Left multiplication is homeomorphism of topological groups Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraGroup topology and free topological groupsAxiomatizing topology through continuous mapsUniform continuity of scalar multiplication in topological vector spacesCusp is homeomorphic to $mathbbR^n=1$Are topological fiber bundles on the same base with homeomorphic fibers isomorphic?Topological group of units of a topological ringOne-point compactification of disjoint union is homeomorphic to wedge sum of one-point compactificationsQuotient map from topological group onto left cosets is openProve that the map $nmapsto 1/n, infty mapsto 0$ is a homeomorphismMaking the subgroup of units of a topological ring a topological group

All ASCII characters with a given bit count

When I export an AI 300x60 art board it saves with bigger dimensions

How was Lagrange appointed professor of mathematics so early?

My admission is revoked after accepting the admission offer

Like totally amazing interchangeable sister outfit accessory swapping or whatever

How long can a nation maintain a technological edge over the rest of the world?

Will I lose my paid in full property

false 'Security alert' from Google - every login generates mails from 'no-reply@accounts.google.com'

Are these square matrices always diagonalisable?

What is the purpose of the side handle on a hand ("eggbeater") drill?

What is ls Largest Number Formed by only moving two sticks in 508?

Page Layouts : 1 column , 2 columns-left , 2 columns-right , 3 column

Married in secret, can marital status in passport be changed at a later date?

Why did Europeans not widely domesticate foxes?

/bin/ls sorts differently than just ls

What's called a person who works as someone who puts products on shelves in stores?

How would it unbalance gameplay to rule that Weapon Master allows for picking a fighting style?

Putting Ant-Man on house arrest

Does Prince Arnaud cause someone holding the Princess to lose?

Does a Draconic Bloodline sorcerer's doubled proficiency bonus for Charisma checks against dragons apply to all dragon types or only the chosen one?

Arriving in Atlanta after US Preclearance in Dublin. Will I go through TSA security in Atlanta to transfer to a connecting flight?

Where to find documentation for `whois` command options?

Why did Israel vote against lifting the American embargo on Cuba?

Did war bonds have better investment alternatives during WWII?



Left multiplication is homeomorphism of topological groups



Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar ManaraGroup topology and free topological groupsAxiomatizing topology through continuous mapsUniform continuity of scalar multiplication in topological vector spacesCusp is homeomorphic to $mathbbR^n=1$Are topological fiber bundles on the same base with homeomorphic fibers isomorphic?Topological group of units of a topological ringOne-point compactification of disjoint union is homeomorphic to wedge sum of one-point compactificationsQuotient map from topological group onto left cosets is openProve that the map $nmapsto 1/n, infty mapsto 0$ is a homeomorphismMaking the subgroup of units of a topological ring a topological group










2












$begingroup$


This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52















2












$begingroup$


This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52













2












2








2





$begingroup$


This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




This is a very simple question involving basic definitions.
I want to prove that if $G$ is a topological group, left multiplication $f_acolon gmapsto ag$ is a homeomorphism of $G$.
Clearly, this map is bijective and it sufficies to show its continuity.



To prove continuity, if $U(ag)$ is an open nhbd of $agin G$, there are open nhbds $V(a)$, $W(g)$ s.t. $V(a)W(g)subseteq U(ag)$, from which I get $aW(g)subseteq U(ag)$.



Here I stuck. Can I conclude it is open? If yes, why?



Thank you in advance for your help.







general-topology continuity topological-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Mar 25 at 15:53







LBJFS

















asked Mar 25 at 15:24









LBJFSLBJFS

416213




416213







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:28







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:47






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And this is straightforward
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    Mar 25 at 15:50










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much!
    $endgroup$
    – LBJFS
    Mar 25 at 15:52







1




1




$begingroup$
Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:28





$begingroup$
Just notice left multiplication is a restiction of the multiplication function to the subspace $atimes G$
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:28





1




1




$begingroup$
In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:47




$begingroup$
In the end, it sufficies to notice that the restriction of a continuous function is continuous.
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:47




1




1




$begingroup$
And this is straightforward
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:50




$begingroup$
And this is straightforward
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
Mar 25 at 15:50












$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:52




$begingroup$
Thank you very much!
$endgroup$
– LBJFS
Mar 25 at 15:52










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Hint:



For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    2












    $begingroup$

    The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



    And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



    Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      2












      $begingroup$

      This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



      Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



      Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



      Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



      Together, we have the desired result.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
        $endgroup$
        – LBJFS
        Mar 25 at 16:05










      • $begingroup$
        I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
        $endgroup$
        – tomasz
        Mar 25 at 16:54










      • $begingroup$
        @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
        $endgroup$
        – user458276
        Mar 25 at 23:11










      • $begingroup$
        I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
        $endgroup$
        – tomasz
        Mar 26 at 11:41



















      1












      $begingroup$

      Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



      Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161917%2fleft-multiplication-is-homeomorphism-of-topological-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3












        $begingroup$

        Hint:



        For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          3












          $begingroup$

          Hint:



          For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            3












            3








            3





            $begingroup$

            Hint:



            For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Hint:



            For a topological group $G $, the map $f:G×Gto G $ sending $(x,y) $ to $xcdot y $ is continuous. Now $f_a $ is nothing but $f $ restricted to $a×G $. So what can you conclude?







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Mar 25 at 15:29









            Thomas ShelbyThomas Shelby

            4,8082727




            4,8082727





















                2












                $begingroup$

                The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                  And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                  Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    2












                    2








                    2





                    $begingroup$

                    The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                    And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                    Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    The map $f_a$ is continuous because, by the definition of topological group, the multiplication is continuous.



                    And the inverse of $f_a$ is $f_a^-1$, which is continuous by the same reason.



                    Therefore, $f_a$ is a homeomorphism.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered Mar 25 at 15:26









                    José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

                    177k24138250




                    177k24138250





















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41
















                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41














                        2












                        2








                        2





                        $begingroup$

                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        This is essentially rephrasing the other answer, but in a Category Theoretic perspective:



                        Let Top be the category of Topological Spaces and continuous maps. A group object in Top is a topological group, ie. a topological space equipped with continuous maps $m:Gtimes Grightarrow G$, $1:*rightarrow G$, and $(-)^-1:Grightarrow G$ expressing multiplication, identity, and inversion.



                        Since $Gtimes G$ is the product of topological spaces, it is equipped with continuous projections $pi_G:Gtimes Grightarrow G$ mapping $(g,h)mapsto g.$



                        Furthermore, a group G considered as a category is a category where the only object is the group $G$, and morphisms are left (or right - left is what's relevant here) multiplication by elements of $G$. These are isomorphisms since the coset $gG = G$.



                        Together, we have the desired result.







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited Mar 25 at 23:11

























                        answered Mar 25 at 16:01









                        user458276user458276

                        7431315




                        7431315











                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41

















                        • $begingroup$
                          I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                          $endgroup$
                          – LBJFS
                          Mar 25 at 16:05










                        • $begingroup$
                          I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 25 at 16:54










                        • $begingroup$
                          @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user458276
                          Mar 25 at 23:11










                        • $begingroup$
                          I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                          $endgroup$
                          – tomasz
                          Mar 26 at 11:41
















                        $begingroup$
                        I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – LBJFS
                        Mar 25 at 16:05




                        $begingroup$
                        I don't know category theory, but I love different perspectives! Thank you very much.
                        $endgroup$
                        – LBJFS
                        Mar 25 at 16:05












                        $begingroup$
                        I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 25 at 16:54




                        $begingroup$
                        I'm not a category theorist, but I like to think that I'm fairly familiar with the basics. Yet I do not see how the facts you stated give the result. Could you elaborate?
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 25 at 16:54












                        $begingroup$
                        @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user458276
                        Mar 25 at 23:11




                        $begingroup$
                        @tomasz I elaborated a bit. Hopefully this makes more sense.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user458276
                        Mar 25 at 23:11












                        $begingroup$
                        I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 26 at 11:41





                        $begingroup$
                        I still don't see how it helps. You just added a bunch of defintions (all of which I've known before). The important point here is that the map $Gto G^2$, $gmapsto (a,g)$ is a morphism. I don't see how it follows. I mean, it would seem reasonable if it did (it would be desirable if for any group object in any concrete category, translation was a morphism), but I don't think it's obvious.
                        $endgroup$
                        – tomasz
                        Mar 26 at 11:41












                        1












                        $begingroup$

                        Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                        Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                          Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            1












                            1








                            1





                            $begingroup$

                            Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                            Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            Hint: if $fcolon Xtimes Yto Z$ is continuous, then it is also coordinatewise continous, i.e. for every $xin X$ and $yin Y$, the functions $f_xcolon Yto Z$, $ymapsto f(x,y)$ and $f_ycolon Xto Z$, $xmapsto f(x,y)$ are both continuous. This follows from the observation that if $Usubseteq Xtimes Y$ is open, then so are its cross-sections (which is immediate by the definition of the product topology).



                            Note that none of the implications mentioned in the preceding paragraph reverse. This is why in general, a semitopological group need not be topological (although there are some very powerful "automatic continuity" theorems for algebraic structures like groups).







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Mar 25 at 16:48









                            tomasztomasz

                            24.1k23482




                            24.1k23482



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161917%2fleft-multiplication-is-homeomorphism-of-topological-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

                                He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

                                Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029