Sentence formation of a past incident





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







0















I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




  1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


  2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.






















    0















    I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




    1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


    2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



    Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?










    share|improve this question
















    bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


    This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.


















      0












      0








      0








      I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




      1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


      2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



      Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?










      share|improve this question
















      I need help with finding out which of the below sentences is correct:




      1. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she was crying.


      2. Since she wore glasses, I could not discern whether she cried.



      Are both the sentences correct? If so, when to use which sentence?







      past-tense progressive-aspect sequence-of-tenses






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Jun 12 '18 at 2:23









      sumelic

      50.5k8121227




      50.5k8121227










      asked May 7 '18 at 3:43









      karthik tskarthik ts

      54




      54





      bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







      bumped to the homepage by Community yesterday


      This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          -1














          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "97"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445012%2fsentence-formation-of-a-past-incident%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          -1














          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago
















          -1














          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer



















          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago














          -1












          -1








          -1







          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.






          share|improve this answer













          The first lacks harmony between the verbs. It would work better if it began "Since she was wearing glasses..."



          However, both can work as saying "she wore glasses" (in general) and that you couldn't tell if she was crying (at that particular moment) also gives the implication that that particular moment was no exception and she was wearing them then too.



          So 1 can work, but it would be better by making it explicit.



          We really could do with more context as this is what really establishes aspect.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered May 7 '18 at 4:07









          Paul ChildsPaul Childs

          44416




          44416








          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago














          • 2





            Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

            – Kate Bunting
            May 7 '18 at 7:33











          • If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

            – Paul Childs
            yesterday











          • You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

            – Kate Bunting
            21 hours ago











          • I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

            – Paul Childs
            1 hour ago








          2




          2





          Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

          – Kate Bunting
          May 7 '18 at 7:33





          Definitely 'was crying' rather than 'cried'.

          – Kate Bunting
          May 7 '18 at 7:33













          If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

          – Paul Childs
          yesterday





          If you believe so, then provide a reasoned answer. An unsubstantiated disagreement in no way helps the OP and other readers understand. Same goes for the silent downvoters.

          – Paul Childs
          yesterday













          You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

          – Kate Bunting
          21 hours ago





          You said in your own answer 'you couldn't tell if she was crying' - the reason being that it's idiomatic English!

          – Kate Bunting
          21 hours ago













          I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

          – Paul Childs
          1 hour ago





          I'd argue against "definitely". Context is a major player.

          – Paul Childs
          1 hour ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f445012%2fsentence-formation-of-a-past-incident%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

          He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

          Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029