Sentence formation of a past incident





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




  1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


  2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















    0















    I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




    1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


    2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



    Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?










    share|improve this question
















    bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




      1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


      2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



      Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?










      share|improve this question
















      I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




      1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


      2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



      Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?







      past-tense progressive-aspect sequence-of-tenses






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 12 '18 at 2:23









      sumelic

      50.5k8121227




      50.5k8121227










      asked May 7 '18 at 3:43









      karthik tskarthik ts

      54




      54





      bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          -1














          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445012%2fsentence-formation-of-a-past-incident%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          -1














          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago
















          -1














          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago














          -1












          -1








          -1







          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer













          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 7 '18 at 4:07









          Paul ChildsPaul Childs

          44416




          44416








          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago














          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago








          2




          2





          Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

          – Kate Bunting
          May 7 '18 at 7:33





          Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

          – Kate Bunting
          May 7 '18 at 7:33













          If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

          – Paul Childs
          yesterday





          If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

          – Paul Childs
          yesterday













          You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

          – Kate Bunting
          21 hours ago





          You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

          – Kate Bunting
          21 hours ago













          I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

          – Paul Childs
          1 hour ago





          I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

          – Paul Childs
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445012%2fsentence-formation-of-a-past-incident%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Bunad

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum