an action, but not all verbs in English work like this. For example, the Wikipedia article on the concept of Patient mentions that a direct object might instead be what is called a "Theme": something that is not affected by the verb.



It's not as easy to find examples of -ed adjectives from verbs like this, but there are a number of ones starting with the negative prefix un- that are fairly commonly used to modify inanimate nouns: unintended consequences, unsuspected power, unexpected arrival, undoubted truth.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "97"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258637%2fis-this-the-correct-explanation-of-the-difference-between-excited-and-excitin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    The Original Poster's explanation is fairly accurate. Here is a more in depth account:



    Agents and patients



    In the sentence:




    • Bob punched me.


    Bob is the person doing the action. In grammar, we say that Bob is the AGENT of the punching action. Me, the person receiving the punches, I'm the PATIENT. I am the recipient of the punching action. Now look at this sentence:




    • I was punched by Bob.


    The grammar of this sentence is different, but Bob is still the agent, and I am still the patient of this sentence. Bob is doing the action. The action is being done to me.



    Adjectives



    Now, some adjectives explain how nouns do things, sometimes to other people or things. Here are some examples:




    • The DJ played annoying music all night.

    • The elephant told us an interesting story.

    • Rain supplies life-giving water to the plants in the forest.


    Notice that in these examples the music has the effect of annoying people. The story has the property of interesting people. The water has the property of giving life to other things. These -ING adjectives describe potential actions:




    • annoying, interesting, giving life


    The nouns that these adjectives describe, are the potential AGENTS of the actions. In the phrase




    • annoying music


    .. the word music describes the agent of the annoying action. ING-adjectives usually describe the AGENTS of the potential action.



    However, adjectives ending in -ED are different! This is because ED-adjectives normally describe the PATIENTS of actions.




    • The bored students went to sleep.

    • The excited monkeys started howling.

    • Happy customers are easier to talk to than annoyed customers


    In the sentences above, the students didn't bore anybody. Something or somebody bored them. They were the recipients of a boring people action. Similarly, something excited the monkeys. The monkeys didn't excite anybody. In the last sentence, something annoyed the customers. They did not annoy somebody else.



    Conclusion





    • annoying habit


    • exciting news


    • *annoyed habit (wrong)


    • *excited news (wrong)





    ING adjectives describe the AGENTS of actions. But ED ones describe the PATIENTS of actions. Annoyed habit is wrong, because nothing annoyed the habit! Habits don't have feelings, so it is very difficult to annoy habits! In the same way, "news" doesn't have feelings. We can't excite the news! Of course the news can excite people and habits can annoy people. For this reason, exciting news and annoying habits would be correct.



    In other words, the Original Poster is correct.



    This is frightenING:



    enter image description here



    This is frightenED



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

      – Caleb
      Jul 11 '15 at 15:09
















    3














    The Original Poster's explanation is fairly accurate. Here is a more in depth account:



    Agents and patients



    In the sentence:




    • Bob punched me.


    Bob is the person doing the action. In grammar, we say that Bob is the AGENT of the punching action. Me, the person receiving the punches, I'm the PATIENT. I am the recipient of the punching action. Now look at this sentence:




    • I was punched by Bob.


    The grammar of this sentence is different, but Bob is still the agent, and I am still the patient of this sentence. Bob is doing the action. The action is being done to me.



    Adjectives



    Now, some adjectives explain how nouns do things, sometimes to other people or things. Here are some examples:




    • The DJ played annoying music all night.

    • The elephant told us an interesting story.

    • Rain supplies life-giving water to the plants in the forest.


    Notice that in these examples the music has the effect of annoying people. The story has the property of interesting people. The water has the property of giving life to other things. These -ING adjectives describe potential actions:




    • annoying, interesting, giving life


    The nouns that these adjectives describe, are the potential AGENTS of the actions. In the phrase




    • annoying music


    .. the word music describes the agent of the annoying action. ING-adjectives usually describe the AGENTS of the potential action.



    However, adjectives ending in -ED are different! This is because ED-adjectives normally describe the PATIENTS of actions.




    • The bored students went to sleep.

    • The excited monkeys started howling.

    • Happy customers are easier to talk to than annoyed customers


    In the sentences above, the students didn't bore anybody. Something or somebody bored them. They were the recipients of a boring people action. Similarly, something excited the monkeys. The monkeys didn't excite anybody. In the last sentence, something annoyed the customers. They did not annoy somebody else.



    Conclusion





    • annoying habit


    • exciting news


    • *annoyed habit (wrong)


    • *excited news (wrong)





    ING adjectives describe the AGENTS of actions. But ED ones describe the PATIENTS of actions. Annoyed habit is wrong, because nothing annoyed the habit! Habits don't have feelings, so it is very difficult to annoy habits! In the same way, "news" doesn't have feelings. We can't excite the news! Of course the news can excite people and habits can annoy people. For this reason, exciting news and annoying habits would be correct.



    In other words, the Original Poster is correct.



    This is frightenING:



    enter image description here



    This is frightenED



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

      – Caleb
      Jul 11 '15 at 15:09














    3












    3








    3







    The Original Poster's explanation is fairly accurate. Here is a more in depth account:



    Agents and patients



    In the sentence:




    • Bob punched me.


    Bob is the person doing the action. In grammar, we say that Bob is the AGENT of the punching action. Me, the person receiving the punches, I'm the PATIENT. I am the recipient of the punching action. Now look at this sentence:




    • I was punched by Bob.


    The grammar of this sentence is different, but Bob is still the agent, and I am still the patient of this sentence. Bob is doing the action. The action is being done to me.



    Adjectives



    Now, some adjectives explain how nouns do things, sometimes to other people or things. Here are some examples:




    • The DJ played annoying music all night.

    • The elephant told us an interesting story.

    • Rain supplies life-giving water to the plants in the forest.


    Notice that in these examples the music has the effect of annoying people. The story has the property of interesting people. The water has the property of giving life to other things. These -ING adjectives describe potential actions:




    • annoying, interesting, giving life


    The nouns that these adjectives describe, are the potential AGENTS of the actions. In the phrase




    • annoying music


    .. the word music describes the agent of the annoying action. ING-adjectives usually describe the AGENTS of the potential action.



    However, adjectives ending in -ED are different! This is because ED-adjectives normally describe the PATIENTS of actions.




    • The bored students went to sleep.

    • The excited monkeys started howling.

    • Happy customers are easier to talk to than annoyed customers


    In the sentences above, the students didn't bore anybody. Something or somebody bored them. They were the recipients of a boring people action. Similarly, something excited the monkeys. The monkeys didn't excite anybody. In the last sentence, something annoyed the customers. They did not annoy somebody else.



    Conclusion





    • annoying habit


    • exciting news


    • *annoyed habit (wrong)


    • *excited news (wrong)





    ING adjectives describe the AGENTS of actions. But ED ones describe the PATIENTS of actions. Annoyed habit is wrong, because nothing annoyed the habit! Habits don't have feelings, so it is very difficult to annoy habits! In the same way, "news" doesn't have feelings. We can't excite the news! Of course the news can excite people and habits can annoy people. For this reason, exciting news and annoying habits would be correct.



    In other words, the Original Poster is correct.



    This is frightenING:



    enter image description here



    This is frightenED



    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer















    The Original Poster's explanation is fairly accurate. Here is a more in depth account:



    Agents and patients



    In the sentence:




    • Bob punched me.


    Bob is the person doing the action. In grammar, we say that Bob is the AGENT of the punching action. Me, the person receiving the punches, I'm the PATIENT. I am the recipient of the punching action. Now look at this sentence:




    • I was punched by Bob.


    The grammar of this sentence is different, but Bob is still the agent, and I am still the patient of this sentence. Bob is doing the action. The action is being done to me.



    Adjectives



    Now, some adjectives explain how nouns do things, sometimes to other people or things. Here are some examples:




    • The DJ played annoying music all night.

    • The elephant told us an interesting story.

    • Rain supplies life-giving water to the plants in the forest.


    Notice that in these examples the music has the effect of annoying people. The story has the property of interesting people. The water has the property of giving life to other things. These -ING adjectives describe potential actions:




    • annoying, interesting, giving life


    The nouns that these adjectives describe, are the potential AGENTS of the actions. In the phrase




    • annoying music


    .. the word music describes the agent of the annoying action. ING-adjectives usually describe the AGENTS of the potential action.



    However, adjectives ending in -ED are different! This is because ED-adjectives normally describe the PATIENTS of actions.




    • The bored students went to sleep.

    • The excited monkeys started howling.

    • Happy customers are easier to talk to than annoyed customers


    In the sentences above, the students didn't bore anybody. Something or somebody bored them. They were the recipients of a boring people action. Similarly, something excited the monkeys. The monkeys didn't excite anybody. In the last sentence, something annoyed the customers. They did not annoy somebody else.



    Conclusion





    • annoying habit


    • exciting news


    • *annoyed habit (wrong)


    • *excited news (wrong)





    ING adjectives describe the AGENTS of actions. But ED ones describe the PATIENTS of actions. Annoyed habit is wrong, because nothing annoyed the habit! Habits don't have feelings, so it is very difficult to annoy habits! In the same way, "news" doesn't have feelings. We can't excite the news! Of course the news can excite people and habits can annoy people. For this reason, exciting news and annoying habits would be correct.



    In other words, the Original Poster is correct.



    This is frightenING:



    enter image description here



    This is frightenED



    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 11 hours ago

























    answered Jul 11 '15 at 14:55









    AraucariaAraucaria

    35.6k1071149




    35.6k1071149








    • 1





      +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

      – Caleb
      Jul 11 '15 at 15:09














    • 1





      +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

      – Caleb
      Jul 11 '15 at 15:09








    1




    1





    +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 15:09





    +1, as much for the direction of the child's eyes as the elegance of the answer.

    – Caleb
    Jul 11 '15 at 15:09













    1














    Araucaria's answer is accurate as far as it goes, but I wanted to add a bit more.



    Things can be patients of many verbs, like finish, polish, cook, bury, so we say e.g. "unfinished work", "polished stone", "cooked food", "buried treasure".



    Participles ending in -ed generally can be used whenever the modified noun would be the object of the verb in a sentence. Sometimes, the object of a verb is the recipient of an action, but not all verbs in English work like this. For example, the Wikipedia article on the concept of Patient mentions that a direct object might instead be what is called a "Theme": something that is not affected by the verb.



    It's not as easy to find examples of -ed adjectives from verbs like this, but there are a number of ones starting with the negative prefix un- that are fairly commonly used to modify inanimate nouns: unintended consequences, unsuspected power, unexpected arrival, undoubted truth.






    share|improve this answer




























      1














      Araucaria's answer is accurate as far as it goes, but I wanted to add a bit more.



      Things can be patients of many verbs, like finish, polish, cook, bury, so we say e.g. "unfinished work", "polished stone", "cooked food", "buried treasure".



      Participles ending in -ed generally can be used whenever the modified noun would be the object of the verb in a sentence. Sometimes, the object of a verb is the recipient of an action, but not all verbs in English work like this. For example, the Wikipedia article on the concept of Patient mentions that a direct object might instead be what is called a "Theme": something that is not affected by the verb.



      It's not as easy to find examples of -ed adjectives from verbs like this, but there are a number of ones starting with the negative prefix un- that are fairly commonly used to modify inanimate nouns: unintended consequences, unsuspected power, unexpected arrival, undoubted truth.






      share|improve this answer


























        1












        1








        1







        Araucaria's answer is accurate as far as it goes, but I wanted to add a bit more.



        Things can be patients of many verbs, like finish, polish, cook, bury, so we say e.g. "unfinished work", "polished stone", "cooked food", "buried treasure".



        Participles ending in -ed generally can be used whenever the modified noun would be the object of the verb in a sentence. Sometimes, the object of a verb is the recipient of an action, but not all verbs in English work like this. For example, the Wikipedia article on the concept of Patient mentions that a direct object might instead be what is called a "Theme": something that is not affected by the verb.



        It's not as easy to find examples of -ed adjectives from verbs like this, but there are a number of ones starting with the negative prefix un- that are fairly commonly used to modify inanimate nouns: unintended consequences, unsuspected power, unexpected arrival, undoubted truth.






        share|improve this answer













        Araucaria's answer is accurate as far as it goes, but I wanted to add a bit more.



        Things can be patients of many verbs, like finish, polish, cook, bury, so we say e.g. "unfinished work", "polished stone", "cooked food", "buried treasure".



        Participles ending in -ed generally can be used whenever the modified noun would be the object of the verb in a sentence. Sometimes, the object of a verb is the recipient of an action, but not all verbs in English work like this. For example, the Wikipedia article on the concept of Patient mentions that a direct object might instead be what is called a "Theme": something that is not affected by the verb.



        It's not as easy to find examples of -ed adjectives from verbs like this, but there are a number of ones starting with the negative prefix un- that are fairly commonly used to modify inanimate nouns: unintended consequences, unsuspected power, unexpected arrival, undoubted truth.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 21 hours ago









        sumelicsumelic

        50.1k8118226




        50.1k8118226






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f258637%2fis-this-the-correct-explanation-of-the-difference-between-excited-and-excitin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029