What are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}







23












$begingroup$


I know one shots are shorter and only last one session (hence the name) compared to a campaign where you play through an ongoing story. But besides that, what are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?



For now at least, I don't see any reason for playing a one shot over a campaign. You take the time to create a character and end up using it one time, not feeling any attachment to your, or fellow player's, characters; and thus, in my eyes at least, would not enjoy as much compared to a campaign.



What are the pros and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your bottom line question and the title don't match. Do you want to edit your title to match your bottom line? What are the benefits and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Answerers, please remember to Back Up your answers with actual table play experience as support. Answers without may be downvoted because they are missing such support.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielR.Collins Please don't answer in comments. As this covers the actual question, you should distill this into an answer. It's also advisable to let folks know the obvious that this is your content video.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    11 hours ago


















23












$begingroup$


I know one shots are shorter and only last one session (hence the name) compared to a campaign where you play through an ongoing story. But besides that, what are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?



For now at least, I don't see any reason for playing a one shot over a campaign. You take the time to create a character and end up using it one time, not feeling any attachment to your, or fellow player's, characters; and thus, in my eyes at least, would not enjoy as much compared to a campaign.



What are the pros and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your bottom line question and the title don't match. Do you want to edit your title to match your bottom line? What are the benefits and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Answerers, please remember to Back Up your answers with actual table play experience as support. Answers without may be downvoted because they are missing such support.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielR.Collins Please don't answer in comments. As this covers the actual question, you should distill this into an answer. It's also advisable to let folks know the obvious that this is your content video.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    11 hours ago














23












23








23


1



$begingroup$


I know one shots are shorter and only last one session (hence the name) compared to a campaign where you play through an ongoing story. But besides that, what are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?



For now at least, I don't see any reason for playing a one shot over a campaign. You take the time to create a character and end up using it one time, not feeling any attachment to your, or fellow player's, characters; and thus, in my eyes at least, would not enjoy as much compared to a campaign.



What are the pros and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I know one shots are shorter and only last one session (hence the name) compared to a campaign where you play through an ongoing story. But besides that, what are the advantages and disadvantages of running one shots compared to campaigns?



For now at least, I don't see any reason for playing a one shot over a campaign. You take the time to create a character and end up using it one time, not feeling any attachment to your, or fellow player's, characters; and thus, in my eyes at least, would not enjoy as much compared to a campaign.



What are the pros and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?







dnd-5e one-shot campaign






share|improve this question









New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Rubiksmoose

61.1k10294450




61.1k10294450






New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Monkey D. LuffyMonkey D. Luffy

32729




32729




New contributor




Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your bottom line question and the title don't match. Do you want to edit your title to match your bottom line? What are the benefits and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Answerers, please remember to Back Up your answers with actual table play experience as support. Answers without may be downvoted because they are missing such support.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielR.Collins Please don't answer in comments. As this covers the actual question, you should distill this into an answer. It's also advisable to let folks know the obvious that this is your content video.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    11 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Let us continue this discussion in chat.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your bottom line question and the title don't match. Do you want to edit your title to match your bottom line? What are the benefits and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Answerers, please remember to Back Up your answers with actual table play experience as support. Answers without may be downvoted because they are missing such support.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @DanielR.Collins Please don't answer in comments. As this covers the actual question, you should distill this into an answer. It's also advisable to let folks know the obvious that this is your content video.
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    11 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
yesterday




$begingroup$
Let us continue this discussion in chat.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Your bottom line question and the title don't match. Do you want to edit your title to match your bottom line? What are the benefits and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
yesterday




$begingroup$
Your bottom line question and the title don't match. Do you want to edit your title to match your bottom line? What are the benefits and cons of playing a one shot instead of a campaign?
$endgroup$
– KorvinStarmast
yesterday




2




2




$begingroup$
Answerers, please remember to Back Up your answers with actual table play experience as support. Answers without may be downvoted because they are missing such support.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
yesterday




$begingroup$
Answerers, please remember to Back Up your answers with actual table play experience as support. Answers without may be downvoted because they are missing such support.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
@DanielR.Collins Please don't answer in comments. As this covers the actual question, you should distill this into an answer. It's also advisable to let folks know the obvious that this is your content video.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
@DanielR.Collins Please don't answer in comments. As this covers the actual question, you should distill this into an answer. It's also advisable to let folks know the obvious that this is your content video.
$endgroup$
– NautArch
11 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















40












$begingroup$

On definitions



Technically, one-shot can mean different things to different people. It doesn't always literally mean a story that can be wrapped up in one session (though that is usually the goal). However, it does always refer to an adventure that is shorter than a full campaign which can vary greatly in length. For the purposes of this answer I will be using the following definitions:




  • One shot - an adventure that can be completed in 1 session (generally 4-8 hours)

  • Short adventure/campaign - can be completed in 2-5 sessions (4-8 hours per session)

  • Long campaign - anything above that


Advantages of a short or one-shot campaign



Testing grounds for character ideas/story ideas/new rules/homebrew



The biggest advantage I have found in my experience running and playing both long and short adventures is that one-shots allow players to play a game and test out character concepts, story concepts, and/or rules variants that are risky or potentially untenable in a long-haul adventure. I've had one-shots turn into longer adventures when the concepts worked out and everyone liked them and also ones where we were happy we tried them out, but were content to stop them after the one-shot was done.



I've run many one-shots where we have tested out risky ideas. The one we are playing now is testing several homebrew rules (one is a neat skill check-based resolution mechanic) and several experimental characters (including me who is testing the new UA alchemist class). Using my character as an example, I never would have wanted to test it out if I knew I was going to be doing a long campaign because it means I would be stuck with a possibly confusing/bad/broken character for a long time or forcing the group to find some way to integrate a new character into the group as I replace it mid-story (we do extensive character work before beginning campaigns so it would be a hassle to say the least).



Great for introducing new players/DMs/systems without a lot commitment



Another really useful way to use one-shots is to introduce new players/DMs to a game. It usually helps, in my experience, to start out new players with a shorter adventure than a full campaign so that they can try an option, learn the rules, and then end the campaign and decide what they want going forward (with regards to character options and the RPG system in general). In particular, I have found this very useful when someone want to try DMing for the first time since they can do so without having the pressure to continue and to reduce the pressure of any mistakes they make.



Every new system I've run or tried with my group has been done as a short campaign or a one shot. We always run one to get a feel for how it plays and if we want to continue playing it. For example, I ran Masks (a Powered by the apocalypse system) as a 2-session intro game before having the group decide if they wanted to continue or not. I gave them a short story to complete but plenty of room to keep going. The group in this case decided to keep going, but easily could have decided that it was enough and to leave it at that. We have two new systems coming up that we are planning to do the same thing with. On the flip side, I've had a player at the table that was new and we started them with a full hardcover adventure in D&D5e. They made a character that didn't really fit, but they didn't understand enough to know that (or express it) and thus they ended up playing 15 levels and two years with a character they would have changed had we run a short adventure first to test things out.



When getting everyone to the table is a DC30 check



One shots are also very handy when you have a very busy group that is only able to meet sporadically. Having an adventure that you can start and finish in one session means that you don't have to worry about the next date people being able to show up at is 2 months after that. It also works in the case that someone has to take a leave of absence and the group wants to break from the current project to wait for them. A one-shot or short adventure can fit perfectly into these gaps.



One-shots are also great for conventions and the like when you are playing with people for only a given time slot and likely never seeing them again.



To give breaks



Sometimes your group is doing a long campaign and the DM just gets burned out for any of many reasons. Sometimes it is even the group that gets burned out as well. Sometimes you just need a short change of tone/pace/system to freshen everything up. One shots deliver this in spades.



A couple examples from my table. Maybe you are in a grimdark 3-year-long campaign and people decide they need a break from it. Maybe the DM gets slammed at work for a month and they need a change so they can get through it but they still want to play. We switched DMs and ran a short 5e one shot in one case and ran a short adventure in another lighter system in the other. In both cases it really helped to have something short and different to switch to without the commitment of a longer campaign. Afterwards, we want back to the long campaign with a fresh take.



Disadvantages of a short or one-shot campaign



It really limits the material and how much you can do



You are limited in the amount of material you can cover in the adventure. Obviously, a short campaign is going to have less stuff in it than a long campaign. But to make a short campaign work it generally has to be very focused such that you can end it in whatever time restriction you set. This often means having a smaller world and a more focused plot with less side quests. The plot may also have significantly less build-up and nuance to it compared with a story that plays out over many sessions.



In my own one-shots I've definitely had issues getting things completed in the alloted time even after thinking that I had made a very focused story. Often I have to railroad the party hard to get them to finish on time and/or cut material. However, this is more an inconvenience that a true bad side and sometimes I have to do this in long campaigns as well for various reasons. It is more pronounced when you are running one shots though for sure, especially if you have a party that enjoys RP/messing around/exploring a lot.



Character development takes a hit



Less character development. Shorter campaign means there is less time to develop party dynamics and characters. Generally, making a character and party takes time. In a long campaign, the players have multiple sessions to feel out their character and discover who they are and what they are like and how they interact with the rest of the party. You don't get as much of that in a one-shot (especially with newer players or players new to a system).



Short testing time



I say that testing ideas is an advantage of one shots, and it is. But, there is an important limitation to it to acknowledge: you only are testing things in a small limited window and that might not generalize into a full campaign context. For example, your UA/homebrew character might work great in your one shot at level 5, but there might be something broken/confusing/unfun that happens at level 11 that completely changes the perspective. One shots give you a taste which is very useful, but it is not replacement for extensive playtesting.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
    $endgroup$
    – Monkey D. Luffy
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    yesterday






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
    $endgroup$
    – 3C273
    yesterday





















16












$begingroup$

Four solid benefits of a one shot



One shots and campaigns serve different gaming needs, so I slightly disagree with your question's point (in paragraph 3 and at the end) that they are somehow in opposition to each other. They fulfill different needs for the players at the table, to include the DM. A given gaming group can do both!



Four things that a one-shot allows you to do in this game system is:





  1. Play at a different level / tier

    If you've been playing a Ranger for 4 levels(Tier 1), a one shot can allow you to play (as an example) a 10th level Druid / 1st level Monk (Tier 2) for a few sessions to get a different game experience and see how you like it. I did that a couple of months ago during a play test session. This is a great way to vary and enrich the play experience.


  2. Play a different character/class/subclass/archetype to broaden your
    experience


    As above, though it need not be in a different tier. We did a one shot a few months back that was a single session. The idea was to help a friend get used to DMing 5e. We all used level 4, Gestalt characters to increase the flexibility of the experience. (And for shennanigans).

  3. Give the DM a break

    If you are in a campaign, sometimes it is nice to give the DM a break for a session and run a one-shot so that the DM gets to play. I've done this with numerous groups.

    This also allows any of the players to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign. (Thanks, @Someone_Evil for this excellent point)


  4. Test out optional, variant, Unearthed Arcana, or homebrew rules to see if your table likes them

    In item two above, we tested out a Gestalt concept within 5e based on the DM's experiences with it in a different edition. Doing that "inside a campaign" would have cost us consistency and continuity.



A potential (minor) down side is: you fall in love with your one shot PC



As you noted in your question, the longer term relationship building and character development is missing from the one shot, and if you fall in love with this PC you have to put it on hold until there is a chance to fold the PC into your campaign, or there is another suitable one shot. But the very act of 'getting into' that character for a session and really enjoying it is fun in and of itself.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
    $endgroup$
    – Monkey D. Luffy
    yesterday






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday



















5












$begingroup$

Rather than try to do an apples to apples comparison and pick apart the differences, I'll go into some detail about how I've used one-shots (or short-shots) vs campaigns and try to paint them in their best light.



One shot



A one shot is like college: a great time to experiment. Maybe you want to test out some friends that you've never gamed with to see if they mesh with your DM style. Maybe you've got a goofy system that you don't think will stand up to more than a night or two of use. Or maybe the people involved just don't have the time/energy to commit. Don't forget the opportunity to FINALLY dust off that Genasi-Dwarf Valor Bard 6 Old One Warlock 5 Storm Sorcerer 3 you've been trying to play (or whatever).



One shots are not dissimilar to a regular board game night. It's mostly an excuse to get together with some people you like around an activity you're passionate about. The rules of conduct don't have to be as strict as usual (or maybe you can make them even stricter?).



The point is, anything goes; just make sure you clear it with your partners first and everyone will have a great time (usually).



One Shot Example



The last one-shot I ran was with four friends of mine. We've all done board game night together, and I knew one of them used to play D&D (or something similar). my objectives for the game were to vet these people as D&D players (in case I wanted to invite them to a campaign), and also to show them the ropes of one of my favorite hobbies. It was like herding cats. Full murder hobos, and not even the good kind that agree with any plot hook because they know that there will be monsters there; the kind that listens to a mother cry out for the rescue of her child and respond with "nah. eff that. I don't care about any kids. Other character, want to go get drunk in the bar?"



I tried having the NPC interest them with money; no interest. I literally had to say "guys, this is the only plot hook for this. So, if you want to keep playing, find a way to get interested". The barbarian's name was "bork bork". I like these people, and it ended up being a fun night, but I will never invite them to a campaign... well, except that one guy.





Campaign



This is it. You've got the group. You trust them to commit to a few hours every third Saturday. Whether you're the DM or one of the players, you're excited for the group to collectively weave their ways into this wondrous world. /insert epic campaign idea here/



You can look forward to watching a plot unfurl. There could (and should) be twists and turns, emotions can run high. It's like writing a book and watching your favorite show all mixed together. Your character(s) grows, moving from their unsure greenfoot status and finally falling into their own as a mighty champion/devout holy warrior of the great dragon god/cunning master thief that only steals from the rich/whatever.



And depending on your age and inclination, a steady and regular excuse to get together with a few friends who you don't see nearly often enough... it gets harder to do as you get older.



Campaign Example



I currently run one game and play one game. I can expect for each game to play 1-2 times a month, on average. I have a celestial tiefling and there is a very-anti-demon Paladin in the party. We have a Tolkienesque dwarf-elf thing going and it's a fun time. But it started as complete distrust. These characters have grown and learned more about each other.



In the game I run, I can tie in player expectations and drop hints and clues. You have a much broader canvas to paint a picture. I like worldbuilding pretty well, but I like giving players something to look forward to better. The town that the party is in right now: we ended a session outside the gate and I asked two players:

Me (as DM): "what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is true?"

Player 1: "the town is inhabited by fish people"

Me (as DM): "ha, okay. and you; what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is false?"

Player 2: "the town is inhabited by fish people".



When we regrouped for the next session, I was able to work that into the fabric of the town and we all had a laugh about it, as well as progressing the plot.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    Time



    As an adult with a full-time job who has many other adult friends with full-time jobs who don't live nearby, one-shots provide a chance to play without a long term commitment. It's nigh impossible to find a weekly or even biweekly time that we could all commit to.



    Also, a lot of my friends haven't played D&D before. They wouldn't feel comfortable jumping headfirst into a long campaign. A one-shot gives them a chance to try it out and see if they like it.



    New ideas



    Apart from that, one-shots give you a chance to do something different that you're curious about but don't think would be fun long term. They also are just a chance to try anything new without a long term commitment.



    A break from a campaign



    They can also serve as a break from an ongoing campaign. My group had a Halloween themed one shot for Halloween that was a blast.



    You could also let someone try DMing or just give the DM a break so they can play for once.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
      $endgroup$
      – BittermanAndy
      13 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
      $endgroup$
      – Captain Man
      4 hours ago





















    2












    $begingroup$

    One shots are consequence-free



    Some GMs run games where they make sure that PC death either isn't a substantial risk, but others are willing to let the PCs actually "fail." In a campaign, everybody dying can bring the game to an abrupt halt. In a one shot, you can laugh about how it was a really bad idea to wait until the necromancer was in the cemetery to confront him. Campaigns allow for regular interaction with a set of important NPCs. One shots tend to gravitate towards NPCs being quest givers/items.



    One group that I played with a few years back ended up switching from a campaign to one shots after our attempt at a campaign resulted in everybody dying. Twice. We actually enjoyed the challenging difficulty, but making new characters and having to find a way to integrate them into the campaign so that they could take over for the dead PCs was getting to be too much. When we switched to one shots, we continued to have the same level of difficulty. We wouldn't always "win" the adventures, but we enjoyed making characters, tossing them at the bad guy of the week, and then seeing who was left standing in the end. With that group, consequence-free one shots allowed everybody to have more fun, because it worked well with the reckless approach that we had to most situations.



    In contrast, I am currently in a campaign with a different group where some of the most fun parts of it have come from the consequences that would have been avoided if there was no continuity. One of the players lost a PC fairly early on, and is now playing as both the replacement PC and the spirit of his original character, now inhabiting the sword that killed him. A serial killer was attacking the town we were in, and NPCs being targeted meant something, because they were characters that we had interacted with instead of just generic background objects. With this group, having a campaign where actions have consequences is good because it has created unique situations and enhanced our immersion in the setting.



    One shots are more flexible



    Sometimes people can't make it to a session. In a campaign, this means that whoever missed last session needs to be brought up to speed on the fact that Bob was captured by evil cultists, and we're now preparing to sneak into the pyramid where he's being held so that we can save him. In one shots, you just have one less person if somebody has to miss.






    share|improve this answer








    New contributor




    HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
      $endgroup$
      – V2Blast
      2 hours ago



















    0












    $begingroup$

    Adding to other people's (excellent) ideas, the fact that players are more dissociated to their characters can actually be a bonus.



    Take ten candles for example, the whole point of the game is to play the tragic and horrible death of the PCs. It is intense, refreshing. Because the game is supposed to be deadly, death is not a failure or frustrating. A one shot can be to a campaign what a movie is to a series: unique, unconstrained by the need of a sequel, with permanent stakes and the actual possibility of a bad ending.



    We had a few games and it was epic. Knowing that the world and our characters would end with the night allowed us to go through dimensional portals, ghost attacks and shapeshifting dogs. In this game, each PC narrates their own death, and I was able to die fending off a shadow-monster horde with a shotgun.



    Also, think of it that way: a great one-shot can be made into a campaign, the opposite is not true. The best example I have about that is a campaign I participated in that started with a Unknown Armies one-shot. It was a beginners' game in our RPG club's attempt to recruit. The game was intense (and pretty gory, considering a PC almost raped another PC by mistake (that GM was dark)). At the end of the game, the GM said "do you guys want more?" and all but one resoundingly answered yes (the "almost raped" girl, for some reason). The campaign lasted for more than a year and was based on the choices and alliances made in the first game. In the finale, the character of the almost-raped girl came back (played by someone else) as a traumatized MacGuffin manipulated by evil forces. Yes, the campaign was not prepared in the first game, but thanks to that, it revolved around it, making everybody's experience and involvement better.



    Since then I've used that schema several times. Sometimes we would play a one-shot and just have fun. Sometimes I would propose to go for a campaign (possibly loosing and gaining a few players in the meantime).



    Finally, I'd say that making a one-shot allows to focus more on the current action. It can be a creative limit to constrain yourself to "prepare things for the future". You know, when you introduce a character that will later be significant, or talk about a prophecy that is frustratingly-out-of-your-level-right-now. The one-shot goes directly to that "all bets are off" campaign finale ambiance.



    One frustrating example I have is the Star wars DarkStryder campaign. Don't get me wrong, it's a great campaign. But you spend an incredible amount of time running after a guy you'll only catch at the end of the season. The whole campaign is pretty much "you're on that guy's tail, but you get into his trap and get slowed down, maybe you'll get him next time (you won't)". To me, that's problem of something that's too much thought as a whole and not enough as a series of individual games. Working on one-shots can help you practice the now.






    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$









    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      12 hours ago










    • $begingroup$
      Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
      $endgroup$
      – V2Blast
      2 hours ago














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144785%2fwhat-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-running-one-shots-compared-to-campa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    40












    $begingroup$

    On definitions



    Technically, one-shot can mean different things to different people. It doesn't always literally mean a story that can be wrapped up in one session (though that is usually the goal). However, it does always refer to an adventure that is shorter than a full campaign which can vary greatly in length. For the purposes of this answer I will be using the following definitions:




    • One shot - an adventure that can be completed in 1 session (generally 4-8 hours)

    • Short adventure/campaign - can be completed in 2-5 sessions (4-8 hours per session)

    • Long campaign - anything above that


    Advantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    Testing grounds for character ideas/story ideas/new rules/homebrew



    The biggest advantage I have found in my experience running and playing both long and short adventures is that one-shots allow players to play a game and test out character concepts, story concepts, and/or rules variants that are risky or potentially untenable in a long-haul adventure. I've had one-shots turn into longer adventures when the concepts worked out and everyone liked them and also ones where we were happy we tried them out, but were content to stop them after the one-shot was done.



    I've run many one-shots where we have tested out risky ideas. The one we are playing now is testing several homebrew rules (one is a neat skill check-based resolution mechanic) and several experimental characters (including me who is testing the new UA alchemist class). Using my character as an example, I never would have wanted to test it out if I knew I was going to be doing a long campaign because it means I would be stuck with a possibly confusing/bad/broken character for a long time or forcing the group to find some way to integrate a new character into the group as I replace it mid-story (we do extensive character work before beginning campaigns so it would be a hassle to say the least).



    Great for introducing new players/DMs/systems without a lot commitment



    Another really useful way to use one-shots is to introduce new players/DMs to a game. It usually helps, in my experience, to start out new players with a shorter adventure than a full campaign so that they can try an option, learn the rules, and then end the campaign and decide what they want going forward (with regards to character options and the RPG system in general). In particular, I have found this very useful when someone want to try DMing for the first time since they can do so without having the pressure to continue and to reduce the pressure of any mistakes they make.



    Every new system I've run or tried with my group has been done as a short campaign or a one shot. We always run one to get a feel for how it plays and if we want to continue playing it. For example, I ran Masks (a Powered by the apocalypse system) as a 2-session intro game before having the group decide if they wanted to continue or not. I gave them a short story to complete but plenty of room to keep going. The group in this case decided to keep going, but easily could have decided that it was enough and to leave it at that. We have two new systems coming up that we are planning to do the same thing with. On the flip side, I've had a player at the table that was new and we started them with a full hardcover adventure in D&D5e. They made a character that didn't really fit, but they didn't understand enough to know that (or express it) and thus they ended up playing 15 levels and two years with a character they would have changed had we run a short adventure first to test things out.



    When getting everyone to the table is a DC30 check



    One shots are also very handy when you have a very busy group that is only able to meet sporadically. Having an adventure that you can start and finish in one session means that you don't have to worry about the next date people being able to show up at is 2 months after that. It also works in the case that someone has to take a leave of absence and the group wants to break from the current project to wait for them. A one-shot or short adventure can fit perfectly into these gaps.



    One-shots are also great for conventions and the like when you are playing with people for only a given time slot and likely never seeing them again.



    To give breaks



    Sometimes your group is doing a long campaign and the DM just gets burned out for any of many reasons. Sometimes it is even the group that gets burned out as well. Sometimes you just need a short change of tone/pace/system to freshen everything up. One shots deliver this in spades.



    A couple examples from my table. Maybe you are in a grimdark 3-year-long campaign and people decide they need a break from it. Maybe the DM gets slammed at work for a month and they need a change so they can get through it but they still want to play. We switched DMs and ran a short 5e one shot in one case and ran a short adventure in another lighter system in the other. In both cases it really helped to have something short and different to switch to without the commitment of a longer campaign. Afterwards, we want back to the long campaign with a fresh take.



    Disadvantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    It really limits the material and how much you can do



    You are limited in the amount of material you can cover in the adventure. Obviously, a short campaign is going to have less stuff in it than a long campaign. But to make a short campaign work it generally has to be very focused such that you can end it in whatever time restriction you set. This often means having a smaller world and a more focused plot with less side quests. The plot may also have significantly less build-up and nuance to it compared with a story that plays out over many sessions.



    In my own one-shots I've definitely had issues getting things completed in the alloted time even after thinking that I had made a very focused story. Often I have to railroad the party hard to get them to finish on time and/or cut material. However, this is more an inconvenience that a true bad side and sometimes I have to do this in long campaigns as well for various reasons. It is more pronounced when you are running one shots though for sure, especially if you have a party that enjoys RP/messing around/exploring a lot.



    Character development takes a hit



    Less character development. Shorter campaign means there is less time to develop party dynamics and characters. Generally, making a character and party takes time. In a long campaign, the players have multiple sessions to feel out their character and discover who they are and what they are like and how they interact with the rest of the party. You don't get as much of that in a one-shot (especially with newer players or players new to a system).



    Short testing time



    I say that testing ideas is an advantage of one shots, and it is. But, there is an important limitation to it to acknowledge: you only are testing things in a small limited window and that might not generalize into a full campaign context. For example, your UA/homebrew character might work great in your one shot at level 5, but there might be something broken/confusing/unfun that happens at level 11 that completely changes the perspective. One shots give you a taste which is very useful, but it is not replacement for extensive playtesting.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
      $endgroup$
      – goodguy5
      yesterday






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
      $endgroup$
      – Rubiksmoose
      yesterday








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
      $endgroup$
      – 3C273
      yesterday


















    40












    $begingroup$

    On definitions



    Technically, one-shot can mean different things to different people. It doesn't always literally mean a story that can be wrapped up in one session (though that is usually the goal). However, it does always refer to an adventure that is shorter than a full campaign which can vary greatly in length. For the purposes of this answer I will be using the following definitions:




    • One shot - an adventure that can be completed in 1 session (generally 4-8 hours)

    • Short adventure/campaign - can be completed in 2-5 sessions (4-8 hours per session)

    • Long campaign - anything above that


    Advantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    Testing grounds for character ideas/story ideas/new rules/homebrew



    The biggest advantage I have found in my experience running and playing both long and short adventures is that one-shots allow players to play a game and test out character concepts, story concepts, and/or rules variants that are risky or potentially untenable in a long-haul adventure. I've had one-shots turn into longer adventures when the concepts worked out and everyone liked them and also ones where we were happy we tried them out, but were content to stop them after the one-shot was done.



    I've run many one-shots where we have tested out risky ideas. The one we are playing now is testing several homebrew rules (one is a neat skill check-based resolution mechanic) and several experimental characters (including me who is testing the new UA alchemist class). Using my character as an example, I never would have wanted to test it out if I knew I was going to be doing a long campaign because it means I would be stuck with a possibly confusing/bad/broken character for a long time or forcing the group to find some way to integrate a new character into the group as I replace it mid-story (we do extensive character work before beginning campaigns so it would be a hassle to say the least).



    Great for introducing new players/DMs/systems without a lot commitment



    Another really useful way to use one-shots is to introduce new players/DMs to a game. It usually helps, in my experience, to start out new players with a shorter adventure than a full campaign so that they can try an option, learn the rules, and then end the campaign and decide what they want going forward (with regards to character options and the RPG system in general). In particular, I have found this very useful when someone want to try DMing for the first time since they can do so without having the pressure to continue and to reduce the pressure of any mistakes they make.



    Every new system I've run or tried with my group has been done as a short campaign or a one shot. We always run one to get a feel for how it plays and if we want to continue playing it. For example, I ran Masks (a Powered by the apocalypse system) as a 2-session intro game before having the group decide if they wanted to continue or not. I gave them a short story to complete but plenty of room to keep going. The group in this case decided to keep going, but easily could have decided that it was enough and to leave it at that. We have two new systems coming up that we are planning to do the same thing with. On the flip side, I've had a player at the table that was new and we started them with a full hardcover adventure in D&D5e. They made a character that didn't really fit, but they didn't understand enough to know that (or express it) and thus they ended up playing 15 levels and two years with a character they would have changed had we run a short adventure first to test things out.



    When getting everyone to the table is a DC30 check



    One shots are also very handy when you have a very busy group that is only able to meet sporadically. Having an adventure that you can start and finish in one session means that you don't have to worry about the next date people being able to show up at is 2 months after that. It also works in the case that someone has to take a leave of absence and the group wants to break from the current project to wait for them. A one-shot or short adventure can fit perfectly into these gaps.



    One-shots are also great for conventions and the like when you are playing with people for only a given time slot and likely never seeing them again.



    To give breaks



    Sometimes your group is doing a long campaign and the DM just gets burned out for any of many reasons. Sometimes it is even the group that gets burned out as well. Sometimes you just need a short change of tone/pace/system to freshen everything up. One shots deliver this in spades.



    A couple examples from my table. Maybe you are in a grimdark 3-year-long campaign and people decide they need a break from it. Maybe the DM gets slammed at work for a month and they need a change so they can get through it but they still want to play. We switched DMs and ran a short 5e one shot in one case and ran a short adventure in another lighter system in the other. In both cases it really helped to have something short and different to switch to without the commitment of a longer campaign. Afterwards, we want back to the long campaign with a fresh take.



    Disadvantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    It really limits the material and how much you can do



    You are limited in the amount of material you can cover in the adventure. Obviously, a short campaign is going to have less stuff in it than a long campaign. But to make a short campaign work it generally has to be very focused such that you can end it in whatever time restriction you set. This often means having a smaller world and a more focused plot with less side quests. The plot may also have significantly less build-up and nuance to it compared with a story that plays out over many sessions.



    In my own one-shots I've definitely had issues getting things completed in the alloted time even after thinking that I had made a very focused story. Often I have to railroad the party hard to get them to finish on time and/or cut material. However, this is more an inconvenience that a true bad side and sometimes I have to do this in long campaigns as well for various reasons. It is more pronounced when you are running one shots though for sure, especially if you have a party that enjoys RP/messing around/exploring a lot.



    Character development takes a hit



    Less character development. Shorter campaign means there is less time to develop party dynamics and characters. Generally, making a character and party takes time. In a long campaign, the players have multiple sessions to feel out their character and discover who they are and what they are like and how they interact with the rest of the party. You don't get as much of that in a one-shot (especially with newer players or players new to a system).



    Short testing time



    I say that testing ideas is an advantage of one shots, and it is. But, there is an important limitation to it to acknowledge: you only are testing things in a small limited window and that might not generalize into a full campaign context. For example, your UA/homebrew character might work great in your one shot at level 5, but there might be something broken/confusing/unfun that happens at level 11 that completely changes the perspective. One shots give you a taste which is very useful, but it is not replacement for extensive playtesting.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
      $endgroup$
      – goodguy5
      yesterday






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
      $endgroup$
      – Rubiksmoose
      yesterday








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
      $endgroup$
      – 3C273
      yesterday
















    40












    40








    40





    $begingroup$

    On definitions



    Technically, one-shot can mean different things to different people. It doesn't always literally mean a story that can be wrapped up in one session (though that is usually the goal). However, it does always refer to an adventure that is shorter than a full campaign which can vary greatly in length. For the purposes of this answer I will be using the following definitions:




    • One shot - an adventure that can be completed in 1 session (generally 4-8 hours)

    • Short adventure/campaign - can be completed in 2-5 sessions (4-8 hours per session)

    • Long campaign - anything above that


    Advantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    Testing grounds for character ideas/story ideas/new rules/homebrew



    The biggest advantage I have found in my experience running and playing both long and short adventures is that one-shots allow players to play a game and test out character concepts, story concepts, and/or rules variants that are risky or potentially untenable in a long-haul adventure. I've had one-shots turn into longer adventures when the concepts worked out and everyone liked them and also ones where we were happy we tried them out, but were content to stop them after the one-shot was done.



    I've run many one-shots where we have tested out risky ideas. The one we are playing now is testing several homebrew rules (one is a neat skill check-based resolution mechanic) and several experimental characters (including me who is testing the new UA alchemist class). Using my character as an example, I never would have wanted to test it out if I knew I was going to be doing a long campaign because it means I would be stuck with a possibly confusing/bad/broken character for a long time or forcing the group to find some way to integrate a new character into the group as I replace it mid-story (we do extensive character work before beginning campaigns so it would be a hassle to say the least).



    Great for introducing new players/DMs/systems without a lot commitment



    Another really useful way to use one-shots is to introduce new players/DMs to a game. It usually helps, in my experience, to start out new players with a shorter adventure than a full campaign so that they can try an option, learn the rules, and then end the campaign and decide what they want going forward (with regards to character options and the RPG system in general). In particular, I have found this very useful when someone want to try DMing for the first time since they can do so without having the pressure to continue and to reduce the pressure of any mistakes they make.



    Every new system I've run or tried with my group has been done as a short campaign or a one shot. We always run one to get a feel for how it plays and if we want to continue playing it. For example, I ran Masks (a Powered by the apocalypse system) as a 2-session intro game before having the group decide if they wanted to continue or not. I gave them a short story to complete but plenty of room to keep going. The group in this case decided to keep going, but easily could have decided that it was enough and to leave it at that. We have two new systems coming up that we are planning to do the same thing with. On the flip side, I've had a player at the table that was new and we started them with a full hardcover adventure in D&D5e. They made a character that didn't really fit, but they didn't understand enough to know that (or express it) and thus they ended up playing 15 levels and two years with a character they would have changed had we run a short adventure first to test things out.



    When getting everyone to the table is a DC30 check



    One shots are also very handy when you have a very busy group that is only able to meet sporadically. Having an adventure that you can start and finish in one session means that you don't have to worry about the next date people being able to show up at is 2 months after that. It also works in the case that someone has to take a leave of absence and the group wants to break from the current project to wait for them. A one-shot or short adventure can fit perfectly into these gaps.



    One-shots are also great for conventions and the like when you are playing with people for only a given time slot and likely never seeing them again.



    To give breaks



    Sometimes your group is doing a long campaign and the DM just gets burned out for any of many reasons. Sometimes it is even the group that gets burned out as well. Sometimes you just need a short change of tone/pace/system to freshen everything up. One shots deliver this in spades.



    A couple examples from my table. Maybe you are in a grimdark 3-year-long campaign and people decide they need a break from it. Maybe the DM gets slammed at work for a month and they need a change so they can get through it but they still want to play. We switched DMs and ran a short 5e one shot in one case and ran a short adventure in another lighter system in the other. In both cases it really helped to have something short and different to switch to without the commitment of a longer campaign. Afterwards, we want back to the long campaign with a fresh take.



    Disadvantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    It really limits the material and how much you can do



    You are limited in the amount of material you can cover in the adventure. Obviously, a short campaign is going to have less stuff in it than a long campaign. But to make a short campaign work it generally has to be very focused such that you can end it in whatever time restriction you set. This often means having a smaller world and a more focused plot with less side quests. The plot may also have significantly less build-up and nuance to it compared with a story that plays out over many sessions.



    In my own one-shots I've definitely had issues getting things completed in the alloted time even after thinking that I had made a very focused story. Often I have to railroad the party hard to get them to finish on time and/or cut material. However, this is more an inconvenience that a true bad side and sometimes I have to do this in long campaigns as well for various reasons. It is more pronounced when you are running one shots though for sure, especially if you have a party that enjoys RP/messing around/exploring a lot.



    Character development takes a hit



    Less character development. Shorter campaign means there is less time to develop party dynamics and characters. Generally, making a character and party takes time. In a long campaign, the players have multiple sessions to feel out their character and discover who they are and what they are like and how they interact with the rest of the party. You don't get as much of that in a one-shot (especially with newer players or players new to a system).



    Short testing time



    I say that testing ideas is an advantage of one shots, and it is. But, there is an important limitation to it to acknowledge: you only are testing things in a small limited window and that might not generalize into a full campaign context. For example, your UA/homebrew character might work great in your one shot at level 5, but there might be something broken/confusing/unfun that happens at level 11 that completely changes the perspective. One shots give you a taste which is very useful, but it is not replacement for extensive playtesting.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    On definitions



    Technically, one-shot can mean different things to different people. It doesn't always literally mean a story that can be wrapped up in one session (though that is usually the goal). However, it does always refer to an adventure that is shorter than a full campaign which can vary greatly in length. For the purposes of this answer I will be using the following definitions:




    • One shot - an adventure that can be completed in 1 session (generally 4-8 hours)

    • Short adventure/campaign - can be completed in 2-5 sessions (4-8 hours per session)

    • Long campaign - anything above that


    Advantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    Testing grounds for character ideas/story ideas/new rules/homebrew



    The biggest advantage I have found in my experience running and playing both long and short adventures is that one-shots allow players to play a game and test out character concepts, story concepts, and/or rules variants that are risky or potentially untenable in a long-haul adventure. I've had one-shots turn into longer adventures when the concepts worked out and everyone liked them and also ones where we were happy we tried them out, but were content to stop them after the one-shot was done.



    I've run many one-shots where we have tested out risky ideas. The one we are playing now is testing several homebrew rules (one is a neat skill check-based resolution mechanic) and several experimental characters (including me who is testing the new UA alchemist class). Using my character as an example, I never would have wanted to test it out if I knew I was going to be doing a long campaign because it means I would be stuck with a possibly confusing/bad/broken character for a long time or forcing the group to find some way to integrate a new character into the group as I replace it mid-story (we do extensive character work before beginning campaigns so it would be a hassle to say the least).



    Great for introducing new players/DMs/systems without a lot commitment



    Another really useful way to use one-shots is to introduce new players/DMs to a game. It usually helps, in my experience, to start out new players with a shorter adventure than a full campaign so that they can try an option, learn the rules, and then end the campaign and decide what they want going forward (with regards to character options and the RPG system in general). In particular, I have found this very useful when someone want to try DMing for the first time since they can do so without having the pressure to continue and to reduce the pressure of any mistakes they make.



    Every new system I've run or tried with my group has been done as a short campaign or a one shot. We always run one to get a feel for how it plays and if we want to continue playing it. For example, I ran Masks (a Powered by the apocalypse system) as a 2-session intro game before having the group decide if they wanted to continue or not. I gave them a short story to complete but plenty of room to keep going. The group in this case decided to keep going, but easily could have decided that it was enough and to leave it at that. We have two new systems coming up that we are planning to do the same thing with. On the flip side, I've had a player at the table that was new and we started them with a full hardcover adventure in D&D5e. They made a character that didn't really fit, but they didn't understand enough to know that (or express it) and thus they ended up playing 15 levels and two years with a character they would have changed had we run a short adventure first to test things out.



    When getting everyone to the table is a DC30 check



    One shots are also very handy when you have a very busy group that is only able to meet sporadically. Having an adventure that you can start and finish in one session means that you don't have to worry about the next date people being able to show up at is 2 months after that. It also works in the case that someone has to take a leave of absence and the group wants to break from the current project to wait for them. A one-shot or short adventure can fit perfectly into these gaps.



    One-shots are also great for conventions and the like when you are playing with people for only a given time slot and likely never seeing them again.



    To give breaks



    Sometimes your group is doing a long campaign and the DM just gets burned out for any of many reasons. Sometimes it is even the group that gets burned out as well. Sometimes you just need a short change of tone/pace/system to freshen everything up. One shots deliver this in spades.



    A couple examples from my table. Maybe you are in a grimdark 3-year-long campaign and people decide they need a break from it. Maybe the DM gets slammed at work for a month and they need a change so they can get through it but they still want to play. We switched DMs and ran a short 5e one shot in one case and ran a short adventure in another lighter system in the other. In both cases it really helped to have something short and different to switch to without the commitment of a longer campaign. Afterwards, we want back to the long campaign with a fresh take.



    Disadvantages of a short or one-shot campaign



    It really limits the material and how much you can do



    You are limited in the amount of material you can cover in the adventure. Obviously, a short campaign is going to have less stuff in it than a long campaign. But to make a short campaign work it generally has to be very focused such that you can end it in whatever time restriction you set. This often means having a smaller world and a more focused plot with less side quests. The plot may also have significantly less build-up and nuance to it compared with a story that plays out over many sessions.



    In my own one-shots I've definitely had issues getting things completed in the alloted time even after thinking that I had made a very focused story. Often I have to railroad the party hard to get them to finish on time and/or cut material. However, this is more an inconvenience that a true bad side and sometimes I have to do this in long campaigns as well for various reasons. It is more pronounced when you are running one shots though for sure, especially if you have a party that enjoys RP/messing around/exploring a lot.



    Character development takes a hit



    Less character development. Shorter campaign means there is less time to develop party dynamics and characters. Generally, making a character and party takes time. In a long campaign, the players have multiple sessions to feel out their character and discover who they are and what they are like and how they interact with the rest of the party. You don't get as much of that in a one-shot (especially with newer players or players new to a system).



    Short testing time



    I say that testing ideas is an advantage of one shots, and it is. But, there is an important limitation to it to acknowledge: you only are testing things in a small limited window and that might not generalize into a full campaign context. For example, your UA/homebrew character might work great in your one shot at level 5, but there might be something broken/confusing/unfun that happens at level 11 that completely changes the perspective. One shots give you a taste which is very useful, but it is not replacement for extensive playtesting.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    RubiksmooseRubiksmoose

    61.1k10294450




    61.1k10294450








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
      $endgroup$
      – goodguy5
      yesterday






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
      $endgroup$
      – Rubiksmoose
      yesterday








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
      $endgroup$
      – 3C273
      yesterday
















    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
      $endgroup$
      – NautArch
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
      $endgroup$
      – goodguy5
      yesterday






    • 3




      $begingroup$
      @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
      $endgroup$
      – Rubiksmoose
      yesterday








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
      $endgroup$
      – 3C273
      yesterday










    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
    $endgroup$
    – Monkey D. Luffy
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    I understand. Thanks for your time, i did not think of any of these
    $endgroup$
    – Monkey D. Luffy
    yesterday




    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Excellent breakdown of the considerations (including how you'd differentiate) and bringing in table experience to support them. +1
    $endgroup$
    – NautArch
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    -1 for not taking the opportunity to call them "short shots". (+1, though)
    $endgroup$
    – goodguy5
    yesterday




    3




    3




    $begingroup$
    @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday






    $begingroup$
    @goodguy5 I definitely typed "one shorts" several times and had to correct it lol
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    yesterday






    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
    $endgroup$
    – 3C273
    yesterday






    $begingroup$
    +1 For the DC30 joke. If I can add something that you hint, but not quite say, I've had success running (that which eventually became) a campaign in the form of successive Shorts with recurring characters. A bit of the best of both world. (And one of the few situations where I've seen players explaining lore to one another without prompt or special info from me!)
    $endgroup$
    – 3C273
    yesterday















    16












    $begingroup$

    Four solid benefits of a one shot



    One shots and campaigns serve different gaming needs, so I slightly disagree with your question's point (in paragraph 3 and at the end) that they are somehow in opposition to each other. They fulfill different needs for the players at the table, to include the DM. A given gaming group can do both!



    Four things that a one-shot allows you to do in this game system is:





    1. Play at a different level / tier

      If you've been playing a Ranger for 4 levels(Tier 1), a one shot can allow you to play (as an example) a 10th level Druid / 1st level Monk (Tier 2) for a few sessions to get a different game experience and see how you like it. I did that a couple of months ago during a play test session. This is a great way to vary and enrich the play experience.


    2. Play a different character/class/subclass/archetype to broaden your
      experience


      As above, though it need not be in a different tier. We did a one shot a few months back that was a single session. The idea was to help a friend get used to DMing 5e. We all used level 4, Gestalt characters to increase the flexibility of the experience. (And for shennanigans).

    3. Give the DM a break

      If you are in a campaign, sometimes it is nice to give the DM a break for a session and run a one-shot so that the DM gets to play. I've done this with numerous groups.

      This also allows any of the players to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign. (Thanks, @Someone_Evil for this excellent point)


    4. Test out optional, variant, Unearthed Arcana, or homebrew rules to see if your table likes them

      In item two above, we tested out a Gestalt concept within 5e based on the DM's experiences with it in a different edition. Doing that "inside a campaign" would have cost us consistency and continuity.



    A potential (minor) down side is: you fall in love with your one shot PC



    As you noted in your question, the longer term relationship building and character development is missing from the one shot, and if you fall in love with this PC you have to put it on hold until there is a chance to fold the PC into your campaign, or there is another suitable one shot. But the very act of 'getting into' that character for a session and really enjoying it is fun in and of itself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
      $endgroup$
      – Someone_Evil
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday
















    16












    $begingroup$

    Four solid benefits of a one shot



    One shots and campaigns serve different gaming needs, so I slightly disagree with your question's point (in paragraph 3 and at the end) that they are somehow in opposition to each other. They fulfill different needs for the players at the table, to include the DM. A given gaming group can do both!



    Four things that a one-shot allows you to do in this game system is:





    1. Play at a different level / tier

      If you've been playing a Ranger for 4 levels(Tier 1), a one shot can allow you to play (as an example) a 10th level Druid / 1st level Monk (Tier 2) for a few sessions to get a different game experience and see how you like it. I did that a couple of months ago during a play test session. This is a great way to vary and enrich the play experience.


    2. Play a different character/class/subclass/archetype to broaden your
      experience


      As above, though it need not be in a different tier. We did a one shot a few months back that was a single session. The idea was to help a friend get used to DMing 5e. We all used level 4, Gestalt characters to increase the flexibility of the experience. (And for shennanigans).

    3. Give the DM a break

      If you are in a campaign, sometimes it is nice to give the DM a break for a session and run a one-shot so that the DM gets to play. I've done this with numerous groups.

      This also allows any of the players to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign. (Thanks, @Someone_Evil for this excellent point)


    4. Test out optional, variant, Unearthed Arcana, or homebrew rules to see if your table likes them

      In item two above, we tested out a Gestalt concept within 5e based on the DM's experiences with it in a different edition. Doing that "inside a campaign" would have cost us consistency and continuity.



    A potential (minor) down side is: you fall in love with your one shot PC



    As you noted in your question, the longer term relationship building and character development is missing from the one shot, and if you fall in love with this PC you have to put it on hold until there is a chance to fold the PC into your campaign, or there is another suitable one shot. But the very act of 'getting into' that character for a session and really enjoying it is fun in and of itself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$









    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
      $endgroup$
      – Someone_Evil
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday














    16












    16








    16





    $begingroup$

    Four solid benefits of a one shot



    One shots and campaigns serve different gaming needs, so I slightly disagree with your question's point (in paragraph 3 and at the end) that they are somehow in opposition to each other. They fulfill different needs for the players at the table, to include the DM. A given gaming group can do both!



    Four things that a one-shot allows you to do in this game system is:





    1. Play at a different level / tier

      If you've been playing a Ranger for 4 levels(Tier 1), a one shot can allow you to play (as an example) a 10th level Druid / 1st level Monk (Tier 2) for a few sessions to get a different game experience and see how you like it. I did that a couple of months ago during a play test session. This is a great way to vary and enrich the play experience.


    2. Play a different character/class/subclass/archetype to broaden your
      experience


      As above, though it need not be in a different tier. We did a one shot a few months back that was a single session. The idea was to help a friend get used to DMing 5e. We all used level 4, Gestalt characters to increase the flexibility of the experience. (And for shennanigans).

    3. Give the DM a break

      If you are in a campaign, sometimes it is nice to give the DM a break for a session and run a one-shot so that the DM gets to play. I've done this with numerous groups.

      This also allows any of the players to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign. (Thanks, @Someone_Evil for this excellent point)


    4. Test out optional, variant, Unearthed Arcana, or homebrew rules to see if your table likes them

      In item two above, we tested out a Gestalt concept within 5e based on the DM's experiences with it in a different edition. Doing that "inside a campaign" would have cost us consistency and continuity.



    A potential (minor) down side is: you fall in love with your one shot PC



    As you noted in your question, the longer term relationship building and character development is missing from the one shot, and if you fall in love with this PC you have to put it on hold until there is a chance to fold the PC into your campaign, or there is another suitable one shot. But the very act of 'getting into' that character for a session and really enjoying it is fun in and of itself.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    Four solid benefits of a one shot



    One shots and campaigns serve different gaming needs, so I slightly disagree with your question's point (in paragraph 3 and at the end) that they are somehow in opposition to each other. They fulfill different needs for the players at the table, to include the DM. A given gaming group can do both!



    Four things that a one-shot allows you to do in this game system is:





    1. Play at a different level / tier

      If you've been playing a Ranger for 4 levels(Tier 1), a one shot can allow you to play (as an example) a 10th level Druid / 1st level Monk (Tier 2) for a few sessions to get a different game experience and see how you like it. I did that a couple of months ago during a play test session. This is a great way to vary and enrich the play experience.


    2. Play a different character/class/subclass/archetype to broaden your
      experience


      As above, though it need not be in a different tier. We did a one shot a few months back that was a single session. The idea was to help a friend get used to DMing 5e. We all used level 4, Gestalt characters to increase the flexibility of the experience. (And for shennanigans).

    3. Give the DM a break

      If you are in a campaign, sometimes it is nice to give the DM a break for a session and run a one-shot so that the DM gets to play. I've done this with numerous groups.

      This also allows any of the players to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign. (Thanks, @Someone_Evil for this excellent point)


    4. Test out optional, variant, Unearthed Arcana, or homebrew rules to see if your table likes them

      In item two above, we tested out a Gestalt concept within 5e based on the DM's experiences with it in a different edition. Doing that "inside a campaign" would have cost us consistency and continuity.



    A potential (minor) down side is: you fall in love with your one shot PC



    As you noted in your question, the longer term relationship building and character development is missing from the one shot, and if you fall in love with this PC you have to put it on hold until there is a chance to fold the PC into your campaign, or there is another suitable one shot. But the very act of 'getting into' that character for a session and really enjoying it is fun in and of itself.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    KorvinStarmastKorvinStarmast

    83.5k20258450




    83.5k20258450








    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
      $endgroup$
      – Someone_Evil
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday














    • 2




      $begingroup$
      I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
      $endgroup$
      – Monkey D. Luffy
      yesterday






    • 6




      $begingroup$
      You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
      $endgroup$
      – Someone_Evil
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      yesterday








    2




    2




    $begingroup$
    I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
    $endgroup$
    – Monkey D. Luffy
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    I see, that's some great points. I haven't thought about it. I'm now eager to play a one shot
    $endgroup$
    – Monkey D. Luffy
    yesterday




    6




    6




    $begingroup$
    You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    You mention it briefly, but might be well served more highlight: Getting to try out DM'ing without committing yourself or the player characters to the promise of a full campaign (I definitely did this)
    $endgroup$
    – Someone_Evil
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @MonkeyD.Luffy Glad to be of assistance. Have fun! :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @Someone_Evil Great point, I folded that in, thanks! :)
    $endgroup$
    – KorvinStarmast
    yesterday











    5












    $begingroup$

    Rather than try to do an apples to apples comparison and pick apart the differences, I'll go into some detail about how I've used one-shots (or short-shots) vs campaigns and try to paint them in their best light.



    One shot



    A one shot is like college: a great time to experiment. Maybe you want to test out some friends that you've never gamed with to see if they mesh with your DM style. Maybe you've got a goofy system that you don't think will stand up to more than a night or two of use. Or maybe the people involved just don't have the time/energy to commit. Don't forget the opportunity to FINALLY dust off that Genasi-Dwarf Valor Bard 6 Old One Warlock 5 Storm Sorcerer 3 you've been trying to play (or whatever).



    One shots are not dissimilar to a regular board game night. It's mostly an excuse to get together with some people you like around an activity you're passionate about. The rules of conduct don't have to be as strict as usual (or maybe you can make them even stricter?).



    The point is, anything goes; just make sure you clear it with your partners first and everyone will have a great time (usually).



    One Shot Example



    The last one-shot I ran was with four friends of mine. We've all done board game night together, and I knew one of them used to play D&D (or something similar). my objectives for the game were to vet these people as D&D players (in case I wanted to invite them to a campaign), and also to show them the ropes of one of my favorite hobbies. It was like herding cats. Full murder hobos, and not even the good kind that agree with any plot hook because they know that there will be monsters there; the kind that listens to a mother cry out for the rescue of her child and respond with "nah. eff that. I don't care about any kids. Other character, want to go get drunk in the bar?"



    I tried having the NPC interest them with money; no interest. I literally had to say "guys, this is the only plot hook for this. So, if you want to keep playing, find a way to get interested". The barbarian's name was "bork bork". I like these people, and it ended up being a fun night, but I will never invite them to a campaign... well, except that one guy.





    Campaign



    This is it. You've got the group. You trust them to commit to a few hours every third Saturday. Whether you're the DM or one of the players, you're excited for the group to collectively weave their ways into this wondrous world. /insert epic campaign idea here/



    You can look forward to watching a plot unfurl. There could (and should) be twists and turns, emotions can run high. It's like writing a book and watching your favorite show all mixed together. Your character(s) grows, moving from their unsure greenfoot status and finally falling into their own as a mighty champion/devout holy warrior of the great dragon god/cunning master thief that only steals from the rich/whatever.



    And depending on your age and inclination, a steady and regular excuse to get together with a few friends who you don't see nearly often enough... it gets harder to do as you get older.



    Campaign Example



    I currently run one game and play one game. I can expect for each game to play 1-2 times a month, on average. I have a celestial tiefling and there is a very-anti-demon Paladin in the party. We have a Tolkienesque dwarf-elf thing going and it's a fun time. But it started as complete distrust. These characters have grown and learned more about each other.



    In the game I run, I can tie in player expectations and drop hints and clues. You have a much broader canvas to paint a picture. I like worldbuilding pretty well, but I like giving players something to look forward to better. The town that the party is in right now: we ended a session outside the gate and I asked two players:

    Me (as DM): "what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is true?"

    Player 1: "the town is inhabited by fish people"

    Me (as DM): "ha, okay. and you; what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is false?"

    Player 2: "the town is inhabited by fish people".



    When we regrouped for the next session, I was able to work that into the fabric of the town and we all had a laugh about it, as well as progressing the plot.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      5












      $begingroup$

      Rather than try to do an apples to apples comparison and pick apart the differences, I'll go into some detail about how I've used one-shots (or short-shots) vs campaigns and try to paint them in their best light.



      One shot



      A one shot is like college: a great time to experiment. Maybe you want to test out some friends that you've never gamed with to see if they mesh with your DM style. Maybe you've got a goofy system that you don't think will stand up to more than a night or two of use. Or maybe the people involved just don't have the time/energy to commit. Don't forget the opportunity to FINALLY dust off that Genasi-Dwarf Valor Bard 6 Old One Warlock 5 Storm Sorcerer 3 you've been trying to play (or whatever).



      One shots are not dissimilar to a regular board game night. It's mostly an excuse to get together with some people you like around an activity you're passionate about. The rules of conduct don't have to be as strict as usual (or maybe you can make them even stricter?).



      The point is, anything goes; just make sure you clear it with your partners first and everyone will have a great time (usually).



      One Shot Example



      The last one-shot I ran was with four friends of mine. We've all done board game night together, and I knew one of them used to play D&D (or something similar). my objectives for the game were to vet these people as D&D players (in case I wanted to invite them to a campaign), and also to show them the ropes of one of my favorite hobbies. It was like herding cats. Full murder hobos, and not even the good kind that agree with any plot hook because they know that there will be monsters there; the kind that listens to a mother cry out for the rescue of her child and respond with "nah. eff that. I don't care about any kids. Other character, want to go get drunk in the bar?"



      I tried having the NPC interest them with money; no interest. I literally had to say "guys, this is the only plot hook for this. So, if you want to keep playing, find a way to get interested". The barbarian's name was "bork bork". I like these people, and it ended up being a fun night, but I will never invite them to a campaign... well, except that one guy.





      Campaign



      This is it. You've got the group. You trust them to commit to a few hours every third Saturday. Whether you're the DM or one of the players, you're excited for the group to collectively weave their ways into this wondrous world. /insert epic campaign idea here/



      You can look forward to watching a plot unfurl. There could (and should) be twists and turns, emotions can run high. It's like writing a book and watching your favorite show all mixed together. Your character(s) grows, moving from their unsure greenfoot status and finally falling into their own as a mighty champion/devout holy warrior of the great dragon god/cunning master thief that only steals from the rich/whatever.



      And depending on your age and inclination, a steady and regular excuse to get together with a few friends who you don't see nearly often enough... it gets harder to do as you get older.



      Campaign Example



      I currently run one game and play one game. I can expect for each game to play 1-2 times a month, on average. I have a celestial tiefling and there is a very-anti-demon Paladin in the party. We have a Tolkienesque dwarf-elf thing going and it's a fun time. But it started as complete distrust. These characters have grown and learned more about each other.



      In the game I run, I can tie in player expectations and drop hints and clues. You have a much broader canvas to paint a picture. I like worldbuilding pretty well, but I like giving players something to look forward to better. The town that the party is in right now: we ended a session outside the gate and I asked two players:

      Me (as DM): "what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is true?"

      Player 1: "the town is inhabited by fish people"

      Me (as DM): "ha, okay. and you; what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is false?"

      Player 2: "the town is inhabited by fish people".



      When we regrouped for the next session, I was able to work that into the fabric of the town and we all had a laugh about it, as well as progressing the plot.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        5












        5








        5





        $begingroup$

        Rather than try to do an apples to apples comparison and pick apart the differences, I'll go into some detail about how I've used one-shots (or short-shots) vs campaigns and try to paint them in their best light.



        One shot



        A one shot is like college: a great time to experiment. Maybe you want to test out some friends that you've never gamed with to see if they mesh with your DM style. Maybe you've got a goofy system that you don't think will stand up to more than a night or two of use. Or maybe the people involved just don't have the time/energy to commit. Don't forget the opportunity to FINALLY dust off that Genasi-Dwarf Valor Bard 6 Old One Warlock 5 Storm Sorcerer 3 you've been trying to play (or whatever).



        One shots are not dissimilar to a regular board game night. It's mostly an excuse to get together with some people you like around an activity you're passionate about. The rules of conduct don't have to be as strict as usual (or maybe you can make them even stricter?).



        The point is, anything goes; just make sure you clear it with your partners first and everyone will have a great time (usually).



        One Shot Example



        The last one-shot I ran was with four friends of mine. We've all done board game night together, and I knew one of them used to play D&D (or something similar). my objectives for the game were to vet these people as D&D players (in case I wanted to invite them to a campaign), and also to show them the ropes of one of my favorite hobbies. It was like herding cats. Full murder hobos, and not even the good kind that agree with any plot hook because they know that there will be monsters there; the kind that listens to a mother cry out for the rescue of her child and respond with "nah. eff that. I don't care about any kids. Other character, want to go get drunk in the bar?"



        I tried having the NPC interest them with money; no interest. I literally had to say "guys, this is the only plot hook for this. So, if you want to keep playing, find a way to get interested". The barbarian's name was "bork bork". I like these people, and it ended up being a fun night, but I will never invite them to a campaign... well, except that one guy.





        Campaign



        This is it. You've got the group. You trust them to commit to a few hours every third Saturday. Whether you're the DM or one of the players, you're excited for the group to collectively weave their ways into this wondrous world. /insert epic campaign idea here/



        You can look forward to watching a plot unfurl. There could (and should) be twists and turns, emotions can run high. It's like writing a book and watching your favorite show all mixed together. Your character(s) grows, moving from their unsure greenfoot status and finally falling into their own as a mighty champion/devout holy warrior of the great dragon god/cunning master thief that only steals from the rich/whatever.



        And depending on your age and inclination, a steady and regular excuse to get together with a few friends who you don't see nearly often enough... it gets harder to do as you get older.



        Campaign Example



        I currently run one game and play one game. I can expect for each game to play 1-2 times a month, on average. I have a celestial tiefling and there is a very-anti-demon Paladin in the party. We have a Tolkienesque dwarf-elf thing going and it's a fun time. But it started as complete distrust. These characters have grown and learned more about each other.



        In the game I run, I can tie in player expectations and drop hints and clues. You have a much broader canvas to paint a picture. I like worldbuilding pretty well, but I like giving players something to look forward to better. The town that the party is in right now: we ended a session outside the gate and I asked two players:

        Me (as DM): "what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is true?"

        Player 1: "the town is inhabited by fish people"

        Me (as DM): "ha, okay. and you; what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is false?"

        Player 2: "the town is inhabited by fish people".



        When we regrouped for the next session, I was able to work that into the fabric of the town and we all had a laugh about it, as well as progressing the plot.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        Rather than try to do an apples to apples comparison and pick apart the differences, I'll go into some detail about how I've used one-shots (or short-shots) vs campaigns and try to paint them in their best light.



        One shot



        A one shot is like college: a great time to experiment. Maybe you want to test out some friends that you've never gamed with to see if they mesh with your DM style. Maybe you've got a goofy system that you don't think will stand up to more than a night or two of use. Or maybe the people involved just don't have the time/energy to commit. Don't forget the opportunity to FINALLY dust off that Genasi-Dwarf Valor Bard 6 Old One Warlock 5 Storm Sorcerer 3 you've been trying to play (or whatever).



        One shots are not dissimilar to a regular board game night. It's mostly an excuse to get together with some people you like around an activity you're passionate about. The rules of conduct don't have to be as strict as usual (or maybe you can make them even stricter?).



        The point is, anything goes; just make sure you clear it with your partners first and everyone will have a great time (usually).



        One Shot Example



        The last one-shot I ran was with four friends of mine. We've all done board game night together, and I knew one of them used to play D&D (or something similar). my objectives for the game were to vet these people as D&D players (in case I wanted to invite them to a campaign), and also to show them the ropes of one of my favorite hobbies. It was like herding cats. Full murder hobos, and not even the good kind that agree with any plot hook because they know that there will be monsters there; the kind that listens to a mother cry out for the rescue of her child and respond with "nah. eff that. I don't care about any kids. Other character, want to go get drunk in the bar?"



        I tried having the NPC interest them with money; no interest. I literally had to say "guys, this is the only plot hook for this. So, if you want to keep playing, find a way to get interested". The barbarian's name was "bork bork". I like these people, and it ended up being a fun night, but I will never invite them to a campaign... well, except that one guy.





        Campaign



        This is it. You've got the group. You trust them to commit to a few hours every third Saturday. Whether you're the DM or one of the players, you're excited for the group to collectively weave their ways into this wondrous world. /insert epic campaign idea here/



        You can look forward to watching a plot unfurl. There could (and should) be twists and turns, emotions can run high. It's like writing a book and watching your favorite show all mixed together. Your character(s) grows, moving from their unsure greenfoot status and finally falling into their own as a mighty champion/devout holy warrior of the great dragon god/cunning master thief that only steals from the rich/whatever.



        And depending on your age and inclination, a steady and regular excuse to get together with a few friends who you don't see nearly often enough... it gets harder to do as you get older.



        Campaign Example



        I currently run one game and play one game. I can expect for each game to play 1-2 times a month, on average. I have a celestial tiefling and there is a very-anti-demon Paladin in the party. We have a Tolkienesque dwarf-elf thing going and it's a fun time. But it started as complete distrust. These characters have grown and learned more about each other.



        In the game I run, I can tie in player expectations and drop hints and clues. You have a much broader canvas to paint a picture. I like worldbuilding pretty well, but I like giving players something to look forward to better. The town that the party is in right now: we ended a session outside the gate and I asked two players:

        Me (as DM): "what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is true?"

        Player 1: "the town is inhabited by fish people"

        Me (as DM): "ha, okay. and you; what is a rumor you've heard about this town that you think is false?"

        Player 2: "the town is inhabited by fish people".



        When we regrouped for the next session, I was able to work that into the fabric of the town and we all had a laugh about it, as well as progressing the plot.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        goodguy5goodguy5

        9,87623578




        9,87623578























            2












            $begingroup$

            Time



            As an adult with a full-time job who has many other adult friends with full-time jobs who don't live nearby, one-shots provide a chance to play without a long term commitment. It's nigh impossible to find a weekly or even biweekly time that we could all commit to.



            Also, a lot of my friends haven't played D&D before. They wouldn't feel comfortable jumping headfirst into a long campaign. A one-shot gives them a chance to try it out and see if they like it.



            New ideas



            Apart from that, one-shots give you a chance to do something different that you're curious about but don't think would be fun long term. They also are just a chance to try anything new without a long term commitment.



            A break from a campaign



            They can also serve as a break from an ongoing campaign. My group had a Halloween themed one shot for Halloween that was a blast.



            You could also let someone try DMing or just give the DM a break so they can play for once.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
              $endgroup$
              – BittermanAndy
              13 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
              $endgroup$
              – Captain Man
              4 hours ago


















            2












            $begingroup$

            Time



            As an adult with a full-time job who has many other adult friends with full-time jobs who don't live nearby, one-shots provide a chance to play without a long term commitment. It's nigh impossible to find a weekly or even biweekly time that we could all commit to.



            Also, a lot of my friends haven't played D&D before. They wouldn't feel comfortable jumping headfirst into a long campaign. A one-shot gives them a chance to try it out and see if they like it.



            New ideas



            Apart from that, one-shots give you a chance to do something different that you're curious about but don't think would be fun long term. They also are just a chance to try anything new without a long term commitment.



            A break from a campaign



            They can also serve as a break from an ongoing campaign. My group had a Halloween themed one shot for Halloween that was a blast.



            You could also let someone try DMing or just give the DM a break so they can play for once.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
              $endgroup$
              – BittermanAndy
              13 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
              $endgroup$
              – Captain Man
              4 hours ago
















            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            Time



            As an adult with a full-time job who has many other adult friends with full-time jobs who don't live nearby, one-shots provide a chance to play without a long term commitment. It's nigh impossible to find a weekly or even biweekly time that we could all commit to.



            Also, a lot of my friends haven't played D&D before. They wouldn't feel comfortable jumping headfirst into a long campaign. A one-shot gives them a chance to try it out and see if they like it.



            New ideas



            Apart from that, one-shots give you a chance to do something different that you're curious about but don't think would be fun long term. They also are just a chance to try anything new without a long term commitment.



            A break from a campaign



            They can also serve as a break from an ongoing campaign. My group had a Halloween themed one shot for Halloween that was a blast.



            You could also let someone try DMing or just give the DM a break so they can play for once.






            share|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Time



            As an adult with a full-time job who has many other adult friends with full-time jobs who don't live nearby, one-shots provide a chance to play without a long term commitment. It's nigh impossible to find a weekly or even biweekly time that we could all commit to.



            Also, a lot of my friends haven't played D&D before. They wouldn't feel comfortable jumping headfirst into a long campaign. A one-shot gives them a chance to try it out and see if they like it.



            New ideas



            Apart from that, one-shots give you a chance to do something different that you're curious about but don't think would be fun long term. They also are just a chance to try anything new without a long term commitment.



            A break from a campaign



            They can also serve as a break from an ongoing campaign. My group had a Halloween themed one shot for Halloween that was a blast.



            You could also let someone try DMing or just give the DM a break so they can play for once.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Captain ManCaptain Man

            474210




            474210












            • $begingroup$
              Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
              $endgroup$
              – BittermanAndy
              13 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
              $endgroup$
              – Captain Man
              4 hours ago




















            • $begingroup$
              Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
              $endgroup$
              – BittermanAndy
              13 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
              $endgroup$
              – Captain Man
              4 hours ago


















            $begingroup$
            Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
            $endgroup$
            – BittermanAndy
            13 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Agreed. Our gaming group gets together maybe four times a year, six if we're really lucky. Any carry-over between sessions just gets forgotten by the next session. One-offs are the only solution.
            $endgroup$
            – BittermanAndy
            13 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            12 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            12 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
            $endgroup$
            – Captain Man
            4 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            @NautArch I'm confused, did I not make it clear these were things I've tried in my answer? I specifically mentioned how one-shots let me avoid scheduling problems and gave an example of a holiday themed adventure we did.
            $endgroup$
            – Captain Man
            4 hours ago













            2












            $begingroup$

            One shots are consequence-free



            Some GMs run games where they make sure that PC death either isn't a substantial risk, but others are willing to let the PCs actually "fail." In a campaign, everybody dying can bring the game to an abrupt halt. In a one shot, you can laugh about how it was a really bad idea to wait until the necromancer was in the cemetery to confront him. Campaigns allow for regular interaction with a set of important NPCs. One shots tend to gravitate towards NPCs being quest givers/items.



            One group that I played with a few years back ended up switching from a campaign to one shots after our attempt at a campaign resulted in everybody dying. Twice. We actually enjoyed the challenging difficulty, but making new characters and having to find a way to integrate them into the campaign so that they could take over for the dead PCs was getting to be too much. When we switched to one shots, we continued to have the same level of difficulty. We wouldn't always "win" the adventures, but we enjoyed making characters, tossing them at the bad guy of the week, and then seeing who was left standing in the end. With that group, consequence-free one shots allowed everybody to have more fun, because it worked well with the reckless approach that we had to most situations.



            In contrast, I am currently in a campaign with a different group where some of the most fun parts of it have come from the consequences that would have been avoided if there was no continuity. One of the players lost a PC fairly early on, and is now playing as both the replacement PC and the spirit of his original character, now inhabiting the sword that killed him. A serial killer was attacking the town we were in, and NPCs being targeted meant something, because they were characters that we had interacted with instead of just generic background objects. With this group, having a campaign where actions have consequences is good because it has created unique situations and enhanced our immersion in the setting.



            One shots are more flexible



            Sometimes people can't make it to a session. In a campaign, this means that whoever missed last session needs to be brought up to speed on the fact that Bob was captured by evil cultists, and we're now preparing to sneak into the pyramid where he's being held so that we can save him. In one shots, you just have one less person if somebody has to miss.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago
















            2












            $begingroup$

            One shots are consequence-free



            Some GMs run games where they make sure that PC death either isn't a substantial risk, but others are willing to let the PCs actually "fail." In a campaign, everybody dying can bring the game to an abrupt halt. In a one shot, you can laugh about how it was a really bad idea to wait until the necromancer was in the cemetery to confront him. Campaigns allow for regular interaction with a set of important NPCs. One shots tend to gravitate towards NPCs being quest givers/items.



            One group that I played with a few years back ended up switching from a campaign to one shots after our attempt at a campaign resulted in everybody dying. Twice. We actually enjoyed the challenging difficulty, but making new characters and having to find a way to integrate them into the campaign so that they could take over for the dead PCs was getting to be too much. When we switched to one shots, we continued to have the same level of difficulty. We wouldn't always "win" the adventures, but we enjoyed making characters, tossing them at the bad guy of the week, and then seeing who was left standing in the end. With that group, consequence-free one shots allowed everybody to have more fun, because it worked well with the reckless approach that we had to most situations.



            In contrast, I am currently in a campaign with a different group where some of the most fun parts of it have come from the consequences that would have been avoided if there was no continuity. One of the players lost a PC fairly early on, and is now playing as both the replacement PC and the spirit of his original character, now inhabiting the sword that killed him. A serial killer was attacking the town we were in, and NPCs being targeted meant something, because they were characters that we had interacted with instead of just generic background objects. With this group, having a campaign where actions have consequences is good because it has created unique situations and enhanced our immersion in the setting.



            One shots are more flexible



            Sometimes people can't make it to a session. In a campaign, this means that whoever missed last session needs to be brought up to speed on the fact that Bob was captured by evil cultists, and we're now preparing to sneak into the pyramid where he's being held so that we can save him. In one shots, you just have one less person if somebody has to miss.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$













            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago














            2












            2








            2





            $begingroup$

            One shots are consequence-free



            Some GMs run games where they make sure that PC death either isn't a substantial risk, but others are willing to let the PCs actually "fail." In a campaign, everybody dying can bring the game to an abrupt halt. In a one shot, you can laugh about how it was a really bad idea to wait until the necromancer was in the cemetery to confront him. Campaigns allow for regular interaction with a set of important NPCs. One shots tend to gravitate towards NPCs being quest givers/items.



            One group that I played with a few years back ended up switching from a campaign to one shots after our attempt at a campaign resulted in everybody dying. Twice. We actually enjoyed the challenging difficulty, but making new characters and having to find a way to integrate them into the campaign so that they could take over for the dead PCs was getting to be too much. When we switched to one shots, we continued to have the same level of difficulty. We wouldn't always "win" the adventures, but we enjoyed making characters, tossing them at the bad guy of the week, and then seeing who was left standing in the end. With that group, consequence-free one shots allowed everybody to have more fun, because it worked well with the reckless approach that we had to most situations.



            In contrast, I am currently in a campaign with a different group where some of the most fun parts of it have come from the consequences that would have been avoided if there was no continuity. One of the players lost a PC fairly early on, and is now playing as both the replacement PC and the spirit of his original character, now inhabiting the sword that killed him. A serial killer was attacking the town we were in, and NPCs being targeted meant something, because they were characters that we had interacted with instead of just generic background objects. With this group, having a campaign where actions have consequences is good because it has created unique situations and enhanced our immersion in the setting.



            One shots are more flexible



            Sometimes people can't make it to a session. In a campaign, this means that whoever missed last session needs to be brought up to speed on the fact that Bob was captured by evil cultists, and we're now preparing to sneak into the pyramid where he's being held so that we can save him. In one shots, you just have one less person if somebody has to miss.






            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            One shots are consequence-free



            Some GMs run games where they make sure that PC death either isn't a substantial risk, but others are willing to let the PCs actually "fail." In a campaign, everybody dying can bring the game to an abrupt halt. In a one shot, you can laugh about how it was a really bad idea to wait until the necromancer was in the cemetery to confront him. Campaigns allow for regular interaction with a set of important NPCs. One shots tend to gravitate towards NPCs being quest givers/items.



            One group that I played with a few years back ended up switching from a campaign to one shots after our attempt at a campaign resulted in everybody dying. Twice. We actually enjoyed the challenging difficulty, but making new characters and having to find a way to integrate them into the campaign so that they could take over for the dead PCs was getting to be too much. When we switched to one shots, we continued to have the same level of difficulty. We wouldn't always "win" the adventures, but we enjoyed making characters, tossing them at the bad guy of the week, and then seeing who was left standing in the end. With that group, consequence-free one shots allowed everybody to have more fun, because it worked well with the reckless approach that we had to most situations.



            In contrast, I am currently in a campaign with a different group where some of the most fun parts of it have come from the consequences that would have been avoided if there was no continuity. One of the players lost a PC fairly early on, and is now playing as both the replacement PC and the spirit of his original character, now inhabiting the sword that killed him. A serial killer was attacking the town we were in, and NPCs being targeted meant something, because they were characters that we had interacted with instead of just generic background objects. With this group, having a campaign where actions have consequences is good because it has created unique situations and enhanced our immersion in the setting.



            One shots are more flexible



            Sometimes people can't make it to a session. In a campaign, this means that whoever missed last session needs to be brought up to speed on the fact that Bob was captured by evil cultists, and we're now preparing to sneak into the pyramid where he's being held so that we can save him. In one shots, you just have one less person if somebody has to miss.







            share|improve this answer








            New contributor




            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer






            New contributor




            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 2 hours ago









            HeraldOfExiusHeraldOfExius

            212




            212




            New contributor




            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            HeraldOfExius is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.












            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago


















            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago
















            $begingroup$
            Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            2 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            2 hours ago











            0












            $begingroup$

            Adding to other people's (excellent) ideas, the fact that players are more dissociated to their characters can actually be a bonus.



            Take ten candles for example, the whole point of the game is to play the tragic and horrible death of the PCs. It is intense, refreshing. Because the game is supposed to be deadly, death is not a failure or frustrating. A one shot can be to a campaign what a movie is to a series: unique, unconstrained by the need of a sequel, with permanent stakes and the actual possibility of a bad ending.



            We had a few games and it was epic. Knowing that the world and our characters would end with the night allowed us to go through dimensional portals, ghost attacks and shapeshifting dogs. In this game, each PC narrates their own death, and I was able to die fending off a shadow-monster horde with a shotgun.



            Also, think of it that way: a great one-shot can be made into a campaign, the opposite is not true. The best example I have about that is a campaign I participated in that started with a Unknown Armies one-shot. It was a beginners' game in our RPG club's attempt to recruit. The game was intense (and pretty gory, considering a PC almost raped another PC by mistake (that GM was dark)). At the end of the game, the GM said "do you guys want more?" and all but one resoundingly answered yes (the "almost raped" girl, for some reason). The campaign lasted for more than a year and was based on the choices and alliances made in the first game. In the finale, the character of the almost-raped girl came back (played by someone else) as a traumatized MacGuffin manipulated by evil forces. Yes, the campaign was not prepared in the first game, but thanks to that, it revolved around it, making everybody's experience and involvement better.



            Since then I've used that schema several times. Sometimes we would play a one-shot and just have fun. Sometimes I would propose to go for a campaign (possibly loosing and gaining a few players in the meantime).



            Finally, I'd say that making a one-shot allows to focus more on the current action. It can be a creative limit to constrain yourself to "prepare things for the future". You know, when you introduce a character that will later be significant, or talk about a prophecy that is frustratingly-out-of-your-level-right-now. The one-shot goes directly to that "all bets are off" campaign finale ambiance.



            One frustrating example I have is the Star wars DarkStryder campaign. Don't get me wrong, it's a great campaign. But you spend an incredible amount of time running after a guy you'll only catch at the end of the season. The whole campaign is pretty much "you're on that guy's tail, but you get into his trap and get slowed down, maybe you'll get him next time (you won't)". To me, that's problem of something that's too much thought as a whole and not enough as a series of individual games. Working on one-shots can help you practice the now.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago


















            0












            $begingroup$

            Adding to other people's (excellent) ideas, the fact that players are more dissociated to their characters can actually be a bonus.



            Take ten candles for example, the whole point of the game is to play the tragic and horrible death of the PCs. It is intense, refreshing. Because the game is supposed to be deadly, death is not a failure or frustrating. A one shot can be to a campaign what a movie is to a series: unique, unconstrained by the need of a sequel, with permanent stakes and the actual possibility of a bad ending.



            We had a few games and it was epic. Knowing that the world and our characters would end with the night allowed us to go through dimensional portals, ghost attacks and shapeshifting dogs. In this game, each PC narrates their own death, and I was able to die fending off a shadow-monster horde with a shotgun.



            Also, think of it that way: a great one-shot can be made into a campaign, the opposite is not true. The best example I have about that is a campaign I participated in that started with a Unknown Armies one-shot. It was a beginners' game in our RPG club's attempt to recruit. The game was intense (and pretty gory, considering a PC almost raped another PC by mistake (that GM was dark)). At the end of the game, the GM said "do you guys want more?" and all but one resoundingly answered yes (the "almost raped" girl, for some reason). The campaign lasted for more than a year and was based on the choices and alliances made in the first game. In the finale, the character of the almost-raped girl came back (played by someone else) as a traumatized MacGuffin manipulated by evil forces. Yes, the campaign was not prepared in the first game, but thanks to that, it revolved around it, making everybody's experience and involvement better.



            Since then I've used that schema several times. Sometimes we would play a one-shot and just have fun. Sometimes I would propose to go for a campaign (possibly loosing and gaining a few players in the meantime).



            Finally, I'd say that making a one-shot allows to focus more on the current action. It can be a creative limit to constrain yourself to "prepare things for the future". You know, when you introduce a character that will later be significant, or talk about a prophecy that is frustratingly-out-of-your-level-right-now. The one-shot goes directly to that "all bets are off" campaign finale ambiance.



            One frustrating example I have is the Star wars DarkStryder campaign. Don't get me wrong, it's a great campaign. But you spend an incredible amount of time running after a guy you'll only catch at the end of the season. The whole campaign is pretty much "you're on that guy's tail, but you get into his trap and get slowed down, maybe you'll get him next time (you won't)". To me, that's problem of something that's too much thought as a whole and not enough as a series of individual games. Working on one-shots can help you practice the now.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$









            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago
















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Adding to other people's (excellent) ideas, the fact that players are more dissociated to their characters can actually be a bonus.



            Take ten candles for example, the whole point of the game is to play the tragic and horrible death of the PCs. It is intense, refreshing. Because the game is supposed to be deadly, death is not a failure or frustrating. A one shot can be to a campaign what a movie is to a series: unique, unconstrained by the need of a sequel, with permanent stakes and the actual possibility of a bad ending.



            We had a few games and it was epic. Knowing that the world and our characters would end with the night allowed us to go through dimensional portals, ghost attacks and shapeshifting dogs. In this game, each PC narrates their own death, and I was able to die fending off a shadow-monster horde with a shotgun.



            Also, think of it that way: a great one-shot can be made into a campaign, the opposite is not true. The best example I have about that is a campaign I participated in that started with a Unknown Armies one-shot. It was a beginners' game in our RPG club's attempt to recruit. The game was intense (and pretty gory, considering a PC almost raped another PC by mistake (that GM was dark)). At the end of the game, the GM said "do you guys want more?" and all but one resoundingly answered yes (the "almost raped" girl, for some reason). The campaign lasted for more than a year and was based on the choices and alliances made in the first game. In the finale, the character of the almost-raped girl came back (played by someone else) as a traumatized MacGuffin manipulated by evil forces. Yes, the campaign was not prepared in the first game, but thanks to that, it revolved around it, making everybody's experience and involvement better.



            Since then I've used that schema several times. Sometimes we would play a one-shot and just have fun. Sometimes I would propose to go for a campaign (possibly loosing and gaining a few players in the meantime).



            Finally, I'd say that making a one-shot allows to focus more on the current action. It can be a creative limit to constrain yourself to "prepare things for the future". You know, when you introduce a character that will later be significant, or talk about a prophecy that is frustratingly-out-of-your-level-right-now. The one-shot goes directly to that "all bets are off" campaign finale ambiance.



            One frustrating example I have is the Star wars DarkStryder campaign. Don't get me wrong, it's a great campaign. But you spend an incredible amount of time running after a guy you'll only catch at the end of the season. The whole campaign is pretty much "you're on that guy's tail, but you get into his trap and get slowed down, maybe you'll get him next time (you won't)". To me, that's problem of something that's too much thought as a whole and not enough as a series of individual games. Working on one-shots can help you practice the now.






            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            Adding to other people's (excellent) ideas, the fact that players are more dissociated to their characters can actually be a bonus.



            Take ten candles for example, the whole point of the game is to play the tragic and horrible death of the PCs. It is intense, refreshing. Because the game is supposed to be deadly, death is not a failure or frustrating. A one shot can be to a campaign what a movie is to a series: unique, unconstrained by the need of a sequel, with permanent stakes and the actual possibility of a bad ending.



            We had a few games and it was epic. Knowing that the world and our characters would end with the night allowed us to go through dimensional portals, ghost attacks and shapeshifting dogs. In this game, each PC narrates their own death, and I was able to die fending off a shadow-monster horde with a shotgun.



            Also, think of it that way: a great one-shot can be made into a campaign, the opposite is not true. The best example I have about that is a campaign I participated in that started with a Unknown Armies one-shot. It was a beginners' game in our RPG club's attempt to recruit. The game was intense (and pretty gory, considering a PC almost raped another PC by mistake (that GM was dark)). At the end of the game, the GM said "do you guys want more?" and all but one resoundingly answered yes (the "almost raped" girl, for some reason). The campaign lasted for more than a year and was based on the choices and alliances made in the first game. In the finale, the character of the almost-raped girl came back (played by someone else) as a traumatized MacGuffin manipulated by evil forces. Yes, the campaign was not prepared in the first game, but thanks to that, it revolved around it, making everybody's experience and involvement better.



            Since then I've used that schema several times. Sometimes we would play a one-shot and just have fun. Sometimes I would propose to go for a campaign (possibly loosing and gaining a few players in the meantime).



            Finally, I'd say that making a one-shot allows to focus more on the current action. It can be a creative limit to constrain yourself to "prepare things for the future". You know, when you introduce a character that will later be significant, or talk about a prophecy that is frustratingly-out-of-your-level-right-now. The one-shot goes directly to that "all bets are off" campaign finale ambiance.



            One frustrating example I have is the Star wars DarkStryder campaign. Don't get me wrong, it's a great campaign. But you spend an incredible amount of time running after a guy you'll only catch at the end of the season. The whole campaign is pretty much "you're on that guy's tail, but you get into his trap and get slowed down, maybe you'll get him next time (you won't)". To me, that's problem of something that's too much thought as a whole and not enough as a series of individual games. Working on one-shots can help you practice the now.







            share|improve this answer










            New contributor




            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 5 hours ago





















            New contributor




            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered 13 hours ago









            PatJPatJ

            1093




            1093




            New contributor




            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            PatJ is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago
















            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
              $endgroup$
              – NautArch
              12 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              2 hours ago










            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            12 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Can you back this up with table experience that you can discuss?
            $endgroup$
            – NautArch
            12 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            2 hours ago






            $begingroup$
            Welcome to RPG.SE! (I see you've had an account here for 7 months, but this is your first answer here.) Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance.
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            2 hours ago












            Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Monkey D. Luffy is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144785%2fwhat-are-the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-running-one-shots-compared-to-campa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Færeyskur hestur Heimild | Tengill | Tilvísanir | LeiðsagnarvalRossið - síða um færeyska hrossið á færeyskuGott ár hjá færeyska hestinum

            He _____ here since 1970 . Answer needed [closed]What does “since he was so high” mean?Meaning of “catch birds for”?How do I ensure “since” takes the meaning I want?“Who cares here” meaningWhat does “right round toward” mean?the time tense (had now been detected)What does the phrase “ring around the roses” mean here?Correct usage of “visited upon”Meaning of “foiled rail sabotage bid”It was the third time I had gone to Rome or It is the third time I had been to Rome

            Slayer Innehåll Historia | Stil, komposition och lyrik | Bandets betydelse och framgångar | Sidoprojekt och samarbeten | Kontroverser | Medlemmar | Utmärkelser och nomineringar | Turnéer och festivaler | Diskografi | Referenser | Externa länkar | Navigeringsmenywww.slayer.net”Metal Massacre vol. 1””Metal Massacre vol. 3””Metal Massacre Volume III””Show No Mercy””Haunting the Chapel””Live Undead””Hell Awaits””Reign in Blood””Reign in Blood””Gold & Platinum – Reign in Blood””Golden Gods Awards Winners”originalet”Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Looks Back On 37-Year Career In New Video Series: Part Two””South of Heaven””Gold & Platinum – South of Heaven””Seasons in the Abyss””Gold & Platinum - Seasons in the Abyss””Divine Intervention””Divine Intervention - Release group by Slayer””Gold & Platinum - Divine Intervention””Live Intrusion””Undisputed Attitude””Abolish Government/Superficial Love””Release “Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer” by Various Artists””Diabolus in Musica””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””God Hates Us All””Systematic - Relationships””War at the Warfield””Gold & Platinum - War at the Warfield””Soundtrack to the Apocalypse””Gold & Platinum - Still Reigning””Metallica, Slayer, Iron Mauden Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Eternal Pyre””Eternal Pyre - Slayer release group””Eternal Pyre””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Bullet-For My Valentine booed at Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Unholy Aliance””The End Of Slayer?””Slayer: We Could Thrash Out Two More Albums If We're Fast Enough...””'The Unholy Alliance: Chapter III' UK Dates Added”originalet”Megadeth And Slayer To Co-Headline 'Canadian Carnage' Trek”originalet”World Painted Blood””Release “World Painted Blood” by Slayer””Metallica Heading To Cinemas””Slayer, Megadeth To Join Forces For 'European Carnage' Tour - Dec. 18, 2010”originalet”Slayer's Hanneman Contracts Acute Infection; Band To Bring In Guest Guitarist””Cannibal Corpse's Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer's Guest Guitarist”originalet”Slayer’s Jeff Hanneman Dead at 49””Dave Lombardo Says He Made Only $67,000 In 2011 While Touring With Slayer””Slayer: We Do Not Agree With Dave Lombardo's Substance Or Timeline Of Events””Slayer Welcomes Drummer Paul Bostaph Back To The Fold””Slayer Hope to Unveil Never-Before-Heard Jeff Hanneman Material on Next Album””Slayer Debut New Song 'Implode' During Surprise Golden Gods Appearance””Release group Repentless by Slayer””Repentless - Slayer - Credits””Slayer””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer - to release comic book "Repentless #1"””Slayer To Release 'Repentless' 6.66" Vinyl Box Set””BREAKING NEWS: Slayer Announce Farewell Tour””Slayer Recruit Lamb of God, Anthrax, Behemoth + Testament for Final Tour””Slayer lägger ner efter 37 år””Slayer Announces Second North American Leg Of 'Final' Tour””Final World Tour””Slayer Announces Final European Tour With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Tour Europe With Lamb of God, Anthrax And Obituary””Slayer To Play 'Last French Show Ever' At Next Year's Hellfst””Slayer's Final World Tour Will Extend Into 2019””Death Angel's Rob Cavestany On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour: 'Some Of Us Could See This Coming'””Testament Has No Plans To Retire Anytime Soon, Says Chuck Billy””Anthrax's Scott Ian On Slayer's 'Farewell' Tour Plans: 'I Was Surprised And I Wasn't Surprised'””Slayer””Slayer's Morbid Schlock””Review/Rock; For Slayer, the Mania Is the Message””Slayer - Biography””Slayer - Reign In Blood”originalet”Dave Lombardo””An exclusive oral history of Slayer”originalet”Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman”originalet”Thinking Out Loud: Slayer's Kerry King on hair metal, Satan and being polite””Slayer Lyrics””Slayer - Biography””Most influential artists for extreme metal music””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dies aged 49””Slatanic Slaughter: A Tribute to Slayer””Gateway to Hell: A Tribute to Slayer””Covered In Blood””Slayer: The Origins of Thrash in San Francisco, CA.””Why They Rule - #6 Slayer”originalet”Guitar World's 100 Greatest Heavy Metal Guitarists Of All Time”originalet”The fans have spoken: Slayer comes out on top in readers' polls”originalet”Tribute to Jeff Hanneman (1964-2013)””Lamb Of God Frontman: We Sound Like A Slayer Rip-Off””BEHEMOTH Frontman Pays Tribute To SLAYER's JEFF HANNEMAN””Slayer, Hatebreed Doing Double Duty On This Year's Ozzfest””System of a Down””Lacuna Coil’s Andrea Ferro Talks Influences, Skateboarding, Band Origins + More””Slayer - Reign in Blood””Into The Lungs of Hell””Slayer rules - en utställning om fans””Slayer and Their Fans Slashed Through a No-Holds-Barred Night at Gas Monkey””Home””Slayer””Gold & Platinum - The Big 4 Live from Sofia, Bulgaria””Exclusive! Interview With Slayer Guitarist Kerry King””2008-02-23: Wiltern, Los Angeles, CA, USA””Slayer's Kerry King To Perform With Megadeth Tonight! - Oct. 21, 2010”originalet”Dave Lombardo - Biography”Slayer Case DismissedArkiveradUltimate Classic Rock: Slayer guitarist Jeff Hanneman dead at 49.”Slayer: "We could never do any thing like Some Kind Of Monster..."””Cannibal Corpse'S Pat O'Brien Will Step In As Slayer'S Guest Guitarist | The Official Slayer Site”originalet”Slayer Wins 'Best Metal' Grammy Award””Slayer Guitarist Jeff Hanneman Dies””Kerrang! Awards 2006 Blog: Kerrang! Hall Of Fame””Kerrang! Awards 2013: Kerrang! Legend”originalet”Metallica, Slayer, Iron Maien Among Winners At Metal Hammer Awards””Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Bullet For My Valentine Booed At Metal Hammer Golden Gods Awards””Metal Storm Awards 2006””Metal Storm Awards 2015””Slayer's Concert History””Slayer - Relationships””Slayer - Releases”Slayers officiella webbplatsSlayer på MusicBrainzOfficiell webbplatsSlayerSlayerr1373445760000 0001 1540 47353068615-5086262726cb13906545x(data)6033143kn20030215029