Are Warlocks Arcane or Divine? Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraCan Yew Wands be used as a focus for both druids and wizards?Do D&D 3.5e's Warlocks always source their power from a pact?What is a “spellcaster” for the purpose of magic item attunement?Relations between types of sources of magicDo clerics, paladins, and warlocks gain level ups from their own power, or from their patrons or gods?Can you use a Spellcasting spell slot to Eldritch Smite?Can a character without caster levels learn a metamagic feat?Is there anything preventing warlocks from learning and casting invocations listed in warlock prestige classes?What are the impacts of changing a Ranger's spellcasting ability?How unbalanced would a feat that allowed access to other spell lists be?Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?

What's parked in Mil Moscow helicopter plant?

Was Objective-C really a hindrance to Apple software development?

Bright yellow or light yellow?

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?

RIP Packet Format

What is /etc/mtab in Linux?

France's Public Holidays' Puzzle

Why isn't everyone flabbergasted about Bran's "gift"?

TV series episode where humans nuke aliens before decrypting their message that states they come in peace

How would it unbalance gameplay to rule that Weapon Master allows for picking a fighting style?

How do I deal with an erroneously large refund?

Simulate round-robin tournament draw

Is it accepted to use working hours to read general interest books?

What were wait-states, and why was it only an issue for PCs?

Will I be more secure with my own router behind my ISP's router?

How did Elite on the NES work?

What do you call an IPA symbol that lacks a name (e.g. ɲ)?

Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?

What is a 'Key' in computer science?

When speaking, how do you change your mind mid-sentence?

What is the definining line between a helicopter and a drone a person can ride in?

Co-worker works way more than he should

Processing ADC conversion result: DMA vs Processor Registers

Suing a Police Officer Instead of the Police Department



Are Warlocks Arcane or Divine?



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraCan Yew Wands be used as a focus for both druids and wizards?Do D&D 3.5e's Warlocks always source their power from a pact?What is a “spellcaster” for the purpose of magic item attunement?Relations between types of sources of magicDo clerics, paladins, and warlocks gain level ups from their own power, or from their patrons or gods?Can you use a Spellcasting spell slot to Eldritch Smite?Can a character without caster levels learn a metamagic feat?Is there anything preventing warlocks from learning and casting invocations listed in warlock prestige classes?What are the impacts of changing a Ranger's spellcasting ability?How unbalanced would a feat that allowed access to other spell lists be?Do these spellcasting foci from Xanathar's Guide to Everything have to be held in a hand?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








18












$begingroup$


This question recently came up in one of my sessions. Are Warlocks considered Arcane or Divine? There is a magic item, Dark Shard Amulet that is for Warlocks and it requires an Arcana check to use.



However, the magic a warlock uses is granted from a patron. So, wouldn't the warlock be a divine caster like the Cleric or Paladin?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you asking rules-wise or lore-wise?
    $endgroup$
    – Peregrine Lennert
    Mar 25 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PeregrineLennert I would accept either answer. We would go with whichever the DM finds to suit his campaign better.
    $endgroup$
    – Eternallord66
    Mar 25 at 17:01

















18












$begingroup$


This question recently came up in one of my sessions. Are Warlocks considered Arcane or Divine? There is a magic item, Dark Shard Amulet that is for Warlocks and it requires an Arcana check to use.



However, the magic a warlock uses is granted from a patron. So, wouldn't the warlock be a divine caster like the Cleric or Paladin?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you asking rules-wise or lore-wise?
    $endgroup$
    – Peregrine Lennert
    Mar 25 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PeregrineLennert I would accept either answer. We would go with whichever the DM finds to suit his campaign better.
    $endgroup$
    – Eternallord66
    Mar 25 at 17:01













18












18








18


1



$begingroup$


This question recently came up in one of my sessions. Are Warlocks considered Arcane or Divine? There is a magic item, Dark Shard Amulet that is for Warlocks and it requires an Arcana check to use.



However, the magic a warlock uses is granted from a patron. So, wouldn't the warlock be a divine caster like the Cleric or Paladin?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




This question recently came up in one of my sessions. Are Warlocks considered Arcane or Divine? There is a magic item, Dark Shard Amulet that is for Warlocks and it requires an Arcana check to use.



However, the magic a warlock uses is granted from a patron. So, wouldn't the warlock be a divine caster like the Cleric or Paladin?







dnd-5e magic warlock






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 21:51







Eternallord66

















asked Mar 25 at 16:52









Eternallord66Eternallord66

1,077833




1,077833







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you asking rules-wise or lore-wise?
    $endgroup$
    – Peregrine Lennert
    Mar 25 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PeregrineLennert I would accept either answer. We would go with whichever the DM finds to suit his campaign better.
    $endgroup$
    – Eternallord66
    Mar 25 at 17:01












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you asking rules-wise or lore-wise?
    $endgroup$
    – Peregrine Lennert
    Mar 25 at 17:00






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @PeregrineLennert I would accept either answer. We would go with whichever the DM finds to suit his campaign better.
    $endgroup$
    – Eternallord66
    Mar 25 at 17:01







2




2




$begingroup$
Are you asking rules-wise or lore-wise?
$endgroup$
– Peregrine Lennert
Mar 25 at 17:00




$begingroup$
Are you asking rules-wise or lore-wise?
$endgroup$
– Peregrine Lennert
Mar 25 at 17:00




1




1




$begingroup$
@PeregrineLennert I would accept either answer. We would go with whichever the DM finds to suit his campaign better.
$endgroup$
– Eternallord66
Mar 25 at 17:01




$begingroup$
@PeregrineLennert I would accept either answer. We would go with whichever the DM finds to suit his campaign better.
$endgroup$
– Eternallord66
Mar 25 at 17:01










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















42












$begingroup$

5th Edition doesn't have a [mechanical] distinction between Arcane and Divine spellcasting



Each spellcasting class has different rules regarding what is allowed to be used as their spellcasting focus, and Warlocks (and Sorcerers and Wizards) are allowed to use an "Arcane Focus" as their spellcasting, suggesting that they constitute Arcane spellcasters. This is also confirmed by the Lore provided in the Weave of Magic blurb found in the player's handbook:




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic. These spells rely on an understanding—learned or intuitive—of the workings of the Weave. The caster plucks directly at the strands of the Weave to create the desired effect. Eldritch knights and arcane tricksters also use arcane magic. The spells of clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers are called divine magic. These spellcasters' access to the Weave is mediated by divine power—gods, the divine forces of nature, or the sacred weight of a paladin's oath.



The Weave of Magic, PHB, pg. 205




But mechanically, this doesn't matter. There's no such thing as "Arcane Spells" or "Divine Spells" in 5th Edition D&D, with any kind of mechanical impact on how the spell is cast or how it functions. Spells are just spells, and individual classes have individual rules regarding how they cast spells and which spells they're allowed to learn and how they "prepare" spells (if they prepare spells at all).



The Dark Shard Amulet calls for an "Arcana" check, not an "Arcane" check



Arcana is a skill that a character may or may not have proficiency in, that usually (though not always; see PHB pg. 175, Variant: Skills with Different Abilities) is based on a character's Intelligence score. This skill is accessible to any class in the game. So if you attempt to use the feature of the Dark Shard Amulet, you're called upon to perform an Intelligence check that allows you to use your Arcana skill proficiency, if you have it, in order to perform the Cantrip you don't already know. The happenstance of the source of your magic being Arcane (or not) is immaterial.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:06






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:10










  • $begingroup$
    @Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:12







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:14


















25












$begingroup$

Warlocks are Arcane Casters



This is answered in the Weave of Magic sidebar in the Spellcasting section of the Basic Rules (or Player's Handbook; emphasis mine):




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Rotenberg
    Mar 26 at 4:49











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143888%2fare-warlocks-arcane-or-divine%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









42












$begingroup$

5th Edition doesn't have a [mechanical] distinction between Arcane and Divine spellcasting



Each spellcasting class has different rules regarding what is allowed to be used as their spellcasting focus, and Warlocks (and Sorcerers and Wizards) are allowed to use an "Arcane Focus" as their spellcasting, suggesting that they constitute Arcane spellcasters. This is also confirmed by the Lore provided in the Weave of Magic blurb found in the player's handbook:




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic. These spells rely on an understanding—learned or intuitive—of the workings of the Weave. The caster plucks directly at the strands of the Weave to create the desired effect. Eldritch knights and arcane tricksters also use arcane magic. The spells of clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers are called divine magic. These spellcasters' access to the Weave is mediated by divine power—gods, the divine forces of nature, or the sacred weight of a paladin's oath.



The Weave of Magic, PHB, pg. 205




But mechanically, this doesn't matter. There's no such thing as "Arcane Spells" or "Divine Spells" in 5th Edition D&D, with any kind of mechanical impact on how the spell is cast or how it functions. Spells are just spells, and individual classes have individual rules regarding how they cast spells and which spells they're allowed to learn and how they "prepare" spells (if they prepare spells at all).



The Dark Shard Amulet calls for an "Arcana" check, not an "Arcane" check



Arcana is a skill that a character may or may not have proficiency in, that usually (though not always; see PHB pg. 175, Variant: Skills with Different Abilities) is based on a character's Intelligence score. This skill is accessible to any class in the game. So if you attempt to use the feature of the Dark Shard Amulet, you're called upon to perform an Intelligence check that allows you to use your Arcana skill proficiency, if you have it, in order to perform the Cantrip you don't already know. The happenstance of the source of your magic being Arcane (or not) is immaterial.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:06






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:10










  • $begingroup$
    @Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:12







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:14















42












$begingroup$

5th Edition doesn't have a [mechanical] distinction between Arcane and Divine spellcasting



Each spellcasting class has different rules regarding what is allowed to be used as their spellcasting focus, and Warlocks (and Sorcerers and Wizards) are allowed to use an "Arcane Focus" as their spellcasting, suggesting that they constitute Arcane spellcasters. This is also confirmed by the Lore provided in the Weave of Magic blurb found in the player's handbook:




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic. These spells rely on an understanding—learned or intuitive—of the workings of the Weave. The caster plucks directly at the strands of the Weave to create the desired effect. Eldritch knights and arcane tricksters also use arcane magic. The spells of clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers are called divine magic. These spellcasters' access to the Weave is mediated by divine power—gods, the divine forces of nature, or the sacred weight of a paladin's oath.



The Weave of Magic, PHB, pg. 205




But mechanically, this doesn't matter. There's no such thing as "Arcane Spells" or "Divine Spells" in 5th Edition D&D, with any kind of mechanical impact on how the spell is cast or how it functions. Spells are just spells, and individual classes have individual rules regarding how they cast spells and which spells they're allowed to learn and how they "prepare" spells (if they prepare spells at all).



The Dark Shard Amulet calls for an "Arcana" check, not an "Arcane" check



Arcana is a skill that a character may or may not have proficiency in, that usually (though not always; see PHB pg. 175, Variant: Skills with Different Abilities) is based on a character's Intelligence score. This skill is accessible to any class in the game. So if you attempt to use the feature of the Dark Shard Amulet, you're called upon to perform an Intelligence check that allows you to use your Arcana skill proficiency, if you have it, in order to perform the Cantrip you don't already know. The happenstance of the source of your magic being Arcane (or not) is immaterial.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:06






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:10










  • $begingroup$
    @Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:12







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:14













42












42








42





$begingroup$

5th Edition doesn't have a [mechanical] distinction between Arcane and Divine spellcasting



Each spellcasting class has different rules regarding what is allowed to be used as their spellcasting focus, and Warlocks (and Sorcerers and Wizards) are allowed to use an "Arcane Focus" as their spellcasting, suggesting that they constitute Arcane spellcasters. This is also confirmed by the Lore provided in the Weave of Magic blurb found in the player's handbook:




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic. These spells rely on an understanding—learned or intuitive—of the workings of the Weave. The caster plucks directly at the strands of the Weave to create the desired effect. Eldritch knights and arcane tricksters also use arcane magic. The spells of clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers are called divine magic. These spellcasters' access to the Weave is mediated by divine power—gods, the divine forces of nature, or the sacred weight of a paladin's oath.



The Weave of Magic, PHB, pg. 205




But mechanically, this doesn't matter. There's no such thing as "Arcane Spells" or "Divine Spells" in 5th Edition D&D, with any kind of mechanical impact on how the spell is cast or how it functions. Spells are just spells, and individual classes have individual rules regarding how they cast spells and which spells they're allowed to learn and how they "prepare" spells (if they prepare spells at all).



The Dark Shard Amulet calls for an "Arcana" check, not an "Arcane" check



Arcana is a skill that a character may or may not have proficiency in, that usually (though not always; see PHB pg. 175, Variant: Skills with Different Abilities) is based on a character's Intelligence score. This skill is accessible to any class in the game. So if you attempt to use the feature of the Dark Shard Amulet, you're called upon to perform an Intelligence check that allows you to use your Arcana skill proficiency, if you have it, in order to perform the Cantrip you don't already know. The happenstance of the source of your magic being Arcane (or not) is immaterial.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



5th Edition doesn't have a [mechanical] distinction between Arcane and Divine spellcasting



Each spellcasting class has different rules regarding what is allowed to be used as their spellcasting focus, and Warlocks (and Sorcerers and Wizards) are allowed to use an "Arcane Focus" as their spellcasting, suggesting that they constitute Arcane spellcasters. This is also confirmed by the Lore provided in the Weave of Magic blurb found in the player's handbook:




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic. These spells rely on an understanding—learned or intuitive—of the workings of the Weave. The caster plucks directly at the strands of the Weave to create the desired effect. Eldritch knights and arcane tricksters also use arcane magic. The spells of clerics, druids, paladins, and rangers are called divine magic. These spellcasters' access to the Weave is mediated by divine power—gods, the divine forces of nature, or the sacred weight of a paladin's oath.



The Weave of Magic, PHB, pg. 205




But mechanically, this doesn't matter. There's no such thing as "Arcane Spells" or "Divine Spells" in 5th Edition D&D, with any kind of mechanical impact on how the spell is cast or how it functions. Spells are just spells, and individual classes have individual rules regarding how they cast spells and which spells they're allowed to learn and how they "prepare" spells (if they prepare spells at all).



The Dark Shard Amulet calls for an "Arcana" check, not an "Arcane" check



Arcana is a skill that a character may or may not have proficiency in, that usually (though not always; see PHB pg. 175, Variant: Skills with Different Abilities) is based on a character's Intelligence score. This skill is accessible to any class in the game. So if you attempt to use the feature of the Dark Shard Amulet, you're called upon to perform an Intelligence check that allows you to use your Arcana skill proficiency, if you have it, in order to perform the Cantrip you don't already know. The happenstance of the source of your magic being Arcane (or not) is immaterial.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 25 at 23:58

























answered Mar 25 at 17:05









XiremaXirema

25k370147




25k370147







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:06






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:10










  • $begingroup$
    @Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:12







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:14












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:06






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:10










  • $begingroup$
    @Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    Mar 25 at 17:12







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
    $endgroup$
    – Sdjz
    Mar 25 at 17:14







1




1




$begingroup$
Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 25 at 17:06




$begingroup$
Wouldn't a mechanical distinction be the type of focus you can use?
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 25 at 17:06




4




4




$begingroup$
@NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Mar 25 at 17:10




$begingroup$
@NautArch There is the possibility of using "arcane focus", "holy symbol", "druidic focus" or "musical instrument" which seems to be different from an arcane/divine split
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Mar 25 at 17:10












$begingroup$
@Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 25 at 17:12





$begingroup$
@Sdjz Maybe, but each focus is related to those classes, and Warlocks are only offered one of them.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
Mar 25 at 17:12





5




5




$begingroup$
@NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Mar 25 at 17:14




$begingroup$
@NautArch That's fair, though I do think it is also fair to say that it isn't really much of a "mechanical distinction", perhaps relaxing the wording to something like "there is little distinction" then
$endgroup$
– Sdjz
Mar 25 at 17:14













25












$begingroup$

Warlocks are Arcane Casters



This is answered in the Weave of Magic sidebar in the Spellcasting section of the Basic Rules (or Player's Handbook; emphasis mine):




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Rotenberg
    Mar 26 at 4:49















25












$begingroup$

Warlocks are Arcane Casters



This is answered in the Weave of Magic sidebar in the Spellcasting section of the Basic Rules (or Player's Handbook; emphasis mine):




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Rotenberg
    Mar 26 at 4:49













25












25








25





$begingroup$

Warlocks are Arcane Casters



This is answered in the Weave of Magic sidebar in the Spellcasting section of the Basic Rules (or Player's Handbook; emphasis mine):




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic.







share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Warlocks are Arcane Casters



This is answered in the Weave of Magic sidebar in the Spellcasting section of the Basic Rules (or Player's Handbook; emphasis mine):




All magic depends on the Weave, though different kinds of magic access it in a variety of ways. The spells of wizards, warlocks, sorcerers, and bards are commonly called arcane magic.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 25 at 17:14

























answered Mar 25 at 17:09









David CoffronDavid Coffron

40.7k3139291




40.7k3139291







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Rotenberg
    Mar 26 at 4:49












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Rotenberg
    Mar 26 at 4:49







1




1




$begingroup$
Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Rotenberg
Mar 26 at 4:49




$begingroup$
Here is an interview with Jeremy Crawford where he describes, among other things, why warlocks are considered arcane casters and not divine casters even though they get their power through a patron.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Rotenberg
Mar 26 at 4:49

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143888%2fare-warlocks-arcane-or-divine%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029